Search

Ropeginterferon-alfa2b (ropegIFNα2b) is a long-acting IFN formulation with broad FDA/EMA approval as a therapy of polycythemia vera (PV) with no symptomatic splenomegaly. There is currently lack of information on the real-world patient selection, including the impact of local reimbursement policies, and drug management, particularly: type/timing of screening and follow-up tests; absolute/relative contraindications to therapy; ropegIFNα2b dose and combinations with hydroxyurea. As a sub-analysis of the PV-ARC retrospective study (NCT06134102), we here report our monocenter experience with ropegIFNα2b in the period from January 2021, corresponding to drug availability outside clinical trial, and December 2023. Among the 149 patients with EMA/FDA indication, only 55 (36.9%) met the local reimbursement criteria and 18 (12.1%) received ropegIFNα2b. Thanks to appropriate screening, relative/absolute contraindications to ropegIFNα2b were detected and managed in a multidisciplinary manner. Efficacy and safety of ropegIFNα2b was confirmed, with 3 cases of early molecular response. General use of low ropegIFNα2b dose, with frequent need for hydroxyurea combinations, was noted. This real-world experience suggests a significant impact of local regulations on drug prescription and the need for greater real-world data collection on ropegIFNα2b in PV patients. Also, it describes appropriate multidisciplinary screening and monitoring procedures during ropegIFNα2b therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In patients with low-risk polycythemia vera, exposure to low-dose Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) 100 µg every 2 weeks for 2 years was more effective than the standard treatment of therapeutic phlebotomy in maintaining target hematocrit (HCT) (< 45%) with a reduction in the need for phlebotomy without disease progression. In the present paper, we analyzed drug survival, defined as a surrogate measure of the efficacy, safety, adherence, and tolerability of Ropeg in patients followed up to 5 years. During the first 2 years, Ropeg and phlebotomy-only (Phl-O) were discontinued in 33% and 70% of patients, respectively, for lack of response (12 in the Ropeg arm vs. 34 in the Phl-O arm) or adverse events (6 vs. 0) and withdrawal of consent in (3 vs. 10). Thirty-six Ropeg responders continued the drug for up to 3 years, and the probability of drug survival after a median of 3.15 years was 59%. Notably, the primary composite endpoint was maintained in 97%, 94%, and 94% of patients still on drug at 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, and 60% of cases were phlebotomy-free. Twenty-three of 63 Phl-O patients (37%) failed the primary endpoint and were crossed over to Ropeg; among the risk factors for this failure, the need for more than three bloodletting procedures in the first 6 months emerged as the most important determinant. In conclusion, to improve the effectiveness of Ropeg, we suggest increasing the dose and using it earlier driven by high phlebotomy need in the first 6 months post-diagnosis., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

BACKGROUND: Whether phlebotomy alone can adequately maintain target hematocrit in patients with low-risk polycythemia vera (PV) remains elusive. METHODS: In a phase 2 open-label randomized trial, we compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg; 100 μg every 2 weeks) with phlebotomy only regarding maintenance of a median hematocrit level (≤45%) over 12 months in the absence of progressive disease (primary end point). In follow-up, crossover to the alternative treatment group was allowed if the primary end point was not met. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients were enrolled (ropeg: n=64; standard group: n=63). The primary end point was met in 81% and 51% in the ropeg and standard groups, respectively. Responders continued the assigned treatment until month 24 and maintained response in 83% and 59%, respectively (P=0.02). Ropeg responders less frequently experienced moderate/severe symptoms (33% vs. 67% in the standard group) and palpable splenomegaly (14% vs. 37%) and showed normalization of ferritin levels and blood counts. Nonresponders at 12 months crossed over to the standard (n=9) or ropeg (n=23) group; in patients switched to ropeg only, 7 of 23 met the response criteria in 12 months, and phlebotomy need was high (4.7 per patient per year). Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in seven patients treated with ropeg. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-month trial, ropeg was superior to phlebotomy alone in maintaining hematocrit on target. No dose-limiting side effects or toxicities were noted; 9.2% of patients on ropeg and no patients on standard treatment developed neutropenia. (Funded by AOP Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03003325.)

