Search

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common long-term condition involving restricted airflow, which reduces quality of life. Treatments include lifestyle changes (smoking cessation), pulmonary rehabilitation and medication with inhaled therapies. However, medication adherence is often suboptimal, resulting in poor health outcomes. A pilot project assessed the impact of medicines management support from a community pharmacy team for people with COPD, delivered in their own homes. Individuals were given a medication review and an assessment of their inhaler technique and were followed up at 3 and 6 months. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score was administered before and after the intervention. A change in score of 2 or more suggests a significant difference; the average score was 19.2 at the first assessment and 16.7 at the six month follow-up. Seventeen patients had improved CAT scores, 10 patients had a reduced score and three remained unchanged. Most patients evaluated the project positively as it helped them to improve their inhaler technique. Medicines optimisation was also achieved as a person-centred approach was taken; suboptimal practice had not been picked up by health professionals previously. Community pharmacists working in integrated care teams provide invaluable support to patients with COPD. This project will be rolled out across the community team, and training on medicines management and inhaler technique provided to other health professionals involved in the care of these patients.

Background: A previous study highlighted the importance of footwear to individuals' sense of their identity, demonstrating that shoes must 'fit' someone socially, as well as functionally. However, unhealthy shoes can have a detrimental effect on both foot health and mobility. This project utilises qualitative social science methods to enable podiatrists to understand the broader contribution of footwear to patients' sense of themselves and from this an online toolkit was developed to aid footwear education., Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six podiatrists/shoe-fitters and 13 people with foot pathologies, some of whom also completed shoe diaries. These were supplemented with some follow-up interviews and photographs of participants' own shoes were taken to allow in-depth discussions., Results: Four areas related to 'fit' were identified; practicalities, personal, purpose and pressures, all of which need to be considered when discussing changes in footwear. These were incorporated into an online toolkit which was further validated by service users and practitioners in a focus group., Conclusion: This toolkit can support podiatrists in partnership with patients to identify and address possible barriers to changing footwear towards a more suitable shoe. Enabling patients to make healthier shoe choices will help contribute to improvements in their foot health and mobility.