1. ALMA uncovers the [C ii] emission and warm dust continuum in a z = 8.31 Lyman break galaxy
- Author
-
Ken Mawatari, Ikkoh Shimizu, Yoshiaki Taniguchi, Takuya Hashimoto, Erik Zackrisson, Kazuaki Ota, Takashi Okamoto, Akio K. Inoue, Hiroshi Matsuo, Kotaro Kohno, Yuichi Matsuda, H. Umehata, Takatoshi Shibuya, Naoki Yoshida, Bunyo Hatsukade, Minju Lee, Yoichi Tamura, and T. Bakx
- Subjects
Physics ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena ,Continuum (design consultancy) ,FOS: Physical sciences ,Astronomy and Astrophysics ,Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics ,Astrophysics ,Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies ,01 natural sciences ,Submillimeter Array ,Space and Planetary Science ,galaxies: high-redshift ,Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA) ,0103 physical sciences ,Astrophysics::Solar and Stellar Astrophysics ,galaxies: formation ,Millimeter ,Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics ,010303 astronomy & astrophysics ,Lyman-break galaxy ,Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics ,galaxies: ISM - Abstract
We report on the detection of the [CII] 157.7 $\mu$m emission from the Lyman break galaxy (LBG) MACS0416_Y1 at z = 8.3113, by using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). The luminosity ratio of [OIII] 88 $\mu$m (from previous campaigns) to [CII] is 9.31 $\pm$ 2.6, indicative of hard interstellar radiation fields and/or a low covering fraction of photo-dissociation regions. The emission of [CII] is cospatial to the 850 $\mu$m dust emission (90 $\mu$m rest-frame, from previous campaigns), however the peak [CII] emission does not agree with the peak [OIII] emission, suggesting that the lines originate from different conditions in the interstellar medium. We fail to detect continuum emission at 1.5 mm (160 $\mu$m rest-frame) down to 18 $\mu$Jy (3$\sigma$). This nondetection places a strong limit on the dust spectrum, considering the 137 $\pm$ 26 $\mu$Jy continuum emission at 850 $\mu$m. This suggests an unusually warm dust component (T $>$ 80 K, 90% confidence limit), and/or a steep dust-emissivity index ($\beta_{\rm dust}$ $>$ 2), compared to galaxy-wide dust emission found at lower redshifts (typically T $\sim$ 30 - 50 K, $\beta_{\rm dust}$ $\sim$ 1 - 2). If such temperatures are common, this would reduce the required dust mass and relax the dust production problem at the highest redshifts. We therefore warn against the use of only single-wavelength information to derive physical properties, recommend a more thorough examination of dust temperatures in the early Universe, and stress the need for instrumentation that probes the peak of warm dust in the Epoch of Reionization., Comment: 15 pages, 8 figures, Accepted by MNRAS
- Published
- 2020