Search

Objective: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a growing population, yet training in complex care varies across pediatric residency programs. The purpose of this study was 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum for pediatric residents in improving performance in a simulated clinical scenario, and 2) to explore residents' perceived self-efficacy in caring for CMC., Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted supplemented by qualitative inquiry. Pediatric residents from 2 residency programs were randomly assigned to participate in interactive modules on: 1) clinical assessment, care planning, and technological dependency or 2) noncomplex care topics. The primary outcome was mean score on an Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of tracheostomy care. Semistructured interviews were conducted postintervention and analyzed using qualitative content analysis., Results: Ninety-four eligible residents were randomized. Residents who attended all modules and the OSCE and consented to participate (intervention [n = 20] and control [n=24]) were included in the final analysis. At baseline, few (9%) reported being comfortable caring for CMC. There was no significant difference in mean OSCE score between intervention and control groups (39.0 ± 1.1 vs 38.0 ± 1.0, P = .48). Qualitative analysis revealed 3 emerging themes related to resident self-efficacy: building a system of care, navigating uncertainty, and professional identity formation., Conclusions: A standardized complex care curriculum delivered in a classroom setting did not lead to improved performance in an OSCE station despite increased resident-reported self-efficacy in approaching care for CMC. These findings highlight the need for multidimensional educational interventions and assessments in complex care., (Copyright © 2019 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background There are limited data on the viral dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children. Understanding viral load changes over the course of illness and duration of viral shedding may provide insight into transmission dynamics to inform public health and infection-control decisions. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of children aged 18 years and younger with polymerase chain reaction–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 between 1 February 2022 and 14 March 2022. SARS-CoV-2 testing occurred on daily samples for 10 days; a subset of participants completed daily rapid antigen tests (RATs). Viral RNA trajectories were described in relation to symptom onset and resolution. The associations between both time since symptom onset/resolution and non-infectious viral load were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among 101 children aged 2 to 17 years, the median time to study-defined non-infectious viral load was 5 days post–symptom onset, with 75% meeting this threshold by 7 days and 90% by 10 days. On the day of and day after symptom resolution, 43 (49%) and 52 (60%) of 87 had met the non-infectious thresholds, respectively. Of the 50 participants completing a RAT, positivity at symptom onset and on the day after symptom onset was 67% (16/24) and 75% (14/20). On the first day where the non-infectious threshold was met, 61% (n = 27/44) of participant RAT results were positive. Conclusions Children often met the study-defined non-infectiousness threshold on the day after symptom resolution. The RATs were often negative early in the course of illness and should not be relied on to exclude infection. Clinical Trials Registration. clinicaltrials.org; NCT05240183. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are individuals with complex chronic conditions who have substantial health care needs, functional limitations, and significant use of health care. By nature of their health status, they have many care providers across multiple settings, making information sharing critical to their health and safety. Connecting2gether (C2), a weband mobile-based patient-facing platform, was codeveloped with families to support and empower parental caregivers, improve information sharing, and facilitate care delivery. C2 also provided a live platform coach to conduct parental feedback and coaching sessions, which included answering questions, providing advice on usage, and addressing technological issues. Objective: This study was conducted to understand the experience of parental caregivers using the C2 platform and the role of the live platform coach. This study is a subset of a larger study assessing the feasibility of C2 in the care of CMC. Methods: Parental caregivers (n=33) participated in biweekly sessions to provide feedback and receive real-time platform use support from a trained research team member acting as a live platform coach. Parental caregivers were asked about the utility and usability of C2's features. Questions, platform issues, and feedback were recorded on a standardized electronic data collection tool. A thematic analysis was performed to analyze parental comments, and codes were categorized into key themes. The number of comments corresponding with each code was quantified. Results: A total of 166 parental feedback and coaching sessions were conducted, with an average of 5 sessions per parental caregiver (range 1-7). There were 33 (85%) parental caregivers that participated in at least one coaching