6 results on '"Loos W"'
Search Results
2. Population pharmacokinetics and dynamics in phase II studies of the novel bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic indoloquinone EO9
- Author
-
Schellens, J. H. M., Dombernowsky, P., Cassidy, J., Epelbaum, R., Dirix, L., Cox, E. H., Wanders, J., Calabresi, F., Paridaens, R., Monfardini, S., Wolff, J., Loos, W. J., Verweij, J., Pavlidis, Nicholas, Hanauske, A. R., EORTC Early Clinical Studies Grp, Medical Oncology, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, and Pavlidis, Nicholas [0000-0002-2195-9961]
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,Indoles ,Indoles/*pharmacokinetics ,Unclassified drug ,Alkylating agent ,Drug exposure ,Aziridines ,Population Dynamics ,Pharmacology ,Controlled clinical trial ,Neoplasms ,Antineoplastic agents ,80 and over ,Sampling studies ,Medicine ,Neoplasms/drug therapy/*metabolism ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Prospective Studies ,Middle aged ,Drug safety ,Prospective cohort study ,Antineoplastic Agents/*pharmacokinetics ,Priority journal ,5 (1 aziridinyl) 3 hydroxymethyl 2 (3 hydroxy 1 propenyl) 1 methyl 4 ,media_common ,Aged, 80 and over ,Area under the curve ,Population analysis ,education.field_of_study ,Eo9 ,Pharmacology. Therapy ,Cytotoxic agent ,Middle Aged ,Phase ii ,Algorithm ,Clinical trial ,Indolequinones ,Oncology ,Area Under Curve ,Toxicity ,Drug clearance ,Female ,Cancer chemotherapy ,Human ,Adult ,Drug ,Indoloquinone ,Population dynamics ,Metabolic Clearance Rate ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Population ,Drug response ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Major clinical study ,Article ,Sampling Studies ,Bayesian algorithm ,Aziridines/*pharmacokinetics ,Pharmacokinetics ,Humans ,Phase 2 clinical trial ,Prospective study ,Area under curve ,education ,Aged ,Quinone derivative ,business.industry ,7 indoledione ,Phase 1 clinical trial ,Pharmacodynamics ,Human medicine ,Metabolic clearance rate ,business ,Controlled study ,Prospective studies - Abstract
Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase If programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, In particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, In particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed. [(C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.].
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Population pharmacokinetic and dynamic analysis of the topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan in phase II studies
- Author
-
Schellens, J. H. M., Heinrich, B., Lehnert, M., Gore, M. E., Kaye, Stanley B., Dombernowsky, P., Paridaens, R., Oosterom, A. T. Van, Verweij, J., Loos, W. J., Calvert, H., Pavlidis, Nicholas, Cortes-Funes, H., Wanders, J., Roelvink, M., Sessa, Cristiana, Selinger, K., Wissel, P. S., Gamucci, T., Hanauske, A. R., Pavlidis, Nicholas [0000-0002-2195-9961], and Medical Oncology
- Subjects
Male ,Lurtotecan ,Bayes theorem ,Drug exposure ,Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics/*pharmacology/toxicity ,Pharmacology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Dna topoisomerases ,Topoisomerase I Inhibitors ,Neoplasms ,Antineoplastic agents ,Sampling studies ,Medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Neoplasms/drug therapy/*metabolism ,Prospective Studies ,Enzyme Inhibitors ,Middle aged ,Drug safety ,Priority journal ,education.field_of_study ,Population analysis ,Sampling (statistics) ,Distribution volume ,Enzyme inhibitors ,Middle Aged ,Dna topoisomerase inhibitor ,Phase ii ,Clinical trial ,Oncology ,Area Under Curve ,Female ,Drug clearance ,Camptothecin derivative ,medicine.drug ,Human ,Adult ,Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives/pharmacokinetics/*pharmacology/toxicity ,Population ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Drug half life ,Topoisomerase-I Inhibitor ,Sampling Studies ,Article ,Bayesian algorithm ,Topoisomerase i ,Nonmem ,Lurtotecan (gi147211) ,Pharmacokinetics ,Humans ,Phase 2 clinical trial ,education ,Area under curve ,Aged ,Drug induced disease ,business.industry ,Type i ,Leukopenia ,Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics/*pharmacology/toxicity ,Thrombocytopenia ,NONMEM ,Drug efficacy ,chemistry ,Pharmacodynamics ,Camptothecin ,business ,Prospective studies ,Granulocytopenia - Abstract
Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in a broad phase II program of lurtotecan (GI147211), a novel camptothecin derived topoisomerase I inhibitor, to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population, to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and to investigate relationships with clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was applied during course one, which involved two sampling time-points. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. In total, samples were collected of 109 (63%) of 173 patients. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic evaluation could be carried out successfully in 85 (78%) of the sampled patients. CL of lurtotecan showed substantial variability (mean 87 +/- 28 L/h) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I studies where full pharmacokinetic curves were used. Residual variability in the population estimate of CL was 9.9%. No significant relationships were observed between exposure parameters and toxicity nor likelihood of tumor response, however the latter relationship may well have been obscured by the heterogeneity of the studied population. Prospective implementation of large scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and important to establish whether interpatient variability in drug exposure is a major determinant of toxicity or activity. Invest New Drugs
- Published
- 2002
4. Decreased exposure to sunitinib due to concomitant administration of ifosfamide: results of a phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the combination of sunitinib and ifosfamide in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
- Author
-
Hamberg, P., Steeghs, N., Loos, W. J., van de Biessen, D., den Hollander, M., Tascilar, M., Verweij, J., Gelderblom, H., and Sleijfer, S.
- Subjects
TUMOR diagnosis ,PHARMACODYNAMICS ,PHARMACOKINETICS ,NEUTROPENIA ,THERAPEUTICS ,ONCOLOGY ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,CLINICAL trials ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DRUG interactions ,DRUG administration ,DRUG dosage ,DRUG toxicity ,HETEROCYCLIC compounds ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,TUMORS ,EVALUATION research ,INDOLE compounds ,IFOSFAMIDE - Abstract
Background: This study aimed to define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib combined with two different infusion schedules of ifosfamide.Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumours, good performance score, good organ function, and no standard therapy available were eligible. Continuous once daily sunitinib, in escalating doses per cohort, was combined with ifosfamide, 9 g m(-2) for 3 days or 6 g m(-2) for 5 days, administered every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments were performed.Results: With growth-factor support, the MTD of sunitinib combined with either ifosfamide schedule was 12.5 mg in 32 patients enrolled. Neutropenia-related adverse events were dose-limiting toxicities. Sunitinib did not affect ifosfamide PK. Ifosfamide significantly decreased exposure to sunitinib and increased exposure to its metabolite, SU12662. No consistent changes in PD parameters were observed.Conclusion: With growth-factor support, the MTD of sunitinib with both ifosfamide schedules was 12.5 mg. Ifosfamide produced decreased sunitinib blood levels because of CYP3A induction. As PK interactions cannot explain the relatively low sunitinib doses that can be combined with ifosfamide, synergy in toxicity is likely. Whether this also holds true for anti-tumour activity needs to be further explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Differential transport of platinum compounds by the human organic cation transporter hOCT2 (hSLC22A2).
