Search

Purpose: Staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly based on [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT, in particular to exclude distant metastases and guide local therapy approaches like resection and radiotherapy. Although it is hoped that PET/CT will increase the value of primary staging compared to conventional imaging, it is generally limited to the characterization of TNM. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the PET parameter metabolic tumor volume (MTV) above liver background uptake as a prognostic marker in lung cancer. The second aim was to investigate the possibility of incorporating MTV into the TNM classification system for disease prognosis in locally advanced NSCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy., Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 235 patients with histologically proven, locally advanced NSCLC from the multi-centre randomized clinical PETPLAN trial and a clinical cohort from a hospital registry. The PET parameters SUVmax, SULpeak, MTV and TLG above liver background uptake were determined. Kaplan-Meier curves and stratified Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the prognostic value of PET parameters and TNM along with clinical variables. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare hazard ratios according to TNM, MTV, and the two variables combined., Results: In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, MTV was associated with significantly worse overall survival independent of stage and other prognostic variables. In locally advanced disease stages treated with chemoradiotherapy, higher MTV was significantly associated with worse survival (median 17 vs. 32 months). Using simple cut-off values (45 ml for stage IIIa, 48 ml for stage IIIb, and 105 ml for stage IIIc), MTV was able to further predict differences in survival for stages IIIa-c. The combination of TNM and MTV staging system showed better discrimination for overall survival in locally advanced disease stages, compared to TNM alone., Conclusion: Higher metabolic tumor volume is significantly associated with worse overall survival and combined with TNM staging, it provides more precise information about the disease prognosis in locally advanced NSCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy compared to TNM alone. As a PET parameter with volumetric information, MTV represents a useful addition to TNM., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee in addition to the main trial for the PET Plan cohort (ARO-2009-09) and approval was waived by the competent Ethic committee for the clinical cohort. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The aim of this secondary analysis of the prospective randomized phase 2 PET-Plan trial (ARO-2009-09; NCT00697333) was to evaluate the impact of mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic spread in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: All patients treated per protocol (n = 172) were included. Patients received isotoxically dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy up to a total dose of 60-74 Gy in 30-37 fractions, aiming as high as possible while adhering to normal tissue constraints. Radiation treatment (RT) planning was based on an 18 F-FDG PET/CT targeting all lymph node (LN) stations containing CT positive LNs (i.e. short axis diameter > 10 mm), even if PET-negative (arm A) or targeting only LN stations containing PET-positive nodes (arm B). LN stations were classified into echelon 1 (ipsilateral hilum), 2 (ipsilateral station 4 and 7), and 3 (rest of the mediastinum, contralateral hilum). The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from local progression (FFLP)., Results: The median follow-up time (95 % confidence interval [CI]) was 41.1 (33.8 - 50.4) months. Patients with a high absolute number of PET-positive LN stations had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09; 95 % CI 0.99 - 1.18; p = 0.05) and PFS (HR = 1.12; 95 % CI 1.04 - 1.20; p = 0.003), irrespective of treatment arm allocation. The prescribed RT dose to the LNs did not correlate with any of the endpoints when considering all patients. However, in patients in arm B (i.e., PET-based selective nodal irradiation), prescribed RT dose to each LN station correlated significantly with FFLP (HR=0.45; 95 % CI 0.24-0.85; p = 0.01). Furthermore, patients with involvement of echelon 3 LN stations had worse PFS (HR = 2.22; 95 % CI 1.16-4.28; p = 0.02), also irrespective of allocation., Conclusion: Mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic involvement patterns influence outcome in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Higher dose to LNs did not improve OS, but did improve FFLP in patients treated with PET-based dose-escalated RT., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [MM reports consultant fees from Novartis, Roche, Telix, and Veraxa. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.]., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: With increasingly precise radiotherapy and advanced medical imaging, the concept of radiotherapy target volume planning might be redefined with the aim of improving outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether target volume reduction is feasible and effective compared with conventional planning in the context of radical chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer., Methods: We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial (PET-Plan; ARO-2009-09) in 24 centres in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Previously untreated patients (aged older than 18 years) with inoperable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer suitable for chemoradiotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of less than 3 were included. Undergoing 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET and CT for treatment planning, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a random number generator and block sizes between four and six to target volume delineation informed by 18 F-FDG PET and CT plus elective nodal irradiation (conventional target group) or target volumes informed by PET alone ( 18 F-FDG PET-based target group). Randomisation was stratified by centre and Union for International Cancer Control stage. In both groups, dose-escalated radiotherapy (60-74 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction) was planned to the respective target volumes and applied with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was time to locoregional progression from randomisation with the objective to test non-inferiority of 18 F-FDG PET-based planning with a prespecified hazard ratio (HR) margin of 1·25. The per-protocol set was included in the primary analysis. The safety set included all patients receiving any study-specific treatment. Patients and study staff were not masked to treatment assignment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00697333., Findings: From May 13, 2009, to Dec 5, 2016, 205 of 311 recruited patients were randomly assigned to the conventional target group (n=99) or the 18 F-FDG PET-based target group (n=106; the intention-to-treat set), and 172 patients were treated per protocol (84 patients in the conventional target group and 88 in the 18 F-FDG PET-based target group). At a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 9-54), the risk of locoregional progression in the 18 F-FDG PET-based target group was non-inferior to, and in fact lower than, that in the conventional target group in the per-protocol set (14% [95% CI 5-21] vs 29% [17-38] at 1 year; HR 0·57 [95% CI 0·30-1·06]). The risk of locoregional progression in the 18 F-FDG PET-based target group was also non-inferior to that in the conventional target group in the intention-to-treat set (17% [95% CI 9-24] vs 30% [20-39] at 1 year; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·37-1·10]). The most common acute grade 3 or worse toxicity was oesophagitis or dysphagia (16 [16%] of 99 patients in the conventional target group vs 17 [16%] of 105 patients in the 18 F-FDG PET-based target group); the most common late toxicities were lung-related (12 [12%] vs 11 [10%]). 20 deaths potentially related to study treatment were reported (seven vs 13)., Interpretation: 18 F-FDG PET-based planning could potentially improve local control and does not seem to increase toxicity in patients with chemoradiotherapy-treated locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Imaging-based target volume reduction in this setting is, therefore, feasible, and could potentially be considered standard of care. The procedures established might also support imaging-based target volume reduction concepts for other tumours., Funding: German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prognostic models based on individual patient characteristics can improve treatment decisions and outcome in the future. In many (radiomic) studies, small size and heterogeneity of datasets is a challenge that often limits performance and potential clinical applicability of these models. The current study is example of a retrospective multi-centric study with challenges and caveats. To highlight common issues and emphasize potential pitfalls, we aimed for an extensive analysis of these multi-center pre-treatment datasets, with an additional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan acquired during treatment., Methods: The dataset consisted of 138 stage II-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from four different cohorts acquired from three different institutes. The differences between the cohorts were compared in terms of clinical characteristics and using the so-called 'cohort differences model' approach. Moreover, the potential prognostic performances for overall survival of radiomic features extracted from CT or FDG-PET, or relative or absolute differences between the scans at the two time points, were assessed using the LASSO regression method. Furthermore, the performances of five different classifiers were evaluated for all image sets., Results: The individual cohorts substantially differed in terms of patient characteristics. Moreover, the cohort differences model indicated statistically significant differences between the cohorts. Neither LASSO nor any of the tested classifiers resulted in a clinical relevant prognostic model that could be validated on the available datasets., Conclusion: The results imply that the study might have been influenced by a limited sample size, heterogeneous patient characteristics, and inconsistent imaging parameters. No prognostic performance of FDG-PET or CT based radiomics models can be reported. This study highlights the necessity of extensive evaluations of cohorts and of validation datasets, especially in retrospective multi-centric datasets., Competing Interests: Author RL is CTO and shareholder of Oncoradiomics SA and co-inventor of a patent related to Radiomics. Author PL is member of the advisory board, shareholder of Oncoradiomics SA and co-inventor of two licenced & approved patents on Radiomics.