Search

Purpose: To use a combination of partial least squares regression and a machine learning approach to predict intraocular lens (IOL) tilt using preoperative biometry data., Setting: Kepler University Clinic Linz, Linz, Austria., Design: Prospective single-center study., Methods: Optical coherence tomography, autorefraction, and subjective refraction were performed at baseline and 8 weeks after cataract surgery. In analysis I, only 1 eye per patient was included and a tilt prediction model was generated. In analysis II, a pairwise comparison between right and left eyes was performed., Results: In analysis I, 50 eyes of 50 patients were analyzed. Difference in amount, orientation, and vector from preoperative to postoperative lens tilt was -0.13 degrees, 2.14 degrees, and 1.20 degrees, respectively. A high predictive power (variable importance for projection [VIP]) for postoperative tilt prediction was found for preoperative tilt (VIP = 2.2), pupil decentration (VIP = 1.5), lens thickness (VIP = 1.1), axial eye length (VIP = 0.9), and preoperative lens decentration (VIP = 0.8). These variables were applied to a machine learning algorithm resulting in an out of bag score of 0.92 degrees. In analysis II, 76 eyes of 38 patients were included. The difference of preoperative to postoperative IOL tilt of right and left eyes of the same individual was statistically relevant., Conclusions: Postoperative IOL tilt showed excellent predictability using preoperative biometry data and a combination of partial least squares regression and a machine learning algorithm. Preoperative lens tilt, pupil decentration, lens thickness, axial eye length, and preoperative lens decentration were found to be the most relevant parameters for this prediction model., (Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the uncertainty in the formula predicted refractive outcome REFU after cataract surgery resulting from measurement uncertainties in modern optical biometers using literature data for within-subject standard deviation S w ., Methods: This Monte-Carlo simulation study used a large dataset containing 16 667 preoperative IOLMaster 700 biometric measurements. Based on literature S w values, REFU was derived for both the Haigis and Castrop formulae using error propagation strategies. Using the Hoya Vivinex lens (IOL) as an example, REFU was calculated both with (WLT) and without (WoLT) consideration of IOL power labelling tolerances., Results: WoLT the median REFU was 0.10/0.12 dpt for the Haigis/Castrop formula, and WLT it was 0.13/0.15 dpt. WoLT REFU increased systematically for short eyes (or high power IOLs), and WLT this effect was even more pronounced because of increased labelling tolerances. WoLT the uncertainty in the measurement of the corneal front surface radius showed the largest contribution to REFU, especially in long eyes (and low power IOLs). WLT the IOL power uncertainty dominated in short eyes (or high power IOLs) and the uncertainty of the corneal front surface in long eyes (or low power IOLs)., Conclusions: Compared with published data on the formula prediction error of refractive outcome after cataract surgery, the uncertainty of biometric measures seems to contribute with ⅓ to ½ to the entire standard deviation. REFU systematically increases with IOL power and decreases with axial length., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the concept of total keratometry (TK) by analyzing extensive international datasets representing diverse ethnic backgrounds. The primary objective was to quantify the disparities between traditional keratometry (K) and TK values in normal eyes and assess their impact on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using various formulas., Design: Retrospective multicenter intra-instrument reliability analysis., Methods: The study involved the analysis of biometry data collected from ten international centers across Europe, the United States, and Asia. Corneal power was expressed as equivalent power and astigmatic vector components for both K and TK values. The study assessed the influence of these differences on IOL power calculations using different formulas. The results were analyzed and plotted using Bland-Altman and double angle plots., Results: The study encompassed a total of 116,982 measurements from 57,862 right eyes and 59,120 left eyes. The analysis revealed a high level of agreement between K and TK values, with 