Search

Tessier 7 clefts are a rare congenital anomaly, usually surgically repaired with Z-plasty or other reconstructive methods, although undesirable scars may result. We present a review of the literature and a case of unilateral Tessier 7 cleft repaired with a novel reconstruction technique using a combined Z-plasty and geometric broken line closure (GBLC) to camouflage and irregularize the otherwise linear scar. We present this case to expand the armamentarium of surgical options to address Tessier 7 clefts and to review techniques for repair., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Abstract: Surgical repair of sagittal suture craniosynostosis is highly variable, and optimal timing/use of bone grafts remains a subset of parameters that continue to be studied. We sought to compare cephalometric outcomes of early surgical intervention without bone grafting compared to later intervention with bone grafting. Patients undergoing primary surgical repair of nonsyndromic sagittal suture craniosynostosis between 2015 and 2019 were followed with preoperative measurements of cephalic index along with postoperative measurements at 6 months to 1 year, respectively. Nineteen patients undergoing cranial vault reconstruction were studied in 2 groups, namely those younger than 6 months who did not have bone grafting performed during primary repair (31.6%) and patients 6 months and older who underwent cranial vault reconstruction with bone grafting during primary repair (68.4%). Mean 6-month to 1-year postoperative cranial index was significantly increased in both groups (P < 0.001). The average cephalic index change for both groups (younger than 6 months without bone grafting, CI value change 9; 6 months and older with bone grafting; CI value change 6) was not significantly different with regards to 95% confidence interval (P = 0.30). Patients older than 6 months of age undergoing cranial vault reconstruction with bone grafting have similar cephalometric outcomes as their younger counterparts undergoing cranial vault remodeling without bone grafting. Bone grafting in the appropriate cohort may improve functional and esthetic outcomes without compromising primary surgical goals of improving cranial vault cephalometric indices., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Craniosynostosis, in which 1 or more cranial sutures prematurely fuse, is associated with diverse environmental and genetic factors. Whereas isolated single-suture synostosis is usually sporadic and nonfamilial, FGFR mutations account for most cases of syndromic craniosynostosis. This article reviews the etiology and various clinical manifestations of the most common isolated and syndromic forms of craniosynostosis, and provides a brief overview of genetics. Past and present surgical management approaches and techniques are examined in depth. Outcomes data in the recent literature are reviewed, and controversies in the field and promising trends in craniofacial surgery discussed., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: To review the past year's literature regarding recent innovations in surgical instrumentation for craniomaxillofacial surgery., Recent Findings: Current advances in surgical instrumentation have led to many improvements in the field, allowing greater visualization and precision both before and during procedures. One of the common goals is to achieve excellent outcomes with minimal complications, while at the same time minimizing invasiveness of surgery. Highlighted innovations include greater capacities for acquisition of data, leading to improved imaging modalities and expansion of computer-assisted surgical techniques; continued developments in biomaterials used in various reconstructions; and novel uses of bone cutting and bone fixation instrumentation., Summary: Technology in the field of craniomaxillofacial surgery is developing rapidly, leading to novel instrumentation being utilized across a broad spectrum of areas. Published data have been encouraging to date, indicating an ever increasing adaptation of these innovations in clinical practice. Future efforts need to focus on cost-benefit analysis and constructing larger-scale studies to better understand effectiveness and patient outcomes.

Unilateral cleft lip repair, over the last century, has seen both revolutionary changes and subtle technical refinements. Millard's rotation/advancement technique stands among the most striking of these innovations. We review the evolution of unilateral cleft lip repair including a look at straight-line, geometric and rotation/advancement type of repairs, while looking closely at the underlying theme of rotation and how common principles are evident in differing techniques. A review of how the medial cleft lip element is lengthened in these differing approaches illustrates common principles that, if learned and applied, will aid both the novice and experienced surgeon approach repair of the unilateral cleft lip in the lifelong quest of improved outcomes., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)