19 results on '"Klüver, Heike"'
Search Results
2. Introducing the party-interest group relationships in contemporary democracies datasets.
- Author
-
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd, Hansen, Vibeke Wøien, Rødland, Lise, Røed, Maiken, Klüver, Heike, Le Gall, Cal, Marshall, David, Otjes, Simon, Poguntke, Thomas, Rasmussen, Anne, Saurugger, Sabine, and Witko, Christopher
- Subjects
POLITICAL parties ,PRESSURE groups ,DEMOCRACY ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,SURVEYS - Abstract
Few existing datasets on parties and interest groups include data from both sides and a wide variety of interest groups and parties. We contribute to filling this gap by making several interconnected new datasets publicly available. The Party-Interest Group Relationships in Contemporary Democracies (PAIRDEM) datasets include cross-national data from three different surveys of (1) central party organizations, (2) legislative party groups, and (3) interest groups. A fourth dataset based on coding of party statutes and party finance data was established together with the Political Party Database. The datasets contain novel indicators on party-group relationships in up to 21 mature democracies. In this research note, we first present the main content of the datasets and the research design. Second, we present descriptive statistics documenting the extent of organizational ties between parties and groups in contemporary democracies. Third, we illustrate more advanced usage through a simple application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Explaining Policy Position Choice of Europarties: The Effect of Legislative Resources
- Author
-
KLÜVER, HEIKE and RODON, TONI
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. How does income inequality affect the support for populist parties?
- Author
-
Stoetzer, Lukas F., Giesecke, Johannes, and Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
INCOME inequality ,POPULIST parties (Politics) ,POLITICAL elites ,SOCIAL integration ,TRUST ,ELECTIONS - Abstract
Recent studies provide evidence that income inequality is a relevant driver for the electoral success of populist parties all over Europe. In this article, we aim to understand how exactly increasing income inequality can lead to support for populist parties. More specifically, we discuss four different attitudinal mechanisms from previous research: economic insecurities, trust in political elites, social integration, and national identity. We rely on eight waves of the European Social Survey and find that economic insecurities, trust in political elites, and national identity are linked to rising income inequality and populist support as expected. However, a causal mediation analysis shows that these mechanisms are not sufficient to fully understand the impact of income inequality on support for populists. This finding raises questions regarding the empirical support of existing theories to explain how macroeconomic changes in inequality became a pre-condition for the rise of populist parties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Policy positions, power and interest group-party lobby routines.
- Author
-
Haugsgjerd Allern, Elin, Klüver, Heike, Marshall, David, Otjes, Simon, Rasmussen, Anne, and Witko, Christopher
- Subjects
- *
LOBBYING , *POLITICAL parties , *IDEOLOGY - Abstract
Prior literature points to the importance of party power and ideology for interest group-party contacts in the legislative arena. But interest groups do not often have ideologies – they are typically active in a small number of policy domains and there may be different parties that share more similar preferences across different policy areas. Therefore, we examine whether and how party power and proximity in policy preferences predict the existence of party-interest group 'lobby routines' in specific policy domains, using a novel survey of representative samples of interest groups in seven long-established democracies. We find that groups often form routines with different parties in different policy areas and that preference proximity on relevant policy dimensions is positively associated with having such area-specific lobby routines. However, the results also suggest that powerful parties are more likely allies and that the effect of policy proximity on routines is positively conditioned by power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Helping or Hurting? How Governing as a Junior Coalition Partner Influences Electoral Outcomes.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike and Spoon, Jae-Jae
- Subjects
- *
COALITION governments , *POLITICAL parties , *ELECTIONS , *POLITICAL campaigns , *CAMPAIGN promises , *POWER (Social sciences) ,EUROPEAN politics & government -- 1945- - Abstract
Does joining a governing coalition as a junior partner influence a party's subsequent electoral success? We argue that joining a multiparty cabinet as a junior partner considerably hurts a party's future electoral prospects as junior partners cannot enact much of what they promised before the election and since they cannot sufficiently differentiate themselves from their larger coalition partner. To test our theoretical expectations comparatively and over time, we have compiled a comprehensive data set on the electoral performance of 307 political parties running in 219 elections in twenty-eight European countries from 1972 to 2017. To shed light on the underlying causal mechanisms, we additionally provide empirical evidence from an illustrative case study showing that the inability to deliver on election promises and a large degree of misperception among voters are important drivers of junior coalition parties' electoral losses. Our findings provide important insights into the relationship between coalition governments and electoral competition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Setting the Party Agenda: Interest Groups, Voters and Issue Attention.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
