Search

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: U.Z. reports personal fees from Amgen; grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, and BMS; personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim; grants and personal fees from Ferrer; and personal fees from Pfizer. K.H. reports personal fees from Chiesi, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eli Lilly.

Objectives: The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the final 5-year safety and effectiveness of the PROMUS Element platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients treated in routine clinical practice., Background: The prospective, open-label PROMUS Element™ European Post-Approval Surveillance Study (PE-PROVE) enrolled 1,010 "real-world" patients who received the PROMUS Element stent. Adverse event rates were low at 1-year, and the incidence of stent thrombosis was 0.6%., Methods: The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF; overall and PE stent-related), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1-year post-implantation. Five-year clinical outcomes were evaluated in overall as well as high-risk patient subgroups., Results: The overall 5-year TVF rate was 14.9%, with 7.0% being related to the study stent. Cardiac death, MI and TVR related to the study stent occurred in 0.5%, 3.2%, and 5.7%, respectively. Stent thrombosis through 5-year follow-up was 1.0%. The rates of overall and study stent related TVF were numerically higher in patients with medically treated diabetes, long lesions (≥28 mm), and small diameter vessels (≤2.5 mm) compared to the overall study population. Additionally, favorable stent thrombosis rates through 5 years were reported for the PROMUS Element stent in these high-risk subgroups., Conclusions: The final 5-year data from the PE-PROVE study demonstrate favorable outcomes and low rates of adverse events with the PE stent when used in "real-world" patients with coronary artery disease., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Prasugrel compared to clopidogrel has been shown to improve outcome in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. Little is known about the use, efficacy and safety of prasugrel in patients with STEMI in clinical practice., Methods: We conducted a prospective registry including patients with STEMI scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Between October 2009 and February 2013 a total of 3291 patients with STEMI receiving a loading dose of either clopidogrel or prasugrel were included in this analysis., Results: Prasugrel was predominantly used in patients <75 years, body weight >60 kg and those without prior stroke. In-hospital mortality was numerically lower in the prasugrel group (1.7% vs. 4.4%), as well as non-fatal reinfarction (0.2% vs. 0.5%), non-fatal stroke (0.1% vs. 0.3%) and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (2.1% vs. 5.2%), while there was no difference in major bleeding complications (0.8% vs. 0.9%). In the multivariate analysis the MACCE-rate tended to be lower in prasugrel treated patients (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence intervals 0.42-1.08) but bleeding-rates tended to be higher., Conclusions: In this real life experience in patients with STEMI scheduled for primary PCI, prasugrel was almost exclusively used in the label-recommended patient population and tended to be more effective but associated with more bleedings compared to clopidogrel. These results support the findings in the STEMI population in the randomized TRITON-TIMI 38 study., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Representative data on the current management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are of high interest. The EPICOR registry aimed to prospectively collect such real-life data with particular focus on antithrombotic drug utilization and outcomes., Methods: As part of the international prospective EPICOR registry, 29 hospitals in Germany documented 296 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-ACS and 333 with unstable angina or non-STEMI (NSTEMI)-ACS surviving the hospital phase. The statistical analysis was performed in a descriptive manner. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT01171404., Results: The mean age of patients was 62 ± 13 years, and 77.4 % were men. Treatment with antithrombotic agents was initiated in the prehospital phase in 50.7 % of STEMI and 33.3 % of NSTEMI patients. During the hospital stay (median 7.0 days), cardiac catheterization was performed in 97.6 %, percutaneous coronary intervention in 85.6 %, thrombolysis in 4.6 %, and coronary bypass surgery in 2.7 % patients. The use of acetylic salicylic acid (ASA) was reported in 95.6 % vs. 96.1 %, clopidogrel in 60.8 % vs. 73.0 %, prasugrel in 45.6 % vs. 22.5 %, any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in 52.4 % vs. 18.9 % [any dual combination of ASA+(clopidogrel/prasugrel)in 94.0 vs. 91.0 %], statins in 94.6 % vs. 92.2 %, beta blockers in 96.3 % vs. 94.6 %, and ACE-I/ARB in 91.6 % vs. 87.7 % of STEMI vs. NSTEMI patients, respectively. Combined use of the five drug classes recommended in the guidelines-ASA, P2Y12 antagonists, statin, beta blocker, and ACE-I/ARB-was reported in 81.1 % vs. 69.4 % of STEMI vs. NSTEMI patients, respectively., Conclusion: In Germany a high proportion of patients with ACS are treated according to current guidelines, receiving primary revascularization as well as antithrombotic drugs and other agents for prevention of secondary events; associated bleeding complications were less frequent as compared with published registries.

Abstract Introduction The preference for using transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is based on evidence suggesting that TRA is associated with less bleeding and fewer vascular complications, shorter hospital stays, improved quality of life, and a potential beneficial effect on mortality. We have limited study data comparing the two access routes in a patient population with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI, who have a particular increased risk of bleeding, while AF itself is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. Methods Using data from the RIVA-PCI registry, which includes patients with AF undergoing PCI, we analyzed a high-bleeding-risk (HBR) cohort. These patients were predominantly on oral anticoagulants (OAC) for AF, and the PCI was performed via radial or femoral access. Endpoints examined were in-hospital bleeding (BARC 2–5), cerebral events (TIA, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke) and coronary events (stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction). Results Out of 1636 patients, 854 (52.2%) underwent TFA, while 782 (47.8%) underwent the procedure via TRA, including nine patients with brachial artery puncture. The mean age was 75.5 years. Groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, AF type, cardiovascular history, risk factors, and comorbidities, except for a higher incidence of previous bypass surgeries, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)