Search

Despite huge promises, bioanalysis of protein biomarkers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for clinical applications is still very challenging. Here, we describe a sensitive and robust LC-MS/MS assay to quantify clinical protein biomarkers in FFPE tumor sections using automated antipeptide antibody immunocapture followed by in-sample calibration curve (ISCC) strategy with multiple isotopologue reaction monitoring (MIRM) technique. ISCC approach with MIRM of stable isotopically labeled (SIL) peptides eliminated the need for authentic matrices for external calibration curves, overcame the matrix effects, and validated the quantification range in each individual sample. Specifically, after deparaffinization, rehydration, antigen retrieval, and homogenization, the protein analytes in FFPE tumor tissues were spiked with a known concentration of one SIL peptide for each analyte, followed by trypsin digestion and antipeptide immunocapture enrichment prior to MIRM-ISCC-based LC-MS/MS analysis. This approach has been successfully used for sensitive quantification of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in 15 representative FFPE tumor samples from lung, colorectal, and head and neck cancer patients. Except for one sample, PD-L1 and PD-1 in all samples were quantifiable using this assay with concentrations of 27.85-798.43 (amol/μg protein) for PD-L1 and 16.96-129.89 (amol/μg protein) for PD-1. These results were generally in agreement with the immunohistochemistry (IHC) data but with some exceptions. This approach demonstrated the feasibility to quantify low abundant protein biomarkers in FFPE tissues with improved sensitivity, specificity, and robustness and showed great potential as an orthogonal analytical approach to IHC for clinical applications.

Context: We wanted to understand the effects of once-weekly vs. twice-daily glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes., Objective: The objective of the study was to compare effects of exenatide once weekly (ExQW) and exenatide twice daily (ExBID) on glycemic control, body weight, and safety., Design: This was a 24-wk, randomized, open-label, comparator-controlled study., Setting: The study was conducted at 43 sites in the United States., Patients: The study population was 252 intent-to-treat patients with type 2 diabetes [baseline (mean ± SD): glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.4 ± 1.2%, fasting plasma glucose 171 ± 47 mg/dl, weight 96 ± 20 kg] that were drug naïve (19%) or previously treated with one (47%) or multiple (35%) oral antidiabetic medications., Interventions: Interventions included ExQW 2 mg for 24 wk or ExBID 5 μg for 4 wk followed by ExBID 10 μg for 20 wk., Main Outcome Measure: The change in HbA1c from baseline to wk 24 was measured., Results: At 24 wk, ExQW produced significantly greater changes from baseline (least squares mean ± SE) vs. ExBID in HbA1c (-1.6 ± 0.1% vs. -0.9 ± 0.1%; P < 0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose (-35 ± 5 mg/dl vs. -12 ± 5 mg/dl; P = 0.0008). Similar reductions in mean body weight from baseline to wk 24 were observed in both groups (-2.3 ± 0.4 kg and -1.4 ± 0.4 kg). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Transient and predominantly mild to moderate nausea, the most frequent adverse event, was less common with ExQW (14%) than with ExBID (35%). Injection-site reactions were infrequent, but more common with ExQW. No major hypoglycemia occurred., Conclusions: Continuous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism with ExQW resulted in superior glycemic control, with less nausea, compared with ExBID in patients with type 2 diabetes. Both groups lost weight.

