Search

The myeloproliferative disease polycythemia vera (PV) driven by the JAK2 V617F mutation can transform into myelofibrosis (post-PV-MF). It remains an open question how JAK2 V617F in hematopoietic stem cells induces MF. Megakaryocytes are major players in murine PV models but are difficult to study in the human setting. We generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from JAK2 V617F PV patients and differentiated them into megakaryocytes. In differentiation assays, JAK2 V617F iPSCs recapitulated the pathognomonic skewed megakaryocytic and erythroid differentiation. JAK2 V617F iPSCs had a TPO-independent and increased propensity to differentiate into megakaryocytes. RNA sequencing of JAK2 V617F iPSC-derived megakaryocytes reflected a proinflammatory, profibrotic phenotype and decreased ribosome biogenesis. In three-dimensional (3D) coculture, JAK2 V617F megakaryocytes induced a profibrotic phenotype through direct cell contact, which was reversed by the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. The 3D coculture system opens the perspective for further disease modeling and drug discovery., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests W.W. and V.T. are involved in Cygenia GmbH (www.cygenia.com), which provides services for DNA methylation analysis to other scientists. S.K. reports funding from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen/Geron; advisory board honoraria from Pfizer, Incyte, Ariad, Novartis, AOP Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Geron, Janssen, CTI, Roche, Baxalta, GSK, Sierra Oncology, and Sanofi; a patent for Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) inhibitor at RWTH Aachen University; honoraria from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Geron, Janssen, Pfizer, Incyte, Ariad, Shire, Roche, and AOP Pharma; and other financial support (e.g., travel support) from Alexion, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Ariad, AOP Pharma, Baxalta, CTI, Pfizer, Sanofi, Celgene, Shire, Janssen, Geron, Abbvie, Imago Biosciences, Sierra Oncology, GSK, and Karthos. T.H.B. served as a consultant for Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer; received research funding form Novartis and Pfizer; and received honoraria from Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) encompass a diverse group of hematologic disorders driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL. The prevailing working model explaining how these driver mutations induce different disease phenotypes is based on the decisive influence of the cellular microenvironment and the acquisition of additional mutations. Here, we report increased levels of chromatin segregation errors in hematopoietic cells stably expressing CALRdel52 or JAK2V617F mutations. Our investigations employing murine 32D MPL and human erythroleukemic TF-1 MPL cells demonstrate a link between CALRdel52 or JAK2V617F expression and a compromised spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), a phenomenon contributing to error-prone mitosis. This defective SAC is associated with imbalances in the recruitment of SAC factors to mitotic kinetochores upon CALRdel52 or JAK2V617F expression. We show that JAK2 mutant CD34 + MPN patient-derived cells exhibit reduced expression of the master mitotic regulators PLK1, aurora kinase B, and PP2A catalytic subunit. Furthermore, the expression profile of mitotic regulators in CD34 + patient-derived cells allows to faithfully distinguish patients from healthy controls, as well as to differentiate primary and secondary myelofibrosis from essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Altogether, our data suggest alterations in mitotic regulation as a potential driver in the pathogenesis in MPN., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) suffer from pruritus, night sweats, and other symptoms, as well as from thromboembolic complications and progression to post-PV myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for second-line therapy in high-risk PV pts with hydroxyurea intolerance or resistance. The RuxoBEAT trial (NCT02577926, registered on October 1, 2015, at clinicaltrials.gov) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 380 pts with PV or ET, randomized to receive RUX or best available therapy. This pre-specified futility analysis assesses the early clinical benefit and tolerability of RUX in previously untreated PV pts (6-week cytoreduction was allowed). Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive RUX. Compared to baseline, after 6 months of treatment, there was a significant reduction of median hematocrit (46 to 41%), the median number of phlebotomies per year (4.0 to 0), and median patient-reported pruritus scores (2 to 1), and a trend for reduced night sweat scores (1.5 to 0). JAK2V617F allele burden, as part of the scientific research program, also significantly decreased. One hundred nine adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24/28 patients (all grade 1 to 3), and no pt permanently discontinued treatment because of AEs. Thus, treatment with ruxolitinib in untreated PV pts is feasible, well-tolerated, and efficient regarding the above-mentioned endpoints., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Polycythaemia vera is associated with a reduced quality of life, a high rate of vascular events, and an intrinsic risk of disease evolution. The results of several randomised trials for the treatment of this disorder are now available, and both a new ropegylated formulation of interferon alfa-2b (ropeginterferon alfa-2b; 2018) and ruxolitinib (2015) have been approved in Europe. European LeukemiaNet (ELN) investigators have therefore deemed it appropriate to provide recommendations for the use of these drugs in clinical practice. An expert panel of 14 senior haematologists from ELN centres that had actively participated in previous ELN projects or relevant randomised trials, chaired by a member of the ELN Steering Committee, developed a list of clinical questions, and a methodologist established three patient, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions and systematically reviewed the evidence. Recommendations were approved by six Delphi consensus rounds and two virtual meetings (on Jan 26, 2021, and June 24, 2021). The expert panel recommended that patients with polycythaemia vera who are younger than 60 years and have not had previous thrombotic events should start cytoreductive drug therapy if at least one of the following criteria are fulfilled: strictly defined intolerance to phlebotomy, symptomatic progressive splenomegaly, persistent leukocytosis (>15 × 10 9 white blood cells per L), progressive leukocytosis (at least 100% increase if baseline count is <10 × 10 9 cells per L or at least 50% increase if baseline count is >10 × 10 9 cells per L), extreme thrombocytosis (>1500 × 10 9 platelets per L), inadequate haematocrit control requiring phlebotomies, persistently high cardiovascular risk, and persistently high symptom burden. Recombinant interferon alfa, either in the form of ropeginterferon alfa-2b or pegylated interferon alfa-2a, is the recommended cytoreductive treatment for these patients. The expert panel suggested that either interferon alfa or ruxolitinib should be considered for patients who are being treated with hydroxyurea but require a therapy change., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MM has received consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, speaker fees from Amgen, support for attending meetings from Takeda, and is a member of the guideline committee of the Italian Society of Hematology. AMV has received speaker fees from Novartis, AOP Health, Incyte, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); and has participated on the advisory boards of Novartis, Incyte, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, GSK, BMS, and Roche. MG has received consulting and speaker fees, support for attending meetings, and participated on advisory boards for AOP Health, Novartis, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CTI BioPharma, Shire, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences. CH has received grants or contracts with payment to her institution from Novartis, Celgene, and Constellation Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Keros Therapeutics, Galecto Biotech, and Roche; speaker fees from Novartis, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Promedior, and Geron Corporation; support for attending meetings from Novartis and Celgene, and has participated on advisory boards for Roche, CTI Biopharma, Geron Corporation, Promedior, AbbVie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, and Galecto. SK has received research grants from AOP Health, Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Imago BioScience; consulting fees from Pfizer, CTI BioPharma, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; speaker fees from Pfizer, CTI BioPharma, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Kartos Therapeutics, and Imago BioScience; support for attending meetings from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, CTI BioPharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Geron Corporation, Kartos Therapeutics, Sierra Oncology, Imago BioScience; has participated on advisory boards for Pfizer, CTI BioPharma, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Kartos Therapeutics, and Imago BioScience; has patents planned, issued, or pending from Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen; and has a leadership role in Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Hamatologie und Medizinische Onkologie. HG has received research grants and support for attending meetings from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals and Novartis; consulting fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and BMS/Celgene; and speaker fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, and Janssen. AÁ-L has participated on advisory boards and has received speaker fees from Novartis, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, and Celgene; and has received support for attending meetings from Novartis and Pfizer. VDS has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Novartis, and participated on advisory boards of AOP Health and Novartis. PG has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Novartis, and support for attending meetings from Sanofi. FPal has received speaker fees from Novartis and Incyte; consulting fees from AOP Health, CTI BioPharma, Novartis, and Celgene/BMS; and support for attending meetings from Celgene/BMS. FPas has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Novartis, BMS, and Amomed Pharma; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and BMS. RTS has received research grants from the Cancer Research & Treatment Fund and Johns Family Fund, received speaker fees and payment for expert testimony from PharmaEssentia, participated on an advisory board for PharmaEssentia, and has a leadership role (Vice-President and Medical Director) at the Cancer Research & Treatment Fund. J-JK received consulting fees from AbbVie and Novartis; speaker fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and BMS; and has participated on advisory boards for Incyte. TB has received research grants and speaker fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals and Novartis, and consultancy fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals. GB