Search

Abstract: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus seems to contribute significantly to increased postoperative complications and mortality after emergency surgical procedures. Additionally, the fear of COVID-19 contagion delays the consultation of patients, resulting in the deterioration of their acute diseases by the time of consultation. In the specific case of urgent digestive surgery patients, both factors significantly worsen the postoperative course and prognosis. Main working hypothesis: infection by COVID-19 increases postoperative 30-day-mortality for any cause in patients submitted to emergency/urgent general or gastrointestinal surgery. Likewise, hospital collapse during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic increased 30-day-mortality for any cause. Hence, the main objective of this study is to estimate the cumulative incidence of mortality at 30-days-after-surgery. Secondary objectives are: to estimate the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications and to develop a specific postoperative risk propensity model for COVID-19-infected patients.A multicenter, observational retrospective cohort study (COVID-CIR-study) will be carried out in consecutive patients operated on for urgent digestive pathology. Two cohorts will be defined: the "pandemic" cohort, which will include all patients (classified as COVID-19-positive or -negative) operated on for emergency digestive pathology during the months of March to June 2020; and the "control" cohort, which will include all patients operated on for emergency digestive pathology during the months of March to June 2019. Information will be gathered on demographic characteristics, clinical and analytical parameters, scores on the usual prognostic scales for quality management in a General Surgery service (POSSUM, P-POSSUM and LUCENTUM scores), prognostic factors applicable to all patients, specific prognostic factors for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, postoperative morbidity and mortality (at 30 and 90 postoperative days). The main objective is to estimate the cumulative incidence of mortality at 30 days after surgery. As secondary objectives, to estimate the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications and to develop a specific postoperative risk propensity model for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.The protocol (version1.0, April 20th 2020) was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (Ethic-and-Clinical-Investigation-Committee, code PR169/20, date 05/05/20). The study findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant national and international scientific meetings.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04479150 (July 21, 2020)., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: Cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of death after noncardiac surgery. Major abdominal operations represent the largest category of procedures considered to have an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. The current aim was to examine trends in the incidence of mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest to determine the presence of potential volume-outcome relationships., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for patients undergoing elective, open abdominal esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, nephrectomy, hepatectomy, splenectomy, and colectomy (major abdominal surgery) during 2008-2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of operative volume on rates of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and mortality., Results: Of the 962,754 elective admissions for major abdominal surgery, 1.4% experienced in-hospital mortality, 0.7% myocardial infarction, and 0.35% cardiac arrest. Myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest were associated with a 24-fold increase in risk of perioperative mortality. Compared with institutions that have a very low volume of operations, those hospitals with larger volumes of operations had a decreased risk of cardiac arrest and incident mortality after cardiovascular complications, but the odds of myocardial infarction were greatest at higher operative-volume hospitals. The annual all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction rates decreased over time, but the incidence of cardiac arrest increased., Conclusion: Myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest after major abdominal surgery increased the odds of mortality with superior rescue after cardiovascular complications at higher volume institutions. Across all US hospitals performing major abdominal surgery, the rate of cardiac arrest increased without a concomitant increase in myocardial infarction or mortality. Novel targets for risk modification of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest as well as investigation of processes that facilitate rescue after these complications at higher operative-volume hospitals are needed to delineate quality improvement opportunities., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aims of this study were to determine the outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery in patients aged ≥90 y and to analyze the role of Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and modified POSSUM in predicting their morbidity and mortality., Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥90 y who underwent emergency abdominal surgery from January 2011 to December 2014 were enrolled in this study., Results: A total of 36 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mortality and morbidity rates in the study group were 8.3% and 61.1%, respectively. Overall observed-to-expected morbidity ratio calculated by POSSUM and modified POSSUM were 0.83 (χ 2  = 32.189, P = 0.6045) and 0.97 (χ 2  = 33.915, P = 0.7398), respectively. Both models demonstrated a good fit for prediction of morbidity. Overall observed-to-expected mortality ratios calculated by POSSUM and modified POSSUM were 0.26 (χ 2  = 12.217, P = 0.2013) and 0.20 (χ 2  = 12.217, P = 0.0936), respectively., Conclusions: Both POSSUM and modified POSSUM accurately predicted morbidity in the setting of emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarians., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Quality of life (QOL) is becoming more and more relevant in clinical research. An increasing number of publications each year confirmed this. The aim of this review is to summarize current data of QOL after surgical procedures. The results are represented by two examples each of malignant and benign diseases. The evaluation of QOL for patients with cancer is only possible with respect to the prognosis. Prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for early gastric cancer are only available from Asia. Data from the USA show that the QOL after gastrectomy was worse regardless of the surgical procedure. During the next 6 months the QOL improved but about one third of the patients had severe impairment during longer follow-up periods. Patients with R1 resection of pancreatic cancer showed only a slightly better prognosis but significantly better QOL compared to patients without resection. The results for the various procedures of cholecystectomy or hernia repair are not always consistent.

