Search

Purpose: This study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of etirinotecan pegol. Experimental Design: Patients with refractory solid malignancies were enrolled and assigned to escalating-dose cohorts. Patients received 1 infusion of etirinotecan pegol weekly 3 times every 4 weeks (w × 3q4w), or every 14 days (q14d), or every 21 days (q21d), with MTD as the primary end point using a standard 3 + 3 design. Results: Seventy-six patients were entered onto 3 dosing schedules (58–245 mg/m2). The MTD was 115 mg/m2 for the w × 3q4w schedule and 145 mg/m2 for both the q14d and q21d schedules. Most adverse events related to study drug were gastrointestinal disorders and were more frequent at higher doses of etirinotecan pegol. Late onset diarrhea was observed in some patients, the frequency of which generally correlated with dose density. Cholinergic diarrhea commonly seen with irinotecan treatment did not occur in patients treated with etirinotecan pegol. Etirinotecan pegol administration resulted in sustained and controlled systemic exposure to SN-38, which had a mean half-life of approximately 50 days. Overall, the pharmacokinetics of etirinotecan pegol are predictable and do not require complex dosing adjustments. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 8 patients with breast, colon, lung (small and squamous cell), bladder, cervical, and neuroendocrine cancer. Conclusion: Etirinotecan pegol showed substantial antitumor activity in patients with various solid tumors and a somewhat different safety profile compared with the irinotecan historical profile. The MTD recommended for phase II clinical trials is 145 mg/m2 q14d or q21d. Clin Cancer Res; 19(1); 268–78. ©2012 AACR.

Background To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and pharmacokinetics of trabectedin with capecitabine in patients with advanced malignancies. Design In this Phase I, open-label, dose-finding study, patients refractory to standard therapy received trabectedin (3-h intravenous infusion, 0.4–1.3 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2,000 or 1,600 mg/m2/day orally, days 2–15) every 3 weeks. Standard “3 + 3” dose escalation was used to define the MTD. Antitumor response was assessed every two cycles; adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout. Results Forty patients received 149 cycles of treatment (median 2; range 1–11) at nine dose levels. Gastrointestinal dose-limiting toxicities in two patients at two dose levels with capecitabine at 2,000 mg/m2/day prompted dose reduction to 1,600 mg/m2/day and initiation of new trabectedin dose escalation at 0.6 mg/m2. The MTD was capecitabine 1,600 mg/m2/day + trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2. Common grade 3–4 drug-related AEs were neutropenia (20%), nausea (18%), diarrhea (15%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (15%). One patient with cholangiocarcinoma achieved a sustained partial response, and 18 patients maintained stable disease (six for ≥6 months). Conclusions The combination of trabectedin and capecitabine is generally well tolerated, without pharmacokinetic interactions, and shows some activity in patients with advanced cancers.

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of the combination of gefitinib, capecitabine, and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were treated with escalating doses of gefitinib once daily, capecitabine twice daily (14 of 28 days), and celecoxib twice daily. Plasma samples for biomarkers were obtained at baseline and weekly for the first 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic variables were correlated with toxicity and presence of biological effect. Tumor biopsies from 5 patients were analyzed for changes in tumor metabolic activity by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was done as a correlate in 6 patients at the MTD. Thirty-nine patients received 168 cycles of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities observed included nausea, dehydration and nausea, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The MTD was 250 mg/d gefitinib (days 1-14) and 2,000 mg/m2/d capecitabine divided twice daily (days 8-21) every 28 days. Celecoxib was eliminated due to concerns of increased risk for cardiovascular toxicity, although no patients in this study had cardiac events. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a confirmed partial response. Fourteen of 39 (36%) patients maintained prolonged stable disease for a median of 4 months (range, 3-24 months). [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan and metabolomic analyses revealed differences in metabolic response to gefitinib versus capecitabine. The combination of gefitinib and capecitabine is well tolerated and appears to have activity against certain advanced solid tumors, providing a rationale for further evaluation in advanced solid malignancies. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(12):3685–94]

This study evaluated the safety, toxicity, pharmacological properties and biological activity of PI-88, a heparanase endoglycosidase enzyme inhibitor, with fixed weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies.This was a phase I study to determine the maximal-tolerated dose of escalating doses of PI-88 administered subcutaneously for 4 days per week, along with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) given on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day schedule.Sixteen patients received a total of 42 courses of therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed despite escalation to the highest planned dose level of PI-88 (250 mg/day). Frequent minor toxicities included fatigue (38%), dysgeusia (28.5%), thrombocytopenia (12%), diarrhea (14%), nausea (12%), and emesis (10%) in the 42 courses. No significant bleeding complications were observed. One patient developed a positive anti-heparin antibody test/serotonin releasing assay with positive anti-platelet factor 4/PI-88 antibodies and grade 1 thrombocytopenia in cycle 5, and was withdrawn from the study without any sequelae. PI-88 plasma concentrations (mirrored by APTT) and urinary elimination were linear and dose-proportional. Docetaxel did not alter the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PI-88, nor did PI-88 affect docetaxel PK. No significant relationship was determined between plasma or urine FGF-2, or plasma VEGF levels and PI-88 dose/response. Although no objective responses were observed; 9 of the 15 evaluable patients had stable disease for greater than two cycles of therapy.PI-88 administered at 250 mg/day for 4 days each week for 3 weeks with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days, was determined to be the recommended dose level for phase II evaluation. This combination was well tolerated without severe toxicities or PK interactions.

This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacological properties and biological activity of the combination of the lonafarnib, a farnesylproteintransferase (FTPase) inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies.This was a single institution study to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating lonafarnib (75-125 mg po BID) with gemcitabine (750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15) and fixed cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in initial patients, these patients were considered "heavily pre-treated" and the protocol was amended to limit prior therapy and re-escalate lonafarnib in "less heavily pre-treated patients" on 28-day and 21-day schedules. Cycle 1 and 2 pharmacokinetics (PK), and farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity were analyzed.Twenty-two patients received 53 courses of therapy. Nausea, vomiting, and fatigue were frequent in all patients. Severe toxicities were observed in 91% of patients: neutropenia (41%), nausea (36%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (23%) and vomiting (23%). Nine patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity. DLTs of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue limited dose-escalation on the 28-day schedule. The MTD was established as lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in heavily pre-treated patients. The MTD in the less heavily pre-treated patients could not be established on the 28-day schedule as DLTs were observed at the lowest dose level, and dose escalation was not completed on the 21-day schedule due to early study termination by the Sponsor. No PK interactions were observed. FTPase inhibition was not observed at the MTD, however HDJ-2 gel shift was observed in one patient at the 100 mg BID lonafarnib dose. Anti-cancer activity was observed: four patients had stable disease lasting2 cycles, one subject had a complete response, and another had a partial response, both with metastatic breast cancer.Lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 on a 28-day schedule was established as the MTD. Lonafarnib did not demonstrate FTPase inhibition at these doses. Despite the observed efficacy, substantial toxicity and questionable contribution of anti-tumor activity of lonafarnib to gemcitabine and cisplatin limits further exploration of this combination.

Background Cilengitide, an antiangiogenic agent that inhibits the binding of integrins alpha(nu)beta(3) and alpha(nu)beta(5) to the extracellular matrix, was studied at two dose levels in cancer patients to determine the optimal biological dose. Patients and methods The doses of cilengitide were 600 or 1200 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion twice weekly every 28 days. A novel dose escalation scheme was utilized that relied upon the biological activity rate. Results Twenty patients received 50 courses of cilengitide with no dose-limiting toxic effects. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile revealed a short elimination half-life of 4 h, supporting twice weekly dosing. Of the six soluble angiogenic molecules assessed, only E-selectin increased significantly from baseline. Analysis of tumor microvessel density and gene expression was not informative due to intrapatient tumor heterogeneity. Although several patients with evaluable tumor biopsy pairs did reveal posttreatment increases in tumor and endothelial cell apoptosis, these results did not reach statistical significance due to the aforementioned heterogeneity. Conclusions Cilengitide is a well-tolerated antiangiogenic agent. The biomarkers chosen in this study underscore the difficulty in assessing the biological activity of antiangiogenic agents in the absence of validated biological assays.

Purpose: PI-88 is a mixture of highly sulfated oligosaccharides that inhibits heparanase, an extracellular matrix endoglycosidase, and the binding of angiogenic growth factors to heparan sulfate. This agent showed potent inhibition of placental blood vessel angiogenesis as well as growth inhibition in multiple xenograft models, thus forming the basis for this study. Experimental Design: This study evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of PI-88 (80-315 mg) when administered s.c. daily for 4 consecutive days bimonthly (part 1) or weekly (part 2). Results: Forty-two patients [median age, 53 years (range, 19-78 years); median performance status, 1] with a range of advanced solid tumors received a total of 232 courses. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg/d. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia and pulmonary embolism. Other toxicity was generally mild and included prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time and injection site echymosis. The pharmacokinetics were linear with dose. Intrapatient variability was low and interpatient variability was moderate. Both AUC and Cmax correlated with the percent increase in activated partial thromboplastin time, showing that this pharmacodynamic end point can be used as a surrogate for drug exposure. No association between PI-88 administration and vascular endothelial growth factor or basic fibroblast growth factor levels was observed. One patient with melanoma had a partial response, which was maintained for >50 months, and 9 patients had stable disease for ≥6 months. Conclusion: The recommended dose of PI-88 administered for 4 consecutive days bimonthly or weekly is 250 mg/d. PI-88 was generally well tolerated. Evidence of efficacy in melanoma supports further evaluation of PI-88 in phase II trials.

Purpose: Exisulind (sulindac sulfone, FGN-1, Aptosyn) is a sulindac metabolite that induces apoptosis via inhibition of cyclic GMP-phosphodiesterase. This agent demonstrated tumor growth inhibition in rodent models of colon, breast, prostate, and lung carcinogenesis. In an orthotopic model of human non–small-cell lung cancer, the combination of exisulind and docetaxel prolonged survival in athymic nude rats, forming the basis of this phase I combination study. Experimental Design: This study evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of combining exisulind (150–250 mg) given orally twice daily and docetaxel (30–36 mg/m2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Results: Twenty patients with a range of advanced solid tumors (median age, 59 years; age range, 35–77 years; median performance status, 1) received a total of 70 courses. Observed adverse events were mild to moderate, and there was no dose-limiting toxicity at any level. Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were present in 10 of the 70 cycles (10%) and included nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Neutropenia was present in four cycles in patients treated with a docetaxel dose of 36 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis did not demonstrate a clear effect of exisulind on docetaxel pharmacokinetics and vice versa. Relationships were evident between the plasma concentration of exisulind and the development of grade 2 or greater toxicities. One third of patients maintained stable disease for 3 to 12 cycles, but no objective responses were observed. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel (36 mg/m2, weekly) and exisulind (500 mg/d) was reasonably well tolerated, and it is undergoing phase II testing in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of the novel protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor enzastaurin on intracellular phosphoprotein signaling using flow cytometry and to use this approach to measure enzastaurin effects on surrogate target cells taken from cancer patients that were orally dosed with this agent. Experimental Design: The activity of PKC was assayed in intact cells using a modification of published techniques. The U937 cell line and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with phorbol ester, fixed, permeabilized, and reacted with an antibody specific for the phosphorylated forms of PKC substrates. The processed samples were quantitatively analyzed using flow cytometry. The assay was validated for selectivity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Finally, blood was obtained from volunteer cancer patients before and after receiving once daily oral doses of enzastaurin. These samples were stimulated ex vivo with phorbol ester and were assayed for PKC activity using this approach. Results: Assay of U937 cells confirmed the selectivity of the antibody reagent and enzastaurin for PKC. Multiparametric analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed monocytes to be the preferred surrogate target cell. Day-to-day PKC activity in normal donors was reproducible. Initial results showed that five of six cancer patients had decreased PKC activity following enzastaurin administration. In a following study, a group of nine patients displayed a significant decrease in PKC activity after receiving once daily oral doses of enzastaurin. Conclusion: An inhibition of surrogate target cell PKC activity was observed both in vitro and ex vivo after exposure to the novel kinase inhibitor, enzastaurin.

RPI.4610 (ANGIOZYME) is a chemically stabilized ribozyme targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of RPI.4610 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study used a sequential treatment design evaluating a single dose level for all three drugs: paclitaxel 175 mg m−2 and carboplatin AUC=6 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, and RPI.4610 100 mg m−2 day−1 beginning on day 8 and continuing daily thereafter. Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on day 1 of courses 1 (chemotherapy alone) and 2 (chemotherapy+RPI.4610), and on day 8 of course 1 (RPI.4610 alone). Ratios were generated by comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters for the combination of carboplatin with paclitaxel when administered alone or together with RPI.4610. Twelve patients were enrolled in this trial and received two to six courses of treatment each. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (three patients), thrombocytopenia (three patients), pain (three patients), anemia (two patients) and fatigue (two patients). The ratio of the mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for carboplatin when administered with paclitaxel alone versus when administered with paclitaxel and RPI.4610 was 1.07 (90% confidence interval, 0.77–1.37). Similarly, the ratio of the mean AUC0-last for carboplatin was 1.04 (0.73–1.35). For paclitaxel the ratio of the mean Cmax when administered with carboplatin alone versus with carboplatin and RPI.4610 was 1.17 (1.03–1.31), and the ratio of the mean AUC0–last was 1.17 (1.04–1.30). Objective tumor responses were observed and included one patient with a complete response (bladder cancer) and one patient with a partial response (esophageal cancer). These results indicate that RPI.4610, carboplatin, and paclitaxel can be administered safely in combination without substantial pharmacokinetic interactions.

3159 Background: Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth and metastasis. Distinct pro-angiogenic pathways are targeted by Cel (a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor), Z (an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that results in reduced vascular endothelial growth factor expression), and Cp (a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) activated by thymidine phosphorylase, a tumor-associated pro-angiogenic molecule). This abstract reports the results of an amended treatment schedule based on preclinical data suggesting that antitumor effects are sequence dependent. In vitro synergistic effects were observed when ZD1839 was administered prior to 5FU, additive effects with concomitant administration, and antagonistic effects when administered after 5FU. Methods: This phase I trial assesses the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic interactions, and biologic effects of the combination of Z (250–500 mg/day days 1–14), Cp (1000 mg/m2- 2000 mg/m2/day days 8–21), and Cel (...