Search

BACKGROUND: The cryoballoon represents the gold standard single-shot device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Single-shot pulsed field PVI ablation (nonthermal, cardiac tissue selective) has recently entered the arena. We sought to compare procedural data and long-term outcome of both techniques. METHODS: Consecutive AF patients who underwent pulsed field ablation (PFA) and cryoballoon-based PVI were enrolled. Cryoballoon PVI was performed using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon; PFA was performed using a 31/35-mm pentaspline catheter. Success was defined as no recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were included (56.5% men; 60.8% paroxysmal AF; age, 70 [interquartile range, 59–77] years), 200 in each group (cryoballoon and PFA), and baseline characteristics did not differ. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PFA and in 98% (196/200) of cryoballoon patients ( P =0.123; 4 touch-up ablations). Median procedure time was significantly shorter in PFA (34.5 [29–40] minutes) versus cryoballoon (50 [45–60] minutes; P P =0.1), driven by a higher rate of phrenic nerve palsies using cryoballoon. The 1-year success rates in paroxysmal AF (cryoballoon, 83.1%; PFA, 80.3%; P =0.724) and persistent AF (cryoballoon, 71%; PFA, 66.8%; P =0.629) were similar for both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: PFA compared with cryoballoon PVI shows a similar procedural efficacy but is associated with shorter procedure time and no phrenic nerve palsies. Importantly, 12-month clinical success rates are favorable but not different between both groups.

Aims A novel irrigated radiofrequency (RF) balloon (RFB) for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) was released in selected centres. We pooled the procedural data on efficacy and safety of RFB-PVI from two high volume German centres. Methods and results Consecutive patients with RFB procedures were enrolled. A 3D electroanatomical left atrial map guided the RFB navigation. Every RF delivery lasted 60 s, and duration was automatically reduced to 20 s for electrodes facing the posterior wall. Procedural data and post-procedural endoscopy data ( Conclusion The RFB showed a high efficacy allowing for fast PVI procedures, and 60% of PVs could be isolated at the first application. Most safety events were recorded during the learning phase. An oesophageal temperature monitoring is suggested: oesophageal lesions were detected in 8% of patients.

Catheter ablation is a widely used, effective and safe treatment for AF. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), as a novel energy source for cardiac ablation, has been shown to be tissue selective and is expected to decrease damage to non-cardiac tissue while providing high efficacy in pulmonary vein isolation. The FARAPULSE ablation system (Boston Scientific) follows the idea of single-shot ablation and is the first device approved for clinical use in Europe. Since its approval, multiple high-volume centres have performed increasing numbers of PFA procedures in patients with AF and have published their experiences. This review summarises the current clinical experience regarding the use of PFA for AF using the FARAPULSE system. It provides an overview of its efficacy and safety.

Ablation of atrial fibrillation in the context of obesity can be challenging. We sought to evaluate the role of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) in obese patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).Patients with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m600 patients were included (59% male; 66 ± 11 years old); 337, 149, and 114 were assigned to G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Acute procedural success was recorded in 99.7% of patients. Procedural and fluoroscopy time were comparable but the radiation dose was significantly higher in G3. Procedural complications were 3% in G1, 5.4% in G2, and 8.8% in G3 (p = .01). The overall freedom from AF after 1-year was 77%. G3 had a significantly worse 1-year success rate compared to G1 and G2 (G3: 66.5% vs. G1: 78.4%; p = .015 and vs. G2: 82.5%; p = .008) with reduced 1-year success in paroxysmal AF (G1: 84.0%; G2: 86.3%; and G3: 69.6%) but not in persistent AF (G1: 68.7%; G2: 77.4%; and G3: 62.1%). G3 showed similar success rates irrespective of AF form (PAF: 69.6% vs. persAF 62.1%; p = .501).Cryoballoon ablation in obese patients can be effective with an acceptable safety profile, 77% of patients were in stable SR at 1 year. Severe obese patients (BMI ≥ 35) showed reduced procedural safety and 1-year success rate. In association with life style modification, CB ablation may represent a strategy to enhance rhythm control in the context of obesity.