Background and Objectives: Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, available in an immediate-release (IR), twice-daily formulation, which improves glycaemic control through enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppression of inappropriately elevated postprandial glucagon secretion, slowing of gastric emptying and reduction of food intake. The objectives of these studies were to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an extended-release (ER) exenatide formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Patients and Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes participated in either a single-dose trial (n = 62) or a repeated-administration trial (n = 45). The pharmacokinetic and safety effects of single-dose subcutaneous administration of exenatide ER (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7 mg or 10 mg) versus placebo were studied over a period of 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes. These results were used to predict the dose regimen of exenatide ER required to achieve steady-state therapeutic plasma exenatide concentrations. A second clinical study investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of weekly exenatide ER subcutaneous injections (0.8 mg or 2 mg) versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes over a period of 15 weeks. Furthermore, population-based analyses of these studies were performed to further define the exposure-response relationships associated with exenatide ER., Results: Exenatide exposure increased with dose (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7 mg or 10 mg) and exhibited a multiple-peak profile over approximately 10 weeks. Multiple-dosing pharmacokinetics were predicted from superpositioning of single-dose data; weekly administration of exenatide ER 0.8 mg and 2 mg for 15 weeks confirmed the predictions. Weekly dosing resulted in steady-state plasma exenatide concentrations after 6-7 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose levels were reduced similarly with both doses after 15 weeks (-42.7 ± 15.7 mg/dL with the 0.8 mg dose and -39.0 ± 9.3 mg/dL with the 2 mg dose; both p < 0.001 vs placebo), and the integrated exposure-response analysis demonstrated that the drug concentration producing 50% of the maximum effect (EC(50)) on fasting plasma glucose was 56.8 pg/mL (a concentration achieved with both the 0.8 mg and 2 mg doses of exenatide ER). The 2 mg dose reduced bodyweight (-3.8 ± 1.4 kg; p < 0.05 vs placebo) and postprandial glucose excursions. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels were reduced with the 0.8 mg dose (-1.4 ± 0.3%; baseline 8.6%) and with the 2 mg dose (-1.7 ± 0.3%; baseline 8.3%) [both p < 0.001 vs placebo]. Adverse events were generally transient and mild to moderate in intensity., Conclusion: These studies demonstrated that (i) a single subcutaneous dose of exenatide ER resulted in dose-related increases in plasma exenatide concentrations; (ii) single-dose exposure successfully predicted the weekly-dosing exposure, with 0.8 mg and 2 mg weekly subcutaneous doses of exenatide ER eliciting therapeutic concentrations of exenatide; and (iii) weekly dosing with either 0.8 or 2 mg of exenatide ER improved fasting plasma glucose control, whereas only the 2 mg dose was associated with improved postprandial glucose control and weight loss. [Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00103935].

Background: Diabetes treatments are needed that are convenient, provide effective glycaemic control, and do not cause weight gain. We aimed to test the hypothesis that improvement in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) achieved with once weekly exenatide was superior to that achieved with insulin glargine titrated to glucose targets., Methods: In this 26-week, open-label, randomised, parallel study, we compared exenatide with insulin glargine in adults with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimum glycaemic control despite use of maximum tolerated doses of blood-glucose-lowering drugs for 3 months or longer. Patients were randomly assigned to add exenatide (2 mg, once-a-week injection) or insulin glargine (once-daily injection, starting dose 10 IU, target glucose range 4.0-5.5 mmol/L) to their blood-glucose-lowering regimens. Randomisation was with a one-to-one allocation and block size four, stratified according to country and concomitant treatment (70% metformin only; 30% metformin plus sulphonylurea). Participants and clinical investigators were not masked to assignment, but investigators analysing data were. The primary endpoint was change in HbA(1c) from baseline, and analysis of this outcome was by modified intention to treat for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00641056., Findings: 456 patients were randomly allocated to treatment and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (233 exenatide, 223 insulin glargine). Participants who received at least one dose of study drug and for whom baseline and at least one postbaseline measurement of HbA(1c) were available were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Change in HbA(1c) at 26 weeks was greater in patients taking exenatide (n=228; -1.5%, SE 0.05) than in those taking insulin glargine (n=220; -1.3%, 0.06; treatment difference -0.16%, 0.07, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.03). 12 (5%) of 233 patients allocated to exenatide and two (1%) of 223 taking insulin glargine discontinued participation because of adverse events (p=0.012). A planned extension period (up to 2.5 years' duration) is in progress., Interpretation: Once weekly exenatide is an important therapeutic option for patients for whom risk of hypoglycaemia, weight loss, and convenience are particular concerns., Funding: Amylin Pharmaceuticals; Eli Lilly and Company., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the Diabetes Therapy Utilization: Researching Changes in A1C, Weight and Other Factors Through Intervention with Exenatide Once Weekly (DURATION-1) study, the safety and efficacy of 30 weeks of treatment with the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly (exenatide QW; 2 mg) was compared with exenatide BID in 295 patients with type 2 diabetes. We now report the safety and efficacy of exenatide QW in 1) patients who continued treatment for an additional 22 weeks (52 weeks total) and 2) patients who switched from exenatide BID to exenatide QW after 30 weeks., Research Design and Methods: In this randomized, multicenter, comparator-controlled, open-label trial, 258 patients entered the 22-week open-ended assessment phase (n = 128 QW-only; n = 130 BID-->QW). A1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, blood pressure, fasting lipids, safety, and tolerability were assessed., Results: Patients continuing exenatide QW maintained A1C improvements through 52 weeks (least squares mean -2.0% [95% CI -2.1 to -1.8%]). Patients switching from exenatide BID to exenatide QW achieved further A1C improvements; both groups exhibited the same A1C reduction and mean A1C (6.6%) at week 52. At week 52, 71 and 54% of all patients achieved A1C <7.0% and 40 mg/dl, and body weight was reduced by >4 kg after 52 weeks. Nausea occurred less frequently in this assessment period and was predominantly mild. No major hypoglycemia was observed., Conclusion: Exenatide QW elicited sustained improvements in glycemic control and body weight through 52 weeks of treatment. Patients switching to exenatide QW experienced further improvements in A1C and FPG, with sustained weight loss.