- Author
-
Burger, H, Zoumaro-Djayoon, A, Boersma, AWM, Helleman, J, Berns, EMJJ, Mathijssen, RHJ, Loos, WJ, Wiemer, EAC, Boersma, A W M, Berns, E M J J, Mathijssen, R H J, Loos, W J, and Wiemer, E A C
- Subjects
PLATINUM compounds ,CARRIER proteins ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,PHARMACOKINETICS ,NEPHROTOXICOLOGY ,NEUROTOXICOLOGY ,DRUG therapy ,CISPLATIN ,DRUG resistance - Abstract
Background: Solute carriers (SLCs), in particular organic cation transporters (OCTs), have been implicated in the cellular uptake of platinum-containing anticancer compounds. The activity of these carriers may determine the pharmacokinetics and the severity of side effects, including neuro- and nephrotoxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy. As decreased drug accumulation is a key mechanism of platinum resistance, SLCs may also contribute to the development of resistance. Here, we define the role of hSLC22A2 (OCT2) in the cellular uptake of platinum compounds.Experimental Approach: Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing the hSLC22A2 gene (HEK293/hSLC22A2) were used in platinum accumulation studies. Following a 2 h exposure to various platinum compounds (100 microM), intracellular platinum levels were determined by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry.Key Results: HEK293/hSLC22A2 cells, compared with HEK293/Neo control cells, displayed significant increases in oxaliplatin (28.6-fold), Pt[DACH]Cl(2) (20.6-fold), ormaplatin (8.1-fold), tetraplatin (4.5-fold), transplatin (3.7-fold) and cisplatin (1.3-fold), but not carboplatin. SLC22A2-mediated transport could be inhibited by 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium. Furthermore, hSLC22A2-mediated oxaliplatin and cisplatin accumulation was time- and concentration-dependent, but non-saturable. Expression of hSLC22A2 in HEK293 cells resulted in enhanced sensitivity to oxaliplatin (12-fold) and cisplatin (1.8-fold). Although, hSLC22A2 mRNA expression was frequently found in ovarian cancer cell lines, its expression in clinical ovarian cancer specimens (n= 80) was low and did not correlate with the treatment outcome of platinum-based regimens.Conclusions and Implications: The hSLC22A2 drug transporter is a critical determinant in the uptake and cytotoxicity of various platinum compounds, particularly oxaliplatin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of XR11576, an oral topoisomerase I and II inhibitor, administered on days 1-5 of a 3-weekly cycle in patients with advanced solid tumours.
- Author
-
de Jonge, M. J. A., Kaye, S., Verweij, J., Brock, C., Reade, S., Scurr, M., van Doorn, L., Verheij, C., Loos, W., Brindley, C., Mistry, P., Cooper, M., and Judson, I.
- Subjects
DNA topoisomerase I ,DNA topoisomerase II ,PHARMACOKINETICS ,PHARMACOLOGY ,TUMORS ,LIQUID chromatography ,PATIENTS ,RESEARCH ,HIGH performance liquid chromatography ,DRUG dosage ,CLINICAL trials ,HETEROCYCLIC compounds ,ORAL drug administration ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,MASS spectrometry ,DOSE-effect relationship in pharmacology ,ENZYME inhibitors ,DRUG toxicity - Abstract
XR11576 is an oral topoisomerase I and II inhibitor. The objectives of this phase I study were to assess the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to describe the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of XR11576 when administered orally on days 1-5 every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumours. Patients were treated with escalating doses of XR11576 at doses ranging from 30 to 180 mg day(-1). For PK analysis, plasma sampling was performed during the first and second courses of treatment and XR11576 concentrations were assayed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection. In all, 21 patients received a total of 47 courses. The MTD was reached at 180 mg day(-1), with diarrhoea and fatigue as DLT. Nausea and vomiting, although not qualifying for DLT, was ubiquitous. Only in combination with an extensive prophylactic antiemetic regimen consisting of a combination of both dexamethasone and a 5HT3 antagonist was treatment with XR11576 at 120 mg day(-1) tolerable. The systemic exposure of XR11576 increased more than proportionally with increasing dose, with a large interpatient variability. No objective responses were seen; four patients experienced stable disease for periods of 12-30 weeks. In this study, the DLTs of XR11576 were diarrhoea and fatigue. The recommended dose for phase II studies of XR11576 is 120 mg administered orally, on days 1-5 every 21 days. Alternative regimens are currently being explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.