AimsPulsed-field ablation (PFA) can offer a novel perspective for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to characterize the incidence of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection, types of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) and lesion quality after PFA-guided PV isolation (PVI).Methods and resultsPatients undergoing second ablation for recurrent ATa following the initial PVI using the pentaspline PFA catheter were investigated. The rate of PV reconnection, the features of recurrent ATa, and the amount of isolated posterior wall (PW) surface area (ISAPW%) (ratio of the isolated- to total surface area on PW) were analyzed.ResultsAmong 360 patients treated with PFA, 25 patients (paroxysmal AF, n = 19) with 99 PVs underwent a second procedure 6.1 ± 4.0 months after the initial procedure. The rate of PV reconnection was 9.1% (9 PVs). Patients presented with atrial tachycardia (AT) (n = 16), AF (n = 8) and typical atrial flutter (n = 1). The mechanism of all but one AT was macro-reentry. The critical isthmus was found to be linked to the initial lesion set at the left atrial (LA) PW in eight patients and linked to pre-existing substrate at the LA anterior wall in four patients. One AT had a focal origin at the septum. In three patients, AT were unmappable. Mean ISAPW% was 72.7 ± 19.0%.ConclusionWe revealed a remarkable low reconnection rate with a large antral lesion at the PW after pentaspline PFA catheter-guided PVI. However, macro-reentrant AT with a critical isthmus at the LAPW linked to the PVI lesion set was commonly observed.

Background: Pulsed field ablation represents an energy source specific for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to describe the adoption and the process of streamlining procedures with a new ablation technology. Methods: All-comer atrial fibrillation patients (n=191; mean age 69±12 years) underwent catheter ablation with a pulsed field ablation ablation device exclusively using analog-sedation. In the validation phase (n=25), device electrogram quality was compared with a circular mapping catheter to assess pulmonary vein isolation and esophageal temperature monitoring was used. In the streamline phase (n=166), a single-catheter approach was implemented. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 53 patients. In 52 patients, esophageal endoscopy was performed at day 1 after the procedure. Follow-up was performed using 72 hours Holter ECGs. Results: On a pulmonary vein basis, pulmonary vein isolation rate was 100% including a single shot isolation rate of 99.5%. The electrogram information of the pulsed field ablation catheter and the circular mapping catheter were 100% congruent. Neither esophageal temperature rises nor esophageal thermal injury were observed. Two minor strokes occurred, presumable due to air embolism during catheter exchanges through the large bore sheath (13.8 F ID). In the streamline phase, reduced procedure times (46±14 versus 38±13 minutes, P =0.004), no further strokes and a low incidence of silent cerebral injury (10/53 patients; 19%) were noted. During short-term follow-up, 17/191 patients (9%) had a atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. Conclusions: The pulsed field ablation device allows for simple and safe simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation using standard sedation protocols. Procedural speed and efficacy are remarkable and streamlining measures have added safety.

Background The role of nonpulmonary vein (PV) triggers ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PEAF) was suggested but it is still under debate. Objectives We aimed to assess the effectiveness of non-PV trigger-targeted ablation for patients with PEAF. Methods Consecutive patients with PEAF undergoing catheter ablation (CA) between January 2015 and April 2017 were enrolled. Isoproterenol plus adenosine challenge was performed to provoke non-PV triggers. Non-PV triggers were defined as the trigger beats inducing AF (non-PV AF triggers) and/or frequent premature contractions (non-PV PACs) from other than PVs. Three groups were defined: Group 1 (n = 186) without non-PV triggers; Group 2 (n = 65) with non-PV triggers that could be completely eliminated with CA; Group 3 (n = 49) with non-PV triggers still inducible after CA. The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence. Results A total of 300 patients (230 males, age 64 ± 10) were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 27 ± 10 months. Freedom from ATa recurrence at 1 and 2 years were significantly lower in Group 3 compared to the other two groups (Group 1; 74.7%, 67.2% vs. Group 2; 75.8%, 68.3% vs. Group 3: 52.1%, 38.6%, p = .0005), irrespective of the type of non-PV triggers (non-PV AF triggers vs. non-PV PACs). On multivariate analysis, unsuccessful elimination of non-PV triggers was an independent predictor for ATa recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval = 1.07-2.95, p = .026). Conclusion Successful non-PV triggers elimination can improve the ATa recurrence rate in PEAF ablation. ATa recurrence rate is higher, if non-PV AF triggers or even non-PV PACs remain in patients with PEAF.