Exenatide is the first glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Exenatide lowers blood glucose through multiple mechanisms, including enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppression of excess glucagon secretion, reduction of food intake and slowing of gastric emptying. The current formulation of exenatide requires twice-daily dosing (exenatide BID), and an extended-release formulation of exenatide is now in development for use as a once-weekly injection (exenatide QW). The purpose of this report is to review the most current clinical data on the development of exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM. In clinical trials, exenatide QW significantly improved glycemic control, resulted in patient weight loss, and was well tolerated in patients with T2DM. In a head-to-head clinical trial, exenatide QW caused greater improvements in glycemic control and was better tolerated than exenatide BID. Given the rapidly increasing prevalence of diabetes and obesity worldwide, exenatide QW is a promising development candidate for the treatment of T2DM.

Background: Exenatide is an incretin mimetic that shares glucoregulatory properties with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and improves glycaemic control, with progressive bodyweight reductions, when administered twice a day in patients with type 2 diabetes. We compared the efficacy of a once-weekly formulation of exenatide to that of a twice daily dose., Methods: A 30-week, randomised, non-inferiority study compared a long-acting release formulation of exenatide 2 mg administered once weekly to 10 mug exenatide administered twice a day, in 295 patients with type 2 diabetes (haemoglobin A(1c) [HbA(1c)] 8.3% [SD 1.0], mean fasting plasma glucose 9 [SD 2] mmol/L, weight 102 [SD 20] kg, diabetes duration 6.7 [SD 5.0] years). The patients were naive to drug therapy, or on one or more oral antidiabetic agents. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA(1c) at 30 weeks. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00308139., Findings: At 30 weeks, the patients given exenatide once a week had significantly greater changes in HbA(1c) than those given exenatide twice a day (-1.9 [SE 0.1%] vs -1.5 [0.1%], 95% CI -0.54% to -0.12%; p=0.0023). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving treatment once a week versus twice a day achieved target HbA(1c) levels of 7.0% or less (77%vs 61% of evaluable patients, p=0.0039)., Interpretation: Exenatide once weekly resulted in significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than exenatide given twice a day, with no increased risk of hypoglycaemia and similar reductions in bodyweight.

Objective: In patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduces A1C, postprandial and fasting glucose, and weight. In this study we investigated the effects of continuous exenatide administration from a long-acting release (LAR) formulation., Research Design and Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, exenatide LAR (0.8 or 2.0 mg) was administered subcutaneously once weekly for 15 weeks to subjects with type 2 diabetes (n = 45) suboptimally controlled with metformin (60%) and/or diet and exercise (40%): 40% female, A1C (mean +/- SD) 8.5 +/- 1.2%, fasting plasma glucose 9.9 +/- 2.3 mmol/l, weight 106 +/- 20 kg, and diabetes duration 5 +/- 4 years., Results: From baseline to week 15, exenatide LAR reduced mean +/- SE A1C by -1.4 +/- 0.3% (0.8 mg) and -1.7 +/- 0.3% (2.0 mg), compared with +0.4 +/- 0.3% with placebo LAR (P < 0.0001 for both). A1C of < or =7% was achieved by 36 and 86% of subjects receiving 0.8 and 2.0 mg exenatide LAR, respectively, compared with 0% of subjects receiving placebo LAR. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced by -2.4 +/- 0.9 mmol/l (0.8 mg) and -2.2 +/- 0.5 mmol/l (2.0 mg) compared with +1.0 +/- 0.7 mmol/l with placebo LAR (P < 0.001 for both). Exenatide LAR reduced self-monitored postprandial hyperglycemia. Subjects receiving 2.0 mg exenatide LAR had body weight reductions (-3.8 +/- 1.4 kg) (P < 0.05), whereas body weight was unchanged with both placebo LAR and the 0.8-mg dose. Mild nausea was the most frequent adverse event. No subjects treated with exenatide LAR withdrew from the study., Conclusions: Exenatide LAR offers the potential of 24-h glycemic control and weight reduction with a novel once-weekly treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Background: Exenatide is the first of a new class of agents known as incretin mimetics that are in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Exenatide has been shown to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as provide sustained reductions in hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c). This study was designed to assess the dose dependencies of the glucoregulatory effects and tolerability of exenatide when added to diet and exercise or metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes., Methods: In this randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial, 156 patients were randomized to placebo or exenatide at 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 microg administered b.i.d. for 28 days., Results: After 28 days of therapy, exenatide was associated with significant (P < 0.0001, linear contrast testing), dose-dependent reductions in HbA 1c (0.1 +/- 0.1%, -0.3 +/- 0.1%, -0.4 +/- 0.1%, +/-0.5 +/- 0.0%, and -0.5 +/- 0.1% for placebo and 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide, respectively) and significant (P = 0.0006, linear contrast testing) reductions in fasting plasma glucose (+6.8 +/- 4.1, -20.1 +/- 5.2, -21.2 +/- 3.9, -17.7 +/- 4.8, and -17.3 +/- 4.4 mg/dL for placebo and 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide, respectively) by Day 28. These reductions were similar for patients treated with diet/exercise and those treated with metformin. In addition, patients receiving exenatide exhibited dose-dependent reductions in body weight (0.0 +/- 0.3, -0.7 +/- 0.3, -0.7 +/- 0.2, -1.4 +/- 0.3, and -1.8 +/- 0.3 kg for placebo and 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide, respectively; P < 0.01 for 7.5 and 10.0 microg b.i.d. exenatide doses compared with placebo) at Day 28. The most common adverse event was mild-to-moderate nausea that was dose-dependent (seven of 123 patients randomized to exenatide withdrew from the study because of gastrointestinal effects)., Conclusions: Exenatide dose-dependently improved glycemic control and reduced body weight over 28 days in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet/exercise or metformin.

