Search

First-generation drug eluting stents (DES) reduced the incidence of restenosis and need for repeated target lesion revascularization but, in autoptic studies, frequently resulted in incomplete endothelial coverage, which is an important predictor of late adverse events and increased mortality after stent implantation. More recently, not only uncovered, but also malapposed or protruding struts have been considered vulnerable structures, as they are deemed to perturb blood flow, whereas only struts well embedded into the vessel wall are considered stable. We compared the number of uncovered and of other vulnerable (protruding or malapposed) struts among three different second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) (Cre8, Biomatrix, Xience), using optical coherence tomography (OCT) 6 months after implantation. Moreover, we analyzed the relationship between the percentage of vulnerable struts and the clinical characteristics of patients. 60 patients with stable angina or non-ST-Elevation acute coronary syndrome and indication to percutaneous angioplasty were randomly assigned to receive one of the three DES. After 6 months, OCT images were obtained. After 6 months, OCT images were obtained (1289 cross sections; 10,728 struts). None of the three DES showed non-coated struts or areas of stent thrombosis. Significant differences in the average number of protruding struts (Cre8: 33.9 ± 12.6; Biomatrix: 26.2 ± 18.1; Xience: 13.2 ± 8.5; p < 0.001) and in the proportion of malapposed struts (Cre8: 0.7%; Biomatrix: 0.9%; Xience: 0.0%; p = 0.040) and of incomplete stent apposition area (Cre8: 10.4%; Biomatrix: 4.7%; Xience: 0.7%; p < 0.001) were observed. No significant difference was found in neointimal hyperplasia area with a not significant tendency toward greater minimal and maximal struts thickness for Biomatrix. In comparison with Cre8 and Biomatrix, Xience showed a significantly lower proportion of vulnerable struts in all clinical sub-groups considered. In the group of 60 patients a significant relation was found between age and number of vulnerable struts (p = 0.014). The three second-generation DES were similarly effective in permitting neo-intimal formation and complete struts coating 6 months after implantation, but Cre8 and Biomatrix showed a greater proportion of protruding and malapposed struts.Trail Registry: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02850497.

Aims: To compare the effects of two thrombus aspiration devices, the manual catheter Export® and the more complex and expensive mechanical Angiojet®, on several indices of reperfusion in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Methods and Results: Clinical, hemodynamic and procedural characteristics of 185 STEMI patients, randomized to treatment with Export (n=95) or Angiojet (n=90) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were analyzed. The primary endpoint was ST-segment elevation reduction 90 min after culprit vessel re-opening. Secondary endpoints included variations in some angiographic parameters (TIMI Flow, TIMI Frame Count and Myocardial Blush Grade) and Infarct Size and Severity at myocardial scintigraphy. A significant reduction in ST-elevation was observed in both groups after PPCI without significant differences between the two groups. No significant difference between Angiojet vs. Export was observed in ST-segment resolution >50% and ≥ 70%, in TIMI Flow, TIMI Frame Count and Myocardial Blush Grade before vs. after PPCI and in Infarct Size and Severity., Conclusions: PPCI with thrombus aspiration was effective in both groups of patients, without differences in myocardial reperfusion and necrosis indices. These results could support the routine use of manual devices during PPCI, reserving the more expensive Angiojet in case of manual device failure and persistent or massive intracoronary thrombosis, with favorable implications in terms of cost containment., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effect of thrombus aspiration on mortality is still controversial, with results which are often inconsistent in different randomized trials, real world registries and different follow-up duration. The aim of this analysis was to assess the effect on 30-day and 1-year mortality of thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared with conventional PCI., Methods: We used data from all the consecutive STEMI patients treated either with conventional PCI or thrombus aspiration between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2012. Propensity matching score was calculated on the basis of several baseline and procedural characteristics in order to predict the probability for each patient of having been treated with thrombus aspiration. This propensity score analysis was used in order to select a cohort of patients treated with thrombus aspiration matched one-to-one with patients treated with conventional PCI., Results: In total, 744 (53.1%) patients out of 1,400 enrolled were treated with thrombus aspiration. In the matched cohort, at 30-day follow-up 6.3% of patients in the conventional PCI group died compared to 4.7% in the thrombus aspiration group. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for 30-day mortality was 1.01 (95% CI 0.33-3.14, p = 0.985). In the same cohort, 10.7% of patients died at 1-year in the conventional PCI group compared to 5.2% in the thrombus aspiration group. The 1-year unadjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 0.47 (95% CI 0.25-0.90, p = 0.025). The HR changed and was no longer significant after adjustment for differences in the use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, lesion pre-dilatation and pre-procedural TIMI flow: 0.71 (95% CI 0.36-1.39, p = 0.322)., Conclusions: Thrombus aspiration does not influence 30-day mortality, however it is associa­ted with 1-year survival benefit. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombus aspiration may have an important synergistic role in leading to this long-term benefit.

Background and Purpose: Although several studies reported that drug-eluting stents (DES) are able to reduce restenosis incidence without increasing mortality, concerns still exist about their safety in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients mainly for a possible higher rate of in-stent thrombosis. Recent evidence suggests a better safety profile of second-generation DES, but data on their outcome in STEMI are still poor. In this study we evaluated the impact on mortality and target lesion revascularization (TLR) of DES or bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in STEMI patients submitted to primary angioplasty., Methods and Subjects: We analyzed mortality and TLR in 1150 STEMI patients during a mean 43-month follow-up after DES (44.6%) or BMS (55.4%) implantation. A propensity score method was used to minimize bias. During follow-up, 223 deaths occurred., Essential Results: Unadjusted for potential confounders, DES implantation was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40; 95%CI 0.30-0.54] and TLR (HR 0.55; 95%CI 0.36-0.86); this latter was confirmed after propensity score analysis (HR 0.39; 95%CI 0.21-0.67). Second- (n=179) vs. first- (n=337) generation DES showed a further reduction in TLR (HR 0.17; 95%CI 0.05-0.57). Adjusted analyses showed a significant reduction in the combined end-point of all-cause mortality or TLR after both first- and second-generation DES vs. BMS implantation with a trend to a lower risk for second- vs. first-generation DES., Principal Conclusions: DES implantation in STEMI patients showed a significant reduction in TLR and in the combined endpoint of TLR or mortality. Second-generation DES showed a more protective effect on the combined endpoint, suggesting that they would be preferred in this setting., (Copyright © 2013 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)