Search

Objective: To determine whether the reported clinical presentation of tension pneumothorax differs between patients who are breathing unassisted versus receiving assisted ventilation., Background: Animal studies suggest that the pathophysiology and physical signs of tension pneumothorax differ by subject ventilatory status., Methods: We searched electronic databases through to October 15, 2013 for observational studies and case reports/series reporting clinical manifestations of tension pneumothorax. Two physicians independently extracted clinical manifestations reported at diagnosis., Results: We identified 5 cohort studies (n = 310 patients) and 156 case series/reports of 183 cases of tension pneumothorax (n = 86 breathing unassisted, n = 97 receiving assisted ventilation). Hypoxia was reported among 43 (50.0%) cases of tension pneumothorax who were breathing unassisted versus 89 (91.8%) receiving assisted ventilation (P < 0.001). Pulmonary dysfunction progressed to respiratory arrest in 9.3% of cases breathing unassisted. As compared to cases who were breathing unassisted, the adjusted odds of hypotension and cardiac arrest were 12.6 (95% confidence interval, 5.8-27.5) and 17.7 (95% confidence interval, 4.0-78.4) times higher among cases receiving assisted ventilation. One cohort study reported that none of the patients with tension pneumothorax who were breathing unassisted versus 39.6% of those receiving assisted ventilation presented without an arterial pulse. In contrast to cases breathing unassisted, the majority (70.4%) of those receiving assisted ventilation who experienced hypotension or cardiac arrest developed these signs within minutes of clinical presentation., Discussion: The reported clinical presentation of tension pneumothorax depends on the ventilatory status of the patient. This may have implications for improving the diagnosis and treatment of this life-threatening disorder.

Background: Although health care providers utilize classically described signs and symptoms to diagnose tension pneumothorax, available literature sources differ in their descriptions of its clinical manifestations. Moreover, while the clinical manifestations of tension pneumothorax have been suggested to differ among subjects of varying respiratory status, it remains unknown if these differences are supported by clinical evidence. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to systematically describe and contrast the clinical manifestations of tension pneumothorax among patients receiving positive pressure ventilation versus those who are breathing unassisted., Methods/design: We will search electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and clinical trial registries from their first available date as well as personal files, identified review articles, and included article bibliographies. Two investigators will independently screen identified article titles and abstracts and select observational (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) studies and case reports and series that report original data on clinical manifestations of tension pneumothorax. These investigators will also independently assess risk of bias and extract data. Identified data on the clinical manifestations of tension pneumothorax will be stratified according to whether adult or pediatric study patients were receiving positive pressure ventilation or were breathing unassisted, as well as whether the two investigators independently agreed that the clinical condition of the study patient(s) aligned with a previously published tension pneumothorax working definition. These data will then be summarized using a formal narrative synthesis alongside a meta-analysis of observational studies and then case reports and series where possible. Pooled or combined estimates of the occurrence rate of clinical manifestations will be calculated using random effects models (for observational studies) and generalized estimating equations adjusted for reported potential confounding factors (for case reports and series)., Discussion: This study will compile the world literature on tension pneumothorax and provide the first systematic description of the clinical manifestations of the disorder according to presenting patient respiratory status. It will also demonstrate a series of methods that may be used to address difficulties likely to be encountered during the conduct of a meta-analysis of data contained in published case reports and series. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42013005826.