Objectives: Polycythemia vera (PV) is an acquired clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by the overproduction of red blood cells. It has long been underlined that there are differences in treatment patterns in routine practice. Therapeutic strategies have also expanded, and in recent years the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has emerged as a second-line therapeutic option in patients who are intolerant to or resistant to hydroxyurea. Determining the impact of changes on practice patterns is of interest, especially for aspects that lack detailed guidance for management., Methods: To gain insights into treatment patterns by clinicians treating patients with PV in Italy, we carried out a survey of 60 hematologists and transfusion specialists. The questions covered: treatment of low-risk patients, definition of significant leukocytosis, splenomegaly and excessive phlebotomies, resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea, use of ruxolitinib, cytoreductive therapy, and vaccines., Results: In general, the results of the survey indicate that there is a large heterogeneity in management of patients with PV across these areas., Conclusions: While helping to provide greater understanding of treatment patterns for patients with PV in Italy, our survey highlights the need for additional clinical studies to obtain more precise guidance for the routine care of patients with PV., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) show an elevated incidence of thromboembolic complications and decreased survival when compared to age-matched healthy individuals. Hypercellularity as indicated by elevated hematocrit, pathophysiological changes induced by the JAK2 driver mutation and cardiovascular risk factors contribute to the increased incidence of thromboembolic events. Higher age and a history of thromboembolic events define a high-risk population of PV patients. Depending on the individual risk profile, phlebotomy or pharmacologic cytoreduction is recommended in combination with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. Stringent cytoreduction is required for effective risk reduction. However, in recent reports, the rate of thromboembolic complications in PV patients under cytoreductive therapy appears still elevated compared to healthy individuals. This study reports on a chart review to assess for cytoreductive therapy of 1440 PV patients in real life., Methods: Forty-two eligible hematologists/oncologists in private practice treating patients with MPN were recruited to participate in a paper-pencil-based survey conducted between January 2019 and March 2020 in Germany. Physicians were asked to report primary documented data obtained from patient charts. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess for patient characteristics, treatment modalities, risk factors and thromboembolic complications., Results: Data were collected from the patient charts of 1440 individuals diagnosed with PV. The patient population was older than those reported in multicenter trials with a median age of 72.2 years at the time of reporting and 63.5 years at diagnosis. Age was the main factor accounting for high-risk status with 84.7% of patients being above the age of 60 followed by thromboembolic complications reported in 21.3% of patients. The use of pharmacologic cytoreduction was highly variable between participating centers with an average of 60.7% and a range of 10.1-100%. Hydroxyurea was the most frequently used drug followed by ruxolitinib, while interferons were reported for a minority of patients. For 35.4% of patients a persistent need for phlebotomy in addition to cytoreductive treatment was reported. Although presence of high-risk criteria and insufficient disease control were reported as main triggers to initiate pharmacologic cytoreduction, 28.1% had elevated hematocrit values (> 45%) and 38.6% showed persistence of elevated leukocyte count (> 10 9/l ) while on cytoreductive treatment. In contrast, physician-reported symptom burden was lower than published in clinical trials and patient-reported outcomes. The rate of patients experiencing thromboembolic complications was 32.2% at any time and 14.3% after diagnosis with most patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid and 10.8% remaining on oral anticoagulants or heparin., Conclusions: Cytoreductive treatment of high-risk PV in real life is highly variable regarding indication for cytoreduction and definition of therapy resistance. This study highlights the need for (i) improved risk stratification for thromboembolic events, (ii) consequent indication of pharmacologic cytoreduction in high-risk PV and (iii) attention to signs of therapy resistance that can trigger an earlier and stringent switch to second line agents., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are at high risk of thrombotic events (TEs). Predisposing factors have been identified in essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and primary myelofibrosis (primary MF, PMF), while yet not recognized in post PV/ET-MF (known as secondary MF, SMF). Within the 1258 SMF of the MYSEC (MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET) dataset, 135 (10.7%) developed a TE at a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 1-21.4), with an incidence of 2.3% patients per year. Venous events accounted for two-thirds of the total. Cox multivariable analysis, supported by Fine-Gray models with death as competitive risk, showed that being on cytoreductive therapy at time of SMF evolution is associated with an absolute risk reduction of thrombosis equal to 3.3% within 3 years. Considering individually cytoreductive therapies, univariate regression model found that both conventional cytoreduction, mainly hydroxyurea, (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.65, p = 0.0001) and JAK inhibitors, mostly ruxolitinib, (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.24-1.02, p = 0.05) were associated with fewer thrombosis. Our study informs treating physicians of a non-low incidence of TEs in post PV/ET-MF and of the potential protective role of cytoreductive therapy in terms of thrombotic events., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: The phase 3b, randomised, open-label RESPONSE-2 study in patients with inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly showed superiority of the Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for the primary endpoint of haematocrit control at week 28. Here, we present secondary endpoints of the RESPONSE-2 study after 5 years of follow-up., Methods: RESPONSE-2 was an open-label, randomised, phase 3b study done at 48 hospitals or clinics across 12 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and Canada. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly, who were intolerant of, or resistant to hydroxyurea, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ruxolitinib or best available therapy for up to 80 weeks. Patients received oral ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day or best available therapy. Patients assigned to best available therapy could cross over to ruxolitinib at week 28 if the primary endpoint was not met, or after week 28 and up to week 80 if best available therapy was ineffective or not tolerated. Patients receiving ruxolitinib at week 80, including crossover patients, could continue ruxolitinib treatment up to week 260. We assessed secondary endpoints at week 260, including durable haematocrit control, median duration of haematocrit control, median haematocrit level over time, number of phlebotomies, and overall survival. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02038036 and was completed on April 7, 2020., Findings: Patients were enrolled between March 25, 2014 and Feb 11, 2015. 149 patients were randomly assigned to ruxolitinib (n=74) or best available therapy (n=75). The median follow-up was 67 months (IQR 65-70). At randomisation, best available therapy regimens included hydroxyurea (n=38), interferon or pegylated interferon (n=9), pipobroman (n=5), lenalidomide (n=1), or no treatment (n=22). Between weeks 28 and 80, 58 (77%) of 75 patients in the best available therapy group crossed over to ruxolitinib; no patients continued best available therapy after week 80 per protocol. 97 patients received ruxolitinib until week 260, including 59 (80%) of 74 patients in the ruxolitinib group and 38 (66%) of 58 patients in the crossover groups. At week 260, 16 (22%; 95% CI 13-33) of 74 patients in the ruxolitinib group had achieved durable haematocrit control, with estimated median duration not reached (NR; 95% CI 144 to NR). Median duration of haematocrit control was not reported for patients in the best available therapy group due to the small number of responders by week 80. During the 5-year follow-up, median haematocrit level among patients in the ruxolitinib group remained below 45%. 60 phlebotomies were required among 74 patients in the ruxolitinib group in 260 weeks, and 106 phlebotomies among 75 patients in the best available therapy group in 80 weeks. 5-year overall survival was 96% (95% CI 87-99) in the ruxolitinib group and 91% (80-96) in the best available therapy group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (exposure-adjusted per 100 patient-years) in the ruxolitinib group (n=74) and best available therapy group (n=75) were hypertension (eight [2·4%] vs three [5·6%]), thrombocytopenia (one [0·3%] vs three [5·6%]), and thrombocytosis (0 vs four [7·5%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of any-grade thromboembolic events were 1·5% per 100 person-years (five of 74 patients) in the ruxolitinib group and 3·7% per 100 person-years (two of 75 patients) in the best available therapy group. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study., Interpretation: 5-year results from the RESPONSE-2 study support the use of ruxolitinib as a second-line therapy of choice for patients with inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly., Funding: Novartis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests FPas reports honoraria and membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committee from Novartis; and fees for speakers bureaus from Celgene, Janssen, and Roche. FPal reports speakers' honoraria from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Novartis, and Telios; and has served on advisory boards for AOP Health, Celgene, CTI biopharma, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. GS has served on advisory boards for Abbvie, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Novartis, and Takeda. JC reports research support from Octapharma Canada and Canadian Blood Services. TD has served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Alexion, Astra Zeneca Rare Disease Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte, and Novartis. PG has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, fees for speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie and Novartis; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Novartis and Sanofi; and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Abbvie and Novartis. AMV reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis; and consulting fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Blueprint, Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, and Roche. MG reports consultancy fees from Amgen, AOP Orphan, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, CTI, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Shire; and honoraria from Amgen, AOP Health, Orphan, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, CTI, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Shire. EZ, MZ, GG, and YZ are employees of Novartis. EZ and YZ hold stock or stock options from Novartis., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Polycythaemia vera is associated with a reduced quality of life, a high rate of vascular events, and an intrinsic risk of disease evolution. The results of several randomised trials for the treatment of this disorder are now available, and both a new ropegylated formulation of interferon alfa-2b (ropeginterferon alfa-2b; 2018) and ruxolitinib (2015) have been approved in Europe. European LeukemiaNet (ELN) investigators have therefore deemed it appropriate to provide recommendations for the use of these drugs in clinical practice. An expert panel of 14 senior haematologists from ELN centres that had actively participated in previous ELN projects or relevant randomised trials, chaired by a member of the ELN Steering Committee, developed a list of clinical questions, and a methodologist established three patient, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions and systematically reviewed the evidence. Recommendations were approved by six Delphi consensus rounds and two virtual meetings (on Jan 26, 2021, and June 24, 2021). The expert panel recommended that patients with polycythaemia vera who are younger than 60 years and have not had previous thrombotic events should start cytoreductive drug therapy if at least one of the following criteria are fulfilled: strictly defined intolerance to phlebotomy, symptomatic progressive splenomegaly, persistent leukocytosis (>15 × 10 9 white blood cells per L), progressive leukocytosis (at least 100% increase if baseline count is <10 × 10 9 cells per L or at least 50% increase if baseline count is >10 × 10 9 cells per L), extreme thrombocytosis (>1500 × 10 9 platelets per L), inadequate haematocrit control requiring phlebotomies, persistently high cardiovascular risk, and persistently high symptom burden. Recombinant interferon alfa, either in the form of ropeginterferon alfa-2b or pegylated interferon alfa-2a, is the recommended cytoreductive treatment for these patients. The expert panel suggested that either interferon alfa or ruxolitinib should be considered for patients who are being treated with hydroxyurea but require a therapy change., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MM has received consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, speaker fees from Amgen, support for attending meetings from Takeda, and is a member of the guideline committee of