93.98% of eyes exhibiting an absolute difference of 0.25 D or less. Astigmatism vector differences exceeding 0.25 D and 0.50 D were observed in 39.43% and 1.08% of eyes, respectively., Conclusions: This large-scale study underscores the similarity between mean K and TK values in healthy eyes, with rare clinical implications for IOL power calculation. Noteworthy differences were observed in astigmatism values between K and TK. Future investigations should delve into the practicality of TK values for astigmatism correction and their implications for surgical outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To evaluate the intraindividual visual performance of a spherical and extended depth of field (EDOF) IOL used in a mix-and-match approach., Methods: Single centre (tertiary care centre), retrospective consecutive case series. Included patients had uneventful cataract surgery with implantation of a spherical monofocal IOL (CT Spheris 204) in the dominant eye and a diffractive EDOF IOL (AT LARA 829) in the non-dominant eye. Monocular and binocular defocus curves and visual acuity at various distances were assessed. In addition, binocular reading speed, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction using QOV, Catquest 9SF, and glare/halo questionnaires are reported., Results: A total of 29 patients (58 eyes) were included. We observed significant intra-individual differences for monocular DCIVA, DCNVA, UIVA, and UNVA. There were no differences in monocular BCDVA or UDVA. The monocular defocus curves for the two IOLs significantly differed at defocus steps between -1.0 and -3.5 D. 93.10% of patients reported they would opt for the same combination of IOLs., Conclusion: Excellent uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity was demonstrated in both groups. The mix-and-match approach described in this study yielded good intermediate vision and improved near vision with high-patient satisfaction., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: To determine (1) if measurements of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) as measured by keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) differ (2) if SIA affects the magnitude and/or meridian of keratometric astigmatism (3) if SIA evolves over time., Setting: Tertiary care center., Design: Retrospective data analysis., Methods: A swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry dataset (IOLMaster700) consisting of 498 eyes (327 patients) from a tertiary care center was analyzed. For all eyes preoperative and postoperative biometric measurements at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-months postoperative visits were considered for vector analysis of SIA K and SIA TK ., Results: Centroids in right and left eyes were 0.26 diopters (D) @5 degrees/0.31 D @1 degree for SIA K and 0.27 D @4 degrees/0.34 D @1 degree for SIA TK . Centroids for difference vectors K-TK in right and left eyes were 0.02 D @ 176 degrees/0.03 D @6 degrees. The mean SIA magnitudes in right and left eyes were 0.48 ± 0.41 D and 0.50 ± 0.37 D for SIA K and 0.53 ± 0.42 D and 0.54 ± 0.40 D for SIA TK . In eyes with ATR astigmatism, an increase in postoperative astigmatism magnitude was more common than a decrease. More than 30% of eyes showed changes in the meridian of more than 15 degrees., Conclusions: Overall, we observed differences in K- and TK-derived SIA, and changes in SIA magnitude over time. For postsurgical interventions, postoperative astigmatism meridian values should be measured to base treatments. Astigmatism magnitude showed a tendency to decrease for steep-meridian incisions and to increase in flat-meridian incisions., (Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) power calculation in a middle European patient cohort., Setting: EyeLaser Clinic, Linz, Austria., Design: Single-center single-surgeon retrospective consecutive case series., Methods: Patients were included after uneventful pIOL surgery implanting 91 nontoric and toric Visian implantable collamer lens model V4c. Online Calculation and Ordering System (OCOS) software, JPhakic software, Olsen-Feingold formula, Holladay formula, and Linz-Homburg-Castrop (LHC) formula were compared. When possible, lens constants were optimized for the patient cohort. Data of single eye per patient were included. Outcome measures were mean absolute prediction error, median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD, and