Search

Background: Overexpression of the oncogene yes-associated-protein-1 (YAP1) is associated with increased cell proliferation in human cancers. YAP1 is a potential target of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway, which plays an important role in adrenocortical tumors (ACT). The role of YAP1 in adrenocortical tumorigenesis has not been assessed., Aims: To evaluate YAP1 expression in normal adrenals and pediatric ACT and its association with disease outcome. To investigate the interaction between YAP1 and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in adrenocortical cells., Results: Strong YAP1 staining was present in fetal adrenals and pediatric ACT but weak in postnatal adrenals. In pediatric ACT, YAP1 mRNA overexpression was associated with death, recurrent/metastatic disease and lower overall survival. The inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway increased YAP1 mRNA expression. siYAP1 increased CTNNB1/beta-catenin expression and nuclear staining regardless of DLV2, moreover, it decreased cell growth and impaired cell migration., Materials and Methods: We assessed in 42 pediatric ACT samples the YAP1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry and mRNA expression by RT-qPCR and analyzed their association with outcome. As controls, we resort 32 fetal and postnatal normal adrenals for IHC and 10 normal adrenal cortices for RT-qPCR. The interaction between YAP1 and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway was assessed in NCI-H295 adrenocortical cells by inhibiting the TCF/beta-catenin complex and by knocking down YAP1., Conclusion: YAP1 overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis for pediatric patients with ACT. In adrenocortical cells, there is a close crosstalk between YAP1 and Wnt/beta-catenin. These data open the possibility of future molecular therapies targeting Hippo/YAP1 signaling to treat advanced ACT.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of p16, p53, and p63 proteins according to some pathologic parameters related to colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas such as grade of dysplasia and histologic type., Methods: Immunohistochemistry with the antibodies p16, p53, and p63 was performed in tubular, tubular-villous, and villous adenomas (n = 30) and in well, moderately, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (n = 30). The p63-positive cases were submitted to double immunolabeling with the cytokeratin 5 (CK5)., Results: The p16 and p53 labelings were observed in some adenomas and adenocarcinomas but without any association with p63 expression, histologic type, or grade of differentiation of the neoplasm. P63 expression was found mainly in the villous adenomas and in the poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. The poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas also exhibited coexpression of CK5 and p63., Conclusions: Despite both p16 and p53 having been detected in colorectal neoplasms, they were not related to the different histologic variables nor to the expression of p63. However, p63 expression was closely associated with villous adenomas and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. Thus, p63 may represent a marker of poor differentiation in colorectal neoplasms. The coexpression of p63 and CK5 observed in this study could be related to divergent differentiation during the development of colorectal cancer, although further studies are warranted to refine the understanding of this process.

Ovarian cancer is a highly lethal disease and its underlying biology is poorly understood. The p63 is a homologue gene of the tumor suppressor p53. p63 appears to be important for the development and differentiation of reproductive epithelium and interacts with p53 in human tumorigenesis. This study presents the immunoexpression of the p63 in benign and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. We evaluated the p63 immunoexpression in 91 ovarian benign cystadenomas (29 mucinous and 62 serous) and in 29 ovarian malignant tumors (3 mucinous borderline, 3 serous borderline, 17 serous carcinomas, 2 endometrioid, 2 undifferentiated, 1 mucinous, and 1 clear-cell carcinoma) using a monoclonal antibody clone 4A4 (1:200), which recognizes all p63 variants. The tumors were considered p63 positive if 5% or more cells presented nuclear immunostaining. We observed 85.7% of positivity in benign tumors, 50% in borderline tumors, and 8.7% in invasive ovarian cancer (P < .0001). The benign serous cystadenomas were positive in 91.9% of cases and benign mucinous cystadenomas in 72.4% (P= .02). These data suggests an important role of p63 in the control of ovarian epithelium behavior. The p63 may be involved in the development of benign and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.