Exenatide is an incretin mimetic with potential glucoregulatory activity in type 2 diabetes. This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled 6-way crossover study assessed exenatide's effect on acetaminophen pharmacokinetics. Of 40 randomized healthy subjects, 39 completed the study. On the placebo day, acetaminophen (1000 mg) was ingested and placebo injected subcutaneously at 0 hours. On exenatide days, acetaminophen was ingested at -1, 0, +1, +2, and +4 hours, relative to the 10 mug exenatide injected subcutaneously at 0 hours. With exenatide injection, mean plasma acetaminophen AUC(0-12 h) values were reduced by 11% to 24% (vs placebo). Peak plasma acetaminophen concentrations were similar for the -1-hour and placebo groups and reduced by 37% to 56% at other times. The most frequent adverse events were generally mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. Exenatide treatment concurrent with or preceding acetaminophen ingestion slowed acetaminophen absorption but had minimal effect on the extent of absorption.

Background: Exenatide (synthetic exendin-4;AC2993) is a 39-amino acid peptide in the new class of antidiabetic agents known as incretin mimetics. In clinical trials, exenatide exhibited glucoregulatory effects (glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion, suppression of inappropriately elevated glucagon secretion, slowing of gastric emptying) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)., Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of exenatide injected subcutaneously into the abdomen, arm, or thigh., Methods: Patients with type 2 DM were randomized in an open-label, crossover study to assess relative bioavailability of exenatide (10 microg) injected into the arm and thigh versus injection into the abdomen. Serial plasma exenatide concentrations were measured for 10 hours after injection. A sample size of >24 patients provided approximately 80% power to ensure that 90% CIs were within the 80% to 125% interval for the ratios (geometric least squares [LS] means) of AUC(0-infinity)., Results: Twenty-eight patients were randomized into the study (mean age, 56 [8] years; glycosylated hemoglobin, 8.0 [1.7]%; body mass index, 33 [5] kg/m2; all values given as mean [SD]). AUC(0-infinity) values (geometric LS mean SE for SC injections into the abdomen arm and thigh were 63,935 (6608), 59,573 (6157), and 62,148 (6424) pg./mL, respectively. The AUC (geometric LS mean ratio for relative bioavailability) for arm versus abdomen was 0.93 (geometric 90% CI, 0.82-1.05); for thigh versus abdomen it was 0.97 (geometric 90% CI, 0.86-1.10). Consistent with the observed data, intrasubject variability of AUC(0-infinity) was low among the 3 treatments (coefficient of variation, 26%). C(max) values (geometric LS mean [SE]) were 220 (24) pg/mL, abdomen; 218 (23) pg/mL, arm; and 193 (21) pg/mL, thigh. The C(max) (geometric LS mean ratio) for arm versus abdomen was 0.99 (geometric 90% CI, 0.85-1.15), and for thigh versus abdomen it was 0.88 (geometric 90% CI, 0.75-1.02). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate nausea (36%), headache (25%), vomiting (21%), and dizziness (18%). Three patients received an inadvertent 10-fold overdose and were withdrawn from the study immediately. All experienced severe nausea and vomiting, and 1 patient experienced severe hypoglycemia requiring aid. All recovered without mishap and were excluded from statistical and tolerability results. There were no adverse events related to the injection or the injection site., Conclusion: In this study of patients with type 2DM, SC administration of exenatide into the abdomen, arm, or thigh resulted in comparable bioavailability.