the Italian Society of Hematology. AMV has received speaker fees from Novartis, AOP Health, Incyte, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); and has participated on the advisory boards of Novartis, Incyte, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, GSK, BMS, and Roche. MG has received consulting and speaker fees, support for attending meetings, and participated on advisory boards for AOP Health, Novartis, Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CTI BioPharma, Shire, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences. CH has received grants or contracts with payment to her institution from Novartis, Celgene, and Constellation Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Keros Therapeutics, Galecto Biotech, and Roche; speaker fees from Novartis, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Promedior, and Geron Corporation; support for attending meetings from Novartis and Celgene, and has participated on advisory boards for Roche, CTI Biopharma, Geron Corporation, Promedior, AbbVie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, and Galecto. SK has received research grants from AOP Health, Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Imago BioScience; consulting fees from Pfizer, CTI BioPharma, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; speaker fees from Pfizer, CTI BioPharma, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Kartos Therapeutics, and Imago BioScience; support for attending meetings from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, CTI BioPharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Geron Corporation, Kartos Therapeutics, Sierra Oncology, Imago BioScience; has participated on advisory boards for Pfizer, CTI BioPharma, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Incyte/ARIAD, Roche, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Kartos Therapeutics, and Imago BioScience; has patents planned, issued, or pending from Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen; and has a leadership role in Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Hamatologie und Medizinische Onkologie. HG has received research grants and support for attending meetings from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals and Novartis; consulting fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and BMS/Celgene; and speaker fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, and Janssen. AÁ-L has participated on advisory boards and has received speaker fees from Novartis, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, and Celgene; and has received support for attending meetings from Novartis and Pfizer. VDS has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Novartis, and participated on advisory boards of AOP Health and Novartis. PG has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Novartis, and support for attending meetings from Sanofi. FPal has received speaker fees from Novartis and Incyte; consulting fees from AOP Health, CTI BioPharma, Novartis, and Celgene/BMS; and support for attending meetings from Celgene/BMS. FPas has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Novartis, BMS, and Amomed Pharma; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and BMS. RTS has received research grants from the Cancer Research & Treatment Fund and Johns Family Fund, received speaker fees and payment for expert testimony from PharmaEssentia, participated on an advisory board for PharmaEssentia, and has a leadership role (Vice-President and Medical Director) at the Cancer Research & Treatment Fund. J-JK received consulting fees from AbbVie and Novartis; speaker fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and BMS; and has participated on advisory boards for Incyte. TB has received research grants and speaker fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals and Novartis, and consultancy fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals. GB and RH declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In 816 patients with 2016 World Health Organization-defined polycythemia vera (PV) enrolled in a multicenter retrospective study, we investigated the predictive value of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and body mass index (BMI) on thrombosis, progression to post-PV myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) and survival. Patients were subgrouped according to CCI = 0 (58.1%, no comorbidities) or CCI ≥ 1 (41.9%) and according to normal/underweight (BMI < 25, 54.5%) or overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25, 45.5%) at PV diagnosis. BMI was available for 529 patients. Patients with CCI ≥ 1 were older and more frequently presented cardiovascular risk factors compared to patients with CCI = 0 (p < 0.001), while overweight/obese patients were more frequently males (p < 0.001). Cumulative incidence of thromboses with death as competing risk was 13.3% at 10 years. Multivariable analysis with death as competing risk showed that previous thromboses (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 2.1, p = 0.01) and hypertension (SHR: 1.77, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with a higher thrombotic risk, while BMI ≥ 25 lost statistical significance (SHR: 1.69, p = 0.05) and CCI ≥ 1 was excluded after evaluation of goodness of fit. After a median follow-up of 6.1 years, progression to PPV-MF occurred in 44 patients, and 75 patients died. BMI ≥ 25 was associated with a lower probability of progression to PPV-MF (SHR: 0.38, CI95%: 0.15-0.94, p = 0.04) and better survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42, CI95%: 0.18-0.97, p = 0.04). CCI ≥ 1 did not affect progression to PPV-MF (p = 0.44) or survival (p = 0.71).  The evaluation of CCI and BMI may improve the prognostic definition of PV. In patients with hypertension an accurate evaluation of thrombotic risk is warranted., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: There is no evidence that phlebotomy alone is sufficient to steadily maintain haematocrit on target level in low-risk patients with polycythaemia vera. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b on top of the standard phlebotomy regimen with phlebotomy alone., Methods: In 2017, we launched the Low-PV study, a multicentre, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, phase 2 randomised trial with a group-sequential adaptive design. The study involved 21 haematological centres across Italy. Participants were recruited in a consecutive order. Participants enrolled in the study were patients, aged 18-60 years, with a diagnosis of polycythaemia vera according to 2008-16 WHO criteria. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either phlebotomy and low-dose aspirin (standard group) or ropeginterferon alfa-2b on top of the standard treatment (experimental group). Randomisation sequence was generated using five blocks of variable sizes proportional to elements of Pascal's triangle. Allocation was stratified by age and time from diagnosis. No masking was done. Patients randomly allocated to the standard group were treated with phlebotomy (300 mL for each phlebotomy to maintain the haematocrit values of lower than 45%) and low-dose aspirin (100 mg daily), if not contraindicated. Patients randomly allocated to the experimental group received ropeginterferon alfa-2b subcutaneously every 2 weeks in a fixed dose of 100 μg on top of the phlebotomy-only regimen. The primary endpoint was treatment response, defined as maintenance of the median haematocrit values of 45% or lower without progressive disease during a 12-month period. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat principle. The study was powered assuming a higher percentage of responders in the experimental group (75%) than in the standard group (50%). Here we report results from the second planned interim analysis when 50 patients had been recruited to each group. The trial is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03003325., Findings: Between Feb 2, 2017, and March 13, 2020, 146 patients were screened, and 127 patients were randomly assigned to the standard group (n=63) or the experimental group (n=64). The median follow-up period was 12·1 months (IQR 12·0-12·6). For the second pre-planned interim analysis, a higher response rate in the experimental group was seen (42 [84%] of 50 patients) than in the standard group (30 [60%] of 50 patients; absolute difference 24%, 95% CI 7-41%, p=0·0075). The observed z value (2·6001) crossed the critical bound of efficacy (2·5262), and the stagewise adjusted p value early showed superiority of experimental treatment. Thus, the data safety monitoring board decided to stop patient accrual for overwhelming efficacy and to continue the follow-up, as per protocol, for 2 years. Under the safety profile, no statistically significant difference between groups in frequency of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was observed; the most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (four [8%] of 50 patients) in the experimental group and skin symptoms (two [4%] of 50 patients) in the standard group. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred., Interpretation: Supplementing phlebotomy with ropeginterferon alfa-2b seems to be safe and effective in steadily maintaining haematocrit values on target in low-risk patients with polycythaemia vera. Findings from the current study might have implications for changing the current management of low-risk patients with polycythaemia vera., Funding: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In recent times, there has been a growing interest in understanding the impact of gender on disease biology and clinical outcomes in Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Among those, polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by increased thrombotic risk, systemic symptoms, and overall reduced survival. Here, we aim to summarize data on whether and to what extent female sex can affect PV biology and outcome. To this end, we will discuss the latest acquisitions in terms of pathogenesis, diagnosis, epidemiology, clinical presentation and symptoms burden, thrombotic risk and related treatment strategies, and prognosis in female patients affected by PV.

Growing evidence highlights the endocannabinoid (EC) system involvement in cancer progression. Lipid mediators of this system are secreted by hematopoietic cells, including the ECs 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2AG) and arachidonoyl-ethanolamide (AEA), the 2AG metabolite 1AG, and members of N-acylethanolamine (NAE) family-palmitoyl-ethanolamide (PEA) and oleoyl-ethanolamide (OEA). However, the relevance of the EC system in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) was never investigated. We explored the EC plasma profile in 55 MPN patients, including myelofibrosis (MF; n = 41), polycythemia vera (PV; n = 9), and essential thrombocythemia (ET; n = 5) subclasses and in 10 healthy controls (HC). AEA, PEA, OEA, 2AG, and 1AG plasma levels were measured by LC-MS/MS. Overall considered, MPN patients displayed similar EC and NAE levels compared to HC. Nonetheless, AEA levels in MPN were directly associated with the platelet count. MF patients showed higher levels of the sum of 2AG and 1AG compared to ET and PV patients, higher OEA/AEA ratios compared to HC and ET patients, and higher OEA/PEA ratios compared to HC. Furthermore, the sum of 2AG and 1AG positively correlated with JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency and splenomegaly in MF and was elevated in high-risk PV patients compared to in low-risk PV patients. In conclusion, our work revealed specific alterations of ECs and NAE plasma profile in MPN subclasses and potentially relevant associations with disease severity.

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are known to have higher incidence of nonhematological second primary malignancies (SPM) compared to general population. In the MYSEC study on 781 secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) patients, the incidence of SPM after SMF diagnosis resulted 0.98/100 patient-years. When including non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), the incidence arose to 1.56/100 patient-years. In SMF, JAK inhibitor treatment was associated only with NMSC occurrence. Then, we merged the MYSEC cohort with a large dataset of PV and ET not evolving into SMF. In this subanalysis, we did not find any correlation between SPM and SMF occurrence. These findings highlight the need of studies aimed at identifying MPN patients at higher risk of SPM., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We conducted a large international nested case-control study including 1881 patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Cases (n = 647) were patients with second cancer (SC: carcinoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, hematological second cancer, and melanoma) and controls (n = 1234) were patients without SC, matched with cases for sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of MPN diagnosis, and MPN disease duration. The aim was to evaluate the risk of SC after exposure to cytoreductive drugs. Patients exposed to hydroxyurea (HU) (median: 3 years) had a risk of SC similar to unexposed patients (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.82-1.38). In contrast, in cancer-specific stratified multivariable analysis, HU had two-fold higher risk of non-melanoma (NM) skin cancer (OR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.15-4.51). A significantly higher risk of NM-skin cancer was also documented for pipobroman (OR = 3.74, 95% CI 1.00-14.01), ruxolitinib (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.18-12.75), and for drug combination (OR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.55-7.75). These three drugs did not show excess risk of carcinoma and hematological second cancer compared with unexposed patients. Exposure to interferon, busulfan, and anagrelide did not increase the risk. In summary, while it is reassuring that no excess of carcinoma was documented, a careful dermatologic active surveillance before and during the course of treatments is recommended.

