The Greater Himalayan Slab (GHS) is composed of a north-dipping anatectic core, bounded above by the South Tibetan detachment system (STDS) and below by the Main Central thrust zone (MCTZ). Assuming simultaneous movement on the MCTZ and STDS, the GHS can be modelled as a southward-extruding wedge or channel. New insights into extrusionrelated flow within the GHS emerge from detailed kinematic and vorticity analyses in the Everest region. At the highest structural levels, mean kinematic vorticity number (Wm) estimates of 0.74–0.91 (c. 45–28% pure shear) were obtained from sheared Tethyan limestone and marble from the Yellow Band on Mount Everest. Underlying amphibolite-facies schists and gneisses, exposed in Rongbuk valley, yield Wm estimates of 0.57–0.85 (c. 62–35% pure shear) and associated microstructures indicate that flow occurred at close to peak metamorphic conditions. Vorticity analysis becomes progressively more problematic as deformation temperatures increase towards the anatectic core. Within the MCTZ, rigid elongate garnet grains yield Wm estimates of 0.63–0.77 (c. 58–44% pure shear). We attribute flow partitioning in the GHS to spatial and temporal variations that resulted in the juxtaposition of amphibolite-facies rocks, which record early stages of extrusion, with greenschist to unmetamorphosed samples that record later stages of exhumation. The .2500 km length of the Himalayan orogen is cored by a suite of north-dipping metamorphic rocks (the Greater Himalayan Slab; GHS), that are bounded above and below by the normal-sense South Tibetan detachment system (STDS) and reverse-sense Main Central thrust zone (MCTZ), respectively (Figs 1 & 2). Assuming simultaneous movement along these crustal-scale bounding shear zones (see review by Godin et al. 2006b), the GHS is often modelled as a north-dipping wedge or channel of mid-crustal rocks that was extruded southward from beneath the Tibetan plateau (Fig. 2) beginning in early Miocene time (e.g. Burchfiel & Royden 1985; Burchfiel et al. 1992; Hodges et al. 1992). Although consensus on this general concept of extrusion during crustal convergence exists, and a range of orogen-scale kinematic and thermal–mechanical extrusion models have been proposed, surprisingly little research has focused on quantifying the kinematics (vorticity) of flow within the slab and its potential causal relationship with progressive exhumation of the GHS. The use of vorticity analysis to quantify flow within sheared rocks has proven to be a useful tool for quantifying the nature and distribution of flow regimes within a range of tectonic settings including contractional (e.g. Simpson & De Paor 1997; Xypolias & Doutsos 2000; Xypolias & Koukouvelas 2001, Xypolias & Kokkalas 2006), extensional (Wells 2001; Bailey & Eyster 2003) and transpressional (Wallis 1995; Klepeis et al. 1999; Holcombe & Little 2001; Bailey et al. 2004) regimes. Vorticity analysis enables estimation of the relative contributions of pure and simple shear, yielding important constraints for GHS extrusion models. Identification of a pure shear component is critically important because such flow would result in: (1) thinning and transport-parallel extension of the slab itself, and (2) an increase in both strain rates and extrusion rates relative to strict simple shear. Attempts to quantify From: LAW, R. D., SEARLE, M. P. & GODIN, L. (eds) Channel Flow, Ductile Extrusion and Exhumation in Continental Collision Zones. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 268, 379–413. 0305-8719/06/$15.00 # The Geological Society of London 2006. flow within the GHS that accommodated this southward extrusion are limited to: (1) a single transect through the lowermost 900 m of the GHS exposed in the Sutlej valley of NW India (Fig. 1; Grasemann et al. 1999; Vannay & Grasemann 2001); (2) preliminary results from the top of the GHS exposed in the Rongbuk valley on the north side of the Everest massif, Tibet (Law et al. 2004); and (3) preliminary results from the middle of the GHS in the Bhutan Himalaya (Carosi et al. 2006). Quantifying and characterizing flow within the GHS is important for development of more realistic models for evolution of the Himalaya, particularly those that propose a synergistic interplay between extrusion, erosion and exhumation (e.g. Beaumont et al. 2001, 2004, 2006; Hodges et al. 2001; Grujic et al. 2002; Jamieson et al. 2004, 2006; Hodges 2006). The topographic relief of the Everest massif, Tibet/Nepal (Fig. 1), provides a window into mid-crustal processes responsible for extrusion of the GHS, and a particularly appropriate field area to test the various components of extrusion models. In this paper, we combine field-based structural analysis with detailed vorticity analyses of samples from a north–south transect through the GHS in the Everest region using the rigid grain technique of Wallis et al. (1993) and Wallis (1995). Samples collected for vorticity analyses are from a variety of structural and lithologic settings, including high-altitude and summit samples collected during two pioneering climbing expeditions (1933 and 1953) on the north and south sides of Mount Everest, respectively. Rigid grain analysis using elongate garnet porphyroclasts quantify flow along the MCTZ and, by integration Khatmandu Darjeeling Everest Transect Shivling Zanskar