Search

Background: What role do people want to play in treatment decision-making (DM)?, Objective: Examine the role patients indicate they would prefer in making treatment decisions across multiple clinical settings in Ontario, Canada., Design: Secondary analysis of a series of survey/interview-based studies measuring preferred role, conducted in 12 different populations., Setting and Participants: Respondents were outpatients, largely but not entirely attending outpatient clinics in large teaching hospitals in urban settings in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The subgroups and sample sizes were: breast cancer (202), prostate disease (202), fractures (202), continence (46), orthopaedic (111), rheumatology (56), multiple sclerosis (22), HIV/AIDS (431), infertility (454), benign prostatic hyperplasia (678) and cardiac disease (300), plus 50 healthy nursing students (for scale validation)., Measurements: All studies categorized preferred role using the Problem-Solving Decision-Making (PSDM) scale with one or both of the Current Health condition and Chest Pain vignettes., Results: Few respondents preferred an autonomous role (1.2% for the current health condition vignette and 0.7% for the chest pain vignette); most preferred shared DM (77.8% current health condition; 65.1% chest pain) or a passive role (20.3% current health condition; 34.1% chest pain). Familiarity with a clinical condition increases desire for a shared (as opposed to passive) role. Preferences for passive vs. shared roles varied across settings; older and less educated individuals were most likely to prefer passive roles., Conclusions: Despite consumerist rhetoric among some bioethicists, very few respondents wish an autonomous role. Most wish to share DM with their providers.

Objectives: To determine patient views about the Shared Decision-Making Program (SDP), an interactive videodisk program designed to inform patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) about their condition and treatment options and to determine its impact on perceived knowledge and treatment preference., Methods: Six hundred seventy-eight patients with symptomatic BPH from eight Canadian centers viewed the SDP. Before and after viewing the video, patients answered questionnaires designed to assess treatment preference, knowledge gained, and satisfaction with this educational format. A 1-year follow-up survey was also conducted., Results: Most patients showed a high desire for information and high satisfaction with the SDP; this satisfaction persisted at 1 year. Patients' self-reported knowledge increased significantly (P <0.0001). However, the SDP did not alter initial treatment preferences among those with already formed preferences, although it aided almost half of those initially undecided in forming a preference. Viewing the SDP also appeared to enhance the physician-patient relationship., Conclusions: Patients saw the SDP as an effective method for teaching patients about BPH and the risks and benefits of various treatments, clarifying particular areas about which many patients appear to have a desire for more information than is often provided. Patients were enthusiastic about the educational value of the program, and their active participation in the decision-making process may actually enhance the physician-patient relationship. Contrary to other studies, we found no significant alterations in treatment preferences. Problems relating to the cost and timely updating of the software need to be addressed for these kinds of programs to realize their full potential.

Background: Although current ideology suggests patients should be active participants in decision making about their care, the literature suggests that patients wish to be informed but not involved., Objective: To test the hypothesis that most patients want their physicians to take the responsibility for problem solving (PS, identifying the one right answer), but that many want to be involved in decision-making (DM, selecting the most desired bundle of outcomes) tasks., Methods: Survey responses from 300 patients undergoing angiogram at a Toronto, Ontario, hospital were analyzed (response rate, 72%). Survey items included scales to measure desire for information and participation, including Autonomy Preference Index, the Krantz Health Opinion Survey, and the Deber-Kraetschmer Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale measured on a scale from, 1 (doctor only) to 5 (patient only)., Results: Patients had a relatively high desire for information. On the Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale, they overwhelmingly wished the PS tasks to be performed by or shared with the physician (98.4% of the 12 PS scores are between 1 and 3), but wanted to be involved in DM (78% of the 6 DM scores are between 3 and 5). Preference for handing over control to the physician was significantly greater for the vignette involving potential mortality (chest pain) than for the vignettes involving mainly morbidity (urinary problems) or quality of life (fertility)., Conclusions: Although patients do not wish to be involved in PS tasks, few wish to hand over DM control to their physician. These findings suggest 2 major roles for clinicians--assisting patients in PS to structure choices and supporting them in making often difficult decisions.