Recently, the myelofibrosis secondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC-PM) was introduced to assess prognosis in myelofibrosis (MF) secondary to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia (post-PV and post-ET MF), replacing the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and/or Dynamic IPSS (DIPSS) that was applied for primary MF (PMF). In a cohort of 421 ruxolitinib (RUX)-treated patients (post-PV and post-ET MF: 44.2%), we evaluated the following: (1) disease phenotype, responses, and toxicity to RUX; and (2) performance of the MYSEC-PM in post-PV or post-ET MF. While the IPSS failed to correctly stratify post-PV or post-ET MF patients at diagnosis, the MYSEC-PM identified 4 risk categories projected at significantly different survival probability (P < .001). Additionally, the MYSEC-PM maintained a prognostic value in post-PV and post-ET MF also when used over time, at RUX start. Notably, the MYSEC-PM reclassified 41.8% and 13.6% of patients into a lower and higher risk category, respectively. Finally, patients at intermediate-1 risk had significantly higher spleen responses and lower hematological toxicities compared to higher risk patients. Compared to PMF, post-PV and post-ET MF presented a more hyperproliferative disease, with higher leukocyte and/or platelet count and hemoglobin levels both at diagnosis and at RUX start. Despite comparable response rates, post-PV and post-ET MF had lower rate of RUX-induced anemia and thrombocytopenia at 3 and 6 months. The study validates MYSEC-PM in post-PV and post-ET MF prognostication. Post-PV or post-ET MF represents a separate entity compared to PMF in terms of clinical manifestations and toxicity to RUX., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

RESPONSE-2 is a phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib with the best available therapy (BAT) in hydroxyurea-resistant/hydroxyurea-intolerant polycythemia vera (PV) patients without palpable splenomegaly. This analysis evaluated the durability of the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib after patients completed the visit at week 80 or discontinued the study. Endpoints included proportion of patients achieving hematocrit control (< 45%), proportion of patients achieving complete hematologic remission (CHR) at week 28, and the durability of hematocrit control and CHR. At the time of analysis, 93% (69/74) of patients randomized to ruxolitinib were receiving ruxolitinib; while in the BAT arm, 77% (58/75) of patients crossed over to ruxolitinib after week 28. No patient remained on BAT by week 80. Among patients who achieved a hematocrit response at week 28, the probability of maintaining response up to week 80 was 78% in the ruxolitinib arm. At week 80, durable CHR was achieved in 18 patients (24%) in the ruxolitinib arm versus 2 patients (3%) in the BAT arm. The safety profile of ruxolitinib was consistent with previous reports. These data support that ruxolitinib treatment should be considered also as a standard of care for hydroxyurea-resistant/hydroxyurea-intolerant PV patients without palpable splenomegaly.

Background: In the pivotal RESPONSE study, ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2 inhibitor, was superior to best available therapy at controlling haematocrit and improving splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with polycythaemia vera with splenomegaly who were inadequately controlled with hydroxyurea. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in controlling disease in patients with polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly who need second-line therapy., Methods: RESPONSE-2 is a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study assessing ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera done in 48 hospitals or clinics across 12 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with polycythaemia vera, no palpable splenomegaly, and hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance were stratified by their hydroxyurea therapy status (resistance vs intolerance) and randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive response technology provider using a validated system to receive either oral ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily or investigator-selected best available therapy (hydroxyurea [at the maximum tolerated dose], interferon or pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide, approved immunomodulators, or no cytoreductive treatment). Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment assignment; however, the study sponsor was masked to treatment assignment until database lock. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving haematocrit control at week 28. Analyses were done according to an intention-to-treat principle, including data from all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02038036) and is ongoing but not recruiting patients., Findings: Between March 25, 2014, and Feb 11, 2015, of 173 patients assessed for eligibility, 74 patients were randomly assigned to receive ruxolitinib and 75 to receive best available therapy. At randomisation, best available therapy included hydroxyurea (37 [49%] of 75 in the best available therapy group), interferon or pegylated interferon (ten [13%] of 75), pipobroman (five [7%] of 75), lenalidomide (one [1%] of 75), no treatment (21 [28%] of 75), and other (one [1%] of 75). Haematocrit control was achieved in 46 (62%) of 74 ruxolitinib-treated patients versus 14 (19%) of 75 patients who received best available therapy (odds ratio 7·28 [95% CI 3·43-15·45]; p<0·0001). The most frequent haematological adverse events of any grade were anaemia (ten [14%] of 74 in the ruxolitinib group vs two [3%] of 75 in the best available therapy group) and thrombocytopenia (two [3%] vs six [8%]). No cases of grade 3-4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia occurred with ruxolitinib; one patient (1%) reported grade 3-4 anaemia and three patients (4%) reported grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in the group receiving best available therapy. Frequent grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were