Introduction: The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease on outcomes following major abdominal surgery is not well defined., Materials and Methods: The 2008 NSQIP database was queried to identify adult patients undergoing complex abdominal surgery (major colorectal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, gastric, and esophageal operations). Thirty-day morbidity and mortality in patients on hemodialysis (HD) versus patients not on HD were compared. The impact of preoperative renal insufficiency, measured by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), on morbidity and mortality was then assessed in non-dialysis patients., Results: Of 24,572 patients who underwent major abdominal operations, excluding emergency cases, only 149 (0.6%) were on HD preoperatively. Thirty-day mortality in the HD group was 12.8% compared to 1.8% for those not on HD (p < 0.0001). Overall complication rate was 23.5 versus 12.3% (p < 0.0001). In particular, rates of pneumonia (6.7 vs 3.0%, p < 0.05) and sepsis (12.8 vs 5.3%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients on HD. In patients not on HD, GFR was significantly predictive of postoperative mortality after controlling for age, gender, race, emergency status, and comorbidities. Compared to patients with normal preoperative kidney function (GFR, 75-90 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), even modest CKD (GFR, 45-60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) was associated with increased postoperative mortality (odds ratio (OR), 1.62). With greater impairment in kidney function, postoperative mortality was even more marked (GFR, 30-45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and OR, 2.84; GFR, 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and OR, 5.56). In addition, CKD was independently associated with increased postoperative complications., Conclusion: Any degree of preoperative kidney impairment, even mild asymptomatic disease, is associated with clinically significant increases in 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery.

Background: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is life sustaining for patients with end-stage heart failure. Most devices require abdominal wall transgression, creating a potential for abdominal complications. The incidence and impact of these relatively underreported complications are unknown., Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 179 patients who received MCS therapy from 1999 to 2008. Abdominal complications were grouped as abdominal wall, gastrointestinal tract, and solid organ., Results: Ninety-eight patients (55%) experienced 157 abdominal complications. These involved the abdominal wall in 69 (44%), the gastrointestinal tract in 52 (33%), and the solid organs in 36 (23%). Surgical intervention was required in 36% of patients with abdominal wall complications, 19% of patients with gastrointestinal tract complications, and 14% of patients with solid organ complications. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), emergent device placement (p = 0.019), and preimplant mechanical ventilation (p = 0.045) as independent risk factors for developing an abdominal complication. Kaplan-Meier survival while receiving MCS was significantly reduced for patients with abdominal complications versus those without (p = 0.0142). Multivariate analysis identified only solid organ abdominal complications (p = 0.001) as an independent risk factor for death while receiving device support., Conclusions: Abdominal complications are common in patients supported with MCS devices and significantly reduce survival. Surgical intervention is more frequently required for complications related to the abdominal wall compared with other complications. Patients with significant comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure) requiring urgent or emergent device placement are at higher risk for the development of abdominal complications with an attendant reduction in device-related survival., (2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hypothermia is common in the operating theatre and may increase susceptibility to postoperative complications. Intraoperative systemic warming has been shown to improve outcomes of surgery. This study aimed to examine the effects of additional perioperative systemic warming on postoperative morbidity., Methods: All patients admitted for elective major abdominal surgery and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized into control or warming groups. Both groups were warmed during surgery, but patients in the warming group were additionally warmed 2 h before and after surgery using a conductive carbon polymer mattress., Results: The trial recruited 103 patients (56 in the control group, 47 in the warming group). Both groups were well matched for age, sex and clinical state. Patients in the warming group had lower blood loss (median 200 (range 5-1000) ml versus median 400 (range 50-2300) ml in the control group; P = 0.011) and complication rates (15 (32 per cent) of 47 versus 30 (54 per cent) of 56 in the control group; P = 0.027). There were three deaths; two in the control group (P = 0.566)., Conclusion: Extending systemic warming to the perioperative period had additional beneficial effects, with minimal additional cost and patient discomfort.