Introduction: Screening CT often detects posttraumatic pneumothoraces that were not diagnosed on a preceding supine anteroposterior chest radiograph (occult pneumothoraces (OPTXs)). Because abdominal CT imaging misses OPTXs in the upper thorax, the objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of cervical spine (C-spine) CT screening for diagnosing OPTXs., Methods: A dual-institution (Foothills Medical Centre and Grady Memorial Hospital) retrospective review of consecutive OPTXs was performed. The accuracy of various CT screening protocols in detecting OPTXs was compared., Results: OPTXs were detected in 75 patients. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were similar between centres (65% male; 97% blunt mechanism; 29% hemodynamically unstable; mean ISS=27; mean length of stay=22 days; mortality=9%)(p>0.05). Patients received either abdominal (41%) or thoraco-abdominal (59%) CT imaging. Most patients (89%) also underwent C-spine CT imaging. OPTXs were evident on thoracic CT in 100% (44/44), abdominal CT in 83% (62/75), and C-spine CT in 82% (55/67) of cases. All patients with OPTXs identified solely on thoracic CT (i.e. not abdominal) who also underwent imaging of their C-spine could have had their OTPXs diagnosed by using the pulmonary windows setting of their C-spine CT series. Combining C-spine and abdominal CT screening diagnosed all OPTXs (67/67) detected on thoracic CT, for patients who also underwent these investigations., Conclusions: OPTXs were evident on thoracic (and not abdominal) CT in 17% of severely injured patients. For patients who also underwent C-spine imaging, all OPTXs isolated to thoracic CT could be diagnosed by using the pulmonary windows setting of their C-spine CT imaging protocol. All OPTXs, regardless of intra-thoracic location, could also be detected by combining C-spine and abdominal CT screening., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tension pneumothorax requires emergent decompression. Unfortunately, some needle thoracostomies (NTs) are unsuccessful because of insufficient catheter length. All previous studies have used thickness of the chest wall (based on cadaver studies, ultrasonography or computed tomography [CT]) to extrapolate probable catheter effectiveness. The objective of this clinical study was to identify the frequency of NT failure with various catheter lengths., Methods: We evaluated the records of all patients with severe blunt injury who had a prehospital NT before arrival at a level-1 trauma centre over a 48-month period. Patients were divided into 2 groups: helicopter (4.5-cm catheter sheath) and ground ambulance (3.2 cm) transport. Success of the NT was confirmed by the absence of a large pneumothorax on subsequent thoracic ultrasonography and CT., Results: Needle thoracostomy decompression was attempted in 1.5% (142/9689) of patients. Among patients with blunt injuries, the incidence was 1.4% (101/7073). Patients transported by helicopter (74%) received a 4.5-cm sheath. The remainder (26% ground transport) received a 3.2-cm catheter. A minority in each group (helicopter 15%, ground 28%) underwent immediate chest tube insertion (before thoracic ultrasound) because of ongoing hemodynamic instability. Failure to decompress the pleural space by NT was observed via ultrasound and/or CT in 65% (17/26) of attempts with a 3.2-cm catheter, compared with only 4% (3/75) of attempts with a 4.5-cm catheter (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Tension pneumothorax decompression using a 3.2-cm catheter was unsuccessful in up to 65% of cases. When a larger 4.5-cm catheter was used, fewer procedures (4%) failed. Thoracic ultrasonography can be used to confirm NT placement.

Background: A tension pneumothorax requires immediate decompression using a needle thoracostomy. According to advanced trauma life support guidelines this procedure is performed in the second intercostal space (ICS) in the midclavicular line (MCL), using a 4.5-cm (2-inch) catheter (5-cm needle). Previous studies have shown a failure rate of up to 40% using this technique. Case reports have suggested that this high failure rate could be because of insufficient length of the needle., Objectives: To analyze the average chest wall thickness (CWT) at the second ICS in the MCL in a trauma population and to evaluate the length of the needle used in needle thoracostomy for emergency decompression of tension pneumothoraces., Methods: Retrospective review of major trauma admissions (Injury Severity Score >12) at the Foothills Medical Centre in Calgary, Canada, who underwent a computed tomography chest scan admitted in the period from October 2001 until March 2004. Subgroup analysis on men and women, <40 years of age and >/=40 years of age was defined a priori. CWT was measured to the nearest 0.01 cm at the second ICS in the MCL., Results: The mean CWT in the 604 male patients and 170 female patients studied averaged 3.50 cm at the left second ICS MCL and 3.51 cm on the right. The mean CWT was significantly higher for women than men (p < 0.0001). About 9.9% to 19.3% of the men had a CWT >4.5 cm and 24.1% to 35.4% of the women studied., Conclusions: A catheter length of 4.5 cm may not penetrate the chest wall of a substantial amount (9.9%-35.4%) of the population, depending on age and gender. This study demonstrates the need for a variable needle length for relief of a tension pneumothorax in certain population groups to improve effectiveness of needle thoracostomy.