- *
POLITICAL parties , *VOTERS , *ELECTIONS - Abstract
Do political parties respond to interest group mobilization? While party responsiveness to voters has received widespread attention, little is known about how interest groups affect parties' policy agendas. I argue that political parties respond to interest groups as lobbyists offer valuable information, campaign contributions, electoral support and personal rewards, but that party responsiveness is conditioned by voter preferences. Based on a novel longitudinal analysis studying the responsiveness of German parties to interest groups across eleven issue areas and seven elections from 1987 until 2009, it is shown that parties adjust their policy agendas in response to interest group mobilization and that interest groups are more successful in shaping party policy when their priorities coincide with those of the electorate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Coalition Agreements, Issue Attention, and Cabinet Governance.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike and Bäck, Hanna
- Subjects
- *
COALITION governments , *POLICY sciences , *CONTRACTS , *POLITICAL parties ,EUROPEAN politics & government - Abstract
Why do coalition parties settle some policy issues in great detail, whereas other issues are hardly mentioned in coalition agreements? Coalition agreements are important policy platforms that determine policy making during the legislative term. However, we know remarkably little about their content. We shed light on why issue attention in coalition agreements varies so extensively. We argue that intra-cabinet conflict positively affects issue attention as parties have stronger incentives to negotiate a detailed policy agenda that constrains their coalition partners. However, we expect that this effect is conditioned by preference tangentiality and the salience of an issue among coalition partners. Our theoretical expectations are tested drawing on a new data set based on a comprehensive content analysis of 224 agreements negotiated by 181 parties between 1945 and 2015 in 24 West and East European countries. We find support for our hypotheses and conclude that parties draft agreements to limit "ministerial drift." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Party convergence and vote switching: Explaining mainstream party decline across Europe.
- Author
-
SPOON, JAE‐JAE and KLÜVER, HEIKE
- Subjects
- *
POLITICAL affiliation , *ELECTIONS , *POLITICAL parties , *POLITICAL platforms , *VOTERS , *THIRD parties (Politics) , *REALIGNMENT (Political science) ,EUROPEAN politics & government - Abstract
How can one explain the significant vote losses of mainstream parties across Europe in recent years? In this article, it is argued that mainstream party convergence is an important determinant of the recent political and electoral volatility in European party systems. More specifically, it is hypothesised that as mainstream parties converge on the left‐right scale, voters will switch from supporting a mainstream party to a non‐mainstream party in the next election as they look for an alternative that better represents their ideological views. To test these theoretical expectations, data is combined from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and the Manifestos Project for nearly 15,000 vote choices of individual voters in 30 elections in 16 West and East European countries from 2001 until 2013. The findings have important implications for understanding the recent rise of non‐mainstream parties, the changing nature of party systems and the increasing complexity of cabinet formation across Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Challenges to multiparty governments: How governing in coalitions affects coalition parties' responsiveness to voters.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike and Spoon, Jae-Jae
- Subjects
- *
COALITIONS , *POLITICAL parties , *VOTER attitudes , *ELECTIONS ,EUROPEAN Union politics & government - Abstract
How does governing in coalitions affect coalition parties' responsiveness to voters? In this article, we seek to understand the relationship between political parties' participation in multiparty governments and their responsiveness to voters. We argue that the extent to which coalition parties respond to policy priorities of voters is influenced by the divisiveness of policy issues within the cabinet and the ministerial responsibility for policies. To test our hypotheses, we combine data on the issue attention of 55 coalition parties from the Comparative Manifestos Project with data on government composition and data on the policy priorities of voters from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various election studies in 45 elections across 16 European countries from 1972 to 2011. While we find that intra-cabinet divisiveness decreases coalition parties' responsiveness, we find no effect for portfolio responsibility. Our findings shed light on the relationship between party competition and coalition governments and its implications for political representation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Where Have All the Leaders Gone? Evaluating the Dynamics of Parties' Issue Attention in Coalition Governments.