session. Technical issues and difficulties navigating C2 were addressed in real time during the sessions to encourage platform engagement. Four key themes were identified: (1) live platform coach, (2) barriers to platform usage and technical challenges, (3) platform requests and modifications, and (4) parent partnership and empowerment. Conclusions: Parental caregivers describe C2 as a valuable tool, acting as a facilitator for enhanced care coordination and communication. Parental caregiver feedback showed that the live platform coach was a critical tool in educating on platform use and addressing technological concerns. Further study of the use of the C2 platform and its role in the care of CMC is needed to understand the possible benefits and cost-effectiveness of this technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical symptoms attributed to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in healthy term infants are non-specific and overlap with age-appropriate behaviours. This practice point reviews the evidence for medically recommended management of this common condition. Current recommendations to manage GERD include feeding modifications such as thickening feeds or avoiding cow's milk protein. There is limited evidence for pharmacological management, including acid suppressive therapy or prokinetic agents, with the risks of such treatments often outweighing possible benefits due to significant safety and side effect concerns. Acid-suppressive therapy should not be routinely used for infants with GERD and is most likely to be useful in the context of symptoms that suggest erosive esophagitis. Evidence for managing symptoms attributed to GERD in otherwise healthy term infants less than 1 year of age is presented, and the over-prescription of medications in this population is discouraged. Anticipatory guidance regarding the natural resolution of reflux symptoms is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paediatric health care providers (HCPs) play an important role in optimizing bone health. Early intervention is essential to maximize the accrual of peak bone mass in adolescence and young adulthood and to reduce osteoporosis and fracture risk later in life. Children and adolescents with chronic health conditions may have several risk factors for poor bone health, including underlying inflammatory conditions, reduced weight-bearing activity, delayed puberty, and inadequate intake of calcium and vitamin D. Some medications—particularly glucocorticoids—can compromise bone mass and place a child at risk for fragility fractures. This practice point describes a targeted approach to identifying bone health risk factors in children and youth with chronic health conditions, highlights office initiatives aimed at optimizing bone mass accrual, and links HCPs to useful web-based tools and medical references. Indications for referral to a bone health specialist and bone-specific pharmacotherapeutic interventions are also reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives Children with medical complexity (CMC) are defined by complex, chronic multi-system disease with significant medical fragility. Limited research exists on dental care in CMC, which is an important part of oral health and overall health. Objectives of this study were to (1) determine the frequency and type of dental visits at a tertiary paediatric hospital of all CMC between 2015 and 2020 and (2) identify the factors associated with dental visits. Methods A retrospective chart review of the electronic records of CMC who were seen at a paediatric hospital from 2015 to 2020 was completed. The number and type of dental visits, demographic and clinical information were reviewed. Poisson regression models were used to test the association between the outcome (number of dental visits) and potential factors associated with receiving dental care. Results Four hundred and eighty-seven CMC (mean age=7.3 ± 4.6 years, 43.7% female) were included in this study. CMC were seen by dentists at the hospital 4.4 ± 3.8 times since 2015, which is approximately once per year over a 5-year period. Dental visits were mostly preventative (66.4% of all visits). CMC had more dental visits if they had dental care funding compared to no funding if they were living in a community with a population >100,000 people and if they were being followed by a greater number of sub-specialists. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of funding, access to paediatric dental specialists, and care coordination support to improve access to dental care for CMC to optimize oral health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genome sequencing (GS) has demonstrated high diagnostic yield in pediatric patients with complex, clinically heterogeneous presentations. Emerging evidence shows generally favorable experiences for patients and families receiving GS. As a result, implementation of GS in pediatrics is gaining momentum. To inform implementation, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the personal utility of GS for parents of children with medical complexity (CMC). GS was performed at an academic tertiary‐care center for CMC for whom a genetic etiology was suspected. Following the return of GS results, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 14 parents about their child's diagnostic journey. Of the children whose parents were interviewed, six children