Search

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have mandated that acute care and critical access hospitals implement an Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Program. This manuscript describes the process that was implemented to ensure CMS compliance for AMS, across a 14-member health system (eight community hospitals, five critical access hospitals, and an academic medical center) in the Omaha metro area, and surrounding cities. The addition of the AMS program to the 14-member health system increased personnel, with a 0.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) infectious diseases (ID) physician, and 2.5 FTE infectious diseases trained clinical pharmacists to support daily AMS activities. Clinical decision support software had previously been implemented across the health system, which was also key to the success of the program. Overall, in its first year, the AMS program demonstrated a $1.2 million normalized reduction (21% total reduction in antimicrobial purchases) in antimicrobial expenses. The ability to review charts daily for antimicrobial optimization with ID pharmacist and physician support, identify facility specific needs and opportunities, and to collect available data endpoints to determine program effectiveness helped to ensure the success of the program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background AMS expansion initiative was implemented in fiscal year 18 (FY18) across a 14-member health system (~1,000 average daily census combined) consisting of 8 community hospitals, 5 rural critical access hospitals and 1 academic medical center. Methods The expansion initiative included a 0.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) infectious diseases (ID) physician and 2.5 FTE ID-trained clinical pharmacists to support daily AMS activities. Clinical decision support software (Theradoc) had previously been implemented across the health system. Here we report our continuation results for the first 9 months of year 2 (FYTD19) of the expansion initiative. Results AMS personnel documented an average of 319.8 and 313.2 interventions per month in FY18 vs. FYTD19, respectively. Mean acceptance rate of AMS interventions by providers was 87.9% and 89.4% in FY18 vs. FYTD19. Provider groups with the highest acceptance rate were Hospital Medicine, Pulmonary/Critical Care and Infectious Disease. Highest interventions in FYTD19 included recommending other diagnostic testing (17%) followed by de-escalating/targeting therapy based on culture results and recommending alternative therapy (both at 11%). Most common ID disease states AMS intervened included bacteremias (29%), pneumonias (ventilator-associated or community-acquired) 13% each, and UTIs 13%. AMS interventions generated 168 ID consults in FYTD19. The financial impact of AMS across the health system was a cumulative saving in antimicrobial expenditures of $1.29 million and $1.27 million in FY18 and FYTD19, respectively. Conclusion The ability to review offsite electronic medical records daily for antimicrobial optimization with ID pharmacist and physician support, identify facility-specific needs and opportunities, and collect available data endpoints to determine program effectiveness has helped to ensure program success. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]