1. Impact of 18 F-FDG PET/MRI on Therapeutic Management of Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Results from a Prospective Double-Center Trial.
- Author
-
Jannusch K, Umutlu L, Kirchner J, Bruckmann NM, Morawitz J, Herrmann K, Fendler WP, Bittner AK, Hoffmann O, Mohrmann S, Ruckhäberle E, Stuschke M, Schmid W, Giesel F, Häberle L, Esposito I, Budach W, Grueneisen J, Matuschek C, Kowall B, Stang A, Antoch G, and Buchbender C
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Adult, Aged, Multimodal Imaging, Neoplasm Staging, Radiopharmaceuticals, Aged, 80 and over, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms therapy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography
- Abstract
Our rationale was to investigate whether
18 F-FDG PET/MRI in addition to (guideline-recommended) conventional staging leads to changes in therapeutic management in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and compare the diagnostic accuracy of18 F-FDG PET/MRI with that of conventional staging for determining the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage. Methods: In this prospective, double-center study, 208 women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naïve invasive breast cancer were enrolled in accordance with the inclusion criteria. All patients underwent guideline-recommended conventional staging and whole-body18 F-FDG PET/MRI with a dedicated breast examination. A multidisciplinary tumor board served to determine 2 different therapy recommendations for each patient, one based on conventional staging alone and another based on combined assessment of conventional staging and18 F-FDG PET/MRI examinations. Major changes in therapy recommendations and differences between the conventional staging algorithm and18 F-FDG PET/MRI for determining the correct UICC stage were reported and evaluated. Results: Major changes in therapeutic management based on combined assessment of conventional staging and18 F-FDG PET/MRI were detected in 5 of 208 patients, amounting to changes in therapeutic management in 2.4% (95% CI, 0.78%-5.2%) of the study population. In determining the UICC stage, the guideline-based staging algorithm and18 F-FDG PET/MRI were concordant in 135 of 208 (64.9%; 95% CI, 58%-71.4%) patients. The conventional guideline algorithm correctly determined the UICC stage in 130 of 208 (62.5%; 95% CI, 55.5%-69.1%) patients, and18 F-FDG PET/MRI correctly determined the UICC stage in 170 of 208 (81.9%; 95% CI, 75.8%-86.7%) patients. Conclusion: Despite the diagnostic superiority of18 F-FDG PET/MRI over conventional staging in determining the correct UICC stage, the current (guideline-recommended) conventional staging algorithm is sufficient for adequate therapeutic management of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, and18 F-FDG PET/MRI does not have an impact on patient management., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF