Search

In pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses based on individual case safety reports are widely used to detect safety signals. Unfortunately, publishing disproportionality analyses lacks specific guidelines, often leading to incomplete and ambiguous reporting, and carries the risk of incorrect conclusions when data are not placed in the correct context. The REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance (READUS-PV) statement was developed to address this issue by promoting transparent and comprehensive reporting of disproportionality studies. While the statement paper explains in greater detail the procedure followed to develop these guidelines, with this explanation paper we present the 14 items retained for READUS-PV guidelines, together with an in-depth explanation of their rationale and bullet points to illustrate their practical implementation. Our primary objective is to foster the adoption of the READUS-PV guidelines among authors, editors, peer reviewers, and readers of disproportionality analyses. Enhancing transparency, completeness, and accuracy of reporting, as well as proper interpretation of their results, READUS-PV guidelines will ultimately facilitate evidence-based decision making in pharmacovigilance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aim: Disproportionality analyses using reports of suspected adverse drug reactions are the most commonly used quantitative methods for detecting safety signals in pharmacovigilance. However, their methods and results are generally poorly reported in published articles and existing guidelines do not capture the specific features of disproportionality analyses. We here describe the development of a guideline (REporting of A Disproportionality analysis for drUg Safety signal detection using individual case safety reports in PharmacoVigilance [READUS-PV]) for reporting the results of disproportionality analyses in articles and abstracts., Methods: We established a group of 34 international experts from universities, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory agencies, with expertise in pharmacovigilance, disproportionality analyses, and assessment of safety signals. We followed a three-step process to develop the checklist: (1) an open-text survey to generate a first list of items; (2) an online Delphi method to select and rephrase the most important items; (3) a final online consensus meeting., Results: Among the panel members, 33 experts responded to round 1 and 30 to round 2 of the Delphi and 25 participated to the consensus meeting. Overall, 60 recommendations for the main body of the manuscript and 13 recommendations for the abstracts were retained by participants after the Delphi method. After merging of some items together and the online consensus meeting, the READUS-PV guidelines comprise a checklist of 32 recommendations, in 14 items, for the reporting of disproportionality analyses in the main body text and four items, comprising 12 recommendations, for abstracts., Conclusions: The READUS-PV guidelines will support authors, editors, peer-reviewers, and users of disproportionality analyses using individual case safety report databases. Adopting these guidelines will lead to more transparent, comprehensive, and accurate reporting and interpretation of disproportionality analyses, facilitating the integration with other sources of evidence., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) cause significant morbidity, mortality and health costs and have an important prevalence in all ages. Few studies focus on ADR in adolescents. The goal of this study was to characterize a case series of ADR reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System (PPS) of the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products (INFARMED, I.P.) during an eleven-year period (from 2006 to 2016) concerning this specific population., Methods: Retrospective analysis of reports concerning patients from 10 to 18 years received by the PPS between 2006 and 2016. The authors evaluated patients' demographics (age and sex). The characteristics and seriousness of the reactions, the type of reaction reported, and the drugs involved were assessed., Results: The authors found 782 reports (59% females). Most reports came from physicians (61%). Overall 80% of the reports described serious ADR. A greater proportion of serious events was found among males. Most reactions referred to general disorders and administration site conditions (38%), followed by skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions (33%). In 3 rd and 4 th were gastrointestinal disorders (24%) and the nervous system disorders (23%), the former more frequent among females. Vaccines were the most represented group (42%) followed by antibacterials for systemic use (19%)., Conclusion: Major findings considering drugs involved and the reported reactions varied according to age and sex.

Brazilian pharmacovigilance regulations involve 3 spheres: health services, Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs), and sanitary agency. Drug tolerability began to be effectively assessed in Brazil after the founding of the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance, which developed the Sentinel Network Project. The objective of the Sentinel Network Project is to increase the adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting rate by health care professionals in the hospital setting. Pharmacovigilance practices became mandatory for MAHs, and patient tolerability issues were considered in drug policy in Brazil only as recently as 2000. However, despite recent events, the regulatory advancements in pharmacovigilance in Brazil are only equivalent to international practices (ie, those of the European Union). The pharmacovigilance system in the European Union integrates the national authorities, the European Commission, and the European Medicines Agency, which is responsible for the scientific evaluation, supervision, and safety monitoring of medicines for human and veterinary use in the European Union. Furthermore, ADR patient reporting is included in the new EU pharmacovigilance regulations. Numerous possible ways are available to improve the Brazilian pharmacovigilance system, mainly through regulations of biosimilar, nanotechnology, and veterinary medicines or by training health care professionals and patients to report nonserious cases and quality deviations. It is necessary to encourage and develop strategies for decentralizing pharmacovigilance actions in the whole country, as is common practice in several EU countries. Motivating and considering ADR reports by patients and improving feedback and audit practices in health care services and MAHs are also necessary measures. With the inclusion of Brazil as a member of the International Conference of Harmonization, significant changes in pharmacovigilance regulation are expected; these updates, which will consider international standards, will improve signal detection and risk communication., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pharmacovigilance systems are important to monitor the safety of on-market drugs after approval. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of rosiglitazone safety alerts on trends in the sale of rosiglitazone and other oral antidiabetic drugs. An ecological study was conducted, using temporally aggregated data and linking safety alerts to countrywide sales of all oral antidiabetic drugs in Portugal from January 2002 to December 2012. Sales figures for oral antidiabetic drugs marketed in Portugal were supplied by IMS Health Portugal with a breakdown by active substance and fixed combinations. The number of defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DIDs) of each oral antidiabetic drug sold to the estimated diabetic population using oral antidiabetic drugs in Portugal was calculated. Particular attention was paid to the case of rosiglitazone, with the results being adjusted for changes in rosiglitazone reimbursement policies. A total of four safety alerts were issued about rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone sales registered an increase of 32.9% (0.202 DIDs; P < 0.001) after the first alert (risk of macular oedema or worsening of pre-existent macular oedema) in January 2006. After subsequent alerts about cardiovascular risks, this trend was not, however, repeated and sales fell. Following the January 2006 and January 2008 safety alerts, rosiglitazone sales described a long-term downward trend, with decreases of 3.75% (-0023 DIDs; P > 0.05) and 0.24% (-0.001 DIDs; P > 0.05), respectively. It is important to promote the dissemination and publication of drug safety alerts., (© 2016 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Aim: To identify the attitudes and knowledge associated with adverse drug reactions (ADR) under-reporting by nurses., Background: The voluntary reporting system is fundamental for expediting the detection of ADR during post-marketing surveillance., Methods: We performed a case-control study. A self-administered questionnaire was sent by mail to 1325 nurses. The knowledge and attitudes related to ADR under-reporting were primarily based on Inman's seven deadly sins., Results: The overall response rate was 34.2%. Nurses working in primary care were 12-fold more likely to report an ADR. A change of attitude increased the probability of ADR reporting for:'The belief that the one case an individual nurse might see could not contribute to medical knowledge'; 'I do not know how the information reported is used by the system'; 'I would be more likely to report if the method was easier'; 'I think the most correct way to report is to inform the doctor' and 'I do not have time to think about the involvement of the drug in ADRs'., Conclusions: Our study shows that the beliefs of nurses, such as 'one single report would not make any difference' and 'the pharmacovigilance system is very complex', act as a barrier to ADR reporting., Implications for Nursing Management: It is important to clarify the ADR reporting procedure and increase the nurses reporting rate., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The information that is available when marketing authorizations are approved is limited. Pharmacovigilance has an important role during the postauthorization period, and alerts published by national authorities allow health care professionals to be informed about new data on safety profiles. This study therefore sought to analyze all safety alerts published by the Portuguese National Authority of Medicines and Health Products I.P. (INFARMED)., Methods: We conducted an observational study of all alerts published on the INFARMED website from January 2002 through December 2014. From the data included in the alerts, the following information was abstracted: active substance name (and trade name), event that led to the alert, and the resulting safety measures. Active substances were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code., Findings: A total of 562 alerts were published, and 304 were eligible for inclusion. The musculoskeletal system was the ATC code with more alerts (n = 53), followed by the nervous system (n = 42). Communication of the information and recommendations to the health care professionals and the public in general was the most frequent safety measure (n = 128), followed by changes in the Summary of the Product Characteristics and package information leaflet (n = 66). During the study period, 26 marketing authorizations were temporarily suspended and 10 were revoked., Implications: The knowledge of the alerts published during the postmarketing period is very useful to the health care professionals for improving prescription and use of medicines and to the scientific community for the development of new researches., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The yellow-card scheme continues to be one of the principal methods for signal generation in pharmacovigilance. Nevertheless, under-reporting, one of its disadvantages, delays alert signals and has a negative influence on public health. Educational interventions in pharmacovigilance may have a positive impact on the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs)., Objectives: To assess the duration of the effect and effectiveness of an educational intervention in pharmacovigilance designed to improve ADR reporting in a robust pharmacovigilance system., Methods: A spatial, cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted covering all National Health System physicians in the northwest of Spain and targeting those who were actively engaged in clinical practice (n = 7,498). Of these, 2,120 were assigned in three spatial clusters to the intervention group (six hospitals and 138 primary care centers) and 3,614 in four clusters to the control group (seven hospitals and 267 primary care centers). The educational intervention consisted of two complementary approaches--one active (group sessions), the other passive (educational material, reporting form)-implemented from November 2007 to December 2008, with a follow-up period of 8 months., Results: Intervention participation was 53.7 % in a hospital setting and 60.5 % in primary care settings. ADR reporting in the intervention group increased by 65.4 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 8.2-153.4) across the follow-up. The ADR reporting rate per 1,000 physicians/year in the intervention group rose from 28.1 to 39.6 following the intervention (51.7 and 27.4 in the first and second 4-month period, respectively). For the intervention group, relative risk (RR) was 2.31 (95 % CI: 1.46-3.68) and 1.04 (95 % CI: 0.61-1.77) in the first and second 4-month period, respectively adjusted to baseline values. There was an increase in unexpected ADR reporting (RR 2.06, 95 % CI 1.19-3.55)., Conclusions: Pharmacovigilance educational interventions that have proved effective can be successfully applied in different geographical areas. A high baseline notification rate could account for the educational program having a moderate effect.

Objective: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a public health problem. They cause significant morbidity, mortality and health costs. Less is known about pediatric ADR. Our goal was to characterize a pediatric case series of ADR reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System (PPS) during the past 10 years., Research Design and Methods: Retrospective analysis of ADR reports concerning patients till 17 years old received by the PPS between 2003 and 2012. We evaluated patients' demographic data and involved drugs, as well as characteristics and seriousness of reactions, stratified by age groups., Results: We found 1742 reports (50% females) corresponding to 9.7% of the total received. The age of the patients varied from 0 to 17 years (median: 5 years, interquartile range: 10.6), with 566 cases (32%) occurring in patients younger than 2y. Among the 1195 serious cases, 31% (370) episodes led to hospitalization. In 32 cases (2%) there was a fatal outcome. Most of the ADR reported referred to general disorders and administration site conditions, followed by skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions. Vaccines were the most represented group (42%) followed by antibacterials for systemic use (17%)., Conclusions: Pediatric ADR represents about 10% of the reports received by the PPS. Most ADR were considered serious. Major findings varied according to age groups.

Background: Adverse drug reactions are a major public health problem. Underreporting is an important limitation of all reporting systems, partially due to attitudes of health professionals., Objective: This study sought: (1) to evaluate the reproducibility of a questionnaire on attitudes to and knowledge of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting among physicians, nurses and pharmacists: and (2) to compare the attitudes and knowledge of these three groups of health professionals., Methods: This study targeted a sample of physicians (n = 30), nurses (n = 30) and pharmacists (n = 20) in the central region of Portugal. A structured questionnaire was administered to each health professional twice, at an interval of 2-4 weeks. Most attitudes were based on Inman's 'seven deadly sins' and measured using a continuous visual analog scale (VAS), with answers scored from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Questionnaire reproducibility was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: The response rate was 100 %. Attitudes that registered the highest ICCs were Complacency (the belief that really serious ADRs are well documented by the time a drug is marketed) (physicians, ICC 0.84; nurses, ICC 0.70; pharmacists, ICC 0.99), and Diffidence (the belief that one would only report an ADR if one were sure that it was related to the use of a particular drug) (physicians, ICC 0.73; nurses, ICC 0.65; pharmacists, ICC 0.98). In most cases, there were no differences among the three groups of professionals in terms of attitudes and knowledge., Conclusions: The Horizontal continuous VAS is reliable to detect the knowledge and attitudes about ADRs.

Background: Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is the method most widely used by pharmacovigilance systems, with the principal limitation being the physician's underreporting., Objective: This study sought to evaluate the results of workshop and telephone-interview interventions designed to improve the quantity and relevance of ADR reporting by physicians., Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted on 6579 physicians in northern Portugal in 2008. Following randomization, we allocated 1034 physicians to a telephone-interview intervention, 438 to a workshop intervention and the remaining 5107 to the control group. At the workshop, a real clinical case was presented and participants were then asked to report on it by completing the relevant form. In the telephone intervention, participants were asked (i) whether they had ever had any suspicion of ADRs; (ii) whether they had experienced any difficulties in reporting; (iii) whether they remembered the different methods that could be used for reporting purposes; and (iv) whether they attached importance to the individual physician's role in reporting. We followed up physicians to assess ADR reporting rates to the Northern Pharmacovigilance Centre. In terms of relevance, adverse reactions were classified as serious or unexpected. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and generalized linear mixed models were applied using the penalized quasi-likelihood method. The physicians studied were followed up over a period of 20 months., Results: Two hundred physicians underwent the educational intervention. Comparison with the control group showed that the workshop intervention increased the spontaneous ADR reporting rate by an average of 4-fold (relative risk [RR] 3.97; 95% CI 3.86, 4.08; p < 0.001) across the 20 months post-intervention. Telephone interviews, in contrast, proved less efficient since they led to no significant difference (p = 0.052) vis-à-vis the control group in ADR reporting (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). The effects of the interventions on the reporting rate of serious and high-causality ADRs indicated that the RRs associated with workshops were 6.84 (95% CI 6.69, 6.98; p < 0.001) for serious ADRs and 3.58 (95% CI 3.51, 3.66; p < 0.001) for high-causality ADRs., Conclusions: Whereas telephone interventions only increased spontaneous reporting in the first 4 months of follow-up, workshops significantly increased both the quantity and relevance of spontaneous ADR reporting for more than 1 year.

In Portugal, the National Pharmacovigilance System (NPS) was created in 1992, completing during this year 20 years of existence. Having been established in a centralized manner, it soon became aware that its geographic decentralization would bring advantages in terms of proximity of the System to health professionals as well as the involvement of the universities. The NPS currently has four regional pharmacovigilance centres, which cover the entire mainland, which became centers of scientific vocation, carrying out pharmacoepidemiological studies in the area of drug safety. Also, they are the guarantee of proper collection, processing and evaluation of spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), as well as the continuing disclosure of the System among health professionals and promotion of spontaneous reporting. Over these 20 years, the NPS has been adapting to the EU requirements in the area of pharmacovigilance, and is currently a mature and well implemented system, with the objectives of the evaluation of the safety profile of marketed drugs and triggering of actions to reduce the risk of these drugs. From the second half of 2012, new adaptation will be run with the implementation of recent European legislation on Pharmacovigilance, published in December 2010. Among other changes, there is the possibility for consumers to report their suspicious of ADR directly to the NPS (exclusive, so far, to health professionals). This work aims to be a reflection about the evolution of the National Pharmacovigilance System and its growing importance in the protection of public health.