Background High-power, short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates the procedure and improve effectiveness; however, esophageal injury remains a safety concern. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during high-power ablation for PVI in terms of endoscopic esophageal lesion. Methods Patients with symptomatic AF underwent ablation index–guided high-power (AI-HP) PVI (50 W; AI anterior wall/posterior wall: 550/400). In the first consecutive set of patients, an insulated esophageal temperature probe was used for LET monitoring (cutoff LET >39°C) (group A). In the second consecutive set of patients, the probe was not used (group B). All patients were scheduled to undergo esophageal endoscopy 1–3 days after ablation. Results A total of 120 patients (60 group A; 60 group B) were included in the study (mean age 67.8 years; 64% male). Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedural PVI was achieved in all patients. First-pass PVI rate was 96.6%. Mean procedural radiofrequency (RF) time was 11.5 minutes, mean procedural time was 55.5 minutes, and fluoroscopic time was 5.6 minutes. Mean contact force at the LA posterior wall was 23 g, and mean RF ablation time at the LA posterior wall was 3.2 minutes. Two patients in group A and 1 patient in group B had endoscopic small esophageal lesions (P = .99). No serious procedural adverse events were observed. Conclusion Among patients undergoing AI-HP (50 W) PVI, the incidences of ablation-related endoscopic esophageal lesion in patients with and those without use of a temperature probe for LET monitoring (cutoff 39°C) were comparably low.

The iCLAS ultra-low temperature cryoablation (ULTC) system has recently been brought to the market. A combination of a newly exploited cryogen and interchangeable stylet enables flexible and continuous lesion creation in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The use of an esophageal warming balloon is recommended when using the system to reduce the potential for collateral esophageal injury.To describe the initial clinical experience when using ULTC in the AF treatment without general anesthesia (GA).Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation using ULTC under deep sedation without GA were enrolled. We assessed the procedural data focusing on "single-shot isolation" defined as successful pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after the first application. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was systematically performed the day after ablation.A total of 27 AF patients (67% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. Onehundred four out of 106 PVs (98.1%) were isolated solely using ULTC. The mean procedure time was 79 ± 30 min. The mean number of applications per PV was 2.6 ± 1.0. Single-shot isolation was achieved in 57 PVs (54%) varying across PVs from left superior to inferior PVs (40%-64%). The single procedure 6-month recurrence-free rate was 84%. No major complication (cerebrovascular event, pericardial effusion/tamponade, esophageal damage on esophagogastroduodenoscopy) occurred. A single transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred during the right superior PV ablation, which had recovered by the 3-month follow-up appointment.AF ablation using the novel ULTC system seemed feasible without GA and enabled a50% single-shot isolation rate. The promising safety profile has to be confirmed in large-scale studies.

We report a case of an incessant atrial tachycardia from the right atrial appendage that was effectively treated with pulsed field ablation after two failed radio frequency ablation attempts.

BACKGROUND The endoscopic ablation system (EAS) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The novel X3 EAS is now equipped with a contiguous circumferential ablation mode (RAPID mode). AIM To determine the feasibility of single-shot fashioned ablation using X3. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation using X3 were enrolled. We assessed the acute procedural data focusing on "Single-sweep PVI" defined as successful PVI with a single RAPID mode energy application, and on "first-pass isolation" defined as successful PVI after initial circular lesion set. RESULTS One hundred AF patients (56% male, age: 68 ± 10 years, 66% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. A total of 379 of 383 PVs (99%) were isolated with X3. Single-sweep PVI and first-pass-isolation were achieved in 214 PVs (56%) and in 362 PVs (95%), respectively. Single-sweep PVI rates varied across PVs with higher rates at the superior PVs (61.2% vs. inferior PVs: 49.5%, p = .0239) and at PVs with maximal ostial diameter 24 mm: 36.8%, p = .0151). The mean total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 43.0 ± 10 and 4.0 ± 2 min, respectively. In none of the patients an acute thromboembolic event (stroke or transient ischemic attack) or a pericardial effusion/tamponade occurred. A single transient phrenic nerve palsy was observed. CONCLUSION The new X3 EAS allows for single-shot fashioned ablation in terms of single-sweep PVI in half or more of PVs. The new RAPID ablation mode leads to an improved rate of first-pass isolation associated with very short procedure times without compromising safety.