hypertension (five [7%] of 74 vs three [4%] of 75) and pruritus (0 of 74 vs two [3%] of 75). Serious adverse events occurring in more than 2% of patients in either group, irrespective of cause, included thrombocytopenia (none in the ruxolitinib group vs two [3%] of 75 in the best available therapy group) and angina pectoris (two [3%] of 74 in the ruxolitinib group vs none in the best available therapy group). Two deaths occurred, both in the best available therapy group., Interpretation: RESPONSE-2 met its primary endpoint. The findings of this study indicate that ruxolitinib could be considered a standard of care for second-line therapy in this post-hydroxyurea patient population., Funding: Novartis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In patients who do not meet the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for overt polycythaemia vera (PV), a diagnosis of masked PV (mPV) can be determined. A fraction of mPV patients may display thrombocytosis, thus mimicking essential thrombocythaemia (ET). No previous studies have examined clinical outcomes of mPV among young JAK2-mutated patients. We analysed a retrospective cohort of 538 JAK2-mutated patients younger than 40 years, after a re-assessment of the diagnosis according to the haemoglobin threshold for mPV. In this cohort of patients, 97 (18%) met the WHO criteria for PV, 66 patients (12%) were classified as mPV and 375 (70%) as JAK2-mutated ET. Surprisingly, a significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis was found when comparing mPV versus overt PV patients (P = 0·04). In multivariate analysis, the only factor accounting for the difference in the risk of thrombosis was the less frequent use of phlebotomies and cytoreduction in mPV patients compared to those with overt PV. Thus, we emphasize the need for the identification of mPV in young JAK2-mutated patients in order to optimize their treatments., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Simple Summary: The prognostic relevance of a patient achieving complete response to hydroxyurea, the predictors of response, and patients' triggers for switching to ruxolitinib are uncertain. A retrospective, real-world analysis was performed on 563 polycythemia vera patients treated with hydroxyurea for ≥12 months during an observational "PV-NET" Italian study. We investigated factors associated with a complete response to hydroxyurea and outcomes of the 397 poor responders to hydroxyurea according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 114) or continued hydroxyurea (n = 283). The results suggest that many PV patients receive underdosed hydroxyurea, leading to lower response and toxicity rates. In addition, many patients continued hydroxyurea despite a poor clinical or hematological response; however, splenomegaly and other symptoms were the main drivers of an early switch. Better HU management, standardization of the criteria for and timing of responses to HU, and adequate intervention in poor responders should be advised. In polycythemia vera (PV), the prognostic relevance of an ELN-defined complete response (CR) to hydroxyurea (HU), the predictors of response, and patients' triggers for switching to ruxolitinib are uncertain. In a real-world analysis, we evaluated the predictors of response, their impact on the clinical outcomes of CR to HU, and the correlations between partial or no response (PR/NR) and a patient switching to ruxolitinib. Among 563 PV patients receiving HU for ≥12 months, 166 (29.5%) achieved CR, 264 achieved PR, and 133 achieved NR. In a multivariate analysis, the absence of splenomegaly (p = 0.03), pruritus (p = 0.002), and a median HU dose of ≥1 g/day (p < 0.001) remained associated with CR. Adverse events were more frequent with a median HU dose of ≥1 g/day. Overall, 283 PR/NR patients (71.3%) continued HU, and 114 switched to ruxolitinib. In the 449 patients receiving only HU, rates of thrombosis, hemorrhages, progression, and overall survival were comparable among the CR, PR, and NR groups. Many PV patients received underdosed HU, leading to lower CR and toxicity rates. In addition, many patients continued HU despite a PR/NR; however, splenomegaly and other symptoms were the main drivers of an early switch. Better HU management, standardization of the criteria for and timing of responses to HU, and adequate intervention in poor responders should be advised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with cytopenic myelofibrosis (MF) have more limited therapeutic options and poorer prognoses compared with patients with the myeloproliferative phenotype. Aims and Methods: Prognostic correlates of cytopenic phenotype were explored in 886 ruxolitinib‐treated patients with primary/secondary MF (PMF/SMF) included in the RUX‐MF retrospective study. Cytopenia was defined as: leukocyte count <4 × 109/L and/or hemoglobin <11/<10 g/dL (males/females) and/or platelets <100 × 109/L. Results: Overall, 407 (45.9%) patients had a cytopenic MF, including 249 (52.4%) with PMF. In multivariable analysis, high molecular risk mutations (p =.04), intermediate 2/high Dynamic International Prognostic Score System (p <.001) and intermediate 2/high Myelofibrosis Secondary to Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia Prognostic Model (p <.001) remained associated with cytopenic MF in the overall cohort, PMF, and SMF, respectively. Patients with cytopenia received lower average ruxolitinib at the starting (25.2 mg/day vs. 30.2 mg/day, p <.001) and overall doses (23.6 mg/day vs. 26.8 mg/day, p <.001) and achieved lower rates of spleen (26.5% vs. 34.1%, p =.04) and symptom (59.8% vs. 68.8%, p =.008) responses at 6 months compared with patients with the proliferative phenotype. Patients with cytopenia also had higher rates of thrombocytopenia at 3 months (31.1% vs. 18.8%, p <.001) but lower rates of anemia (65.6% vs. 57.7%, p =.02 at 3 months and 56.6% vs. 23.9% at 6 months, p <.001). After competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of ruxolitinib discontinuation at 5 years was 57% and 38% in patients with cytopenia and the proliferative phenotype (p <.001), whereas cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation was similar (p =.06). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for Dynamic International Prognostic Score System score, survival was significantly shorter in patients with cytopenia (p <.001). Conclusions: Cytopenic MF has a lower probability of therapeutic success with ruxolitinib as monotherapy and worse outcome. These patients should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies. Cytopenic myelofibrosis has a lower probability of therapeutic success with ruxolitinib as monotherapy and worse outcome. Patients with cytopenic myelofibrosis should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased risk of thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis. Chronic inflammation is commonly observed in myeloproliferative neoplasms including PV. The inflammatory network includes the extracellular vesicles (EVs), which play a role in cell-cell communication. Recent evidence points to circulating microbial components/microbes as potential players in hemopoiesis regulation. To address the role of EVs in PV, here we investigated phenotype and microbial DNA cargo of circulating EVs through multidimensional analysis. Peripheral blood and feces were collected from PV patients (n=38) and healthy donors (n=30). Circulating megakaryocyte (MK)- and platelet (PLT)-derived EVs were analyzed by flow cytometry. After microbial DNA extraction from feces and isolated EVs, the 16S rDNA V3-V4 region was sequenced. We found that the proportion of circulating MK-derived EVs was significantly decreased in PV patients as compared with the healthy donors. By contrast, the proportion of the PLT-derived EVs was increased. Interestingly, PV was also associated with a microbial DNA signature of the isolated EVs with higher diversity and distinct microbial composition than the healthy counterparts. Of note, increased proportion of isolated lipopolysaccharide-associated EVs has been demonstrated in PV patients. Conversely, the gut microbiome profile failed to identify a distinct layout between PV patients and healthy donors. In conclusion, PV is associated with circulating EVs harbouring abnormal phenotype and dysbiosis signature with a potential role in the (inflammatory) pathogenesis of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with polycythemia vera, a myeloproliferative neoplasm, are at increased risk of thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis. However, no disease-specific risk factors have been identified so far. Extracellular vesicles, released from a broad variety of cells, are receiving increasing attention for their effects on cell-to-cell communication. In addition, they play a role in cancer and thrombosis. Interestingly, circulating microbial components/microbes have been recently indicated as potential modifiers of inflammation and coagulation. Here, we identified a signature of thrombosis history and marrow fibrosis by analyzing the phenotype and the microbial DNA cargo of the circulating extracellular vesicles after isolation from the plasma of patients with polycythemia vera. These data may support the role of extracellular vesicles as liquid biomarkers of aggressive disease, thus contributing to refining the prognosis of polycythemia vera. Polycythemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased risk of thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis. However, no disease-specific risk factors have been identified so far. Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mostly of megakaryocyte (MK-EVs) and platelet (PLT-EVs) origin and, along with phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)-EVs, play a role in cancer and thrombosis. Interestingly, circulating microbial components/microbes have been recently indicated as potential modifiers of inflammation and coagulation. Here, we investigated phenotype and microbial DNA cargo of EVs after isolation from the plasma of 38 patients with polycythemia vera. Increased proportion of MK-EVs and reduced proportion of PLT-EVs identify patients with thrombosis history. Interestingly, EVs from patients with thrombosis history were depleted in Staphylococcus DNA but enriched in DNA from Actinobacteria members as well as Anaerococcus. In addition, patients with thrombosis history had also lower levels of lipopolysaccharide-associated EVs. In regard to fibrosis, along with increased proportion of PE-EVs, the EVs of patients with marrow fibrosis were enriched in DNA from Collinsella and Flavobacterium. Here, we identified a polycythemia-vera-specific host/microbial EV-based signature associated to thrombosis history and marrow fibrosis. These data may contribute to refining PV prognosis and to identifying novel druggable targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) are acquired clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cells and include Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera and Myelofibrosis. MPN are characterized by mutations in three driver genes (JAK2, CALR and MPL) and by a state of chronic inflammation. Notably, MPN patients experience increased risk of thrombosis, disease progression, second neoplasia and evolution to acute leukemia. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a heterogeneous population of microparticles with a role in cell-cell communication. The EV-mediated cross-talk occurs via the trafficking of bioactive molecules such as nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites and lipids. Growing interest is focused on EVs and their potential impact on the regulation of blood cancers. Overall, EVs have been suggested to orchestrate the complex interplay between tumor cells and the microenvironment with a pivotal role in "education" and "crafting" of the microenvironment by regulating angiogenesis, coagulation, immune escape and drug resistance of tumors. This review is focused on the role of EVs in MPN. Specifically, we will provide an overview of recent findings on the involvement of EVs in MPN pathogenesis and discuss opportunities for their potential application as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]