Search

Objective: Traumatic popliteal artery injuries are associated with the greatest risk of limb loss of all peripheral vascular injuries, with amputation rates of 10% to 15%. The purpose of the present study was to examine the outcomes of patients who had undergone operative repair for traumatic popliteal arterial injuries and identify the factors independently associated with limb loss., Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective review of all patients with traumatic popliteal artery injuries from 2007 to 2018 was performed. All the patients who had undergone operative repair of popliteal arterial injuries were included in the present analysis. The patients who had required a major lower extremity amputation (transtibial or transfemoral) were compared with those with successful limb salvage at the last follow-up. The significant predictors (P < .05) for amputation on univariate analysis were included in a multivariable analysis., Results: A total of 302 patients from 11 institutions were included in the present analysis. The median age was 32 years (interquartile range, 21-40 years), and 79% were men. The median follow-up was 72 days (interquartile range, 20-366 days). The overall major amputation rate was 13%. Primary repair had been performed in 17% of patients, patch repair in 2%, and interposition or bypass in 81%. One patient had undergone endovascular repair with stenting. The overall 1-year primary patency was 89%. Of the patients who had lost primary patency, 46% ultimately required major amputation. Early loss (within 30 days postoperatively) of primary patency was five times more frequent for the patients who had subsequently required amputation. On multivariate regression, the significant perioperative factors independently associated with major amputation included the initial POPSAVEIT (popliteal scoring assessment for vascular extremity injury in trauma) score, loss of primary patency, absence of detectable immediate postoperative pedal Doppler signals, and lack of postoperative antiplatelet therapy. Concomitant popliteal vein injury, popliteal injury location (P1, P2, P3), injury severity score, and tibial vs popliteal distal bypass target were not independently associated with amputation., Conclusions: Traumatic popliteal artery injuries are associated with a significant rate of major amputation. The preoperative POPSAVEIT score remained independently associated with amputation after including the perioperative factors. The lack of postoperative pedal Doppler signals and loss of primary patency were highly associated with major amputation. The use of postoperative antiplatelet therapy was inversely associated with amputation, perhaps indicating a protective effect., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Traumatic popliteal vascular injuries are associated with the highest risk of limb loss of all peripheral vascular injuries. A method to evaluate the predictors of amputation is needed because previous scores could not be validated. In the present study, we aimed to provide a simplified scoring system (POPSAVEIT [popliteal scoring assessment for vascular extremity injuries in trauma]) that could be used preoperatively to risk stratify patients with traumatic popliteal vascular injuries for amputation., Methods: A review of patients sustaining traumatic popliteal artery injuries was performed. Patients requiring amputation were compared with those with limb salvage at the last follow-up. Of these patients, 80% were randomly assigned to a training group for score generation and 20% to a testing group for validation. Significant predictors of amputation (P < .1) on univariate analysis were included in a multivariable analysis. Those with P < .05 on multivariable analysis were assigned points according to the relative value of their odds ratios (ORs). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine low- vs high-risk scores. An area under the curve of >0.65 was considered adequate for validation., Results: A total of 355 patients were included, with an overall amputation rate of 16%. On multivariate regression analysis, the risk factors independently associated with amputation in the final model were as follows: systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (OR, 3.2; P = .027; 1 point), associated orthopedic injury (OR, 4.9; P = .014; 2 points), and a lack of preoperative pedal Doppler signals (OR, 5.5; P = .002; 2 points [or 1 point for a lack of palpable pedal pulses if Doppler signal data were unavailable]). A score of ≥3 was found to maximize the sensitivity (85%) and specificity (49%) for a high risk of amputation. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the validation group had an area under the curve of 0.750, meeting the threshold for score validation., Conclusions: The POPSAVEIT score provides a simple and practical method to effectively stratify patients preoperatively into low- and high-risk major amputation categories., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Traumatic injury of popliteal artery records the highest risk of lower extremity loss with amputation rates of 10% to 15%. A method to investigate the predictors of amputation is needed because previous scores could not be validated. The goal of this review is to investigate if POPSAVEIT (popliteal scoring assessment for vascular extremity injuries in trauma) may be used as a preoperative indicator of amputation risk in patients with traumatic injury of popliteal vessel. Methods: From 2017 to 2022, all patients who