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency high-power ablation appears to be a novel concept for atrial fibrillation (AF). The ablation index (AI) value has been associated with durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). OBJECTIVES This study aimed to report the procedural data and initial results of a combined ablation technique using AI-guided high-power (AI-HP; 50 W) ablation for PVI. METHODS Symptomatic AF patients were consecutively enrolled and underwent wide-area contiguous circumferential PVI. Contact-force catheters were used, ablation power was set to 50 W targeting AI values (550 anterior and 400 posterior). Esophageal temperature was monitored during procedure, all patients underwent postablation esophageal endoscopy. RESULTS PVI was achieved in all (n = 50, mean age: 68 ± 9 years, female: 60%) patients, rate of first-round PVI was 92%. A total of N = 2105 AI-guided ablation lesions were analyzed. Comparing left anterior wall vs left posterior wall and right anterior wall vs right posterior wall, mean ablation time (s) per lesion was 20.5 ± 8 vs 8.6 ± 3 and 12.2 ± 4 vs 9.3 ± 3; mean contact force (g): 17.1 ± 12 vs 25.4 ± 14 and 33.7 ± 13 vs 21.0 ± 11; mean AI: 547 ± 48 vs 445 ± 55 and 555 ± 56 vs 440 ± 47 (all P

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): CardioFocus Background The endoscopic ablation system (EAS) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). In randomized studies, however, point-by-point laser ablation resulted in longer procedure times. The novel X3 EAS is now equipped with a motor driven laser generator that sweeps the diode laser beam around the individual PV ostium at a pre-defined speed (2.25°/sec) thus allowing for contiguous circumferential ablation (RAPID mode). Purpose To determine the feasibility of single sweep ablation using the new X3 EAS. Methods Consecutive AF patients were enrolled. After single transseptal puncture selective PV angiographies were performed. A 3D enabled circular mapping catheter was used to record PV potentials and to create a 3D map of the left atrium. Then, the transseptal sheath was exchanged for the 12F EAS delivery sheath. The EAS was inflated to obtain optimal circumferential contact to the PV ostium. Before ablation, the laser generator was retracted to ensure optimal contact behind the catheter shaft (blind spot). Ideally, RAPID mode ablation was employed at 13-15W. In case of esophageal heating >39°C or suboptimal tissue exposure point-by-point ablation (5.5-12W for 20-30 secs) was used instead. During ablation at the septal PVs phrenic nerve pacing was performed via a diagnostic catheter in the superior vena cava. Single sweep ablation was defined as one single RAPID energy application per PV to complete the singular, circular lesion set. PV conduction was re-assessed after all PVs had been treated. In case of residual PV conduction, gap mapping followed by EAS guided ablation was performed. If EAS failed to achieve complete PVI, touch up ablation was allowed at the discretion of the operator. Hemostasis was achieved by means of a figure of 8 suture. Procedure time was defined as initial groin puncture to groin closure. Follow-up included office visits at 3, 6 and 12 months including 72 h Holter monitoring. Results One-hundred AF patients (56% male, mean age 6810 years, 66% PAF) with normal LV ejection fraction (mean 60 ± 10%) and normal LA size (41 ± 6mm) underwent X3 EAS ablation. Of 382 PVs 378 (99%) were isolated with the X3 EAS. In 214 PVs (56%) single sweep isolation was achieved. First pass isolation and RAPID mode only PVI was achieved in 362 (95%) and 357 (94%), respectively. Single sweep isolation rates varied across PVs from 46% at LIPV to 64% at RSPV. The mean total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 43 ± 10 and 4 ± 2 mins, respectively. Safety data and the complete follow-up will be reported. Conclusion The new X3 EAS equipped with a motor driven laser generator allows for single sweep PVI in 56% of PVs. Almost all PVs (94%) may be isolated with RAPID mode only leading to a very high first pass isolation rate. Altogether, this leads to substantially faster procedure times compared to the predecessor EAS.