Search

Background Sulbactam dosing for Acinetobacter baumannii infections has not been standardized due to limited available pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) data. Herein, we report a comprehensive PK/PD analysis of ampicillin-sulbactam against A. baumannii pneumonia. Methods Twenty-one A. baumannii clinical isolates were tested in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model. For dose-ranging studies, groups of mice were administered escalating doses of ampicillin-sulbactam. Changes in log10cfu/lungs relative to 0 h were assessed. Dose-fractionation studies were performed. Estimates of the percentage of of time during which the unbound plasma sulbactam concentrations exceeded the MIC (% f T > MIC) required for different efficacy endpoints were calculated. The probabilities of target attainment (PTA) for the 1-log kill plasma targets were estimated following clinically utilized sulbactam regimens. Results Dose-fractionation studies demonstrated time-dependent kill. Isolates resistant to both sulbactam and meropenem required three times the exposures to achieve 1-log kill; median [IQR] % f T > MIC of 60.37% [51.6–66.8] compared with other phenotypes (21.17 [16.0–32.9] % f T > MIC). Sulbactam standard dose (1 g q6h, 0.5 h infusion) provided >90% PTA up to MIC of 4 mg/L. Sulbactam 3 g q8h, 4 h inf provided greater PTA for isolates with sulbactam-intermediate susceptibility (8 mg/L, 100% versus 86% following the standard dose). Despite the higher exposure following 3 g q8h, 4 h inf, PTA was ≤57% among sulbactam-resistant/meropenem-resistant isolates. Conclusion Sulbactam standard dose is a valuable regimen across sulbactam-susceptible isolates while the high-dose extended-infusion provides additional benefit against sulbactam-intermediate isolates. Given that most of the sulbactam-resistant A. baumannii isolates are meropenem-resistant, high-dose prolonged-infusion regimens are not expected to be effective as monotherapy against infections due to these isolates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gram-negative antibiotic resistance continues to grow as a global problem due to the evolution and spread of β-lactamases. The early β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) are characterized by spectra limited to class A β-lactamases and ineffective against carbapenemases and most extended spectrum β-lactamases. In order to address this therapeutic need, newer BLIs were developed with the goal of treating carbapenemase producing, carbapenem resistant organisms (CRO), specifically targeting the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). These BL/BLI combination drugs, avibactam/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam, have proven to be indispensable tools in this effort. However, non-KPC mechanisms of resistance are rising in prevalence and increasingly challenging to treat. It is critical for clinicians to understand the unique spectra of these BL/BLIs with respect to non-KPC CRO. In Part 1of this 2-part series, we describe the non-KPC attributes of the newer BL/BLIs with a focus on utility against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions.Methods: Pharmacodynamic studies were conducted using the in vitro chemostat model over 24 h against three trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-susceptible S. maltophilia isolates with MICs from 0.25/4.75 to 2/38 mg/L. The primary endpoint was the change in cfu at 24 h relative to baseline. The log ratio of the area under the cfu curve (LR AUcfu) was a secondary endpoint. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole exposures required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reduction were determined.Results: Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exposures achieved stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions in 9/16 (56%) and 2/16 (13%) of experiments. Both the fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC were identified as equivalent pharmacodynamic drivers, with stasis achieved at an fAUC/MIC of 67.4 and 30.0 for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Clinically meaningful exposures required to achieve 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions were not quantifiable. The LR AUcfu analysis supported the lack of overall bacterial burden reduction against S. maltophilia.Conclusions: In this in vitro chemostat model, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, even at higher doses, achieved limited activity against susceptible S. maltophilia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Minocycline displays high susceptibility rates against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at the current breakpoint of 4 mg/L. However, no pharmacodynamic data are available to guide dosing or justify this breakpoint.Methods: The murine neutropenic thigh infection model was utilized to determine minocycline pharmacodynamics against four S. maltophilia through dose ranging and fractionation studies. The efficacy of a human simulated regimen (HSR) of 100 mg IV q12h was tested against 17 isolates with a range of minocycline MICs. Monte Carlo simulation was employed to assess the PTA for achieving defined pharmacodynamic thresholds in critically ill patients.Results: The pharmacodynamic index best correlated with reductions in cfu was fAUC/MIC (R2 = 0.376). The composite fAUC/MIC required for stasis and 1 log10 reduction was 9.6 and 23.6, respectively. The minocycline 100 mg q12h HSR yielded no bacterial reduction at MICs ≥1 mg/L and mixed efficacy at 0.5 mg/L. Monte Carlo simulation of minocycline 200 mg IV q12h achieved the 1 log10 kill threshold with PTAs of 93% and 51.7% at MICs of 0.5 and 1 mg/L, respectively, but 0.1% at the current breakpoint of 4 mg/L.Conclusions: Clinically utilized minocycline dosing regimens fail to reach exposures predicted to be efficacious against S. maltophilia in critically ill patients at the current susceptibility breakpoint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Beta-lactams remain a critical member of our antibiotic armamentarium and are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in the inpatient setting. For these agents, the percentage of time that the free concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (% f T > MIC) of the pathogen has been shown to be the best predictor of antibacterial killing effects. However, debate remains about the quantity of f T > MIC exposure needed for successful clinical response. While pre-clinical animal based studies, such as the neutropenic thigh infection model, have been widely used to support dosing regimen selection for clinical development and susceptibility breakpoint evaluation, pharmacodynamic based studies in human patients are used validate exposures needed in the clinic and for guidance during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For the majority of studied beta-lactams, pre-clinical animal studies routinely demonstrated the f T > MIC should exceed approximately 40–70% f T > MIC to achieve 1 log reductions in colony forming units. In contrast, clinical studies tend to suggest higher exposures may be needed, but tremendous variability exists study to study. Herein, we will review and critique pre-clinical versus human-based pharmacodynamic studies aimed at determining beta-lactam exposure thresholds, so as to determine which targets may be best suited for optimal dosage selection, TDM, and for susceptibility breakpoint determination. Based on our review of murine and clinical literature on beta-lactam pharmacodynamic thresholds, murine based targets specific to each antibiotic are most useful during dosage regimen development and susceptibility breakpoint assessment, while a range of exposures between 50 and 100% f T > MIC are reasonable to define the beta-lactam TDM therapeutic window for most infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Levofloxacin displays in vitro activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (STM); however, current susceptibility breakpoints are supported by limited data. We employed the murine neutropenic thigh infection model to assess levofloxacin pharmacodynamics against STM.Methods: Twenty-six clinical STM were studied using the neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Human simulated regimens (HSR) of levofloxacin 750 mg q24h were administered over 24 h. Efficacy was measured as the change in log10 cfu/thigh at 24 h compared with 0 h. Composite cfu data were fitted to an Emax model to determine the fAUC/MIC needed for stasis and 1 log10 reduction at 24 h. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine PTA.Results: Levofloxacin MICs ranged from 0.5-8 mg/L. Mean bacterial burden at 0 h was 6.21 ± 0.20 log10 cfu/thigh. In the 24 h controls, bacterial growth was 1.64 ± 0.66 log10 cfu/thigh. In isolates with levofloxacin MICs ≤1, 2 and ≥4 mg/L, changes in bacterial density following levofloxacin HSR were -1.66 ± 0.89, 0.13 ± 0.97 and 1.54 ± 0.43 log10 cfu/thigh, respectively. The Emax model demonstrated strong agreement between fAUC/MIC and change in bacterial density (R2 = 0.82). The fAUC/MIC exposure needed for stasis and 1 log10 reduction was 39.9 and 54.9, respectively. PTAs for the 1 log10 reduction threshold were 95.8, 72.2, and 26.6% at MICs of 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively.Conclusions: These are the first data to describe fAUC/MIC thresholds predictive of cfu reductions for levofloxacin against STM. Due to poor in vivo efficacy and PTA at MICs ≥2 mg/L, reassessment of the current susceptibility breakpoint is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) opens the door to personalized medicine, yet it is infrequently applied to β‐lactam antibiotics, one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the hospital setting. As we continue to understand more about β‐lactam pharmacodynamics (PD) and wide inter‐ and intra‐patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), the utility of TDM has become increasingly apparent. For β‐lactams, the time that free concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as a function of the dosing interval (%fT>MIC) has been shown to best predict antibacterial effect. Many studies have shown that β‐lactam %fT>MIC exposures are often suboptimal across a wide variety of disease states and clinical settings. A limitation to implementing this practice is the general lack of understanding on how to best operationalize this intervention and interpret the results. The instrumentation and expertise needed to quantify β‐lactams for TDM is rarely available locally, but certain laboratories advertise these services and perform them regularly. Familiarity with the modalities and nuances of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial to establishing β‐lactam concentration targets that meet the relevant exposure thresholds. Evaluation of these concentrations is best accomplished using population PK software and Bayesian modeling, for which a multitude of programs are available. While TDM of β‐lactams has shown an ability to increase the rate of target attainment, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that it leads to improved clinical outcomes. Although consensus guidelines for β‐lactam TDM do not exist in the United States, guidance would help to promote this important practice and better standardize the approach across institutions. Herein, we discuss the basis for β‐lactam TDM, review supporting evidence, and provide guidance for implementation in specific patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance continues to be a major public health concern due to the emergence and spread of multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms, including extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales. Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside that demonstrates activity against MDR gram-negatives, including those producing ESBLs and most carbapenemases, and retains activity against aminoglycoside modifying enzymes as a result of structural modifications. The information discussed is meant to assist in identifying plazomicin's place in therapy and to expand the clinician's armamentarium.Areas Covered: Herein, we review the pharmacology, microbiology, clinical efficacy, and safety of plazomicin. To gather relevant information, a literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Search terms used include plazomicin, ACHN-490, extended spectrum ß-lactamase, ESBL, CRE, aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, and AME. Additional information was obtained from FDA review documents and research abstracts presented at international conferences.Expert Opinion: Plazomicin is a promising carbapenem or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor-sparing alternative for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by MDR Enterobacterales. Although robust data for bloodstream infections and bacterial pneumonias are lacking, plazomicin may be considered in individual clinical scenarios if combination therapy is warranted provided supportive microbiological data and therapeutic drug monitoring are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia at double the dose (i.e. 2 g/1 g) recommended for other indications. We evaluated the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of this 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam regimen in ventilated pneumonia patients.Methods: This was an open-label, multicentre, Phase 1 trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02387372). Mechanically ventilated patients with proven/suspected pneumonia received four to six doses of 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam (adjusted for renal function) q8h. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and last doses. One bronchoalveolar lavage sample per patient was collected at 1, 2, 4, 6 or 8 h after the last dose and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) drug concentrations were determined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis and pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted to graphically evaluate achievement of target exposures (plasma and ELF ceftolozane concentrations >4 mg/L and tazobactam concentrations >1 mg/L; target in plasma: ≥30% and ≥20% of the dosing interval, respectively).Results: Twenty-six patients received four to six doses of study drug; 22 were included in the ELF analyses. Ceftolozane and tazobactam Tmax (6 and 2 h, respectively) were delayed in ELF compared with plasma (1 h). Lung penetration, expressed as the ratio of mean drug exposure (AUC) in ELF to plasma, was 50% (ceftolozane) and 62% (tazobactam). Mean ceftolozane and tazobactam ELF concentrations remained >4 mg/L and >1 mg/L, respectively, for 100% of the dosing interval. There were no deaths or adverse event-related study discontinuations.Conclusions: In ventilated pneumonia patients, 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h yielded ELF exposures considered adequate to cover ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible respiratory pathogens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daptomycin is one of the few treatment options for infections caused by enterococci that are resistant to ampicillin and vancomycin, such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. The emergence and clinical significance of daptomycin-resistant enterococci and evolving microbiologic, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, and clinical data indicated that the pre-2019 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptible-only breakpoint of ≤4 μg/mL for daptomycin and enterococci was no longer appropriate. After analyzing data that are outlined in this article, the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing established new breakpoints for daptomycin and enterococci. For E. faecium , a susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) breakpoint of ≤4 μg/mL was established based on an increased dosage of 8–12 mg/kg/day (≥8 μg/mL-resistant). CLSI suggests infectious diseases consultation to guide daptomycin use for the SDD category. For Enterococcus faecalis and other enterococcal species, revised breakpoints of ≤2 μg/mL-susceptible, 4 μg/mL-intermediate, and ≥8 μg/mL-resistant were established based on a standard dosage of 6 mg/kg/day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) are used in antibiotic development to predict the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) for a dosing regimen. However, for β‐lactam/β‐lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL‐BLICs), methods for linking simulated concentration profiles of the β‐lactam (BL) and β‐lactamase inhibitor (BLI) components are rarely described. Using a previously defined pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime/avibactam from critically ill patients, we performed four 5000‐patient MCSs using different methods of increasing complexity to couple the BL and BLI components and compared PTA for ceftazidime and avibactam targets of >70% fT>MIC and >70% fT>1 mg/L, respectively, at MICs from 1 to 128 mg/L. Method A ignored all covariates and correlations, whereas methods B, C, and D enhanced associations by adding (B) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug only; (C) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug and creatinine clearance (CRCL); and (D) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug, CRCL, and pharmacokinetic parameter correlation between drugs. Method D produced a simulated patient population that best recapitulated the observed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters in actual patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam PTA at MIC 8 mg/L (the susceptibility break point) and 16 mg/L ranged from 92.4% to 98.3% and 80.2% to 88.4%, respectively. PTA was lowest with method A, whereas PTA estimates were similar for all other methods. Compared with ignoring all pharmacokinetic parameter associations, the inclusion of covariate relationships and parameter correlation between both components of ceftazidime/avibactam leads to fewer patients with discordant pharmacokinetic parameters and results in higher PTA. Consideration of these methodologies should guide future MCS analyses for BL‐BLIC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A daptomycin pharmacodynamic threshold is associated with survival in enterococcal bacteraemia. • The threshold is lower in patients prescribed other antibiotics (e.g. β-lactams) with daptomycin. • Daptomycin doses of 10–12 mg/kg/day (in combination regimens) optimise threshold attainment. Daptomycin is commonly prescribed in combination with other antibiotics for treatment of enterococcal bacteraemia. Whilst a free drug area under the concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (f AUC/MIC) ratio >27.4 is associated with 30-day survival with daptomycin monotherapy, it is unknown whether receipt of other antibiotics affects this threshold. Data were pooled from seven published trials assessing outcomes in daptomycin-treated enterococcal bacteraemia, including patients receiving daptomycin (≥72 h) and any β-lactam, intravenous aminoglycoside, linezolid, tigecycline and/or vancomycin. Exposures were calculated using a published population pharmacokinetic model based on creatinine clearance, 90% protein binding and daptomycin Etest MIC. The f AUC/MIC threshold predictive of 30-day survival was determined by classification and regression tree analysis. Following pooling of data, 240 adults were included; 137 (57.1%) were alive at 30 days. A majority of patients were immunosuppressed (65.8%) and received a β-lactam (94.6%). Examining the threshold in low-acuity patients (n = 135) to control for co-morbidities, these patients were more likely to survive when f AUC/MIC >12.3 was achieved (63.2% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.015). The difference remained significant in a multivariable logistic regression model that controlled for infection source and immunosuppression (P = 0.017). This threshold is 2-fold lower than that observed with daptomycin monotherapy. Probabilities of threshold attainment using a 10 mg/kg/day dose were 100% for isolates with MICs ≤ 2 mg/L and 95.2% for a 12 mg/kg/day dose for MICs of 4 mg/L. These data support the use of high-dose daptomycin in combination with another antibiotic for treatment of enterococcal bacteraemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Currently, there is debate over whether the daptomycin susceptibility breakpoint for enterococci (ie, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤4 mg/L) is appropriate. In bacteremia, observational data support prescription of high doses (>8 mg/kg). However, pharmacodynamic targets associated with positive patient outcomes are undefined. Methods Data were pooled from observational studies that assessed outcomes in daptomycin-treated enterococcal bacteremia. Patients who received an additional antienterococcal antibiotic and/or a β-lactam antibiotic at any time during treatment were excluded. Daptomycin exposures were calculated using a published population pharmacokinetic model. The free drug area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (fAUC/MIC) threshold predictive of survival at 30 days was identified by classification and regression tree analysis and confirmed with multivariable logistic regression. Monte Carlo simulations determined the probability of target attainment (PTA) at clinically relevant MICs. Results Of 114 patients who received daptomycin monotherapy, 67 (58.8%) were alive at 30 days. A fAUC/MIC >27.43 was associated with survival in low-acuity (n = 77) patients (68.9 vs 37.5%, P =.006), which remained significant after adjusting for infection source and immunosuppression (P =.026). The PTA for a 6-mg/kg/day (every 24 hours) dose was 1.5%–5.5% when the MIC was 4 mg/L (ie, daptomycin-susceptible) and 91.0%–97.9% when the MIC was 1 mg/L. Conclusions For enterococcal bacteremia, a daptomycin fAUC/MIC >27.43 was associated with 30-day survival among low-acuity patients. As pharmacodynamics for the approved dose are optimized only when MIC ≤1 mg/L, these data continue to stress the importance of reevaluation of the susceptibility breakpoint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Meropenem exposures from 15 children (8–17 years old) with cystic fibrosis (CF) acute pulmonary exacerbation were analyzed to define the pharmacodynamic threshold required for a positive response. The primary endpoint was the relative increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (↑FEV 1 ) between pre- and posttreatment. Meropenem pharmacodynamic indices ( f T > MIC, f AUC/MIC, f C min /MIC) over the first 24 h were estimated for each participant based on their individual parameter estimates and the isolated pathogen with the highest meropenem MIC. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common pathogen ( n = 11/15). The mean ± SD ↑FEV 1 was 18.8% ± 11.3% posttreatment. The mean (range) f T > MIC exposure was 63% (0–100%). An E max model determined a significant relationship between f T > MIC and ↑FEV 1 ( r 2 = 0.8, P < 0.0004). 65% f T > MIC was a significant predictor of response; the median (25th, 75th %) ↑FEV 1 was 28.5% (22.2%, 31.7%) in those patients who achieved above 65% f T > MIC and 7.8% (1.1%, 12.6%) in those at or below 65% f T > MIC ( P = 0.001). This is the first study in CF children to link meropenem exposure with a positive response as measured by ↑FEV 1 . Larger studies are required to confirm this exposure threshold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic exposure of piperacillin/tazobactam across the renal function range using 4.5 or 3.375 g dosing regimens. Methods: A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to determine the probability of achieving 50% free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) for piperacillin. Proposed regimens, using solely 4.5 or 3.375 g strengths, were compared with regimens listed in piperacillin/tazobactam prescribing information over creatinine clearance (CrCl) ranges of 120 mL/min to hemodialysis. The probability of target attainment (PTA) at MICs ≤ 16 μg/mL was compared between proposed and standard regimens. Results: At CrCl 41 to 120 mL/min, prolonged infusions of 4.5 g (3 hours) and 3.375 g (4 hours) every 6 hours resulted in ≥95% PTA versus ≥76% for standard regimens (0.5 hour). At CrCl 20 to 40 mL/min, 4.5 and 3.375 g every 8 hours as prolonged infusions achieved slightly higher PTA (≥98%) versus standard regimens (≥93%). Similarly, PTA achieved with prolonged infusions of 4.5 and 3.375 g every 12 hours (≥93%) was comparable with those of standard regimens (≥91%) at CrCl 1 to 19 mL/min. In hemodialysis, 100% PTA was achieved with prolonged infusion regimens. Conclusion: Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens designed around the 4.5 or 3.375 g dose and prolonged infusions provided similar or better PTA at MICs ≤ 16 μg/mL compared with standard regimens. These observations may support the stocking and use of a single piperacillin/tazobactam strength to simplify dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to assess linezolid pharmacokinetics in the plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of patients with sepsis, diabetic foot infections or cystic fibrosis and healthy volunteers. The impacts of joint characteristics and disease on plasma and target-site exposure were to be identified together with the benefit of dose intensification in critically ill patients.Methods: Rich plasma (n = 1598) and ISF concentrations in subcutaneous adipose (n = 1430) and muscle tissue (n = 1089) measured by microdialysis were pooled from three clinical trials with 51 individuals receiving 600 mg of intravenous and oral linezolid. All data were analysed simultaneously by a population approach also considering methodological aspects of microdialysis. The impact of covariates on the attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, AUC/MIC = 100 (area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration) and fT>MIC = 99 % (time that unbound concentrations exceed the MIC), was assessed by deterministic and Monte Carlo simulations.Results: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with nonlinear elimination and tissue distribution factors accounting for differences between plasma and ISF concentrations adequately predicted all measurements. Clearance (CL) was highest in septic patients (11.2 L/h vs. CLHealthy/CLCystic fibrosis/CLDiabetic = 7.67/6.87/6.35 L/h). Penetration into subcutaneous adipose ISF was lowest in diabetic patients (-34.9 % compared with healthy volunteers). Creatinine clearance and total body weight further impacted linezolid exposure. To achieve timely efficacious therapy, front-loaded dosing and continuous infusion seemed beneficial in septic patients.Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that after standard linezolid doses, particularly patients with sepsis and conserved renal function are at risk of not attaining pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and would benefit from initial dose intensification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gram-negative organisms are an increasing source of concern within the healthcare setting due to their common presence as a cause of infection and emerging resistance to current therapies. However, current antimicrobial dosing recommendations may be insufficient for the treatment of gram-negative infections. Applying knowledge of an antibiotic’s pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile when designing a dosing regimen leads to a greater likelihood of achieving optimal exposure, including against gram-negative pathogens with higher MICs. Additionally, administering antibiotics directly to the site of infection, such as via aerosolization for pneumonia, is another method to achieve optimized drug exposure at the site of infection. Incorporating these treatment strategies into clinical practice will assist antimicrobial stewardship programs in successfully treating gram-negative infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Cefepime trough concentrations >22 mg/L (T >22 ) have been associated with neurotoxicity in a single study. Patients and methods Neurotoxicity outcomes for 28 cefepime-treated adult patients with febrile neutropenia were abstracted from the literature. The precision of T >22 to predict neurotoxicity was quantified using 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-two cefepime-treated patients contributed serum concentrations for a pharmacokinetic model, fit using the Nonparametric Adaptive Grid algorithm within the Pmetrics package for R. Concentration-time curves were simulated for common dosing schemes and 3 renal dispositions. Probabilities of neurotoxicity and numbers needed to harm were calculated from simulations according to the proposed pharmacokinetic/toxicodynamic threshold of T >22 . Bayesian modeling was utilized to explore other pharmacokinetic parameters relationships with neurotoxicity. Results The mean probability of neurotoxicity at T >22 was 51.4% (95% CI: 16.4–85.0%). Among the schemes and renal dispositions simulated, the combination of cefepime 2 g every 8 h and a creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min produced the greatest probability of neurotoxicity (48.3%). Estimated numbers needed to harm according to T >22 ranged from 2.1 to 18.5 persons. Explorations of maximal serum concentration and area under the curve demonstrated high levels of collinearity, making it impossible to identify trough concentrations as the driver of neurotoxicity. Discussion T >22 had low precision as a predictive neurotoxic threshold. When a neurotoxic threshold of T >22 was assumed, projected neurotoxicity rates and numbers needed to harm greatly exceeded observed neurotoxicity rates in the general population and in high risk subpopulations. Other drug exposure metrics should be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Meropenem is frequently used to treat pulmonary exacerbations in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the USA. Prolonged-infusion meropenem improves the time that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT> MIC) in adults, but data in CF children are sparse. We describe the population pharmacokinetics, tolerability and treatment burden of prolonged-infusion meropenem in CF children.Methods: Thirty children aged 6-17 years with a pulmonary exacerbation received 40 mg/kg meropenem every 8 h; each dose was administered as a 3 h infusion. Pharmacokinetics were determined using population methods in Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulation was employed to compare 0.5 with 3 h infusions to estimate the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) at 40% fT> MIC. NCT#01429259.Results: A two-compartment model fitted the data best with clearance and volume predicted by body weight. Clearance and volume of the central compartment were 0.41 ± 0.23 L/h/kg and 0.30 ± 0.17 L/kg, respectively. Half-life was 1.11 ± 0.38 h. At MICs of 1, 2 and 4 mg/L, PTAs for the 0.5 h infusion were 87.6%, 70.1% and 35.4%, respectively. The prolonged infusion increased PTAs to >99% for these MICs and achieved 82.8% at 8 mg/L. Of the 30 children, 18 (60%) completed treatment with prolonged infusion; 5 did so at home without any reported burden. Nine patients were changed to a 0.5 h infusion when discharged home.Conclusions: In these CF children, meropenem clearance was greater compared with published values from non-CF children. Prolonged infusion provided an exposure benefit against pathogens with MICs ≥1 mg/L, was well tolerated and was feasible to administer in the hospital and home settings, the latter depending on perception and family schedule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Given the sparse antibiotic pipeline and the increasing prevalence of resistant organisms, efforts should be made to optimise the pharmacodynamic exposure of currently available agents. Prolonging the infusion duration is a strategy used to increase the percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC), the pharmacodynamic efficacy driver for time-dependent antibiotics such as β-lactams. β-Lactams, the most commonly prescribed class of antibiotics owing to their efficacy and safety profile, have been the mainstay of therapy since the discovery of penicillin over 60 years ago. Mounting evidence, including the use of population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulation, suggests that prolonging the infusion time of β-lactam antibiotics may have advantages over standard infusion techniques, including an enhanced probability of achieving requisite fT>MIC exposures, lower mortality and potentially reductions in infection/antibiotic-related costs. As a result of these favourable attributes, clinical practice guidelines support the use of prolonged-infusion β-lactams in the treatment of many severe infections. This article discusses the rationale and evidence for prolonging the infusion of β-lactam antibiotics and provides guidance for the implementation of a prolonged-infusion programme. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives Multidrug resistance is common among Acinetobacter baumannii, limiting the available options used to treat infections caused by this organism. The objective of this study was to compare monotherapy and combination therapy with ampicillin/sulbactam, doripenem and tigecycline against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Methods Human free-drug concentration profiles of clinically relevant ampicillin/sulbactam, doripenem and tigecycline were simulated alone and in two-drug combinations against four clinical A. baumannii isolates (MICs: ampicillin/sulbactam, 4/2–64/32 mg/L; doripenem, 16 to ≥64 mg/L; and tigecycline, 1–4 mg/L) over 24 h. Microbiological response was measured as log10 cfu/mL and the area under the bactericidal curve (AUBC). Results Control strains grew to 7.11 ± 0.13 log10 cfu/mL. Except for ampicillin/sulbactam-containing regimens against the single ampicillin/sulbactam-susceptible isolate, all A. baumannii demonstrated regrowth to 24 h control levels against all mono and combination regimens. Using AUBC as an endpoint, the most active regimens were 9 g of ampicillin/sulbactam every 8 h (3 h infusion) + 2 g of doripenem every 8 h (4 h infusion; 87.8 ± 21.0), 9 g of ampicillin/sulbactam every 8 h (3 h infusion) + 200 mg of tigecycline every 12 h (30 min infusion; 100.6 ± 33.0) and 9 g of ampicillin/sulbactam every 8 h (3 h infusion) monotherapy (116.7 ± 31.6), followed by 3 g of ampicillin/sulbactam every 6 h (30 min infusion) + 200 mg of tigecycline every 12 h (30 min infusion; 134.0 ± 31.5) and 2 g of doripenem every 8 h (4 h infusion) + 200 mg of tigecycline every 12 h (30 min infusion; 142.7 ± 16.9). Conclusions Although specific combination regimens displayed additive activity at aggressive doses against these multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, none of the regimens could maintain cfu reductions against the more resistant isolates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective To compare ertapenem pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability when administered as a rapid 5-minute infusion to the standard 30-minute infusion. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic study. Setting Clinical research center. Subjects Twelve healthy adult volunteers. Intervention Each subject received ertapenem 1 g intravenously, administered either as a rapid 5-minute infusion or the standard 30-minute infusion, every 24 hours for 3 days (first phase); after a 4-day washout period, each subject then received the other infusion every 24 hours for 3 days (second phase). Measurements and Main Results Plasma samples were collected after the first and third (steady-state) doses of each study phase, and protein binding was assessed by use of ultrafiltration. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using noncompartmental and compartmental methods. A 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the probability of target attainment for free drug concentration remaining above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 40% or greater of the dosing interval (40% fT > MIC) over an MIC range. Ertapenem was well tolerated and adverse events were similar for both infusions. The ertapenem steady-state mean ± SD maximum concentrations were 193.3 ± 43.3 and 165.7 ± 20.4 mg/L for the 5- and 30-minute infusions, respectively; the mean ± SD areas under the concentration-time curves from 0-24 hours were 561.2 ± 77.0 and 531.3 ± 56.9 μg · hr/ml (geometric mean ratio 1.008, 90% confidence interval 0.999-1.017), respectively. Protein binding was concentration dependent (range 87.9-98.9%). A two-compartment model best described ertapenem pharmacokinetics with the following parameter estimates: clearance 1.89 ± 0.19 L/hr, volume of central compartment 5.04 ± 0.56 L, and transfer constants k12 0.43 ± 0.08/hr and k21 0.44 ± 0.07/hr. The probabilities of target attainment for 5- and 30-minute infusions were 97.0% and 97.9% at an MIC of 0.25 mg/L and 1.7% and 2.8% at an MIC of 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Conclusion Ertapenem administered as a rapid 5-minute infusion provides a well tolerated, bioequivalent, and pharmacodynamically equivalent regimen to the 30-minute infusion at clinically relevant MICs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Selected i.v. antimicrobials were evaluated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from U.S. hospitals to predict the likelihood of achieving maximal bactericidal activity. Methods. The pharmacodynamic profiles of ceftazidime, doripenem, imipenem-cilastatin, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin.tazobactam were simulated for 5000 adult patients using pharmacokinetic data from infected patients with the minimum inhibitory concentrations of 6142 P. aeruginosa isolates in U.S. hospitals collected during 2009. The probability of achieving bactericidal activity in this population, referred to as the cumulative fraction of response (CFR), was calculated for each antimicrobial. An optimal regimen was defined as achieving a CFR of .90%. Results. The majority of isolates were collected from male inpatients who were not in an intensive care unit (ICU) and were over age 65 years. Standard dosing for all antimicrobials failed to achieve optimal CFRs, regardless of hospital location. While high-dose prolonged infusions improved the CFRs for the β-lactams, optimal exposures were only attained by doripenem (2 g every 8 hours infused over 1 hour; 0.5-2 g every 8 hours infused over 4 hours) and meropenem (2 g every 8 hours infused over 0.5 and 3 hours) for all isolates. Non-ICU isolates had approximately 5-10% higher CFRs compared with those collected in the ICU. Lower-respiratory-tract isolates had a lower predicted CFR than did isolates from the blood and skin or wounds. Conclusion. Simulated pharmacodynamic profiles of i.v. antimicrobials commonly used to treat P. aeruginosa indicated that higher dosages and prolonged infusion times are needed to achieve optimal exposure for bactericidal activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resistant Gram-positive infections present serious challenges to patients and providers who care for them. Ceftaroline is a novel advanced-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against many pathogens. Recently, ceftaroline was approved by FDA for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Like other cephalosporins, ceftaroline has predictable pharmacokinetics and is primarily renally excreted, increasing the ease of dosing. Ceftaroline has demonstrated activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae as well as common respiratory Gram-negatives including Haemophilus, Moraxella, and Klebsiella species. During clinical trials, ceftaroline demonstrated noninferiority to vancomycin plus aztreonam for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (now called ABSSSIs) and ceftriaxone for the treatment of CABP. Ceftaroline was well tolerated in clinical trials with gastrointestinal side effects being the most common adverse event. Ceftaroline's unique spectrum of activity and ease of dosing based on renal function make it a unique addition to the clinician's armamentarium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective. To determine hospital costs associated with the use of a clinical pathway implemented in our intensive care units (ICUs) to optimize antibiotic regimen selection for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared with costs in a historical control group treated according to prescriber preference. Design. Retrospective cost analysis from the hospital perspective. Setting. Single, tertiary-care medical center. Patients. One hundred sixty-six adults with VAP from the medical, surgical, and neurotrauma ICUs (73 historical control patients [2004-2005] and 93 patients given an empiric antibiotic clinical pathway for VAP 12006-2007]). Measurements and Main Results. The VAP clinical pathway consisted of an ICU-specific three-drug regimen that considered local minimum inhibitory concentration distributions and a pharmacodynamically optimized dosing strategy, Hospital cost data were collected and inflated to 2007 according to the consumer price index. The VAP-related length of treatment, hospitalization costs, and antibiotic costs were compared between groups. The median VAP length of treatment was 24 days (interquartile range [IQR] 13-35 days] and 11 days (IQR 7-17 days) for historical and clinical pathway groups, respectively (p<0.001). Daily hospital costs were similar for both cohorts over the first 7 days, after which costs declined significantly for patients treated with the clinical pathway (p<0.001). When controlling for baseline differences between groups and length of stay before development of VAP, patients treated with the clinical pathway had shorter lengths of ICU stay after VAP, shorter total hospital lengths of stay after VAP, and lower hospital costs after the treatment of VAP. Median total antibiotic costs for individual patients were similar between groups ($535 [IQR $261-998] vs $482 [IQR $222-985] clinical pathway vs control, p=0.45), and the proportion of VAP hospital resources consumed by antibiotics for both groups was low. Conclusion. Although aggressive dosing of more costly antibiotics was empirically prescribed using the clinical pathway, patients in this group exhibited a shorter duration of treatment, reduced hospital length of stay after VAP, and lower hospital costs without any significant increase in antibiotic expenditures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a disease marked by repeated acute pulmonary exacerbations of infections, often caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. As antibiotic susceptibility declines, dose optimization must be considered to provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposure. We report three cases of CF exacerbations in adults caused by multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa and B. cepacia. Each case required dosing strategies greater than currently recognized in package inserts: meropenem 3000mg every 8h (3-hour infusion) and doripenem 2000mg every 8h (4-hour infusion). Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated that targeted pharmacodynamic exposures were achieved against most of the organisms, resulting in clinical improvements despite laboratory reported resistance. The high-dose, prolonged infusion regimens were well tolerated demonstrating that pharmacodynamically optimized carbapenem regimens may be used safely and effectively in patients with limited conventional treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Because of the high frequency of multidrug resistant bacteria in our intensive care units (ICUs), we implemented a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) clinical pathway based on unit-specific minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and pharmacodynamic modeling in 3 of our ICUs. Methods: This was a prospective, observational evaluation with a historical control group in adult patients (n = 168) who met clinical and radiologic criteria for VAP. Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine antibiotic regimens having the greatest likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposures against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic regimens were incorporated into an ICU-specific computerized clinical pathway as empiric agents of choice. Results: Pharmacodynamic modeling found 3-hour infusions of cefepime 2 g every 8 hours or meropenem 2 g every 8 hours plus tobramycin and vancomycin would provide the greatest probability of empirically treating VAP in these ICUs. Infection-related mortality was reduced by 69% (8.5% vs 21.6%; P = .029), infection-related length of stay was shorter (11.7 ± 8.1 vs 26.1 ± 18.5; P < .001), and fewer superinfections were observed in patients treated on the pathway. A number of patients with nonsusceptible P aeruginosa were successfully treated with high-dose, 3-hour infusion regimens. Conclusions: In our ICUs where multidrug resistant bacteria are common, an approach considering ICU-specific antibiotic MICs coupled with pharmacodynamic dosing strategies resulted in improved outcomes and shorter duration of treatments. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The pharmacodynamic characteristics of antibiotics should be considered when choosing empiric dosage regimens for the treatment of pneumonia. Objective: This study compared the probabilities of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic exposure (ie, f T > MIC, AUC/MIC) for antibiotics given for the empiric treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) as recommended by the 2005 guidelines of the American Thoracic Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Methods: In a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation, pharmacodynamic analyses were performed for standard doses of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Prolonged 3-hour infusion regimens were also evaluated for anti-pseudomonal β-lactams. MIC data were incorporated from the 2007 Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection, a national surveillance study. The weighted cumulative fraction of response (wCFR) against common pneumonia pathogens was determined for each regimen. A second scenario was conducted by altering the pathogen prevalence to assess wCFR for late-onset pneumonia (ie, HAP in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation). Optimal wCFR was defined a priori as ≥90%. Results: Among the 0.5-hour infusions, cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem had the highest wCFRs (≥90%) against pathogens that cause HAP (cefepime, 1 g q8h, 92.8%; 2 g q8h, 97.2%; 2 g q12h, 94.3%; ceftazidime, 2 g q8h, 93.2%; meropenem, 1 g q8h, 90.9%; 2 g q8h, 93.9%). Imipenem (500 mg q6h, 85.5%; 1 g q8h, 88.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g q6h, 80.5%) as 0.5-hour infusions were nearly optimal, whereas ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and the fluoroquinolones had the lowest wCFR values. All regimens showed lower wCFRs for late-onset pneumonia than for HAP. Optimal wCFRs were found only with prolonged (3-hour) infusions of 2 g q8h for ceftazidime (94.5%) and meropenem (90.1%), whereas cefepime 2 g q8h achieved optimal wCFR with both a 0.5-hour infusion (93.1%) and a 3-hour infusion (95.3%). Conclusions: Results of this model suggest that standard doses of most antipseudomonal β-lactams (cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem) had high probabilities of achieving optimal pharmacodynamic exposure as empiric therapy for HAP, whereas the low probabilities predicted from ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and the fluoroquinolones suggest that these agents would be inappropriate as monotherapy. For late-onset HAP, prolonged infusions of cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem offered the highest probabilities of achieving bactericidal exposure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Treatment of infections caused by gram-negative bacilli is increasingly challenging because of emerging resistance. Current surveillance data are informative, but may not discern differences by infection site and clinical setting, and do not incorporate pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics when determining susceptibility. Objectives: This study explored the differences in infection site and clinical setting and evaluated dose-optimization strategies using PD principles. The stud focused only on systemic isolates, and targeted a cohort of 40 hospitals in the United States with a nationwide geographic distribution. Methods: Nonduplicate, nonurine isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 937) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1044) collected from adult patients at 40 US hospitals underwent MIC testing by broth microdilution to 15 agents. Results were analyzed by infection site and unit type (ward or intensive care unit [ICU]). PD modeling employing Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the microbiologic success of varying dosing strategies. Results: E coli were highly susceptible except to fluoroquinolones; 6.8% were multidrug resistant (MDR) and were more likely in ICUs (risk ratio [RR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6–4.0). P aeruginosa displayed ≤86% susceptibility for all agents; MICs differed significantly by site of infection (P < 0.05). Isolates were 9.2%MDR (less likely in wound infections [RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3–0.9]). PD simulations predicted results similar to breakpoint-derived susceptibilities for both species, with notable exceptions of piperacillin/tazobactam and fluoroquinolones, which underpredicted susceptibility by as much as 20%. Prolonged (3 hours) or continuous infusion regimens of β-lactams appeared to improve drug exposure. Conclusions: These data suggest that susceptibility of E coli to commonly used antibiotics remains high (>90% for most drug classes), with the important exception of the fluoroquinolones; however, susceptibility of P aeruginosa is low enough to warrant concern. Attention to the source of the organism and the patient''s location in an ICU or a ward—combined with knowledge of local epidemiology and PD principles-—should prove valuable in empiric agent selection. Additionally, reassessment of breakpoints employing PD principles is recommended, particularly for fluoroquinolones and piperacillin/tazobactam. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

objective: To define contemporary levels of resistance of Haemophilus influenzae to antibacteriais commonly used to treat children for bacterial respiratory infections, and to assess the probability of achieving the requisite pharmacodynamic exposures for regimens against recent respiratory H, influenzae isolates using Monte Carlo simulation. Methods: 233 H. influenzae isolates obtained from pediatrie outpatients with acute otitis media (n = 55), sinusitis (n = 58), or lower respiratory tract infections ( n = 120) from 1 November 2004 to 30 April 2005 were characterized for β-lactamase production and susceptibility to a panel of 10 β-lactam antimicrobials, 5000 concentration-time profiles were simulated for US FDA-approved doses of oral amoxicillin, amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, ceftibuten, and cefuroxime using pharmacokinetics and weights of 5-year old male children. The probability of attaining free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 50% of the dosing interval (50%/r>MIC) was assessed for each regimen against this population of H. influenzae. Results: β-Lactamase production was demonstrated in 67 (28,8%) of the H, influenzae isolates and varied by isolation site (38% acute otitis media, 36% sinusitis, and 21% lower respiratory tract infections). Regarding susceptibility, the rank order of the tested antimicrobials was ceftriaxone = cefixime (100%) > cefpodoxime (99,6%) > ceftibuten = amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (99,1 %) > cefdinir (98,7%) > cefuroxime (97,4%) > cefprozil (93,1%) > cefaclor (92,3%) > amoxicillin (63,1%), The most active agents based on pharmacodynamic assessment (50%/r>MIC) were cefpodoxime (98,9%), ceftibuten (95,3%), and high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (90,4%), Several amoxicillin regimens also achieved a high likelihood of pharmacodynamic target attainment (91,8- 98,6%) when β-lactamase-positive strains were excluded from the analysis. Conclusion: Against H. influenzae, the antibacteriais most likely to achieve optimal in vivo exposures in children are cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the probability of oral ß-lactam regimens achieving bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposure against pathogens causing acute otitis media (AOM) given contemporary prevalence and resistance rates. METHODS: A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was used to recreate steady-state concentration-time profiles for oral drug administration regimens of amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, ceftibuten, and cefuroxime in a population of 12.5-month-old children. The percent of simulated children in whom free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 50% of the drug administration interval (50% f T>MIC) were achieved was determined; 180 middle ear fluid isolates (56 Haemophilus influenzae and 124 Streptococcus pneumoniae) collected during the 2004 Global Respiratory Antimicrobial Surveillance Project (GRASP) were used. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated and weighted against the prevalence of organisms causing AOM extrapolated from the literature. The contribution of a ‘Pollyanna phenomenon’ for each organism was also incorporated to estimate clinical effectiveness. RESULTS: Against S. pneumoniae isolates, amoxicillin 30 mg/kg every 8 hours (84.7%) achieved the greatest CFR followed by amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and the other amoxicillin-based regimens. Against H. influenzae isolates, cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid each achieved a CFR of >90%. When weighted by the prevalence of AOM-causing pathogens, CFR was highest for cefpodoxime (87.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (85.7%), and amoxicillin 30 mg/kg every 8 hours (70.8%). The contribution of a ‘Pollyanna phenomenon’ increased the probability of clinical effectiveness for all agents, with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (90.2%) and cefpodoxime (90.1%) having the highest weighted CFR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the recent epidemiologic and resistance profiles of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (45 mg/kg every 12 hours) and cefpodoxime (5 mg/kg every 12 hours) provide the greatest likelihood of achieving optimal pharmacodynamic exposures empirically in children with AOM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective. To compare conventional intermittent dosing regimens of piperacillin-tazobactam with prolonged and continuous infusions to determine the optimal dosing scheme against a local Pseudomonas aeruginosa population. Design. Pharmacodynamic Monte Carlo simulation model. Data Source. Microbiologic data from 470 consecutive nonduplicate P. aeruginosa isolates collected from a single institution over 6 months in 2006. Patients. Five thousand simulated surgical patients and patients with neutropenia. Measurements and Main Results. We simulated serum concentration-time profiles at steady state for several piperacillin-tazobactam dosing regimens, including intermittent, prolonged, and continuous infusions. The probability of achieving 50% free time above the MIC against 470 P. aeruginosa isolates was calculated. The cumulative fractions of response for the intermittent-infusion regimens were 74.7% (3.375 g every 6 hrs), 79.9% (4.5 g every 6 hrs), and 85.6% (3.375 g every 4 hrs). For prolongedinfusion regimens, the cumulative fractions of response were 83.3% (3.375 g every 8 hrs, 4-hr infusion), 87.1% (4.5 g every 8 hrs, 4-hr infusion), and 89.6% (4.5 g every 6 hrs, 3-hr infusion). For continuous-infusion regimens, the cumulative fractions of response were 82.3% (10.125 g), 86.5% (13.5 g), 89.2% (18 g), 90.0% (20.25 g), and 90.6% (22.5 g). Conclusion. Both prolonged- and continuous-infusion strategies improved the pharmacodynamics of piperacillin-tazobactam over those of traditional 30-minute intermittent-infusion regimens. Prolonged- and continuousinfusion regimens that contained the same daily doses of piperacillin had similar likelihoods of bactericidal exposure. Thus, the selection of dosing strategy depends on the availability of intravenous access versus the convenience of once-daily administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Although pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling is now being considered for decision support for susceptibility breakpoint determination against Gram-negative bacteria, these PD-derived breakpoints should be verified using a clinically applicable population of organisms. In this analysis, a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine PD breakpoints, the highest 2-fold MIC in which the probability of bactericidal target attainment (PTA) remained ≥90%. Percent susceptibilities for 639 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 103 Acinetobacter baumannii, 705 Escherichia coli, and 418 Klebsiella spp. collected during the 2004 Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection surveillance study were then defined according to the PD-derived breakpoint (%S PD) and compared with the current Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined breakpoints (%S CLSI). %S PD and %S CLSI were compared with the bactericidal PTA for each pathogen population to determine the degree of agreement. Resulting PD breakpoints were drug and dose dependent; moreover, values were commonly 2 to 4 MIC dilutions lower than CLSI breakpoints. Overall, %S PD more closely agreed with the PTA for the tested β-lactam and fluoroquinolone dosing regimens. In contrast, %S CLSI overestimated PTA for many dosing regimens, especially against Pseudomonas: piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g qid (+9.7%), ciprofloxacin 0.4 g bid (+13.7%) and 0.4 g tid (+9.3%), and levofloxacin 0.5 g every 24 h (+22.4%) and 0.75 g every 24 h (+9.9%). Differences were most pronounced against the nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria and were not observed among the Enterobacteriaceae. As a result, a new method of breakpoint classification is proposed, which is dosing regimen and pathogen specific, and is designed to denote isolates as susceptible only if target bactericidal exposures are achievable with the dosing regimen selected. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background:: Inappropriate antibiotic therapy (ie, the selection of an empiric agent without activity against the responsible pathogen) of secondary peritonitis may result in poor patient outcomes. The selection of an appropriate agent can be challenging because of the emerging resistance of target organisms to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Objective:: The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacodynamic analysis, using recent global surveillance data, of commonly prescribed antibiotic agents and a newer agent, tigecycline, indicated in 2005 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, to determine their probability for achieving microbiologic success against aerobic bacteria associated with secondary peritonitis. Methods:: A 2-compartment model was constructed using pharmacokinetic data from critically ill patients and global surveillance data on MIC distributions for microorganisms encountered in secondary peritonitis. A Monte Carlo simulation of the modeled data was performed to determine drug-appropriate pharmacodynamic end points, including free-drug time above the MIC, steady-state concentration above the MIC, and AUC/MIC ratios. A cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against aerobic bacteria involved in secondary peritonitis was calculated for cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, levofloxacin, pip eracillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. A CFR ≥90% was considered microbiologic success. The following treatment regimens, administered as 30-minute N infusions, were examined: cefepime 1 and 2 g q12h, ceftazidime 1 and 2 g q8h, ceftriaxone 1 and 2 g q24h, imipenem 500 mg q6h, levofloxacin 750 mg q24h, pip eracillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h, and tigecycline 50 mg q12h, after a loading dose of 100 mg. Results:: A CFR ≥90% against nonenterococcal bacteria was predicted for imipenem 500 mg q6h (96.8%), cefepime 2 and 1 g q12h (95.3% and 92.4%, respectively), ceftazidime 2 g q8h (94.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h (91.2%). A CFR of 84.5% was predicted for tigecycline 50 mg q12h. Ceftriaxone and levofloxacin were predicted to have a CFR <80%. When enterococci were included in the model, the predicted CFRs for imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline were 93.4%, 88.4%, and 86.7%, respectively. Conclusions:: MIC distribution and pathogen prevalence strongly influence the likelihood of microbiological success in secondary peritonitis; therefore, decisions regarding empiric therapy should consider local epidemiology. Using current global data, the following regimens are adequate choices if Enterococcus is not targeted: Combination therapy (with metronidazole) using cefepime 1 g or 2 g q12h, or ceftazidime 2 g q8h; or monotherapy with imipenem 500 mg q6h or piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h. When Enterococcus is included in the epidemiologic mix, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline all appear to be viable monotherapeutic choices. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Objective: This study was designed to compare cefepime exposures with microbiological outcomes in ESBL and non-ESBL infections and determine the pharmacodynamic profiles associated with successful outcome. Methods: Cefepime pharmacodynamic exposures of unbound drug [time above MIC (fT>MIC), minimal concentration over MIC (fCmin/MIC), and area under the curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC)] for 18 patients with ESBL and non-ESBL infections were determined by using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify pharmacodynamic breakpoints that predicted eradication. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo Simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment for the goal pharmacodynamic exposures. Results: Eradication was 80% when fT>MIC was 50% compared with 0% when T>MIC was less than 50% (p <0.05). The median fCmin/MIC ratio for ESBL group was statistically lower than that for the non-ESBL group (1.54 versus 138, p <0.001). Regardless of ESBL production, all pathogens were eradicated when fCmin/MIC>7.6 and only 33.3% were eradicated when fCmin/MIC≤7.6 (p <0.05). Pharmacodynamic exposures of 50% fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC>1654 were also predictive of eradication. While conventional dosage regimens of 2g q 12h and q 8h failed to achieve adequate target attainment, 4g continuous infusion and 2g q 6–8h prolonged infusion could attain more than 90% of target attainment at the MIC of 2μg/ml for the breakpoint of fCmin/MIC=7.6. Conclusion: Microbiological eradication in patients receiving cefepime was best predicted by fCmin/MIC ratio greater than 7.6 regardless of the presence of an ESBL. Continuous or prolonged infusion regimens provided the greatest probability of attaining this exposure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Hospital formulary decisions regarding antibiotics are typically made based on the comparative efficacy, safety, and pricing of these agents. Comparative efficacy studies, when available, usually demonstrate equivalence of antibiotics, making it difficult for formulary decision-makers to compare compounds. We propose using the results of pharmacodynamic Monte Carlo simulation studies as a surrogate marker for potential efficacy of antibiotic dosage regimens and applying these end points to the calculation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Monte Carlo simulation studies consider