median prediction error, as well as the percentage of eyes with an absolute prediction error within limits of 0.25 diopters (D), 0.5 D, 0.75 D, and 1.0 D., Results: 91 eyes of 91 patients were assessed. After application of the Cochran Q test, the Olsen-Feingold formula achieved a significantly lower percentage of eyes within an absolute prediction error of 1.0 D than all other methods., Conclusions: In the patient cohort, OCOS software, JPhakic software, and Holladay and LHC formulas showed equal results and can be cross-checked. The LHC formula was not published before. A ready-to-use Excel sheet is available as an addendum., (Copyright © 2022 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Background: Overall ocular magnification (OOM) and meridional ocular magnification (MOM) with consequent image distortions have been widely ignored in modern cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate OOM and MOM in a general situation with an astigmatic refracting surface., Methods: From a large dataset containing biometric measurements (IOLMaster 700) of both eyes of 9734 patients prior to cataract surgery, the equivalent (P IOL eq) and cylindric power (P IOL cyl) were derived for the HofferQ, Haigis, and Castrop formulae for emmetropia. Based on the pseudophakic eye model, OOM and MOM were extracted using 4 × 4 matrix algebra for the corrected eye (with P IOL eq/P IOL cyl (scenario 1) or with P IOL eq and spectacle correction of the residual refractive cylinder (scenario 2) or with P IOL eq remaining the residual uncorrected refractive cylinder (blurry image) (scenario 3)). In each case, the relative image distortion of MOM/OOM was calculated in %., Results: On average, P IOL eq/P IOL cyl was 20.73 ± 4.50 dpt/1.39 ± 1.09 dpt for HofferQ, 20.75 ± 4.23 dpt/1.29 ± 1.01 dpt for Haigis, and 20.63 ± 4.31 dpt/1.26 ± 0.98 dpt for Castrop formulae. Cylindric refraction for scenario 2 was 0.91 ± 0.70 dpt, 0.89 ± 0.69 dpt, and 0.89 ± 0.69 dpt, respectively. OOM/MOM (× 1000) was 16.56 ± 1.20/0.08 ± 0.07, 16.56 ± 1.20/0.18 ± 0.14, and 16.56 ± 1.20/0.08 ± 0.07 mm/mrad with HofferQ; 16.64 ± 1.16/0.07 ± 0.06, 16.64 ± 1.16/0.18 ± 0.14, and 16.64 ± 1.16/0.07 ± 0.06 mm/mrad with Haigis; and 16.72 ± 1.18/0.07 ± 0.05, 16.72 ± 1.18/0.18 ± 0.14, and 16.72 ± 1.18/0.07 ± 0.05 mm/mrad with Castrop formulae. Mean/95% quantile relative image distortion was 0.49/1.23%, 0.41/1.05%, and 0.40/0.98% for scenarios 1 and 3 and 1.09/2.71%, 1.07/2.66%, and 1.06/2.64% for scenario 2 with HofferQ, Haigis, and Castrop formulae., Conclusion: Matrix representation of the pseudophakic eye allows for a simple and straightforward prediction of OOM and MOM of the pseudophakic eye after cataract surgery. OOM and MOM could be used for estimating monocular image distortions, or differences in overall or meridional magnifications between eyes., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the potential accuracy of different second eye refinement methods in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation schemes in high hyperopes., Methods: The study design was a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective consecutive case series. The setting of the study was in Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Patients were assessed after uneventful bilateral cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were an axial eye length of ≤21.5 mm and/or emmetropizing IOL power of >28.5 dpt. Outcome measures were the mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with standard deviation, median prediction error, and the percentage of eyes with an absolute prediction error (absPE) within 0.25 dpt, 0.5 dpt, 0.75 dpt, or 1.0 dpt. Second eye refinement was performed using the first eye prediction error, either with a correction coefficient of 0.50 (SER1), or an individual coefficient optimized for MAE., Results: A total of 55 patients were assessed. A statistically significant reduction in the absPE after the application of SER1 was observed in 9 of 13 formulae. The SER1 refined Hoffer Q, refined Holladay I, refined Holladay II, refined Kane, refined Okulix, and refined PEARL-DGS provided a smaller absPE than other methods., Conclusion: In this patient cohort with a short axial eye length, the second eye refinement led to a lower MAE in almost all formulae. The use of refinement in Kane, Okulix, PEARL-DGS, and Castrop formulae exhibited the lowest MAE.