- Author
-
Sagarzazu, Iñaki and Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
- *
HISTORY of coalition governments , *POLITICAL parties , *POLITICAL communication , *POLITICAL competition , *POLITICAL campaigns - Abstract
Objective While selective issue emphasis is a widely recognized strategy of party competition, we have little knowledge about how coalition parties interact with each other when deciding which policy issues to emphasize. Therefore we ask: Who leads and who follows the issue agenda in coalition governments? Methods. We create an issue attention data set using quantitative text analysis from over 40,000 press releases. We use this data set and time series cross-section regression analysis to study the dynamics of coalition parties' issue attention. Results. We find that junior coalition parties are more responsive to their senior partners than senior partners to their junior partners. Hence, while coalition partners generally follow each other, senior partners enjoy a stronger leadership role in the cabinet. Conclusion. Coalition parties indeed coordinate their issue priorities as they respond to each other's issue agenda. However, due the asymmetric power distribution in coalition cabinets, it is not a negotiation process on equal footing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Does anybody notice? How policy positions of coalition parties are perceived by voters.
- Author
-
SPOON, JAE‐JAE and KLÜVER, HEIKE
- Subjects
- *
COALITION governments , *VOTERS , *SENSORY perception , *GOVERNMENT policy , *POLITICAL participation , *RESPONSIBILITY , *POLITICAL parties - Abstract
Does governing in coalitions affect how coalition parties' policy positions are perceived by voters? In this article, the authors seek to understand the relationship between parties' participation in coalition governments and their perception by voters. Policy positions are an important instrument through which parties compete for the support of voters. However, it is unclear to what extent voters can correctly perceive the positions of parties when they govern together with other coalition partners. It is argued here that because of the blurred lines of responsibility in multiparty cabinets, it is difficult for voters to correctly perceive the positions of coalition parties. What is more, it is expected that the internal functioning of coalition cabinets affects the extent to which coalition parties struggle to get their message out to voters. It is hypothesized in the article that intra-cabinet conflict is negatively related to misperception. To test their theoretical expectations, the authors combine data on the left-right policy positions of political parties from the Comparative Manifestos Project with data on how these positions are perceived by voters gathered from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems from 1996 to 2011. The findings shed light on the relationship between party competition and coalition governments, and its implications for political representation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention.
- Author
-
KLÜVER, HEIKE and SPOON, JAE-JAE
- Subjects
- *
ELECTIONS , *POLITICAL parties , *VOTERS , *VOTING , *DEMOCRATIZATION - Abstract
Do parties listen to their voters? This article addresses this important question by moving beyond position congruence to explore whether parties respond to voters' issue priorities. It argues that political parties respond to voters in their election manifestos, but that their responsiveness varies across different party types: namely, that large parties are more responsive to voters' policy priorities, while government parties listen less to voters' issue demands. The study also posits that niche parties are not generally more responsive to voter demands, but that they are more responsive to the concerns of their supporters in their owned issue areas. To test these theoretical expectations, the study combines data from the Comparative Manifestos Project with data on voters' policy priorities from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various national election studies across eighteen European democracies in sixty-three elections from 1972-2011. Our findings have important implications for understanding political representation and democratic linkage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Bicameralism, intra-party bargaining, and the formation of party policy positions.
- Author
-
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
BICAMERALISM ,POLITICAL parties ,SUBNATIONAL governments ,POLITICAL manifestoes ,FEDERAL government - Abstract
How do political parties arrive at their policy positions? We conceptualize position formation in federalist countries as an intra-party bargaining process in which subnational parties compete with each other in an attempt to get their own positions into their national party manifesto. Drawing on theories about inter-party bargaining over ministerial portfolios, we hypothesize that the bargaining success of subnational parties depends on their parliamentary strength. We evaluate our hypotheses based on a comprehensive dataset on policy positions of national and subnational parties in Germany from 1990 until 2009. Our results show that German subnational parties that are powerful in the second parliamentary chamber (Bundesrat) are particularly successful in shaping the manifesto of their national party. The findings have important implications for our understanding of intra-party politics and position formation within political parties in Germany more specifically and federalist countries more generally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike and Sagarzazu, Iñaki
- Subjects
- *
POLITICAL parties , *PRESS & politics , *REPRESENTATIVE government , *QUANTITATIVE research , *DEMOCRACY , *HISTORY ,GERMAN politics & government - Abstract