and RH declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies, including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), as well as post-PV-MF and post-ET-MF. Progression to more symptomatic disease, such as overt MF or acute leukemia, represents one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality. There are clinically evident but also subclinical types of MPN progression. Clinically evident progression includes evolution from ET to PV, ET to post-ET-MF, PV to post-PV-MF, or pre-PMF to overt PMF, and transformation of any of these subtypes to myelodysplastic neoplasms or acute leukemia. Thrombosis, major hemorrhage, severe infections, or increasing symptom burden (e.g., pruritus, night sweats) may herald progression. Subclinical types of progression may include increases in the extent of bone marrow fibrosis, increases of driver gene mutational allele burden, and clonal evolution. The underlying causes of MPN progression are diverse and can be attributed to genetic alterations and chronic inflammation. Particularly, bystander mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators or splicing factors were associated with progression. Finally, comorbidities such as systemic inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, and organ fibrosis may augment the risk of progression. The aim of this review was to discuss types and mechanisms of MPN progression and how their knowledge might improve risk stratification and therapeutic intervention. In view of these aspects, we discuss the potential benefits of early diagnosis using molecular and functional imaging and exploitable therapeutic strategies that may prevent progression, but also highlight current challenges and methodological pitfalls.

The chemokine CXCL4/platelet factor 4 (PF4) gene, a key player in myelofibrosis, was knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) of a polycythemia vera (PV) patient with JAK2 V617F mutation. Two CXCL4 KO iPS cell lines with and without JAK2 V617F mutation (UKAi002-B-1 and UKAi002-A-1, respectively) were generated. CXCL4 KO iPS cells showed deletion of exon 1 and complete loss of CXCL4 protein. Pluripotency of iPS cells was confirmed by expression of pluripotency markers and trilineage differentiation. CXCL4 KO iPS cells are expected to provide a valuable tool for investigating the role of CXCL4 in human diseases., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b RELIEF trial evaluated polycythaemia vera (PV)-related symptoms in patients who were well controlled with a stable dose of hydroxycarbamide (also termed hydroxyurea) but reported PV-related symptoms. Patients were randomized 1:1 to ruxolitinib 10 mg BID (n = 54) or hydroxycarbamide (prerandomization dose/schedule; n = 56); crossover to ruxolitinib was permitted after Week 16. The primary endpoint, ≥50% improvement from baseline in myeloproliferative neoplasm -symptom assessment form total symptom score cytokine symptom cluster (TSS-C; sum of tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake) at Week 16, was achieved by 43·4% vs. 29·6% of ruxolitinib- and hydroxycarbamide-treated patients, respectively (odds ratio, 1·82; 95% confidence interval, 0·82-4·04; P = 0·139). The primary endpoint was achieved by 34% of a subgroup who maintained their hydroxycarbamide dose from baseline to Weeks 13-16. In a post hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was achieved by more patients with stable screening-to-baseline TSS-C scores (ratio ≤ 2) receiving ruxolitinib than hydroxycarbamide (47·4% vs. 25·0%; P = 0·0346). Ruxolitinib treatment after unblinding was associated with continued symptom score improvements. Adverse events were primarily grades 1/2 with no unexpected safety signals. Ruxolitinib was associated with a nonsignificant trend towards improved PV-related symptoms versus hydroxycarbamide, although an unexpectedly large proportion of patients who maintained their hydroxycarbamide dose reported symptom improvement., (© 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events and constitute the major risk factor of splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT) in Western countries. Although timely anticoagulation resolves SVT, unrecognized SVT frequently leads to portal hypertension and, potentially, variceal bleeding, which may render anticoagulation difficult. Thus, early identification of SVT development is clinically relevant in MPN patients.In this retrospective analysis, we included 126 patients with MPN and/or SVT referred to our hospital between 2009 and 2014. A total of 86 patients diagnosed with MPN formed the first cohort (PV n = 18, ET n = 16, and MF n = 40), whereas 40 patients who had SVT without adjunct MPN formed a control cohort. Median follow-up period was 960 days. Clinical and laboratory data were collected and analyzed for the identification of potential biomarkers applying descriptive statistics, nonparametric testing, Kaplan-Meier, and logistic regression analysis. The relevance of the identified biomarkers was evaluated in an independent 2nd cohort of 181 patients from the MPN registry of the Study Alliance of Leukemia (SAL-MPN).Thirty-three MPN patients (38%) in the 1st cohort had SVT. Elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, serum bilirubin, or γ-GT were significantly correlated to the presence of SVT. In multivariate testing, CRP and aspartate aminotransferase were predictors for survival and γ-GT remained the only significant variable associated with SVT in MPN patients (P < 0.05). These findings were confirmed in the 2nd cohort comprising 42% of patients with MPN suffering from SVT.Elevated γ-GT levels indicate SVT in MPN patients, whereas CRP levels are independent predictors of patient survival.