Aims: To study the expression of p63, cytokeratin (CK) 5 and CK8/18 in invasive ductal carcinomas and their relationship with BRCA1 and other pathological and immunohistochemical features of clinical significance., Methods and Results: Immunohistochemistry with the antibodies p63, CK5, CK8/18, BRCA1, oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, c-erbB-2 and Ki67 was performed in 102 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of invasive ductal carcinomas. The CK5+ cases were submitted to a double-immunolabelling study with p63. There was a strong relationship between CK5 and p63 expression and both markers were associated with hormonal receptor-negative high-grade carcinomas with high proliferative rate. Furthermore, there was coexpression of CK5 and p63 in neoplastic cells, indicating that p63, like CK5, is a marker of the basal phenotype of breast cancer. There was a strong relationship between reduced expression of BRCA1 with both p63 and CK5 expression as well as an inverse correlation between p63 and CK8/18 expression, suggesting that loss of p63 expression is required for the transition between a basal to a luminal phenotype of breast carcinoma., Conclusions: Since p63 is thought to be a marker of stem cells and may act as an oncogene, our data support the idea that BRCA1 acts as stem cell regulator.

Several investigators have identified Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) particles in breast carcinomas, a fact that supports a role for EBV in mammary tumorigenesis. The possible mechanism involved in this process is not clear. The present study was carried out in an attempt to determine whether there is a relationship between latent infection with EBV and p53 and p63 expression in breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry developed with 3.3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was performed in 85 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas using anti-EBV EBNA-1, anti-p63, anti-p53, anti-estrogen receptor (ER) and anti-progesterone receptor (PR) antibodies. The cases were selected to represent each of the various histologic types: intraductal carcinoma (N=12), grade I invasive ductal carcinoma (N=15), grade II invasive ductal carcinoma (N=15), grade III invasive ductal carcinoma (N=15), tubular carcinoma (N=8), lobular carcinoma (N=10), and medullary carcinoma (N=10). The ductal breast carcinomas were graded I, II and III based on the Scarff-Bloom and Richardson grading system modified by Elston and Ellis. One slide containing at least 1000 neoplastic cells was examined in each case. ER, PR, p63, p53 and EBNA-1 were positive in 60, 40, 11.8, 21.2 and 37.6% of carcinomas, respectively. There was a correlation between EBNA-1 and p63 expression (P<0.001), but not between EBNA-1 and p53 (P=0.10). These data suggest a possible role for p63 in the mammary tumorigenesis associated with Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Context: p63 is a recently described p53 homologue. Despite structural homology, they have different activities., Objectives: To obtain new insights into the role of p63 in normal and neoplastic breast tissue and to verify the possible association between p63 and p53 in breast carcinomas., Design: Immunohistochemistry in 85 breast carcinomas using p63, smooth muscle actin (1A4), p53, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor. The p63-positive cases were submitted to a double-immunolabeling study using p63 with 1A4, cytokeratin 7, and 34betaE12. Clinical data were retrieved from medical files., Results: p63, like 1A4, stained a single and continuous layer surrounding normal breast ductal and alveolar epithelium. In carcinomas, p53 was expressed in 21.17% of carcinomas, whereas p63 was expressed only in poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas (11.76% of cases). p63-positive cells coexpressed 1A4 and 34betaE12, but not cytokeratin 7. Expression of p63 correlated with pathologic staging, tumor size, histologic grading, nodal metastasis, and estrogen receptor negativity., Conclusions: p63 is a specific myoepithelial cell marker in normal breast tissue and is expressed in a minority of breast carcinomas, being seen only in grade III ductal carcinomas. In ductal carcinomas, malignant p63-positive cells have an immunophenotype similar to that of myoepithelial cells, suggesting that these cells originate from a primary progenitor cell that underwent divergent differentiation to ductal and myoepithelial cells during clonal expansion. Our study argues against a direct role in mammary tumorigenesis. However, p53 is rarely coexpressed with p63, suggesting that p63 could act indirectly as an oncogene by inhibiting p53. This hypothesis could also explain why p63 correlated with several other indicators of poor prognosis.