Search

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of periodontal disease (PD) on the outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods and results: The study included 77 consecutive non-smoking patients with de novo coronary lesions treated with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Periodontal measurements, including the community periodontal index (CPI), were performed by independent periodontists. A CPI score of ≥3 was used to define PD. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), which were defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or non-target lesion revascularization, was compared between patients with and without PD. Of the 77 patients, 49 (63.6%) exhibited a CPI score of 3 or 4 and were assigned to the PD group. The remaining 28 patients (36.4%) were assigned to the non-PD group. Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic findings were comparable between the 2 groups. MACEs occurred in 13 (26.5%) of the PD patients and 2 (7.1%) of the non-PD patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower MACE-free survival rate in the PD group than for the non-PD group (P=0.034)., Conclusions: PD at baseline was associated with an increased risk of MACEs in CAD patients who were treated with a DES for de novo coronary lesions.

Background: While the evaluation of burr speed was discussed regarding platelet aggregation, the association between platform speed and acute lumen gain of rotational atherectomy remains unknown., Methods: Through the evaluation of the potential of low-speed rotational atherectomy (LSRA) in in-vitro experiments, minimum lumen diameter (MLD) and minimum lumen area (MLA) after conventional high-speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA group) and those after LSRA following HSRA (LSRA+HSRA group) treated by 1.5 mm burrs were measured by optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) in 30 consecutive human lesions., Results: The in-vitro experiments demonstrated that MLD and MLA after LSRA+HSRA were significantly larger (MLD: LSRA+HSRA=1.50 ±0.05 mm, HSRA= 1.43 ±0.05 mm, p=0.015; MLA: LSRA+HSRA= 1.90 ±0.17 mm 2 , HSRA= 1.71±0.11 mm 2 , and p= 0.037), requiring more crossing attempts (LSRA= 134 ±20 times, HSRA= 72 ±11 times, and p< 0.001). In human studies, there was no significance in reference vessel diameter and lesion length before the procedure between two groups. MLDs after LSRA+HSRA were significantly larger than those in HSRA (LSRA+HSRA= 1.22 ±0.16 mm, HSRA= 1.07 ±0.14 mm, and p= 0.0078), while MLAs after LSRA+HSRA tended to be larger (LSRA+HSRA= 1.79 ±0.51 mm 2 , HSRA= 1.55 ±0.47 mm 2 , and p= 0.19). There was no significance in the occurrence of in-hospital complication, including slow flow or no reflow, major dissection, and procedural myocardial infarction, between LSRA+HSRA and HSRA., Conclusions: LSRA can achieve larger lumen gain compared, whereas HSRA can pass calcified lesions easily. Combination of LSRA and HSRA is a safe and feasible strategy for severely calcified lesions in clinical practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2019 Takanobu Yamamoto et al.)

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between hypercholesterolemia (HC) and clinical events through a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. HC is a well-known independent risk factor for long-term cardiovascular events after PCI. However, it has been reported to be associated with a lower risk of adverse events in patients with cancer or acute coronary syndrome. Methods We analyzed the relationship between HC and adverse events in patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) through the Tokyo-MD PCI study (an all-comer, multicenter, observational registry). The propensity score method was applied to select two groups with similar baseline characteristics. Results The unadjusted population included 1,536 HC patients and 330 non-HC patients. Propensity score matching yielded 314 matched pairs. After baseline adjustment, the outcomes of HC patients were significantly better than those of the non-HC patients with respect to the primary endpoint, which was a combination of mortality from all causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal neurological events, and major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.81; p=0.002], and the secondary endpoints, which included a combination of mortality from all causes, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal neurological events (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.88; p=0.01), and major bleeding (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.88; p=0.02). A subgroup analysis showed age as an interaction factor for the primary endpoint (interaction p=0.035). Conclusion HC was associated with better outcomes in patients who underwent EES implantation, even after baseline adjustment.

