6 results on '"Dobson, Andrew"'
Search Results
2. Elephants, Ivory, and Trade
- Author
-
Wasser, Samuel, Poole, Joyce, Lee, Phyllis, Lindsay, Keith, Dobson, Andrew, Hart, John, Douglas-Hamilton, Lain, Wittemyer, George, Granli, Petter, Morgan, Bethan, Gunn, Jody, Alberts, Susan, Beyers, Rene, Chiyo, Patrick, Croze, Harvey, Estes, Richard, Gobush, Kathleen, Joram, Ponjoli, Kikoti, Alfred, Kingdon, Jonathan, King, Lucy, Macdonald, David, Moss, Cynthia, Mutayoba, Benezeth, Njumbi, Steve, Omondi, Patrick, and Nowak, Katarzyna
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Evidence of deterrence from patrol data: Trialling application of a differenced‐CPUE metric.
- Author
-
Dancer, Anthony, Keane, Aidan, Beale, Colin M., Dobson, Andrew D. M., Amin, Rajan, Freeman, Robin, Imong, Inaoyom, Jones, Kate, Linkie, Matthew, Long, Barney, Okeke, Francis O., Plumptre, Andrew J., Rowcliffe, J. Marcus, Stokes, Emma J., van der Westhuizen, Elsabé, and Collen, Ben
- Subjects
LAW enforcement ,PROTECTED areas - Abstract
Ranger‐led law enforcement patrols are the primary, site‐level response to – and the most common source of data on – illegal activity threatening wildlife in protected areas. Yet evidence that patrols effectively deter rule‐breaking is limited, and common management metrics for evaluating deterrence, which use ranger‐collected data, are particularly vulnerable to bias. "Differenced plots" (of the association between change in patrol effort and subsequent change in illegal activity) were recently proposed as a simple, new metric for deterrence, which, in tests with simulated patrol data, were more robust than the common alternatives. Here, we trial application of differenced plots to real patrol data collected in four protected areas, and explore methods for applying the metric in practice, using two indicators of rule‐breaking: snares, and people. We find evidence which is consistent with deterrence in some but not all sites, over shorter timescales than observed hitherto: increases in patrol effort were associated with subsequent reductions in snaring in one site, and in the presence of people in two sites. However, whether pressure on wildlife had been reduced or merely displaced was unclear from differenced plots, nor could the metric confirm absence of deterrence, raising questions for future applications. Our findings suggest differenced plots can be a useful metric, particularly for exploring variation in deterrence within sites, but should be applied and interpreted with care, and further work is urgently needed to determine whether and how patrols deter illegal activity, and to evaluate the effect reliably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Estimating hunting prevalence and reliance on wild meat in Cambodia's Eastern Plains.
- Author
-
Ibbett, Harriet, Keane, Aidan, Dobson, Andrew D.M., Griffin, Olly, Travers, Henry, and Milner-Gulland, E.J.
- Subjects
HUNTING dogs ,DOGS ,HUNTING ,WILDLIFE refuges ,ENVIRONMENTAL degradation - Abstract
Hunting is a primary driver of biodiversity loss across South-east Asia. Within Cambodia, the use of wire snares to capture wildlife is a severe threat in protected areas but there have been few studies of the behaviour of hunters from local communities. Here, we combine the unmatched count technique with direct questioning to estimate the prevalence of hunting behaviours and wildlife consumption amongst 705 households living within Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia. We assessed respondents' knowledge of rules, and their perceptions of patrols responsible for enforcing rules. Estimates of hunting behaviour were variable: results from the unmatched count technique were inconclusive, and direct questioning revealed 9% of households hunted, and 20% set snares around farms to prevent wildlife eating crops. Hunting with domestic dogs was the method most commonly used to catch wildlife (87% of households owned dogs). Wild meat was consumed by 84% of households, and was most frequently bought or caught, but also gifted. We detected a high awareness of conservation rules, but low awareness of punishments and penalties, with wildlife depletion, rather than the risk of being caught by patrols, causing the greatest reduction in hunting. Our findings demonstrate the challenges associated with reliably estimating rule-breaking behaviour and highlight the need to incorporate careful triangulation into study design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Detecting deterrence from patrol data.
- Author
-
Dobson, Andrew D. M., Milner‐Gulland, E. J., Beale, Colin M., Ibbett, Harriet, and Keane, Aidan
- Subjects
- *
BIODIVERSITY conservation , *PROTECTED areas , *BUSHMEAT hunting , *WILDLIFE as food , *POACHING - Abstract
The threat posed to protected areas by the illegal killing of wildlife is countered principally by ranger patrols that aim to detect and deter potential offenders. Deterring poaching is a fundamental conservation objective, but its achievement is difficult to identify, especially when the prime source of information comes in the form of the patrols' own records, which inevitably contain biases. The most common metric of deterrence is a plot of illegal activities detected per unit of patrol effort (CPUE) against patrol effort (CPUE‐E). We devised a simple, mechanistic model of law breaking and law enforcement in which we simulated deterrence alongside exogenous changes in the frequency of offences under different temporal patterns of enforcement effort. The CPUE‐E plots were not reliable indicators of deterrence. However, plots of change in CPUE over change in effort (ΔCPUE‐ΔE) reliably identified deterrence, regardless of the temporal distribution of effort or any exogenous change in illegal activity levels as long as the time lag between patrol effort and subsequent behavioral change among offenders was approximately known. The ΔCPUE‐ΔE plots offered a robust, simple metric for monitoring patrol effectiveness; were no more conceptually complicated than the basic CPUE‐E plots; and required no specialist knowledge or software to produce. Our findings demonstrate the need to account for temporal autocorrelation in patrol data and to consider appropriate (and poaching‐activity‐specific) intervals for aggregation. They also reveal important gaps in understanding of deterrence in this context, especially the mechanisms by which it occurs. In practical applications, we recommend the use of ΔCPUE‐ΔE plots in preference to other basic metrics and advise that deterrence should be suspected only if there is a clear negative slope. Distinct types of illegal activity should not be grouped together for analysis, especially if the signs of their occurrence have different persistence times in the environment. Article impact statement: Deterrent effects of conservation law enforcement may be robustly assessed by applying relatively simple metrics to ranger patrol data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Ivory crisis: Growing no-trade consensus.
- Author
-
Sekar, Nitin, Clark, William, Dobson, Andrew, Cristina Francisco Coelho, Paula, Hannam, Phillip M., Hepworth, Robert, Hsiang, Solomon, Kahumbu, Paula, Lee, Phyllis C., Lindsay, Keith, Lopes Pereira, Carlos, Wasser, Samuel K., and Nowak, Katarzyna
- Subjects
- *
IVORY industry , *POACHING , *ELEPHANT trade - Published
- 2018
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.