Search

Quinone analogue molecules, functioning as herbicides, bind to the secondary quinone site, Q B , in type-II photosynthetic reaction centers, including those from purple bacteria (PbRC). Here, we investigated the impact of herbicide binding on electron transfer branches, using herbicide-bound PbRC crystal structures and employing the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation. In contrast to urea and phenolic herbicides [Fufezan, C. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 12780-12789], binding of atrazine and triazine did not cause significant changes in the redox-potential ( E m ) values of the primary quinone (Q A difference at the bacteriopheophytin in the electron transfer inactive branch (H E m difference at the bacteriopheophytin in the electron transfer inactive branch (H M ) was observed between the S -mediated link between the electron transfer inactive H R (+)-triazine-bound PbRC structures. This discrepancy is linked to variations in the protonation pattern of the tightly coupled Glu-L212 and Glu-H177 pairs, crucial components of the proton uptake pathway in native PbRC. These findings suggest the existence of a Q B -mediated link between the electron transfer inactive H M and the proton uptake pathway in PbRCs.

Using the X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) structures of the photosynthetic reaction center from Blastochloris viridis that show light-induced time-dependent structural changes (Dods et al., (2021) Nature 589 , 310-314), we investigated time-dependent changes in the energetics of the electron-transfer pathway, considering the entire protein environment of the protein structures and titrating the redox-active sites in the presence of all fully equilibrated titratable residues. In the dark and charge separation intermediate structures, the calculated redox potential ( E m and H L and H L and H M and H M ). However, the stabilization of the charge-separated [P L P M H •+ H L (H • - state owing to protein reorganization is not clearly observed in the E m H L state) structure. Furthermore, the expected chlorin ring deformation upon formation of H L (saddling mode) is absent in the H M ] •+ H L • - state) structure. Furthermore, the expected chlorin ring deformation upon formation of H L • - (saddling mode) is absent in the H L geometry of the original 5 ps structure. These findings suggest that there is no clear link between the time-dependent structural changes and the electron-transfer events in the XFEL structures., Competing Interests: GN, YS, KS, HI No competing interests declared, (© 2023, Nishikawa et al.)

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs), light-induced charge separation leads to the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor quinone, Q B . The reduction of Q B to Q B •- is followed by protonation via Asp-L213 and Ser-L223 in PbRC from Rhodobacter sphaeroides . However, Asp-L213 is replaced with nontitratable Asn-L222 and Asn-L213 in PbRCs from Thermochromatium tepidum , respectively. Here, we investigated the energetics of proton transfer along the asparagine-involved H-bond network using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. The potential energy profile for the H-bond between H Blastochloris viridis , respectively. Here, we investigated the energetics of proton transfer along the asparagine-involved H-bond network using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. The potential energy profile for the H-bond between H 3 O + and the carbonyl O site of Asn-L222 shows that the proton is predominantly localized at the Asn-L222 moiety in the T. tepidum site toward Ser-L232 via tautomerization suffers from the energy barrier. Upon reorientation of Asn-L222, the enol -OH site forms a short low-barrier H-bond with Ser-L232, facilitating protonation of Q 2 site toward Ser-L232 via tautomerization suffers from the energy barrier. Upon reorientation of Asn-L222, the enol -OH site forms a short low-barrier H-bond with Ser-L232, facilitating protonation of Q B •- in a Grotthuss-like mechanism. This is a basis of how asparagine or glutamine side chains function as acceptors/donors in proton transfer pathways.

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides , the secondary quinone Q B accepts two electrons and two protons via electron-coupled proton transfer (PT). Here, we identify PT pathways that proceed toward the Q B binding site, using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. As the first electron is transferred to Q B , the formation of the Grotthuss-like pre-PT H-bond network is observed along Asp-L213, Ser-L223, and the distal Q B carbonyl O site. As the second electron is transferred, the formation of a low-barrier H-bond is observed between His-L190 at Fe and the proximal Q B carbonyl O site, which facilitates the second PT. As Q B H 2 leaves PbRC, a chain of water molecules connects protonated Glu-L212 and deprotonated His-L190 forms, which serves as a pathway for the His-L190 reprotonation. The findings of the second pathway, which does not involve Glu-L212, and the third pathway, which proceeds from Glu-L212 to His-L190, provide a mechanism for PT commonly used among PbRCs., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.)