The current standard‐of‐care for treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) comprises inhibitors of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators (STAT) pathway; however, despite their ability to alleviate symptoms, they do not appear to modify underlying disease and have not demonstrated substantial survival benefit. Allogeneic‐hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option for patients with MF but is limited to a subset of high‐risk and fit patients. Early disease modification could positively affect disease trajectory for lower risk patients with MF as well as those with conditions that can precede MF, such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Here, the authors discuss critical unmet needs in the MF treatment paradigm, including: the need for safe, impactful therapies for lower risk patients, thus allowing intervention when success is most likely; better development of first‐line therapies (likely highly novel or combination strategies) for intermediate‐risk/higher risk patients; and approved drugs to manage cytopenia. Finally, a consensus definition of disease modification is needed that informs trial design, allowing the development of clinical end points that enable understanding of therapies and responses and that facilitate the development of therapies that work according to this definition. Through close collaboration between clinicians, patients, and the pharmaceutical industry, better efforts to define benefit and identify patients most likely to benefit from a particular combination or treatment strategy should enable the development of more effective and safe treatments to extend and improve quality of life for patients with MF. Early disease modification could positively affect the disease trajectory for patients with myelofibrosis. Herein, the authors discuss critical unmet needs in the myelofibrosis treatment paradigm, including safe therapies for lower risk patients, better development of first‐line therapies for intermediate‐risk/higher risk patients, approved drugs to manage cytopenia, and a consensus definition of disease modification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bone marrow (BM) fibrosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is associated with a poor prognosis. The development of myelofibrosis and differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells to profibrotic myofibroblasts depends on macrophages. Here, we compared macrophage frequencies in BM biopsies of MPN patients and controls (patients with non-neoplastic processes), including primary myelofibrosis (PMF, n = 18), essential thrombocythemia (ET, n = 14), polycythemia vera (PV, n = 12), and Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 9). In PMF, CD68-positive macrophages were greatly increased compared to CML (p = 0.017) and control BM (p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed by CD163 staining (PMF vs. CML: p = 0.017; PMF vs. control: p < 0.001). Moreover, CD68-positive macrophages were increased in PV compared with ET (p = 0.009) and reactive cases (p < 0.001). PMF had higher frequencies of macrophages than PV (CD68: p < 0.001; CD163: p < 0.001) and ET (CD68: p < 0.001; CD163: p < 0.001). CD163 and CD68 were often co-expressed in macrophages with stellate morphology in Philadelphia chromosome–negative MPN, resulting in a sponge-like reticular network that may be a key regulator of unbalanced hematopoiesis in the BM space and may explain differences in cellularity and clinical course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Philadelphia negative (Ph-neg) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogenous group of clonal stem cell disorders. Approved treatment options include hydroxyurea, anagrelide, and ruxolitinib, which are not curative. The concept of synthetic lethality may become an additional therapeutic strategy in these diseases. In our study, we show that DNA repair is altered in classical Ph-neg MPN, as analyzed by gene expression analysis of 11 genes involved in the homologous recombination repair pathway (HRR), the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ), and the single-strand break repair pathway (SSB). Altogether, peripheral blood-derived cells from 57 patients with classical Ph-neg MPN and 13 healthy controls were analyzed. LIG3 as an essential part of the SSB was significantly lower expressed compared to controls in all three entities (essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF)). In