Search

LiPF6 as a dominant lithium salt of electrolyte is widely used in commercial rechargeable lithium‐ion batteries due to its well‐balanced properties, including high solubility in organic solvents, good electrochemical stability, and high ionic conductivity. However, it suffers from several undesirable properties, such as high moisture sensitivity, thermal instability, and high cost. To address these issues, herein, we propose an electron‐donation modulation (EDM) rule for the development of low‐cost, sustainable, and electrochemically compatible LiNO3‐based electrolytes. We employ high donor‐number solvents (HDNSs) with strong electron‐donation ability to dissolve LiNO3, while low donor‐number solvents (LDNSs) with weak electron‐donation ability are used to regulate the solvation structure to stabilize the electrolytes. As an example, we design the LiNO3‐DMSO@PC electrolyte, where DMSO acts as an HDNS and PC serves as an LDNS. This electrolyte exhibits excellent electrochemical compatibility with graphite anodes, as well as the LiFePO4 and LiCoO2 cathodes, leading to stable cycling over 200 cycles. Through spectroscopy analyses and theoretical calculation, we uncover the underlying mechanism responsible for the stabilization of these electrolytes. Our findings provide valuable insights into the preparation of LiNO3‐based electrolytes using the EDM rule, opening new avenues for the development of advanced electrolytes with versatile functions for sustainable rechargeable batteries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dual‐carbon batteries (DCBs) are a promising candidate for smart grid applications, owing to their low cost, high power capability, and environmentally friendly benefits. As an essential component of DCBs, electrolytes not only act as a medium for ion migration during the running of the battery, but also provide active ions to be intercalated into carbon electrodes, exerting significant impacts on the electrochemical performance and safety of the DCB. In this Review, we discuss recent progress in electrolyte research for DCBs, including conventional liquid electrolytes, highly concentrated electrolytes, and gel polymer electrolytes, with a focus on their stability and compatibility with carbon electrodes. Finally, we present perspectives on the current limitations and future research directions of electrolytes for DCBs. Some recommendations for battery evaluation are also offered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]