Search

Highlights • Ants have a navigational toolbox that includes learned cues across multiple senses. • We review current work on learning panoramas as well as non-visual cues. • We call for more experimental ethology focussed on learning processes. Abstract Foraging desert ants are repeatedly presented with the challenge of leaving the nest, searching the scorching desert landscape to find food, and then transporting it back home. To accomplish this task, foragers have a navigational toolbox, which relies on olfactory, idiothetic, visual and magnetic cues. Desert ants have been widely studied with regards to these abilities, including a heavy focus on learned visual cues, the most prominent being the terrestrial panorama. Nest cues are first acquired during pre-foraging learning walks. Once foragers leave the nest area, they also learn a number of cues to aid them when returning both back to the nest and to known food sites, using experience of previous trips to navigate on future trips. In this review, we describe the learning processes involved in accurate navigation in desert ants. We first focus on recent research on nest-site panorama learning during pre-foraging learning walks as well as panorama learning away from the nest during foraging. We also review learning cues beyond the terrestrial panorama, including tactile, magnetic, olfactory and vibrational cues. These studies provide a basis for future work to further explore how these navigators, despite their small brains, acquire, retain and use many cue sets present in their environments. We call for more experimental ethology focussed on learning processes, both by exploring run-by-run and step-by-step acquisition of information for navigation, as well as for other natural tasks in an animal's life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Desert ants that forage solitarily continually update their position relative to the nest through path integration. This is accomplished by combining information from their celestial compass and pedometer. The path integration system can adapt when memories of previous inbound routes do not coincide with the outbound route, through vector calibration. Here, we test the speed and limit of vector calibration in the desert ant Melophorus bagoti by creating directional conflicts between the inbound and outbound routes (45°, 90°, 135°, 180°). The homeward vector appears to calibrate rapidly after training with shifts occurring after three foraging trips, yet the limit of the vector’s plasticity appears to be a maximum of 45°. At 45° conflicts, the vector calibrates the full 45°, suggesting dominance of the previous inbound memories over the outbound cues of the current trip. Yet at larger directional conflicts, vector shifts after training diminish, with foragers in the 90° and 135° conditions showing smaller intermediate shifts between the inbound memories and the current outbound vector. When the conflict is at its maximum (180°), foragers show no calibration, suggesting the outbound vector is dominant. Panorama exposure during training appears to aid foragers orienting to the true nest, but this also appears limited to about a 45° shift and does not improve with training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ants use both terrestrial landmarks and celestial cues to navigate to and from their nest location. These cues persist even as light levels drop during the twilight/night. Here, we determined the compass cues used by a nocturnal bull ant, Myrmecia midas, in which the majority of individuals begin foraging during the evening twilight period. Myrmecia midas foragers with vectors of =5 m when displaced to unfamiliar locations did not follow the home vector, but instead showed random heading directions. Foragers with larger home vectors (=10 m) oriented towards the fictive nest, indicating a possible increase in cue strength with vector length. When the ants were displaced locally to create a conflict between the home direction indicated by the path integrator and terrestrial landmarks, foragers oriented using landmark information exclusively and ignored any accumulated home vector regardless of vector length. When the visual landmarks at the local displacement site were blocked, foragers were unable to orient to the nest direction and their heading directions were randomly distributed. Myrmecia midas ants typically nest at the base of the tree and some individuals forage on the same tree. Foragers collected on the nest tree during evening twilight were unable to orient towards the nest after small lateral displacements away from the nest. This suggests the possibility of high tree fidelity and an inability to extrapolate landmark compass cues from information collected on the tree and at the nest site to close displacement sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]