the antibiotic dosage regimen used, the drug's pharmacokinetics, and the level of susceptibility or resistance of targeted bactena to arrive at a cumulative fraction of response (CFR), the probability that a specific antibiotic dosage regimen will achieve bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures against the bacterial population of interest, It is assumed that the ability to obtain this exposure will result in a positive clinical response. In this article, we present examples of applying CFR during ICER analyses to compare cefepime with ceftazidime and meropenem with imipenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In the absence of comparative clinical trial data, incorporation of pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to calculate the ICER can serve as a useful tool to pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees during the formulary review process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective. To determine the likelihood that antibiotic regimens achieve bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures against common nosocomial pathogens. Design. Pharmacodynamic Monte Carlo simulation model. Data Source. Microbiologic data generated from isolates from the 14 centers in the United States in the 2004 Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) surveillance study. Patients. Five thousand simulated patients with infection. Measurements and Main Results. Pharmacokinetic profiles of the patients were simulated to determine the bactericidal cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for commonly used intravenous regimens of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella species. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin had CFRs among the lowest of all drugs against all pathogens, especially P. aeruginosa (40.4-65.5%) and A. baumannii (43.6-48.2%). The low CFR of about 78% against E. coli with these two agents was of particular concern. Among the β-lactams, only high-dose cefepime and ceftazidime regimens achieved CFRs of greater than 90% against P. aeruginosa, followed by cefepime 2 g every 12 hours and the carbapenems (86.3-89.7%). No regimen achieved an optimum CFR for A. baumannii. All β-lactam regimens achieved a greater-than-90% likelihood of having bactericidal CFRs against Enterobacteriaceae. Conclusion. Because of the continual evolution of resistance among gram-negative bacteria in the United States, reevaluation of optimum dosing strategies for β-lactam and fluoroquinolone antibiotics is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The pharmacodynamic potency of imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates was investigated. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination, confirmation of ESBLs by Etest and the disk approximation test were performed for 133 ESBL-producing isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. Pharmacodynamic exposure, measured as percent of the dosing interval during which free drug was above the MIC (% fT>MIC), was modelled via a 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation. Bactericidal cumulative fraction of response (CFR), defined as 40% fT>MIC, was calculated against each bacterial population. All agents achieved high bactericidal CFR against all ESBL isolates as a group, but ertapenem (96.26%) was slightly less effective than imipenem (99.96%) and meropenem (99.90%) (P <0.05). Similar results were observed against Klebsiella spp. only (P <0.05). Against E. coli, CFRs were close to 100%. Ertapenem is probably an effective agent against ESBL-producing bacteria, although its ability to achieve bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures will depend on the bacterial susceptibility. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The objectives of this study were to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model using patient data and use it to explore alternative dosage regimens that could optimize the currently used dosing regimen to achieve higher likelihood of pharmacodynamic exposure against pathogenic bacteria. We gathered concentration data from 79 patients (ages 18-93 years) who received meropenem 0.5, 1, or 2 g over 0.5-or 3-hour infusion every 8 hours. Meropenem population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM program. A 2-compartment model fit the data best. Creatinine clearance, age, and body weight were the most significant covariates to affect meropenem pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to mimic the concentrationtime profiles while 1 g meropenem was administrated via infusion over 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours. The 3-hour prolonged infusion improved the likelihood of obtaining both bacteriostatic and bactericidal exposures most notably at the current susceptibility breakpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Monte Carlo simulation is often used to predict the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for antibiotics, but the relevance of these predictions to outcomes in humans has not been well studied. We compared the CFR for meropenem 500mg every 8h against pathogens causing complicated skin and skin structure infections from a randomised, multicentre clinical trial with clinical response (CR) and microbiological response (MR). A population pharmacokinetic model was utilised to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters for 96 clinically evaluable patients with pathogen and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data available. A 1000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was performed to estimate bacteriostatic (20% of time serum concentration above the MIC (T >MIC)) and bactericidal (40% T >MIC) exposures for comparison. Only the bactericidal CFR versus the CR was not statistically different (92% CR versus 91.9% CFR; 95% confidence interval of the difference, −7.7% to 4.2%), whilst bacteriostatic CFRs overestimated actual CR and MR. This study demonstrates that the use of Monte Carlo simulation to predict the CR of meropenem in complicated skin and skin structures is accurate. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Evolving antimicrobial resistance is of global concern. The impact of decreased susceptibility to current antibacterials coupled with the decline in the marketing of new agents with novel mechanisms of action places a tremendous burden on clinicians to appropriately use available agents. Optimising antibacterial dose administration through the use of pharmacodynamic principles can aid clinicians in accomplishing this task more effectively. Methods to achieve this include: continuous or prolonged infusion, or the use of smaller doses administered more frequently for the time-dependent β-lactam agents; or higher, less frequent dose administration of the concentration-dependent aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. Pharmacodynamic breakpoints, which are predictive of clinical and/or microbiological success in the treatment of infection, have been determined for many classes of antibacterials, including the fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and β-lactams. Although surpassing these values may predict efficacy, it may not prevent the development of resistance. Recent studies seek to determine the pharmacodynamic breakpoints that prevent the development of resistance. Numerous studies to this point have determined these values in fluoroquinolones in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. However, among the other antibacterial classes, there is a lack of sufficient data. Additionally, a new term, the mutant prevention concentration, has been based on the concentrations above which resistance is unlikely to occur. Future work is needed to fully characterise these target concentrations that prevent resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background:: Assessing the likelihood of achievingbactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with intravenous antimicrobial regimens would provide insights into the selection of empiric therapy in the pediatric population. Objective:: The objective of this study was to usepharmacodynamic modeling to determine the likelihood of various pediatric antibiotic regimens achieving bactericidal exposures against P aeruginosa in children. Methods:: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for meropenem (20 and 40 mg/kg q8h), imipenem (15 and 25 mg/kg q6h), ceftazidime (50 mg/kg q8h), cefepime (50 mg/kg q8h), and pip eracillin/tazobactam (75 mg/kg q6h) against P aeruginosa isolates from 2 pediatric institutions. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was performed to predict attainment of pharmacodynamic targets against P aeruginosa for each of these regimens in a population of 10-year-olds. Optimal regimens were defined as those that had a ≥90% likelihood of attaining target exposures. Results:: At institution 1, high-dose imipenem, high-dose meropenem, and ceftazidime achieved bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures (likelihood of target attainment: 94%, 92%, and 92%, respectively). No other regimen was associated with a high probability of attaining bactericidal exposure (low-dose imipenem, 87%; cefepime, 85%; low-dose meropenem, 84%; piperacillin/tazobactam, 60%). At institution 2, no regimen was associated with a high likelihood of attaining bactericidal exposure; the calculated probabilities were cefepime, 78%; ceftazidime, 65%; high-dose meropenem, 58%; high-dose imipenem, 57%; low-dose imipenem, 54%; low-dose meropenem, 47%; and piperacillin/tazobactam, 47%. A lack of agreement between attainment of bactericidal exposures and percent susceptibility was apparent for many of the regimens. Conclusions:: Few regimens demonstrated a highlikelihood of achieving bactericidal exposures against P aeruginosa at these institutions. Importantly, percent susceptibility overestimated attainment of the bactericidal target for some regimens, suggesting that further study is necessary in pediatric patients. The findings of this study highlight differences in target attainment and MIC distributions between institutions, emphasizing the importance of using institution-specific data when selecting empiric antimicrobial therapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Dosage recommendations for antibiotics in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) should be based on pharmacodynamic requirements. For meropenem, this would be achieving appropriate time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC). We employed Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the bactericidal target attainment for various dosing regimens of meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. Methods: Target attainment at 40% T > MIC was calculated for 5,000 simulated subjects receiving meropenem 1,000 mg every 12 and 8 h, and 500 mg every 12, 8 and 6 h. Pharmacokinetics were extrapolated from primary literature sources utilizing similar methods of CVVH. MIC data for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were derived from the US 2003 MYSTIC study. Target attainment at the breakpoint of 4 μg/ml was also calculated. Results: Only regimens of 1,000 mg every 8 h and 500 mg every 6 h essentially achieve 100% target attainment at the breakpoint. However, due to higher peak concentrations, 1,000 mg every 8 h is able to attain improved target attainment against more resistant populations of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species, thus providing the greatest probability of bactericidal exposure. Conclusion: Meropenem 1,000 mg every 8 h optimizes the pharmacodynamic profile in patients undergoing CVVH. Lower doses or increased dosing intervals should not be advocated for inpatients receiving this renal replacement technique. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective:: We developed a model to predict the phar macodynamic exposure of antibiotics against bacteria commonly implicated in nosocomial bloodstream infections to determine which dosage regimens would provide the greatest likelihood of obtaining a bactericidal effect. Methods:: Pharmacodynamic exposures were simulated for 5000 subjects receiving standard doses of ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, or ciprofloxacin. Exposures were indexed to the MICs of bacteria weighted by their prevalence in causing nosocomial bloodstream infections, derived from 2002 SENTRY data. Enterococci were excluded. MIC data were derived from the 2003 Meropenem Yearly Surveillance Test Information Collection resistance study. The probabilities of achieving bactericidal exposures (ie, target attainment) for each antibiotic regimen were compared. The effect of increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on attainment of bactericidal targets was tested. Results:: All dosage regimens except ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime 1 g q8h achieved >90% likelihood of bactericidal exposure. The rank order of target attainment was as follows: imipenem 500 mg q6h, 100.0%; imipenem 1 g q8h, 99.9%; cefepime 2 g q12h, 99.4%; meropenem 1 g q8h, 98.4%; cefepime 1 g q12h, 98.2%; piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h, 97.9%; piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 gq8h, 95.0%; ceftazidime 2 g q8h, 94.2%; ceftazidime 1 g q8h, 71.7%; ciprofloxacin 400 mg q8h, 63.3%; and ciprofloxacin 400 mg q12h,63.0%. Target attainments dropped to &#60;90% for all agents when MRSA was modeled at ≥10% prevalence. Conclusions:: The results of this model analysis suggest that standard doses of the carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, and cefepime, and higher doses of ceftazidime, may provide optimal likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposure against pathogens implicated in nosocomial bloodstream infections, excluding MRSA and enterococci. When MRSA rates are ≥10%, therapy with an antibiotic that has activity against this phenotype should be empirically initiated. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Study Objective. To compare the pharmacodynamics of two β-lactams--ceftazidime and meropenem--in healthy subjects versus patients. Design. Monte Carlo simulation based on published pharmacokinetic studies. Subjects. One hundred and ninety-seven participants (75 healthy volunteers and 122 patients) from published pharmacokinetic studies of ceftazidime or meropenem. Measurements and Main Results. Data on total body clearance and volume of distribution for ceftazidime and meropenem in healthy subjects and patients were obtained from published studies. Monte Carlo simulations were performed based on the pharmacokinetics from each study for ceftazidime 1000 mg every 8 hours and meropenem 1000 mg every 8 hours against isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from North and South America. We calculated the likelihood of obtaining bactericidal exposures (50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for ceftazidime and 40% time above the MIC for meropenem) for each combination of pharmacokinetic study data and MIC distribution. Linear regression was used to compare target attainments for healthy subjects versus patients. Only three drug-pathogen combinations differed in target attainment between healthy subjects and patients: ceftazidime against P. aeruginosa in North America and meropenem against E. coli and P. aeruginosa in South America. The regression line of target attainment for patients versus healthy subjects had a slope of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.983-1.093) and a y intercept of -3.73 (95% CI -8.265-0.827, r² = 0.992). The β values for slope and intercept did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the regression line and the line of identity (p=0.264). Conclusion. The pharmacodynamic target attainment calculated with healthy subject pharmacokinetic data was predictive of patient target attainment for ceftazidime and meropenem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 31-year-old man with cystic fibrosis was diagnosed with multidrug-resistant Burkholderia cepacia pneumonia. Meropenem 2000 mg every 8 hours was administered as a 3-hour infusion to maximize pharmacodynamic exposure; oral minocycline 100 mg twice/day was also given. Blood samples were collected to confirm meropenem concentrations. Concentrations above the mimimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 μg/ml were achieved for 52% of the dosing interval, which is greater than what is required for a bactericidal effect. The patient's condition improved, he was discharged, and completed a 3-week course of the antibiotic regimen. After 6 months, he had remained at his baseline level of health. This case demonstrates that pharmacodynamic principles can be used to design an antibiotic dosing regimen that can achieve optimal exposures when the MIC is above that considered susceptible to conventional dosing strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibiotics that are often employed as the last line of therapy for patients with nonresponsive nosocomial infections. Consideration of pharmacodynamic principles in dosage regimens for these agents can maximize their antibacterial effectiveness and reduce the number of bacterial strains that survive to mutate or continue infection.The objectives of this review were to highlight examples of the application of pharmacodynamics to the carbapenems (particularly meropenem) and to comment on clinical utility of these dosage regimens.Relevant information was identified through a MEDLINE search of the literature (1980–present) using the terms carbapenem, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, pharmacoeconomic, meropenem, imipenem, ertapenem, biapenem, and panipenem. Additionally, meeting posters were identified from the International Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (years 2001–2003) and the International Conference of the American Thoracic Society (years 2002–2003). All studies demonstrating the pharmacodynamics of the carbapenems by incorporating changes in dosage strategies were included.Only relevant data for meropenem were identified in our literature search. The dosage scheme for meropenem may be modified to maximize the percentage of the dosage interval that drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration, an important parameter related to the bacterial kill rate. Only relevant data for meropenem were identified in our literature search. Human volunteer and Monte Carlo simulation studies suggested that in the treatment of susceptible pathogens, higher meropenem doses, increased frequency of administration, or prolonged duration of infusion resulted in improved pharmacodynamics.When proper pharmacodynamic principles are applied to dosage strategies for meropenem, clinical and microbiological outcomes can be optimized. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Meropenem is commonly used to treat lung infections in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Although continuous infusion is the ideal method to maximize the pharmacodynamic properties of this betalactam antibiotic, meropenem is stable for only ∼4 to 6 hours at room temperature, and its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, when administered by continuous infusion to patients with CF, are largely unknown.Objective: This study was undertaken to determine the PK properties and stability of meropenem when administered to adults with CF by a continuous ambulatory drug-delivery infusion pump stored in a cold pouch between 2 freezer packs.Methods: This open-label, multidose, randomized, crossover PK study was conducted at the Clinical Research Center at Hartford Hospital (Harford, Connecticut). Adults aged ≥ 18 years with CF were eligible. Study participants were randomized to receive meropenem 125 mg/h or 250 mg/h (equivalent to 3 g and 6 g, respectively, over 24 hours) by continuous IV infusion for 12 hours. Serum samples were collected throughout the infusion and then for 6 hours after infusion to determine the PK properties (volume of distribution [Vd], elimination rate constant, total body clearance [CL], terminal half-life [t1/2], and steady-state concentration [Css]). Serum meropenem concentrations were assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography, and PK profiles were determined using compartmental analysis. Meropenem stability was ascertained by sampling the drug directly from the infusion pump at prespecified time points. Meropenem tolerability was assessed throughout the study by questioning subjects on how they felt. In addition, laboratory values of serum chemistries and liver enzymes were compared with baseline values.Results: Seven adult volunteers with CF (4 women, 3 men; mean [SD] age, 27 [10] years [range, 19–46 years]) participated in the study. Mean (SD) Css values were 8.31 (0.68) mg/L and 18.50 (3.31) mg/L for the 125-mg/h and 250-mg/h infusion rates, respectively. Vd, CL, and t1/2 were dose independent and similar between the 2 infusion rates. Meropenem stability was maintained over 12 and 24 hours. Meropenem by continuous infusion was well tolerated. One patient complained of a headache during the study.Conclusions: In this study of adults with CF, meropenem infusion rates of 125 mg/h and 250 mg/h provided serum drug concentrations greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration for pathogens considered meropenem susceptible (≤ 4 μg/mL) and intermediately resistant (8 μg/mL), respectively. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]