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background A novel irrigated RF balloon (RFB) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was recently released in selected centers . It is a 28 mm open irrigated balloon with 10 unipolar electrodes on its surface to deploy a circular ostial lesion set around the PVs. An inner lumen spiral catheter allows for real time PVI visualization during the ablation. Methods Data from consecutive RFB procedures were collected and analysed. After a single transseptal puncture and selective PV angiograms a 3D map of the left atrium was acquired. Sequential PVI was performed using the RFB: each application lasted 60 seconds, the posterior electrodes were identified to stop the energy delivery after 20 seconds. Real time to isolation data were acquired. A 3D bipolar remap was finally performed to observe the level of isolation. A temperature probe was used to monitor the local esophageal temperature (LET) with a cut off of 39°C. Acute procedural data and complication were collected. Endoscopy was scheduled the day after procedure. Results Data from 10 consecutive RFB procedures were analyzed: 6/10 patients were male, 67 ± 9 years old, 8/10 with history of paroxysmal AF. A total of 36 PVs were targeted and isolated with the RFB, with a mean of 7,3 ± 4,0 applications per patient and 2,0 ± 1,2 applications per PV. First pass "single shot" isolation was achieved in 22/36 (61%), time to isolation during the first application was observed in 29/36 (80%) PVs, but an acute reconnection was observed in 10/29 (35%) isolated PVs. Mean time to sustained isolation was 13 ± 5 sec., mean time to non-sustained isolation was significantly longer (29 ± 17 sec; p = 0,001). Procedure time was 57 ± 16 min., left atrial dwell time 50 ± 14 min, ablation phase time 29 ± 14 min and fluoroscopy time was 10 ± 4 minutes. An esophageal temperature above 39°C was recorded in 2/36 PVs. No phrenic nerve palsy was recorded. 7/10 patients underwent endoscopy and no thermal lesions were detected. No other complications were recorded. Conclusion The novel irrigated RFB seems to allow an effective, safe and fast pulmonary vein isolation. More studies are needed to optimize energy dosing to possibly increase the rate of durable single shot PVI.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of anterior line (AL) and roof line (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI) guided high-power(50W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia (LAT) or substrate at LA anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were enrolled. Ablation power was set to 50W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. First-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into 3(caudal, middle and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients. Results A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them respectively. In non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. Final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and block of RL was achieved in 100%. The RF ablation time was short (2,9 ± 0,8 min for AL and 46,2 ± 15,6 sec for RL). For AL, female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients(p 0,028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 sec vs 161 ± 41 sec; p = 0,02). No procedural complications occurred. Conclusion AI guided high-power(50W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) represents the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation. Cryoballoon and laserballoon catheters have emerged as promising devices but lack randomized comparisons. Therefore, we sought to compare efficacy and safety comparing both balloons in patients with persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Symptomatic AF patients (n=200) were prospectively randomized (1:1) to receive either cryoballoon or laserballoon PVI (cryoballoon: n=100: 50 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation + 50 persistent AF versus laserballoon: n=100: 50 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation + 50 persistent AF). All antiarrhythmic drugs were stopped after ablation. Follow-up included 3-day Holter-ECG recordings and office visits at 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary efficacy end point was defined as freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia between 90 and 365 days after a single ablation. Secondary end points included procedural parameters and periprocedural complications. Results: Patient baseline parameters were not different between both groups. In all (n=200) complete PVI was obtained and the entire follow-up accomplished. Balloon only PVI was obtained in 98% (cryoballoon) versus 95% (laserballoon) requiring focal touch-up in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Procedure but not fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the cryoballoon group (50.9±21.0 versus 96.0±20.4 minutes; P P =0.083). Overall, the primary end point of no atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was met in 79% (cryoballoon: 80.0% versus laserballoon: 78.0%, P =ns). No death, atrio-esophageal fistula, tamponade, or vascular laceration requiring surgery occurred. In the cryoballoon group, 8 transient but no persistent phrenic nerve palsy were noted compared with 2 persistent phrenic nerve palsy and one transient ischemic attack in the laserballoon group. Conclusions: Both balloon technologies represent highly effective and safe tools for PVI resulting in similar favorable rhythm outcome after 12 months. Use of the cryoballoon is associated with significantly shorter procedure but not fluoroscopy time.