addition, while genes of other DNA-repair pathways showed-possibly compensatory-increased expression in ET (HRR, NHEJ) and PV (NHEJ), MF samples displayed downregulation of all genes involved in NHEJ. With regard to the JAK2 mutational status (analyzed in ET and MF only), no upregulation of the HRR was detected. Though further studies are needed, based on these findings, we conclude that synthetic lethality may become a promising strategy in treating patients with Ph-neg MPN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Interferon alpha (IFNa) monotherapy is recommended as the standard therapy in polycythemia vera (PV) but not in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Here, we investigated the mechanisms of IFNa efficacy in JAK2V617F- vs. BCR-ABL-positive cells. Methods: Gene expression microarrays and RT-qPCR of PV vs. CML patient PBMCs and CD34+ cells and of the murine cell line 32D expressing JAK2V617F or BCR-ABL were used to analyze and compare interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. Furthermore, using CRISPR/Cas9n technology, targeted disruption of STAT1 or STAT2, respectively, was performed in 32D-BCR-ABL and 32D-JAK2V617F cells to evaluate the role of these transcription factors for IFNa efficacy. The knockout cell lines were reconstituted with STAT1, STAT2, STAT1Y701F, or STAT2Y689F to analyze the importance of wild-type and phosphomutant STATs for the IFNa response. ChIP-seq and ChIP were performed to correlate histone marks with ISG expression. Results: Microarray analysis and RT-qPCR revealed significant upregulation of ISGs in 32D-JAK2V617F but downregulation in 32D-BCR-ABL cells, and these effects were reversed by tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Similar expression patterns were confirmed in human cell lines, primary PV and CML patient PBMCs and CD34+ cells, demonstrating that these effects are operational in patients. IFNa treatment increased Stat1, Stat2, and Irf9 mRNA as well as pY-STAT1 in all cell lines; however, viability was specifically decreased in 32D-JAK2V617F. STAT1 or STAT2 knockout and reconstitution with wild-type or phospho-deficient STAT mutants demonstrated the necessity of STAT2 for IFNa-induced STAT1 phosphorylation in BCR-ABL- but not in JAK2V617F-expressing cells. STAT1 was essential for IFNa activity in both BCR-ABLand JAK2V617F-positive cells. Furthermore, ChIP experiments demonstrate higher repressive and lower active chromatin marks at the promoters of ISGs in BCR-ABL-expressing cells. Conclusions: JAK2V617F but not BCR-ABL sensitizes MPN cells to interferon, and this effect was dependent on STAT1. Moreover, STAT2 is a survival factor in BCR-ABL- and JAK2V617F-positive cells but an IFNa-sensitizing factor solely in 32DJAK2V617F cells by upregulation of STAT1 expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) associated with high disease burden, reduced quality of life (QOL), and shortened survival. To assess how MPNs affect patients, we conducted a global MPN Landmark survey. This online survey of patients with MPNs and physicians was conducted in Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Italy, and the United Kingdom. The survey measured MPN-related symptoms and the impact of MPNs on QOL and the ability to work as well as disease-management strategies. Overall, 219 physicians and 699 patients (MF, n = 174; PV, n = 223; ET, n = 302) completed the survey; 90% of patients experienced MPN-related symptoms. The most frequent and severe symptom was fatigue. Most patients experienced a reduction in QOL, including those with low symptom burden or low-risk scores. A substantial proportion of patients reported impairment at work and in overall activity. Interestingly, physician feedback and blood counts were the most important indicators of treatment success among patients, with improvements in symptoms and QOL being less important. Regarding disease management, our study revealed a lack of alignment between physician and patient perceptions relating to communication and disease management, with patients often having different treatment goals than physicians. Overall, our study suggested that therapies that reduce symptom burden and improve QOL in patients with MPNs are crucial in minimizing disease impact on patient daily lives. Additionally, our findings showed a need for improved patient-physician communication, standardized monitoring of symptoms, and agreement on treatment goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]