Being overweight has been identified as independent risk factors for coronary artery disease. However, overweight patients have been reported frequently to have better mortality outcomes, and there is little data showing they are at a disadvantage regarding secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. We analyzed the influence of being overweight (defined as body mass index > 25 kg/m 2 ) on adverse events in patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation using a multicenter registry with a maximum follow-up of 3 years. Propensity score matching was done for adjusting baseline characteristics. We defined primary end points as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: a composite of mortality from all causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) and "MACCE excluding non-cardiac mortality". Other adverse events were analyzed as key secondary end points. Out of 1918 patients, 450 pairs were obtained through propensity score matching. Overweight patients were superior to non-overweight patients regarding MACCE (event rates: 8.2 vs. 13.8% in overweight vs. non-overweight, respectively; log-rank p = 0.009) and "MACCE excluding non-cardiac mortality" (5.9 vs. 10.1%, p = 0.03). On secondary end points, not only did overweight patients have significantly fewer major bleeding events (2.2 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.02), but they also had smaller adverse event rates for almost all such events; the differences were not statistically significant. Overweight patients had better outcomes for MACCE, even on excluding non-cardiac mortalities. No result was supportive of an evident advantage to non-overweight EES-implanted patients in terms of secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Background: Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients treated with coronary stents has been reported to be effective. However the effectiveness of long-term DAPT for everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implanted patients has been controversial. We assessed the major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE: a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebral arterial disease) in patients free from MACCE during the first 2 years after EES implantation., Methods and Results: A total of 1918 patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with EES at 22 centers in Japan in 2010-2011 were enrolled, and 742 patients were free from MACCE for 2 years. We divided these MACCE-free patients into two groups: those who received DAPT for >2 years (Over-2-Year DAPT: n=591), and those who received DAPT for ≤2 years (Under-2-Year DAPT: n=151). We performed the landmark analysis that began at 2 years and evaluated at 3 years after PCI about the occurrence of MACCE, major bleeding, stent thrombosis, and restenosis between these groups, both with and without baseline adjustment by propensity score matching (n=145 in both groups)., Results: Fifty MACCE cases were reported (Over-2-Year DAPT, 38; Under-2-Year DAPT, 12), with no significant differences between the 2 groups (log-rank test, p=0.19). Even after baseline adjustment, there were no differences in MACCE occurrence (Over-2-Year DAPT, 8; Under-2-Year DAPT, 11, p=0.19); 15 cases of major bleeding, 5 of restenosis, and 2 of stent thrombosis were observed after 2-years' follow-up, with no statistical differences between the groups, although the event numbers were too low for comparison., Conclusion: Continuing DAPT for >2 years did not prevent MACCE in patients free from MACCE during initial 2 years after EES implantation. Few events of major bleeding, stent thrombosis, and restenosis were observed, with no statistical differences., (Copyright © 2016 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Stenting for severely calcified lesions has a higher risk of stent restenosis or stent failure than stenting for lesions without calcification, and stenting for complex lesions including ostial or bifurcation lesions sometimes causes plaque shift which leads to side branch occlusion. A calcified nodule (CN) is considered one of the culprits for stable angina or acute coronary syndrome. However, the optimal strategy for this lesion is not well clarified. We report a patient who presented stable angina with a CN at the ostial left circumflex artery. In this case, pretreatment with excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) and scoring balloon dilatation followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) dilatation successfully prevented plaque shift caused by stenting in the acute phase. In addition, it also maintained the patency in the late phase. Furthermore, we observed the CN lesions at preprocedural, postprocedural, and late phase by optical coherence tomography. ELCA, which has a unique debulking technique, and scoring balloon dilatation followed by DCB dilatation might offer an alternative treatment for ostial CN lesions instead of stenting. 〈 Learning objective: The optimal strategy for severely calcified lesions with calcified nodule is controversial because the prevalence of calcified nodule is rare and stent failure is more common in calcified lesions. In particular, regarding a calcified nodule located in ostial left circumflex coronary artery lesion, excimer laser coronary atherectomy and scoring balloon dilatation followed by drug-coated balloon may give an alternative treatment to avoid stenting.〉 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of the proximal optimization technique (POT) to prevent longitudinal stent elongation.Background: The mechanism of stent elongation, which occurs after post-balloon dilation, is still unclear.Methods: A total of 103 lesions treated with optical coherence tomography guided coronary intervention between May 2013 and November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Lesions were divided according to the circumferential degree of malapposition at the stent edge immediately after deployment into well-apposed group (<180°) and malapposed group (≥180°). Post-dilation was performed from distal to proximal within the stent until August 2016 (non-POT cohort), and POT was applied thereafter (POT cohort). In the POT cohort, post-dilation was done at the proximal portion of the stent with sufficiently large balloon to minimize malapposition followed by distal dilatations. Stent elongation length was defined as the change in stent length from stent deployment to after post-dilatation.Results: In the non-POT cohort, 72 lesions, including 54 lesions in the well-apposed group and 18 in the malapposed group were analyzed. Stent elongation length was significantly longer in the malapposed group than in the well-apposed group (1.51 ± 1.34 mm vs 0.13 ± 0.84 mm, P < 0.01). In the POT cohort, 31 lesions including 21 in the well-apposed group and 10 in the malapposed group were analyzed. Stent elongation length was not significantly different between the groups (-0.09 ± 0.91 mm vs 0.30 ± 0.99 mm, P = 0.29).Conclusions: Malapposition of the stent edge is responsible for longitudinal stent elongation caused by post-dilatation. POT appeared to effectively prevent longitudinal stent elongation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]