Why do political parties prioritise some policy issues over others? While the issue ownership theory suggests that parties emphasise policy issues on which they have an advantage in order to increase the salience of these issues among voters, the riding the wave theory argues instead that parties respond to voters by highlighting policy issues that are salient in the minds of citizens. This study sheds new light on the selective issue emphasis of political parties by analysing issue attention throughout the entire electoral cycle. On the basis of a quantitative text analysis of more than 40,000 press releases published by German parties from 2000 until 2010, this article provides empirical support for the riding the wave theory. It shows that political parties take their cues from voters by responding to the issue priorities of their electorate. The results have important implications for political representation and the role that parties play in democracies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Bringing salience back in: Explaining voting defection in the European Parliament.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike and Spoon, Jae-Jae
- Subjects
- *
POLITICAL parties , *VOTING , *POLITICAL participation ,EUROPEAN Union countries politics & government - Abstract
What explains when Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) defect from their EP party group? While previous research has focused on the policy distance between an MEP’s national party and her party group, it has been overlooked that not all issues are equally important to national parties. As parties prioritize certain issues over others, we argue that it is both the distance and the salience of the issue for the MEP’s national party that explains defection. To test our theoretical claim, we explore more than 400,000 vote decisions across 1,948 different roll-call votes in four issue areas – agriculture, environment, social policy and external trade – from 1979 until 1999. To measure policy salience and distance, we combine roll-call analysis with data from the Euromanifestos Project. Our findings have important implications for understanding the dynamics of party competition and the role that national parties play in the European Parliament. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Interest Groups in the German Bundestag: Exploring the Issue Linkage between Citizens and Interest Groups.
- Author
-
Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
- *
PUBLIC opinion , *PRESSURE groups , *POLITICAL debates , *POLITICAL parties , *POLITICAL participation - Abstract
Do interest groups adjust their activity in response to public opinion? While previous studies have primarily focused on the link between voters, political parties and governments, interest groups have largely been ignored. This article therefore examines how public opinion affects interest group activity. It is argued that interest group activity is a bottom–up process in which interest groups respond to the issue priorities of citizens. Bringing together panel data on citizen concerns with longitudinal data on interest group issue attention, this article examines the issue linkage between citizens and interest groups in Germany from 1984 until 2010 in two different policy domains. Based on a time-series cross-section analysis, it is shown that issue attention of citizens precedes the registration of interest groups in the Bundestag indicating that interest groups play an important role in issue evolution and political representation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Voter polarisation and party responsiveness: Why parties emphasise divided issues, but remain silent on unified issues.
- Author
-
Spoon, Jae‐Jae and Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
- *
POLARIZATION (Social sciences) , *VOTER attitudes , *POLITICAL parties , *POLITICAL science research , *POLITICAL participation , *LIKES & dislikes , *POLITICAL competition , *ELECTIONS , *POLITICAL manifestoes , *HISTORY ,WESTERN European politics & government - Abstract
How does voter polarisation affect party responsiveness? Previous research has shown that political parties emphasise political issues that are important to their voters. However, it is posited in this article that political parties are not equally responsive to citizen demands across all issue areas. The hypothesis is that party responsiveness varies considerably with the preference configuration of the electorate. More specifically, it is argued that party responsiveness increases with the polarisation of issues among voters. To test these theoretical expectations, party responsiveness is analysed across nine West European countries from 1982 until 2013. Data on voter attention and voter preferences with regard to specific policy issues from a variety of national election studies is combined with Comparative Manifestos Project data on parties' emphasis of these issues in their election manifestos. The findings have major implications for understanding party competition and political representation in Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness.
- Author
-
Jae-Jae Spoon and Klüver, Heike
- Subjects
- *
POLITICAL parties , *REPRESENTATIVE government , *POLITICAL platforms , *VOTERS , *CITIZEN participation in political planning - Abstract
How responsive are political parties to the issue priorities of voters? While there are numerous studies that examine policy position congruence between parties and voters or government responsiveness, we know little about the extent to which parties adjust their policy priorities to the issue concerns of voters. Following saliency and issue ownership theory, we argue that political parties listen to their voters by emphasizing policy issues in their election manifestos that have been prioritized by citizens. However, in line with second-order election theory, we expect that issue responsiveness varies with the electoral context. To test our theoretical expectations, we generated a novel dataset that combines data on issue attention of political parties from the Comparative Manifesto and the Euromanifesto projects with data on policy priorities of voters from the European Election Studies, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and various national election studies. We empirically test our theoretical claims based on a comprehensive analysis of 104 parties from 17 countries competing in 84 national and European elections from 1986 to 2011. Our findings have important implications for political representation in Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.