This study assessed whether glucose-dependent insulin secretion and overall counterregulatory response are preserved during hypoglycemia in the presence of exenatide. Twelve healthy fasted volunteers were randomized in a triple-blind crossover study to receive either intravenous exenatide (0.066 pmol. kg(-1). min(-1)) or placebo during a 270-min stepwise hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp (insulin infusion 0.8 mU. kg(-1). min(-1)). Plasma glucose was clamped sequentially at 5.0 (0-120 min), 4.0 (120-180 min), 3.2 (180-240 min), and 2.7 mmol/l (240-270 min). At 270 min, insulin infusion was terminated and plasma glucose increased to approximately 3.2 mmol/l. The time to achieve plasma glucose >/=4 mmol/l thereafter was recorded. Insulin secretory rates (ISRs) and counterregulatory hormones were measured throughout. Glucose profiles were superimposable between the exenatide and placebo arms. In the presence of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, ISRs in the exenatide arm were approximately 3.5-fold higher than in the placebo arm (353 +/- 29 vs. 100 +/- 29 pmol/min [least-square means +/- SE]). However, ISRs declined similarly and rapidly at all hypoglycemic steps (

Background: Exenatide (exendin-4) exhibits dose-dependent glucoregulatory activity, but causes dose-limiting nausea and vomiting. This study was designed to formally assess the possibility of inducing tolerance to the side effects of nausea and vomiting at therapeutic doses of exenatide, using a dose-escalation methodology., Methods: In this two-arm, triple-blind, multicenter study, 123 subjects with type 2 diabetes were enrolled and randomized; 99 (80.5%) of them completed the study. Subjects in the exenatide-primed arm received subcutaneous exenatide, starting at 0.02 micro g/kg three times a day (TID) and increasing in 0.02 micro g/kg per dose increments every 3 days for 35 days. Subjects in the exenatide-naive arm received placebo TID for 35 days. At the end of this 35-day regimen, subjects in both arms received the same highest dose of exenatide (0.24 micro g/kg TID) for 3 days. Thus, the exenatide-naive arm received exenatide for the first time on Day 35., Results: The exenatide-primed arm had a lower proportion of subjects experiencing nausea and vomiting in response to exposure to the highest dose of exenatide (27 vs 56% in the exenatide-naive arm; p = 0.0018). Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence were 0.28 in the exenatide-primed arm, compared with 0.68 in the exenatide-naive arm (p

Objective: AC2993 (synthetic exendin-4; exenatide) is a peptide that enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppresses inappropriately elevated glucagon secretion, and slows gastric emptying. AC2993 also promotes beta-cell proliferation and neogenesis in vitro and in animal models. This study examines the activity and safety of subcutaneously injected AC2993 in patients with type 2 diabetes currently treated with diet and/or oral antidiabetic agents (OAAs)., Research Design and Methods: A total of 109 patients treated with diet and a sulfonylurea and/or metformin were enrolled in a blinded study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three subcutaneously (SC) injected regimens of AC2993 (0.08 micro g/kg) or placebo for 28 days., Results: All three AC2993 regimens led to significant reductions in serum fructosamine relative to placebo (P

Despite the advent of new treatments, glucose control in the type 2 diabetes population is unsatisfactory. AC2993 (synthetic exendin-4; exenatide), a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic agent, exhibited notable antidiabetic potential in two clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes. In study A, 24 subjects received sc injections of study medication (0.1 micro g/kg AC2993 or placebo) twice daily with meals for 5 d. Statistically significant reductions in mean postprandial circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, and glucagon occurred following treatment with AC2993. In study B, 13 subjects receiving a single dose of study medication (0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 micro g/kg AC2993 or placebo) following an overnight fast had reduced fasting plasma glucose concentrations during the subsequent 8-h period. The relative glucose and insulin concentration profiles were consistent with glucose-dependent insulinotropism. AC2993 was well tolerated. Mild transient headache, nausea, and vomiting were the main adverse events. In conclusion, AC2993 acutely and markedly reduces fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes. During fasting, glucose-dependent enhancement of insulin secretion and suppression of glucagon secretion are the predominant mechanisms, and postprandially, slowing of gastric emptying is additionally operative. This robust antidiabetic effect warrants further evaluation of AC2993.