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes., Methodology: The study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Inclusion of patients after uneventful cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were axial eye length <21.5 mm and/or emmetropising IOL power >28.5 D. Lens constants were optimised on a separate patient cohort considering the full bandwidth of axial eye length. Data of one single eye per patient were randomly included. The outcome measures were: mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD and median prediction error and the percentage of eyes with an MAE within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D and 1.0 D., Results: A total of 150 eyes from 150 patients were assessed. Okulix, PEARL-DGS, Kane and Castrop provided a statistically significantly smaller MAE compared with the Hoffer Q and SRK/T formulae., Conclusion: In our patient cohort with short axial eye length, the use of PEARL-DGS, Okulix, Kane or Castrop formulae showed the lowest MAE. The Castrop formula has not been published before, but will be disclosed with a ready-to-use Excel sheet as an addendum to this paper., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose : To evaluate rotational stability, tilt and decentration of a new monofocal IOL with a 7.0 mm optic and frame haptics. Methods: Prospective post-market clinical follow-up study at the Kepler University Hospital Linz, Austria. An Aspira-aXA (HumanOptics, Germany) was implanted in 74 eyes of 42 cataract patients. The lens was manufactured with toric markings. IOL rotational stability was evaluated by comparing its position at the end of surgery (EoS) versus 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 4 months postoperatively. IOL tilt and decentration were measured using a Scheimpflug camera at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months. Results: Median absolute IOL rotation was 1.42 degrees (n = 52; mean = 2.18 ± 2.23°) within 1 day after surgery and was significantly higher compared to all later intervals (median <1.0 degree; P = .001). At the 4 months follow-up, IOL rotation was within 5.0 degrees in 85% of the eyes (n = 40) and within 10.0 degrees in 98% (n = 46) of the eyes. The only eye with an IOL rotation of ≥ 10.ty0 degrees (EoS vs . 1 day) had an AL of 26.45 mm. At the last follow-up, the IOL vertical and horizontal tilt referenced to the pupillary axis was in average less than 1.5 degrees in both eyes (n = 54; maximum 5.85°). Decentration in both meridians was on average less than 0.10 mm in both eyes (maximum 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The one-piece Aspira-aXA IOL showed good and stable positioning within the capsular bag over a 4 months period.

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using the Victus laser system and conventional cataract surgery., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria., Design: Prospective randomized case series., Methods: Both eyes of patients with age-related cataract were randomized to conventional cataract surgery or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, both with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Postoperative follow-up was at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months and comprised corrected distance visual acuity, endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and central retinal thickness. The main outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications and the effective phacoemulsification time (EPT). Intraocular lens and capsulotomy centration were evaluated using retroillumination slitlamp photography., Results: The study enrolled 50 patients. No intraoperative complications occurred in either group. The ECD, CCT, and central retinal thickness were similar between the groups at all follow-up examinations (P > .05). The EPT was not statistically significantly different between the groups (P = .22). The IOL centration was similar between the groups (P = .93)., Conclusion: Femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery using the mentioned system were equally safe and effective., (Copyright © 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess whether a temporal limbal-corneal incision approach for phacoemulsification cataract surgery induces a gradient in corneal thickening along the horizontal meridian., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria., Methods: Corneal thickness in 21 eyes of 21 patients was measured preoperatively as well as 1 day, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months after phacoemulsification through a temporal limbal-corneal incision. Measurements were performed using partial coherence interferometry (PCI) with a commercial instrument, the ACMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena). Measurements were taken along the horizontal meridian centrally along the visual axis at 1.5 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.5 mm eccentricity., Results: Preoperatively, there were slight nasal-temporal differences in corneal thickness at all eccentricities. The mean thickness was 522 microm +/- 34 (SD) at 1.5 mm nasally and 513 +/- 36 microm at 1.5 mm temporally (P<.01). On day 1, there was a significant mean increase in corneal thickness (38 +/- 43 microm) along all locations. The thickening was slightly more pronounced in the periphery than in the center, a difference not reaching statistical significance. At 1 week, corneal thickness returned almost to baseline at all locations except for 3.0 mm temporally, where it was slightly, but not significantly, thicker (mean 8 +/- 14 mum). At 1 month, corneal thickness at the 3.0 mm temporal location returned to baseline., Conclusions: A nasal-temporal difference in corneal thickness was found preoperatively in all patients. Phacoemulsification through a temporal limbal-corneal incision caused an increase in corneal thickness along the horizontal meridian 1 day after surgery. The prolonged corneal thickening at 3.0 mm eccentricity temporally could be a result of the proximity to the incision site.