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of the anterior line (AL) and roofline (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI)-guided high power (50 W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Data from 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia or substrate at the left atrium anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were collected. Ablation power was set to 50 W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. The first-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into three (caudal, middle, and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients. Results A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them, respectively. In the non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. The final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and the block of RL was achieved in 100%. The radiofrequency (RF) ablation time was short (2.9 ± 0.8 min for AL and 46.2 ± 15.6 s for RL). For AL, the female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients (p = .028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 s vs. 161 ± 41 s; p = .02). No procedural complications occurred. Conclusion AI-guided high-power (50 W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective, and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.

Background Radiofrequency (RF) high-power ablation appears to be a novel concept in treating atrial fibrillation (AF). The ablation-index (AI) has been linked with the durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). To report the midterm clinical results of a new ablation strategy using AI-guided high-power (50 W) ablation (AI-HP). Methods and results Symptomatic AF patients were included and underwent wide-area circumferential PVI. Contact-force catheters were used, RF power was set to 50 W targeting AI values (550/400 for anterior/posterior) and interlesion distance 6 mm. Luminal esophageal temperature (LET) was monitored during the procedure; patients with LET ≥39°C underwent post-ablation esophageal-endoscopy. Seventy-two-hour-Holter ECGs were scheduled during follow-up. Procedural PVI was achieved in all (N = 122; mean age, 68.2 years; male, 71.3%) patients, rate of first-pass PVI was 96.7% per patient. Procedural mean RF time was 11.5 min, and mean RF time during posterior wall segment was 3.1 min. Per RF-lesion, the mean contact force, RF duration, AI, and impedance-drop at anterior/posterior wall were 26 ± 14 g/23 ± 12 g, 16.2 ± 7.5 s/8.8 ± 3.6 s, 552 ± 53/438 ± 47, and 13 ± 6 Ω/9 ± 5 Ω, respectively. Mean PVI procedural-time, 55.8 min; mean procedural fluoroscopic time, 5.6 min. Three (2.5%) patients had asymptomatic endoscopic small erosion/erythema esophageal lesions, no serious adverse events were observed. During a 15-month follow-up, overall single-procedure freedom from clinical recurrence of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) off antiarrhythmic drug after blanking period was 85.2% (89.4% for paroxysmal AF, 80.4% for persistent AF). Conclusion The AI-HP (50 W) appears as an efficient ablation technique in treating AF and leads to a high single-procedure arrhythmia-free survival at 15 months.

BACKGROUND Time-to-isolation (TTI) guided second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) ablation has been shown to be effective for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper is to compare the safety and clinical outcome of CB2 PVI using the TTI guided 4 minutes vs 3 minutes freeze protocol. METHODS This was a propensity-matched study based on an institutional database. Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent CB2 PVI and systematic follow-up were consecutively included. RESULTS A total of 573 patients were identified, of them 214 (107 matched-pairs) symptomatic AF (paroxysmal AF: 61%, persistent AF: 39%) patients (age: 67.7 ± 11.2 years) were analyzed. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Procedural time was significantly longer in the 4 minutes group compared to 3 minutes group (67.2 ± 21.8 vs 55.9 ± 16.9 minutes, P

