Search

Objective: To systematically retrieve and assess studies regarding the effectiveness of basic behavioral management techniques (BMTs) in pediatric patients., Data Sources: Electronic and hand searches were conducted to locate Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) reporting on objective and subjective evaluation of anxiety and behavior of children up to 12 years of age. Data extraction and risk of bias evaluation, using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0 Tool), were performed independently and in duplicate for all included studies. Mean differences and standard deviations were used to summarize the data from each study and meta-analyses were conducted with studies of limited heterogeneity., Study Selection: A total of 708 papers were identified and screened, 122 retrieved for full text appraisal and 62 finally included. Results suggested that all basic BMTs have acceptable effectiveness on pediatric patients' anxiety, fear and behavior during dental treatment. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference in favor of distraction for subjective anxiety using Facial scale (Mean diff.: 2.78; 95% CI: -3.08, -0.53; p = 0.005) and Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (Mean diff.: 12.76; 95% CI: -6.09, -4.47; p = 0.001) and a non-significant difference for heart rate (Mean diff.: 1.70; 95% CI: -6.54, 0.46; p = 0.09). Music significantly reduced heart rate when compared to a control comparator, underlining the superiority of the BMT (Mean diff.: 2.71; 95% CI: -3.70, -0.59; p = 0.007)., Conclusions: Limited evidence about efficacy of one technique over another raises important issues on the topic for future research regarding the management of the child patient in the dental setting of the 21st century., Clinical Significance: Behavioral management comprises a challenge for clinicians, who need to be familiar with a range of techniques to meet patients' needs at individual level and be flexible in their implementation. Appropriate technique should incorporate patients' personality and parents' active involvement, within the contents of the changes in modern societies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: The European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) has developed this best clinical practice guidance to help clinicians manage deep carious lesions in primary teeth., Methods: Three expert groups conducted systematic reviews of the relevant literature. The topics were: (1) conventional techniques (2) Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) and (3) materials. Workshops were held during the corresponding EAPD interim seminar in Oslo in April 2021. Several clinical based recommendations and statements were agreed upon, and gaps in our knowledge were identified., Results: There is strong evidence that indirect pulp capping and pulpotomy techniques, and 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride are shown to be effective for the management of caries in the primary dentition. Due to the strict criteria, it is not possible to give clear recommendations on which materials are most appropriate for restoring primary teeth with deep carious lesions. Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART) is not suitable for multi-surface caries, and Pre-formed Metal Crowns (PMCs) using the Hall technique reduce patient discomfort. GIC and RMGIC seem to be more favourable given the lower annual failure rate compared to HVGIC and MRGIC. Glass carbomer cannot be recommended due to inferior marginal adaptation and fractures. Compomers, hybrid composite resins and bulk-fill composite resins demonstrated similar values for annual failure rates., Conclusion: The management of deep carious lesions in primary teeth can be challenging and must consider the patient's compliance, operator skills, materials and costs. There is a clear need to increase the use of MID techniques in managing carious primary teeth as a mainstream rather than a compromise option., (© 2022. The Author(s).)