Search

In the present work, the suitability of polyethersulfone (PES) tube was assessed for the simultaneous sorptive microextraction of commonly found endocrine disrupting compounds in natural waters such as bisphenol-A (BPA), nonylphenol technical mixture (NP mix), 4-tert-octylphenol (4tOP), 4-n-octylphenol (4-nOP), 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethynilestradiol (EE2). After the concentration of target compounds in the PES polymer, the analytes were recovered soaking the polymer with a suitable solvent (ethyl acetate or methanol), derivatized using N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide with 1% of trimethylchlorosilane (BSTFA+1% TMCS) and determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The analysis was also performed without derivatization step by means of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Extraction parameters (addition of MeOH, ionic strength, extraction speed and time and desorption time) were evaluated and the optimum conditions were fixed as follows: 150 mL water samples containing a 10% (w/v) of sodium chloride and using 5 tubular PES sorbent fibers (1.5 cm length×0.7 mm o.d.). Equilibrium conditions were achieved after 9 h, with absolute extraction efficiencies ranging from 27 to 56%. On the whole, good apparent recoveries were achieved (68-103% and 81-122% for GC-MS and LC-MS/MS, respectively) using deuterated analogues as surrogates. Achieved quantification limits (LOQs) varied between 2-154 ng/L and 2-63 ng/L for all the compounds using GC-MS and LC-MS/MS, respectively. The effect of organic matter was evaluated previous to apply the final method to the analysis of estuarine and wastewater real samples. The comparison of both methods showed that overall, PES-LC-MS/MS provided shorter sample preparation time and better LODs, but PES-silylation-GC-MS allowed the simultaneous determination of all the studied compounds with adequate repeatability and accuracy., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In this study a priority organic pollutants usually found in environmental water samples were considered to accomplish two extraction and analysis approaches. Among those compounds organochlorine compounds, pesticides, phthalates, phenols and residues of pharmaceutical and personal care products were included. The extraction and analysis steps were based on silicone rod extraction (SR) followed by liquid desorption in combination with large volume injection-programmable temperature vaporiser (LVI-PTV) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Variables affecting the analytical response as a function of the programmable temperature vaporiser (PTV) parameters were firstly optimised following an experimental design approach. The SR extraction and desorption conditions were assessed afterwards, including matrix modification, time extraction, and stripping solvent composition. Subsequently, the possibility of performing membrane enclosed sorptive coating extraction (MESCO) as a modified extraction approach was also evaluated. The optimised method showed low method detection limits (3-35 ng L(-1)), acceptable accuracy (78-114%) and precision values (<13%) for most of the studied analytes regardless of the aqueous matrix. Finally, the developed approach was successfully applied to the determination of target analytes in aqueous environmental matrices including estuarine and wastewater samples., (© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In the present work, the separation of complex nonylphenol technical mixtures has been optimized using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with a flame ionization detector and quadrupole mass spectrometer (GC×GC-qMS), using valve-based modulator. The optimization of GC×GC-qMS has been carried out using experimental designs and the optimal separation was obtained at the following conditions: 1st column flow: 1mL/min; 2nd column flow: 17.75 mL/min, oven temperature ramp: 1°C/min, modulation period: 1.5s and discharge time: 0.12s. These values have been used to determinate the previously synthesized 22OP, 33OP, 363NP and 22NP isomers in two different nonylphenol technical mixtures. Percentages obtained were as follows: 4.86% and 0.59% for 22OP, 4.91% and 2.82% for 33OP, 11.79% and 7.71% for 363NP and 2.28% and 1.98% for 22NP, in Fluka and Aldrich mixtures, respectively. The values obtained for NP isomers are in good agreement with the literature., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The on-fibre derivatisation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) using N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-N-methyltrifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA) was optimised in the simultaneous determination of VFAs together with phenols and indoles by headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Firstly, the nature of the SPME fibre was optimised and four different fibres were studied (100 microm polydimethylsiloxane, 85 microm Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane, 5/30 microm divinylbenzene/Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane and 85 microm polyacrylate). The optimum fibre (50/30 microm divinylbenzene/Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane) was used to study the exposure time of the fibre to the derivatisation agent and the desorption time and temperature. Firstly, a factorial design was built but since the three variables had a significant effect, a central composite design was used to build the response surfaces. The best signals were obtained after the exposure of the fibre in the headspace of the MTBSTFA derivatisation reagent for 1 h and desorption at 300 degrees C for 9 min. The determination of underivatised phenols and indoles was not affected by the presence of the derivatisation reagent in the fibre.

A new method was developed for the simultaneous extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), phthalate esters (PEs), nonylphenols (NPs) and nonylphenol mono- and diethoxylates (NP1EOs and NP2EOs, respectively) in sediment samples by means of a closed microwave system. The extractions were carried out at 21 psi and 80% of microwave power and 15 ml of acetone were used as the common extraction solvent. The filtered extract was further fractionated in two groups using Florisil cartridges: PAHs and PCBs were eluted with n-hexane:toluene (4:1) and the PEs, NPs and ethoxylates were eluted with ethyl acetate. All the compounds were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In case of PAHs and PCBs, the developed method was validated by comparison of the results obtained for the certified reference material NIST 1944 with the certified values. In the absence of a reference material for phthalate esters and nonylphenols, one sediment sample was extracted twice under the optimal conditions in order to check than an exhaustive extraction of the analytes occurred. This method is currently used in the study of the distribution of those organic contaminants in the estuaries of the Bay of Biscay (Spain).

Focused ultrasonic solid-liquid extraction (FUSLE) has been optimised for simultaneous analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), phthalate esters (PEs), and nonylphenols (NPs) in sediment samples. Optimisation was performed using naturally polluted freeze-dried sediment samples. The variables studied during the optimisation process were: percentage of maximum power (10–60%), extraction time (10–300 s), number of cycles (1–9), composition of the extraction solvent (acetone- n-hexane, 10:90–90:10), and sample mass (0.1–1 g). The volume of the extractant was constant (10 mL) and the extraction was performed at 0°C in an ice-bath during the optimisation process. All these variables were studied using an experimental design approach by means of The Unscrambler software. The extraction time and the operational variables (number of cycles and power) had no statistically significant effect in the extraction and they were held at 2 min, 20% power, and seven cycles, respectively. The mass and the addition of non-polar solvent ( n-hexane) had a negative effect in the extraction yield and, thus, the mass was held at 0.5 g and pure acetone was used as extraction solvent. After those variables were optimised, the effect of the extraction temperature (0°C or room temperature) was also studied. The validation of the extraction method was performed using NIST-1944 reference material in the case of PAHs and PCBs. Because no certified reference sediment is available for PEs and NPs, the results obtained for FUSLE were compared with those obtained for microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) under conditions optimised elsewhere. In all the cases the analysis were performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Good accuracy were achieved in all cases. The limits of detection (LODs) obtained were between 0.10 and 1.70 ng g−1 for PAHs (except for naphthalene 5.33 ng g−1), 0.02 and 0.16 ng g−1 for PCBs, 46 and 188 ng g−1 for PEs, and 0.6 and 12.4 μg g−1 for NPs. The precision was around 5–10% for most of the PAHs and PCBs and around 2–10% for most of the PEs and NPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of nonylphenols (NP), nonylphenol mono- and diethoxylates (NP1EO and NP2EO, respectively) and phthalate esters was optimised using an experimental design approach. A D-optimal mixture design was used to optimise the pressure inside the extraction vessel (110–207kPa), the extraction time (5–25min) and the extraction solvent (methanol, acetone or n-hexane) or the solvent mixture for the microwave-assisted extraction. Percentage of microwave power (80%) and solvent volume (15ml) were fixed in all the experiments. As a consequence, the optimum extraction of these compounds was carried out at an intermediate pressure (159kPa) with pure methanol and during 15min. Moreover, solid phase extraction was also optimised for the clean-up of the extracts and C-18, LiChrolut® and Oasis® cartridges were studied in order to obtain the best recoveries of the compounds of interest. The highest recoveries were obtained with LiChrolut® cartridges after the elution with ethyl acetate. The cleaned extracts were analysed in a gas chromatograph with mass spectrometric detection and in a liquid chromatograph with diode array and fluorescence detection (HPLC–DAD-UV–FLD). The same sediment was also extracted twice in order to check that an exhaustive extraction of the analytes had occurred. Finally, the optimised extraction method was compared with pressurised solvent extraction (PSE), using an estuarine sediment sample. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]