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRC) and the water-oxidizing enzyme, photosystem II (PSII), charge separation occurs along one of the two symmetrical electron-transfer branches. Here we report the microscopic origin of the unidirectional charge separation, fully considering electron-hole interaction, electronic coupling of the pigments, and electrostatic interaction with the polarizable entire protein environments. The electronic coupling between the pair of bacteriochlorophylls is large in PbRC, forming a delocalized excited state with the lowest excitation energy (i.e., the special pair). The charge-separated state in the active branch is stabilized by uncharged polar residues in the transmembrane region and charged residues on the cytochrome c 2 binding surface. In contrast, the accessory chlorophyll in the D1 protein (Chl D1 ) has the lowest excitation energy in PSII. The charge-separated state involves Chl D1 •+ and is stabilized predominantly by charged residues near the Mn 4 CaO 5 cluster and the proceeding proton-transfer pathway. It seems likely that the acquirement of water-splitting ability makes Chl D1 the initial electron donor in PSII., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest., (Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.)

Photosynthetic reaction centers from Blastochloris viridis possess Tyr-L162 located mid-way between the special pair chlorophyll (P) and the heme (heme3). While mutation of the tyrosine does not affect the kinetics of electron transfer from heme3 to P, recent time-resolved Laue diffraction studies reported displacement of Tyr-L162 in response to the formation of the photo-oxidized P(+•), implying a possible tyrosine deprotonation event. pK(a) values for Tyr-L162 were calculated using the corresponding crystal structures. Movement of deprotonated Tyr-L162 toward Thr-M185 was observed in P(+•) formation. It was associated with rearrangement of the H-bond network that proceeds to P via Thr-M185 and His-L168.

In bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), the electron is transferred from the special pair (P) via accessory bacteriochlorophyll (B(A)), bacteriopheopytin (H(A)), the primary quinone (Q(A)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)). Although the non-heme iron complex (Fe complex) is located between Q(A) and Q(B), it was generally supposed not to be redox-active. Involvement of the Fe complex in electron transfer (ET) was proposed in recent FTIR studies [A. Remy and K. Gerwert, Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis, Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 637-644]. However, other FTIR studies resulted in opposite results [J. Breton, Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of Q(A) and Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones, Biochemistry 46 (2007) 4459-4465]. In this study, we calculated redox potentials of Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) and the Fe complex (E(m)(Fe)) based on crystal structure of the wild-type bRC (WT-bRC), and we investigated the energetics of the system where the Fe complex is assumed to be involved in the ET. E(m)(Fe) in WT-bRC is much less pH-dependent than that in PSII. In WT-bRC, we observed significant coupling of ET with Glu-L212 protonation upon oxidation of the Fe complex and a dramatic E(m)(Fe) downshift by 230 mV upon formation of Q(A)(-) (but not Q(B)(-)) due to the absence of proton uptake of Glu-L212. Changes in net charges of the His ligands of the Fe complex appear to be the nature of the redox event if we assume the involvement of the Fe complex in the ET.

In photosynthesis, light is captured by antenna proteins. These proteins transfer the excitation energy with almost 100% quantum efficiency to the reaction centers, where charge separation takes place. The time scale and pathways of this transfer are controlled by the protein scaffold, which holds the pigments at optimal geometry and tunes their excitation energies (site energies). The detailed understanding of the tuning of site energies by the protein has been an unsolved problem since the first high-resolution crystal structure of a light-harvesting antenna appeared >30 years ago [Fenna RE, Matthews BW (1975) Nature 258:573-577]. Here, we present a combined quantum chemical/electrostatic approach to compute site energies that considers the whole protein in atomic detail and provides the missing link between crystallography and spectroscopy. The calculation of site energies of the Fenna-Matthews-Olson protein results in optical spectra that are in quantitative agreement with experiment and reveals an unexpectedly strong influence of the backbone of two alpha-helices. The electric field from the latter defines the direction of excitation energy flow in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson protein, whereas the effects of amino acid side chains, hitherto thought to be crucial, largely compensate each other. This result challenges the current view of how energy flow is regulated in pigment-protein complexes and demonstrates that attention has to be paid to the backbone architecture.

To elucidate the role of the non-heme iron complex (Fe-complex) in the electron transfer (ET) events of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), we calculated redox potentials of primary/secondary quinones Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) in the Fe-depleted bRC. Removing the Fe-complex, the calculated E(m)(Q(A/B)) are downshifted by approximately 220 mV/ approximately 80 mV explaining both the 15-fold decrease in ET rate from bacteriopheophytin (H(A)(-)) to Q(A) and triplet state occurrence in Fe-depleted bRC. The larger downshift in E(m)(Q(A)) relative to E(m)(Q(B)) increases the driving-energy for ET from Q(A) to Q(B) by 140 meV, in agreement with approximately 100 meV increase derived from kinetic studies.

