Search

Objective: Severe brain injuries can result in disorders of consciousness, such as the Minimally Conscious State (MCS), where individuals display intermittent yet discernible signs of conscious awareness. The varied levels of responsiveness and awareness observed in this state have spurred the progressive delineation of two subgroups within MCS, termed "plus" (MCS+) and "minus" (MCS-). However, the clinical validity of these classifications remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate and compare the likelihood of emergence from MCS, as well as the functional independence after emergence, in individuals categorized as in MCS+ and MCS-., Methods: Demographic and behavioral data of 80 participants, admitted as either in MCS+ (n = 30) or MCS- (n = 50) to a long-term neurorehabilitation unit, were retrospectively analyzed. The neurobehavioral condition of each participant was evaluated weekly until discharge, demise, or emergence from MCS. The functional independence of those participants who emerged from MCS was assessed 6 months after emergence., Results: While only about half of the individuals classified as in MCS- (n = 24) emerged from the MCS, all those admitted as in MCS+ did, and in a shorter postinjury period. Despite these differences, all individuals who emerged from the MCS demonstrated similar high disability and low functional independence 6 months after emergence, regardless of their state at admission., Interpretation: Individuals classified as MCS+ exhibited a higher likelihood of emergence and a shorter time to emergence compared to those in MCS-. However, the level of functional independence 6 months after emergence was found to be unrelated to the initial state at admission., (© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Introduction: Altered states of consciousness have traditionally been associated with poor prognosis. At present, clinical differences between these entities are beginning to be established., Method: Our study included 37 patients diagnosed with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and 43 in a minimally conscious state (MCS) according to the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). All patients were followed up each month for at least 6 months using the CRS-R. We recorded the time points when vegetative state progressed from 'persistent' to 'permanent' based on the cut-off points established by the Multi-Society-Task-Force: 12 months in patients with traumatic injury and 3 months in those with non-traumatic injury. A logistic regression model was used to determine the factors potentially predicting which patients will emerge from MCS., Results: In the UWS group, 23 patients emerged from UWS but only 9 emerged from MCS. Of the 43 patients in the MCS group, 26 patients emerged from that state during follow-up. Eight of the 23 patients (34.7%) who emerged from UWS and 17 of the 35 (48.6%) who emerged from MCS recovered after the time points proposed by the Multi-Society-Task-Force. According to the multivariate regression analysis, aetiology (P<.01), chronicity (P=.01), and CRS-R scores at admission (P<.001) correctly predicted emergence from MCS in 77.5% of the cases., Conclusions: UWS and MCS are different clinical entities in terms of diagnosis and outcomes. Some of the factors traditionally associated with poor prognosis, such as time from injury and likelihood of recovery, should be revaluated., (Copyright © 2017 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and short-term pattern of evolution of a sample of patients within 1 year after acquiring a brain injury that led to a vegetative state (VS) or a minimally conscious state (MCS)., Design: Cohort study., Setting: Inpatient brain injury rehabilitation program., Participants: Patients with acquired brain injury (N=32; 47% traumatic, 37.5% hemorrhagic, 15.5% anoxic) who were in a VS or an MCS according to Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores., Intervention: Integrative multisensory program comprising daily physical rehabilitation procedures and multimodal sensory stimulation., Main Outcome Measure: All patients were assessed with a Spanish version of the CRS-R at admission and then monthly for at least 6 months or until emergence from MCS., Results: At the time of admission, 12 patients were diagnosed as being in a VS and 20 as being in an MCS. Eight patients were able to emerge from their MCS during follow-up. Seven of these 8 patients were diagnosed as being in an MCS at inclusion, and only 1 was diagnosed as being in a VS. Emergence from an MCS was mostly associated with improvement in both the communication and motor function scales (n=4). Lesser chronicity (P=.01) and the presence of more than visual behavioral responses at admission (P=.05) were both significant predictors of emergence from an MCS., Conclusions: The CRS-R seems appropriate for establishing an immediate prognosis in this population. A quick referral of these patients for specialized assessment and rehabilitation facilities is recommended., (Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)