Aims Systematic data on phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) associated with contemporary balloon ablation techniques (cryoballoon [CBA] vs laser balloon [LBA]) are sparse. We aimed to investigate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical recovery course in patients with PNP who underwent CBA or LBA. Methods and results A total of 2433 consecutive patients who underwent balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (CBA: n = 1720 and LBA: n = 713) were retrospectively identified. PNP was classified into (a) transient (recovery before discharge) or (b) persistent (within 6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months) according to clinical recovery course. In general, PNP occurred significantly more often in CBA 71/1720 (4.2%) than LBA 11/713 (1.5%) (P = .003). The rate of transient PNP was significantly higher in CBA (3.0%, n = 45) than LBA (0.1%, n = 1, P = .004). The rate of persistent PNP did not significantly differ between two groups (CBA: 1.2% vs LBA: 1.4%, P = .89). The rate of persistent PNP which recovered within 6 months was similar (CBA: 17.4% vs LBA 18.2%, P = 1.000). However, the rates of persistent PNP which recovered within 6 to 12 months (CBA: 2.9% vs LBA 27.3%, P = .0171) and more than 12 months (CBA: 7.3% vs LBA 45.5%, P = .0034) were significantly higher in LBA. Conclusion PNP occurred more often in CBA than LBA, however, the majority of PNP in CBA was transient whereas the majority of PNP in LBA was persistent. Either balloon technology is not superior in terms of long-term PNP.

BACKGROUND Patients with a left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) despite oral anticoagulation (OAC) are at high risk of thromboembolism (TE) and a relevant proportion of LAAT do not resolve under continued OAC. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in the presence of LAAT was anecdotally described as a therapeutic option to prevent TE in the patients. OBJECTIVE To describe the feasibility of LAAC despite LAAT in consecutive patients. METHODS We searched the LAAC database of our center to identify patients in whom a LAAC was performed despite evidence of a thrombus in the LAA. All procedures were performed under transesophageal echocardiography guidance, no angiographies were performed to avoid LAAT dislocation. An Amulet Occluder device was preferred to allow proximal implantation and sealing of the LAA. RESULTS Nine patients were identified. The mean age was 68.1 ± 10.7 years, four were female, mean CHADSVASC and HASBLED were 3.6 ± 1.7 and 3.0 ± 1.0. Eight of nine patients were on OAC, one patient was under lone aspirin therapy because of bleeding. The mean distance between the LAAT and the estimated landing zone was 18 ± 6 mm, the minimal distance was 11 mm. The mean landing zone was 21 ± 3 mm, devices with a mean size of 25 ± 4 mm were chosen for implantation. All implantation succeeded, only two patients required an intraprocedural replacement. No procedural complication nor short term thromboembolic complication during a follow up of 138 ± 149 days were recorded. CONCLUSION In the presented series a percutaneous LAAC despite a LAAT resulted to be feasible and safe.

Background The third-generation laser balloon (LB3) became available recently. We aimed to describe the impact on procedural efficacy and safety of LB3 compared to the second generation LB2 for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Consecutive patients treated with the LB3 for symptomatic AF were enrolled. As a control group the previous consecutive patients treated with the LB2 were analyzed. Acute procedural data and complications between two groups were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 84 patients with LB3 (317 PVs, 75.9% Paroxysmal AF) and the previous 100 patients (387 PVs, 63.0 % Paroxysmal AF) with LB2 who underwent PVI were enrolled in this study. LB3 enabled significantly shorter procedural time (LB3: 60.6 ± 22.0 min vs LB2: 100.9 ± 21.5 min, P

Introduction: The predictive factor of whether asymptomatic restenosis needs reintervention after initial therapy remains unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) is effective to predict target lesion revascularization (TLR) after endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal (FP) lesion. Methods: From April 2007 to September 2013, 120 restenotic limbs without ischemic symptoms (mean age: 73.1±9.0, men: 75.0%, stent implantation: 57.5%) were selected and analyzed, 73 limbs underwent reintervention. Median follow-up period was 33.7 months (5.1-110.4 months). They were followed by serial duplex ultrasound (DUS). Restenosis was defined as peak systolic velocity (PSV) > 250cm/s or PSVR > 2.4 by using DUS. We divided them into two groups (High PSVR group (PSVR ≧3.63)and low PSVR group (PSVR < 3.63)). The ratio of TLR was compared between two groups by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. We also analyzed the TLR between balloon angioplasty (POBA) alone and stent implantation on initial EVT. Each cut off value of PSVR were 4.19 and 3.63. Results: At 1, 3 and 5 years after initial EVT, Freedom from TLR were significantly different between two groups (76.5%, 33.2% and 18.3% vs 90.7%, 75.4%, and 58.0%, p Conclusions: PSVR may be a predictive factor of performing reintervention for asymptomatic patient with restenosis after EVT of FP lesion.