Background: Nonradiologists typically diagnose pneumothoraces (PTX) based on a visible pleural stripe. PTXs not seen on supine AP chest radiographs (CXR), but appreciated on a computed tomographic (CT) scan, termed occult pneumothoraces (OPTX), are increasingly common. The purpose was to (1) determine whether perceived OPTXs were truly occult or simply missed and (2) address factors that contribute to the poor sensitivity of the supine CXR., Methods: A previous study of severely injured patients (ISS >or =12) identified 44 patients with OPTXs. JPEG images of these CXRs were randomly arranged with images of 11 injured patients without PTXs (CT proven). Three unique groups of radiologists reviewed the images for signs of PTXs, and determined if a thoracic CT was subsequently required., Results: Retrospective review identified only 12 to 24% of the OPTXs depending on radiology group. The kappa inter-observer agreement value was 0.55 to 0.56 (poor agreement). PTXs were most commonly identified via the deep sulcus sign (75-90%). CXRs were considered inadequate in 16 to 25% of OPTX images and in 0 to 18% of images without OPTXs. Thoracic CT scans were recommended in 18 to 33% of patients with inadequate CXRs, but 67 to 82% of patients with adequate CXRs., Conclusions: Less than 24% of all OPTXs might have been inferred from subtle radiologic findings, such as the deep sulcus sign. The majority of OPTX cases (50-64%) did not warrant a CT scan based on other findings. Concern for an OPTX after severe trauma is a valid indication for thoracic CT.

Background: The supine anteroposterior chest radiograph (CXR) is an insensitive test for posttraumatic pneumothoraces (PTXs). Computed tomographic (CT) scanning often detects PTXs that were not diagnosed on CXR (occult PTXs [OPTXs]). The purpose of this study was to define the incidence, predictors, and outcomes for OPTXs after trauma., Methods: Thoracoabdominal CT scans and corresponding CXRs of all trauma patients entered into a regional database were reviewed. Patients with OPTXs were compared with those with overt, residual, and no PTXs regarding incidence, demographics, associated injuries, early resuscitative predictors, treatment, and outcomes., Results: Paired CXRs and CT scans were available for 338 of 761 (44%) patients (98.5% blunt trauma). One hundred three PTXs were present in 89 patients, 57 (55%) of which were occult; 6 (11%) were seen only on thoracic CT scan. Age, sex, length of stay, and survival were similar between all groups. OPTXs and PTXs were similar in comparative size index and number of images. Subcutaneous emphysema, pulmonary contusion, rib fracture(s), and female sex were independent predictors of OPTXs. Seventeen (35%) patients with OPTXs were ventilated, of whom 13 (76%) underwent thoracostomy. No complications resulted from observation, although 23% of patients with thoracostomy had tube-related complications or required repositioning., Conclusion: OPTXs are commonly missed both by CXR and even abdominal CT scanning in seriously injured patients. Basic markers available early in resuscitation are highly predictive for OPTXs and may guide management before CT scanning. Further study of OPTX detection and management is required.

Purpose: Although posttraumatic pneumothoraces (PTXs) are common and potentially life threatening, the supine chest radiograph (CXR) is an insensitive test for their detection. Computed tomography (CT) often identifies occult pneumothoraces (OPTXs). Previous descriptions of OPTX topography have been poor. Our purpose was to define their distribution and aid in the targeting of thoracic ultrasound., Methods: Posttraumatic supine CXRs and CTs were reviewed for occult, overt, and residual PTXs. PTXs were compared according to their apical, basal, anterior, lateral, medial, and posterior components. A comparative size index was calculated., Results: Among 761 patients, 338 CT scans revealed 103 PTXs in 89 patients; 55% were OPTXs. OPTXs were apical (57%), basal (41%), anterior (84%), lateral (24%), and medial (27%), with 0% posterior., Conclusions: CXR missed over half of all PTXs. OPTXs had a greater anterior versus lateral (nearly 4-fold) and both basal and apical versus lateral (2-fold) distribution. OPTXs are often located at easily accessible sonographic windows.

The term occult pneumothorax (OP) describes a pneumothorax that is not suspected on the basis of clinical examination or plain radiography but is ultimately detected with thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT). This situation is increasingly common in trauma care with the increased use of CT. The rate is approximately 5% in injured people presenting to hospital, with CT revealing at least twice as many pneumothoraces as suspected on plain radiography. Whereas pneumothorax is a common and treatable cause of mortality and morbidity, there is substantial disagreement regarding the appropriate treatment of OP. The greatest controversy is in patients in the critical care unit who require positive-pressure ventilation. There is little current evidence to direct the proper management of ventilated trauma patients with OP, and no studies have focussed specifically on these patients. Future randomized trials will need to consider the potential effects of OP on pulmonary mechanics and potential influences on the known risks of ventilator-induced lung injury associated with mechanical ventilation.