Search

This paper investigates the multistage expansion planning problem of a distribution network considering reliability. Thus, the best alternative, location, and installation time for the candidate assets are identified while jointly accounting for economic and reliability aspects. As a major salient feature, the conventional simulation-based reliability assessment is equivalently implemented through algebraic expressions whereby the effect of the network topology is explicitly represented by decision variables of the optimization process. For expository purposes, the focus is placed on the expected energy not supplied, which is a widely-used metric for reliability assessment. The resulting optimization problem is cast as an instance of mixed-integer linear programming. Hence, unlike existing heuristic and metaheuristic solution techniques for reliability-constrained distribution system planning, the proposed approach is finitely convergent to the optimal solution and can be readily implemented using commercially available software. Simulation results show the effective performance of the proposed methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Reliability is an essential factor in distribution networkt expansion planning. However, standard distribution reliability assessment techniques rely on quantifying the impact of a pre-specified set of events on service continuity through the simulation of component outages, one at a time. Due to such a simulation-based nature, the incorporation of reliability into distribution network expansion planning has customarily required the application of heuristic and metaheuristic approaches. Recently, alternative mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models have been proposed for distribution network expansion planning considering reliability. Nonetheless, such models suffer from either low computational efficiency or over-simplification. To overcome these shortcomings, this paper proposes an enhanced MILP model for multistage reliability-constrained distribution network expansion planning. Leveraging an efficient, yet accurate reliability evaluation model, proposing a customized technique for effectively imposing radial operation, as well as utilizing pragmatic measures to model reliability-related costs are the salient features of this work. In this respect, practical reliability-related costs are considered based on reliability incentive schemes and the revenue lost due to undelivered energy during customer outages. The proposed planning approach is tested on four networks with 24, 54, 86, and 138 nodes to illustrate its efficiency and applicability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper addresses the transmission network expansion planning problem under uncertain demand and generation capacity. A two-stage adaptive robust optimization framework is adopted whereby the worst-case operating cost is accounted for under a given user-defined uncertainty set. This paper differs from previously reported robust solutions in two respects. First, the typically disregarded correlation of uncertainty sources is explicitly considered through an ellipsoidal uncertainty set relying on their variance-covariance matrix. In addition, we describe the analogy between the corresponding second-stage problem and a certain class of mathematical programs arising in structural reliability. This analogy gives rise to a relevant probabilistic interpretation of the second stage, thereby revealing an undisclosed feature of the worst-case setting characterizing robust optimization with ellipsoidal uncertainty sets. More importantly, a novel nested decomposition approach based on results from structural reliability is devised to solve the proposed robust counterpart, which is cast as an instance of mixed-integer trilevel programming. Numerical results from several case studies demonstrate that the effect of correlated uncertainty can be captured by the proposed robust approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]