Search

An experiment on taste sensory analysis was conducted to explore the effects of manipulating signal intensity and response incentives on sensitivity and decision processes when evaluating basic tastes under high ecological validity conditions. Salt concentration (0.07%, 0.1% or 0.75%) and payoff matrices that were intended to produce lenient, conservative, or neutral response strategies were manipulated in a full factorial between-subjects design. Salt concentration only affected the sensory process (sensory index A’) while payoffs only affected the decision process (decision index B’ D ). The effect of the payoff manipulation on the decision index was symmetrical for lenient and conservative induced response strategies, though less extreme than the values predicted by Signal Detection Theory for an optimal performance under unbalanced payoffs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An experiment on taste sensory analysis of an artificially arranged compound of salty and sour flavors was conducted with the goal of evaluating sensory performance to a mixture of flavors akin to natural food, but that allows for keeping a higher experimental control than natural foods do. Participants performed a detection task in which the concentration of salt was manipulated between-subjects (from 0.07 to 0.75%). A procedure based on a dissociative model that allows for obtaining independent measures of sensitivity and criterion performance was used. In general, sensitivity index increased with the increase in signal salience, with actual performance approaching a Weibull distribution. A slight but reliable lenient response bias was found regardless of the salt concentration. The relevance of using independent measures of sensitivity and bias in sensory evaluation of complex compounds, and its relevance for sensory analysis of food is discussed. Practical Applications In tasting situations, perception seems to be easily influenced by cognitive factors and different response biases might appear, modifying the response criterion location. Difficulty of discrimination may also increases by qualitative changes that occur in taste mixtures. Signal Detection Theory allows the measurement of both: sensory and nonsensory components. Taking apart cognitive and sensory components is central to uncovering small differences in sensory qualities and developing accurate models of perception. This approach is of special interest to study the psychological processes involved in tasting situations, including the evaluation of training programs conducted to improve tasters' discriminative abilities. In addition, function modelization has important implications for the area of perceptual research since psychophysical functions for binary compounds as it allows conducting predictions about interaction effects between studied components in complex stimuli. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Training schedules including progressive increments of difficulty lead to a better performance on a harder version of a discrimination task than non-progressive schedules that only include the hardest level of difficulty. A detection task in which participants had to detect whether the samples that they tasted contained a small amount of olive oil was used to test the relevance of this phenomenon in an olive oil tasting context. Two groups of participants received three training sessions with this task before receiving a final test of performance. In group hard-to-hard, olive oil concentration was kept low and constant throughout sessions and testing. In group easy-to-hard, olive oil concentration was high in the first training session. Olive oil concentration was progressively decreased across sessions, reaching the same level of the hard-to-hard group at the time of testing. Results showed better ability for detecting olive oil when participants were trained with progressively lower concentrations of olive oil than when the training program involved only the lowest (most difficult) one. Progressive training led participants to show a conservative bias that did not appear when training was only conducted with the most difficult discrimination. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]