Search

Background. Unfractionated heparin is administered in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Anticoagulation monitoring is recommended, with an anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) targeting 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL. Owing to heparin's heterogeneous pharmacokinetic properties, anti-Xa is unpredictable, generating a challenge in anticoagulation practices. The aim of this study was to build a pharmacokinetic model of heparin accounting for potential confounders, and derive an optimized dosing regimen for a given anti-Xa target. Methods. Adult patients undergoing VA-ECMO were included between January 2020 and June 2021. Anticoagulation was managed with an initial 100 IU/kg heparin loading dose followed by a continuous infusion targeting 0.2 to 0.7 IU/mL anti-Xa. The data were split into model development and model validation cohorts. Statistical analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling population approach. Model-based simulations were performed to develop an optimized dosing regimen targeting the desired anti-Xa. Results. A total of 74 patients were included, with 1703 anti-Xa observations. A single-compartment model best fitted the data. Interpatient variability for distribution volume was best explained by body weight, C-reactive protein and ECMO indication (post-cardiotomy shock or medical cardiogenic shock), and interpatient variability for elimination clearance was best explained by serum creatinine and C-reactive protein. Simulations using the optimized regimen according to these covariates showed accurate anti-Xa target attainment. Conclusion. In adult patients on VA-ECMO, heparin's effect increased with serum creatinine and medical indication, whereas it decreased with body weight and systemic inflammation. We propose an optimized dosing regimen accounting for key covariates, capable of accurately predicting a given anti-Xa target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last decades, tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as an essential tool in blood loss management in obstetrics. TXA prophylaxis for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) has been studied in double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Given the small observed preventive effect, the systematic use of TXA for vaginal and/or caesarean deliveries remains controversial. The result of a pharmacokinetic modelling suggests that relative to intravenous administration, intramuscular administration may be an equally effective alternative route for preventing PPH and may enable access to this drug in low-resource countries. Prophylaxis is currently studied in high-risk populations, such as women with prepartum anaemia or placenta previa. TXA effectively reduces blood loss and PPH-related morbidity and mortality during active PPH, as demonstrated by high-grade evidence from large RCTs. The drug has a good safety profile: in most cases, only mild gastrointestinal or visual adverse events may be observed. TXA use does not increase the risk of serious adverse events, such as venous or arterial thromboembolism, seizures, or acute kidney injury. The TRACES in vivo analysis of biomarkers of TXA's antifibrinolytic effect have suggested that a dose of at least 1 g is required for the treatment of PPH. The TRACES pharmacokinetic model suggests that because TXA can be lost in the haemorrhaged blood, a second dose should be administered if the PPH continues or if severe coagulopathy occurs. Future pharmacodynamic analyses will focus on the appropriateness of TXA dosing regimens with regard to the intensity of fibrinolysis in catastrophic obstetric events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]