Search

Unlabelled: Photopheresis (ECP) is a new immunomodulatory therapy in which recipient lymphocytes are treated extracorporeally with 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet light. The treatment seems to induce an inhibition of both humoral and cellular rejection after transplantation., Objective: Since recurrent rejection (RR) continues to be a severe complication after heart transplantation (HTx) and the immunosuppressive regimes used for the treatment are often associated with increased morbidity and mortality, we investigated whether ECP could have a beneficial effect on the number and severity of rejection episodes., Methods: Eleven HTX recipients (5 M and 6 F, mean age 48.5 yrs) with RR were enrolled in the study. ECP was performed at weekly intervals during the 1st month, at 2 week intervals during the 2nd and 3rd month, and then monthly for another 3 months., Results: The fraction of biopsies (EMB) with a grade 0/1A rejection increased during ECP from 46% to 72% while the EMB showing a 3A/3B rejection decreased from 42% to 18%. It is also noteworthy that out of the 78 EMB performed during ECP only one showed a 3B rejection in comparison with 13 out of 110 EMB in the pre-ECP period. Six rejection relapses were observed in a total follow-up of 60 months, two of them occurring during the tapering of oral steroid. Four relapses were reversed by ECP, one by i.v. steroids and the last by methotrexate after the failure of both i.v. steroids and ECP. The mean doses of immunosuppressive drugs resulted lower after 6 months of ECP: steroids were reduced from 13 to 8.25 mg/day, cyclosporine from 375 to 285 mg/day, azathioprine from 55 to 35 mg/day., Conclusions: ECP is a well tolerated treatment. Its administration allows better RR control and significant reduction in immunosuppressive therapy.

Photopheresis (ECP) is a new form of photochemotherapy that induces a selective inhibition of the host response to foreign histocompatibility antigens and reverses allograft rejection after organ transplantation. This report describes four adolescent patients with recurrent rejection episodes after renal transplantation, all uncontrolled using standard protocols of immunosuppression (intravenous steroids and OKT3), yet successfully treated with a 6-mo course of ECP. The ECP treatment was performed at weekly intervals during the first month, at 2-wk intervals during the second and third months, and then monthly for another 3 mo. Creatinine clearance improved throughout the treatment in three patients and remained unchanged in one. All patients had a pre-ECP biopsy with a grade 2 or 3 rejection (Banff) with a diffuse infiltrate CD8, CD14, LFA-1 (166 cells positive/0.048 mm2), and VLA-4 (51 cells positive/0.048 mm2) positive, as well as a tubular expression of HLA-DR (6.2 sections of tubule positive/0.048 mm2), ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 (3.1 and 2.9 sections of tubule positive/0.048 mm2). A strong reduction of cell infiltrate and expression of LFA-1 (6.6 cells positive/0.048 mm2). VLA-4 (0.7 cells positive/0.048 mm2), HLA-DR (0.2 section of tubules positive/0.048 mm2), ICAM-1 (0.3 section of tubules positive/0.048 mm2), and a disappearance of VCAM-1 staining were observed in the biopsies performed after 3 mo of ECP. All patients remained rejection-free during ECP, without infections or other complications commonly observed with increasing doses of standard immunosuppression. The clinical improvement allowed a progressive reduction of oral steroids in three of the four patients treated.

Photopheresis (ECP) is a new type of photochemotherapy, used for the treatment of oncological and autoimmune diseases. Lymphocytes are drawn from the patients by leukapheresis, treated with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and ultraviolet light A (UVA) in an extracorporeal system and then reinfused. Skin exposure to 8-MOP and UVA (PUVA) has been shown to relieve cutaneous symptoms of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. ECP, which is similar in some ways to PUVA, has been used in this study to treat four paediatric patients who developed chronic GVHD following BMT and in whom GVHD had failed to respond to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Following ECP, skin lesions cleared almost completely and pulmonary function tests improved in two of three patients with cutaneous and lung involvement. Serum bilirubin and transaminases gradually normalized, and gammaGT decreased considerably in the remaining patient who had a severe cholestatic hepatopathy. The Karnofsky performance score increased to 90% in the three patients with positive responses to ECP and remained unchanged (40%) in the patient who did not respond. Immunosuppressive therapy was reduced in three patients and eventually discontinued in two. No significant side-effects were observed during the treatment. Our results suggest that ECP is a non-aggressive treatment that may benefit patients with chronic GVHD who do not respond to standard immunosuppressive therapy.

Recurrent rejection is an uncommon, severe complication after heart transplantation that is associated with a poor long-term prognosis. Photopheresis (ECP), a new form of extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy used for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma and several autoimmune diseases, has also been used for prevention and treatment of acute rejection in heart transplant recipients. It seems to induce specific suppression of both cellular and humoral rejection. In this study, we evaluated whether ECP added to standard therapies allowed better control of rejection and reduction of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in patients with repeated rejection episodes. Eight heart transplant recipients (6 men and 2 women, mean age 48 yr), with recurrent rejection were treated with ECP for 6 months. Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) were performed monthly. As a result of treatment, 7 patients on ECP experienced a reduction of the number and severity of rejection episodes. The fraction of EMB negative for rejection increased from 13 to 41%, whereas the fraction of specimens with multifocal and/or diffuse moderate lymphocytes infiltration (grades 3A and 3B) decreased from 41 to 21%. ECP allowed reductions of daily immunosuppressive therapy: prednisone by 44% (16.9 vs. 9.4 mg), cyclosporine by 21% (366 vs. 291 mg), and azathioprine by 29% (137 vs. 97 mg). No major side effects were observed. We conclude that, although the number of patients is small, the use of ECP was safe and associated with improved control of recurrent rejection. This allowed tapering of immunosuppressive drugs, which was particularly useful in two patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and one with sternal wound osteomyelitis.