At the heart of photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) are pairs of chlorophyll a (Chla), P700 in photosystem I (PSI) and P680 in photosystem II (PSII) of cyanobacteria, algae, or plants, and a pair of bacteriochlorophyll a (BChla), P870 in purple bacterial RCs (PbRCs). These pairs differ greatly in their redox potentials for one-electron oxidation, E(m). For P680, E(m) is 1,100-1,200 mV, but for P700 and P870, E(m) is only 500 mV. Calculations with the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation reproduce these measured E(m) differences successfully. Analyzing the origin for these differences, we found as major factors in PSII the unique Mn(4)Ca cluster (relative to PSI and PbRC), the position of P680 close to the luminal edge of transmembrane alpha-helix d (relative to PSI), local variations in the cd loop (relative to PbRC), and the intrinsically higher E(m) of Chla compared with BChla (relative to PbRC).

The absence of the PsaC subunit in the photosystem I (PSI) complex (native PSI complex) by mutagenesis or chemical manipulation yields a PSI core (P700-F(X) core) that also lacks subunits PsaD and PsaE and the two iron-sulfur clusters F(A) and F(B), which constitute an integral part of PsaC. In this P700-F(X) core, the redox potentials (E(m)) of the two quinones A(1A/B) and the iron-sulfur cluster F(X) as well as the corresponding protonation patterns are investigated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation. The B-side specific Asp-B558 changes its protonation state significantly upon isolating the P700-F(X) core, being mainly protonated in the native PSI complex but ionized in the P700-F(X) core. In the P700-F(X) core, E(m)(A(1A/B)) remains practically unchanged, whereas E(m)(F(X)) is upshifted by 42 mV. With these calculated E(m) values, the electron transfer rate from A(1) to F(X) in the P700-F(X) core is estimated to be slightly faster on the A(1A) side than that of the wild type, which is consistent with kinetic measurements.

Cd(2+) binding at the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides is known to inhibit proton transfer (PT) from bulk solvent to the secondary quinone Q(B). To elucidate this mechanism, we calculated the pK(a) for residues along the water channels connecting Q(B) with the stromal side based on the crystal structures of WT-bRC and Cd(2+)-bound bRC. Upon Cd(2+) binding, we observed the release of two protons from His-H126/128 at the Cd(2+) binding site and significant pK(a) shifts for residues along the PT pathways. Remarkably, Asp-L213 near Q(B), which is proposed to play a significant role in PT, resulted in a decrease in pK(a) upon Cd(2+) binding. The direct electrostatic influence of the Cd(2+)-positive charge on these pK(a) shifts was small. Instead, conformational changes of amino acid side chains induced electrostatically by Cd(2+) binding were the main mechanism for these pK(a) shifts. The long-range electrostatic influence over approximately 12 A between Cd(2+) and Asp-L213 is likely to originate from a set of Cd(2+)-induced successive reorientations of side chains (Asp-H124, His-H126, His-H128, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, Asp-M17, and Asp-L210), which propagate along the PT pathways as a "domino" effect.

Accessory chlorophylls (B(A/B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center play a key role in charge-separation. Although light-exposed and dark-adapted bRC crystal structures are virtually identical, the calculated B(A) redox potentials for one-electron reduction differ. This can be traced back to different orientations of the B(A) ester-group. This tuning ability of chlorophyll redox potentials modulates the electron transfer from SP* to B(A).

Ser-L223 is close to ubiquinone (Q(B)) in the B-branch of the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) from Rhodobacter (Rb) sphaeroides. Therefore, the presence of a hydrogen bond (H bond) between the two was naturally proposed from the crystal structure. The hydrogen bonding pattern of Q(B) from the light-exposed structure was studied by generating hydrogen atom coordinates based on the CHARMM force field. In the Q(B) neutral charge state (Q(B)(0)), no H bond was found between the oxygen of the OH group from Ser-L223 and the carbonyl oxygen of Q(B) that is distal to the non-heme iron. In the reduced state (Q(B)(-)), however, Ser-L213 was found to form an H bond with Q(B) only when Asp-L213 is protonated by more than 0.75 H(+). This indicates the significance of the protonation of Asp-L213 in forming an H bond between Ser-L223 and Q(B). We found that the driving force to form the H bond between Ser-L223 and Q(B) is enhanced by the positively charged Arg-L217. The calculated Q(B) redox potentials with or without this H bond discriminated two ET rates, which are close to the faster and slower time phases observed in UV-Vis and FTIR studies. Together with the calculated redox potential of the quinones, this H-bond formation could play a key role in conformational gating for the ET process from Q(A) to Q(B).

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.