underwent surgical repair of popliteal arterial traumatic injuries at Zagazig University Hospitals were included in this retrospective study. Patients who needed amputation were assessed to those with limb salvage. Based on univariate analysis, the significant predictors of POPSAVEIT variables for amputation were included in a multivariable analysis. To determine low vs. high-risk scores, receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve are created. Results: 76 patients were included in the study, with an overall amputation rate of 18.4%. The following risk factors were shown to be independently related with amputation: systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (OR, 5.3; P = 0.05), associated orthopedic injury (OR, 6.1; P = 0.009), and a lack of preoperative pedal Doppler signals (OR, 8.3; P = 0.001). For a high risk of amputation, a score of ≥3 was determined to have the best sensitivity (78.6%) and specificity (59%). Conclusions: POPSAVEIT is a preoperative simple and practical way to classify patients into low- and high-risk major amputation categories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Compartment syndrome of the lower extremity following arterial vascular trauma can cause irreversible damage to muscle as well as nerve tissue leading to long-term functional impairment of the extremity or worse limb loss. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of compartment syndrome is mandatory to preserve muscle tissue and prevent limb loss. The aim of the study was to analyze the fasciotomy rate of our patient cohort and to perform a predictors analysis for the need of fasciotomy.Material and Methods: In a retrospective study all patients treated for arterial vascular trauma since 1990 were identified. Demographics, clinical data and outcome were analysed. After separation in a fasciotomy and non-fasciotomy group, a Bayes Network was used to arrive at a predictor ranking for the need of fasciotomy via a gain ratio feature evaluation.Results: In the period of 28 years, 88 (73.9%) of a total of 119 patients, predominantly male (80.7%) and aged under 40 years (37.5 ± 17.5), required fasciotomy after arterial vascular trauma. Patients of the fasciotomy group presented at higher Rutherford categories (grade III 34.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.005), varied in terms of the type of arterial vascular injury (dissection 25% vs. 61.3%, p <0.001, occlusion 15.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and showed prolonged hospitalization (35.17 ± 29.3 vs. 21.48±25.4, p = 0.002). Ischaemia duration exceeding 2.5 h followed by the Rutherford grade IIa and greater, the site (popliteal artery segment 3), type (transection and occlusion), and mechanism of vascular trauma (work related accident over traffic and sports accidents), as well as the male gender presented as strong predictors for fasciotomy.Conclusions: Arterial vascular trauma requiring fasciotomy for compartment syndrome accounted for 73.9% of all cases. Immediate diagnosis and treatment is mandatory to prevent long-term functional impairment or limb loss. The above mentioned predictors should help identifying patients at risk for developing a compartment syndrome to provide best possible treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap provides a thin, pliable and durable soft tissue reconstruction with adequate pedicle length and low donor morbidity. It is an ideal choice for small-to-moderate defects of the lower extremity, although it does have limitations. We report our experience of the flap in a three-pronged anatomical, clinical and patient reported outcome-based study.Methods: Cadaveric fresh frozen lower limbs (n = 10) were used for anatomical dissections to assess pertinent and clinically relevant findings. Data relating to MSAP flaps was collected from a prospectively maintained database over a 2-year period. Both clinical data and modified Enneking scores were analysed.Results: Anatomical study: A mean of 2.1 ± 0.99 perforators arose from the medial sural artery, located 11.9 cm ± 2.07 along the line between the popliteal fossa and medial malleolus. The largest perforator was located 13.58 cm ± 2.01 from the popliteal artery. The distance from the dominant perforator to the first branching point within the gastrocnemius was 7.39 ± 1.50 (range 5-9.2 cm). The short saphenous vein was located on average 3.08 cm ± 0.77 from the dominant perforator. Clinical study: Twenty free and nine pedicled MSAPs were included (n = 29). Open lower limb fractures (n = 18, 62%) and infection (n = 10, 35%) were the most common aetiologies. Defects sites included: foot-and-ankle (n = 12, 55%), knee (n = 9, 31%) and anterior leg (n = 4, 14%). Four patients (14%) required SSG to for donor site coverage. Venous congestion was responsible for partial flap necrosis in 6.9%(n = 2) of patients. All wounds were healed at discharge. At 14 months, the mean Enneking score was 72.5%. All patients were ambulant, 96% returned to work and 87% were using pre-operative footwear.Conclusions: The MSAP provides robust foot-and-ankle reconstruction, whilst permitting glide when over the knee. Patient satisfaction and functional outcomes are excellent with careful patient selection. Care should be taken to avoid compression or kinking of the large, thin walled veins as the most commonly observed complication was venous congestion. We advocate MSAP as a first choice flap for small-to-moderate foot, ankle or knee defects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]