received a diagnosis, two received a possible diagnosis, and six did not receive a diagnosis. A predominantly deductive thematic analysis approach to the interview data was used by applying Kohler's personal utility framework to understand affective, cognitive, behavioral and social impacts of GS. Both the diagnosed and undiagnosed groups experienced enhanced emotion‐focused coping (affective). The diagnosed group experienced favorable utility related to knowledge of condition (cognitive) and communication with relatives (behavioral). A domain beyond Kohler's framework related to the presence or absence of GS impact on medical management was also described by parents. The deployment of GS late in the diagnostic odyssey and the limited knowledge available for the rare genetic disorders diagnosed in this cohort appeared to diminish the perceived utility of GS. As GS capabilities continue to evolve at a rapid pace and become available earlier in the diagnostic journey, it is important to consider the impact and timing of testing on parents of CMC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with medical complexity (CMC) often have multiple life-limiting conditions with no unifying diagnosis and an unclear prognosis and are at high risk for morbidity and mortality. Advance care planning (ACP) conversations need to be uniquely tailored to this population. Our primary objective for this study was to develop an in-depth understanding of the ACP experiences from the perspectives of both parents and health care providers (HCPs) of CMC. METHODS: We conducted 25 semistructured interviews with parents of CMC and HCPs of various disciplines from a tertiary pediatric hospital. Interview guide questions were focused on ACP, including understanding of the definition, positive and negative experiences, and suggestions for improvement. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen mothers and 11 HCPs participated in individual interviews. Interviews revealed 4 major themes and several associated subthemes (in parentheses): (1) holistic mind-set, (2) discussion content (beliefs and values, hopes and goals, and quality of life), (3) communication enhancers (partnerships in shared decision-making, supportive setting, early and ongoing conversations, consistent language and practice, family readiness, provider expertise in ACP discussions, and provider comfort in ACP discussions), and (4) the ACP definition. CONCLUSIONS: Family and HCP perspectives revealed a need for family-centered ACP for CMC and their families. Our results aided the development of a family-centered framework to enhance the delivery of ACP through a holistic mind-set, thoughtful discussion content, and promoting of conversation enhancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has had dramatic effects on the lives of children globally. However, socially vulnerable children have been particularly impacted. Certain populations have increased vulnerabilities, including children and youth experiencing homelessness. Increased infection risk due to congregant living and challenges with physical distancing are contributing factors. An urgent need exists for a wholistic approach to care with unique cross-sectoral partnerships across disciplines. A recognition of the unintended consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic on this population is urgently required by all those supporting children. Families should receive direct support in clinical settings to identify their social needs. Partnership with community agencies and advocacy for appropriate isolation facilities for patients experiencing homelessness are critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Approximately 73% of children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) can experience episodes of pain and irritability often of unknown origin (PIUO). Limited research exists on how these experiences of PIUO may affect parental caregivers and families. The primary objective of this study was to understand the parental caregiver experience of caring for a child with SNI who experiences persistent PIUO.Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to explore the experience of parental caregivers of children with SNI. Interview guide questions focused on exploring pain behaviours, the diagnostic process, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, healthcare-team support, discussion surrounding irritability, and family impact. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded and analyzed by 2 independent reviewers using thematic analysis.Results: 15 parental caregivers were interviewed, with 93% being mothers and 33% being a visible minority. Interviews revealed 3 major themes: 1) Variations in Clinical Care for PIUO; 2) The Experience and Challenges of Living with PIUO); 3) Managing the Impact of PIUO on Parental Well Being. Interviews demonstrated that parent and child can be viewed as a dyad, in which the child's experience is inherently linked to the parental experience.Conclusion: Parental caregivers described caring for a child with persistent PIUO as physically and emotionally exhausting, and negatively impacting family quality of life. Interviews highlighted avenues of future exploration for clinical care, including both enhanced management pathways for children and supportive resources for education and coping for parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]