Septic shock still has an unacceptable high mortality rate. To lowering this high mortality rate in the long run, we built a database that is unique in its data amount. Until now we have transferred 282 handwritten patient records into our database. Data were collected retrospectively from 1997 to 2001, based on voluntary cooperation of 62 hospitals. With the preprocessed data of our database we give mainly an epidemiologic overview and make first statistical evaluations. Thereby we noticed that some diagnoses and operations appear significantly higher for deceased patients than for survivors. At the end we discuss the future potential of the database.

The paper presents a retrospective study of a digestive surgery unit, evaluating the outcome of the patients who were operated and received blood transfusions over a 5 years time, compared with a random sample of patients operated during the same period and who did not receive transfusions. The patients were stratified by the type of operation and the ASA criteria. The paper also briefly reviews the literature on this topic. The study noted a prolonged postoperative course and overall hospitalization time, and an increase in the infectious complications and mortality rates in the study group, compared to the control group. The results of the study support a transfusion practice policy based on strict indications, and the use of alternatives to transfusion, whenever available.

Unlabelled: A personal method for the conservative treatment of the postsurgical external digestive fistulas by means of obturation with an elastic balloon of adjustable pressure, used in Surgical Clinic I Craiova in the past 12 years is presented. Initially conceived as an elective method for the treatment of the fistulas exposed in evisceration, the procedure was later applied as a unique method or in association with other conservative procedure in almost all types of fistulas. 122 patients have been treated by means of our method (3 esophageal, 65 gastro-duodenal and gastro-intestinal, 27 intestinal and 27 colo-rectal fistulas), in 53 cases a unique method and in 69 cases as a therapeutically sequences within the conservative treatment of the fistulas., Results: 115 patients (94.2%) have had a fair evolution; we have registered 7 death, which represent a mortality rate of 5.93%., Conclusions: Our method offers the following advantages: it considerably reduces the losses of digestive liquids through the fistula; it allows early resumption of normal nourishment; it allows early mobilization of the patients; it prevents the occurrence of new fistulas which are caused by decubitus lesions; it is a simple and economic method, which can be applied in any surgical department.

The lethality for 2 years in two general surgical departments is analysed. In total, 7417 patients underwent 4254 operations, including 1181 (27.7%)--elective, 3073 (72.2%)--emergency ones. After elective operations, 12 (1%) patients died, after the emergency operation--189 (6.1%). There were the following causes of lethality after elective operations: different concomitant diseases present before the operation, or developed after it (0.68% of cases); diagnostic, tactical and technical errors (0.32%). Causes of lethality after emergency operations: related to age and irreversible changes in the organism (2.6% of cases); different concomitant diseases (0.8%); late referral to a physician (1.49%); diagnostic, tactical and technical errors (1.3%).

Between May 1988 und March 1989 all patients who underwent elective or emergency surgery followed by intensive care were randomly assigned to group A (n = 149): routine sonography at the postoperative day 1, 3, 7 and 9, group B (n = 151): sonography on demand. In these two groups, the following parameters were compared: number of relaparotomies, lethality of relaparotomies, total lethality, moment of relaparotomy, period of hospitalisation, time spent with sonography. In the analyzed parameters, our examination showed no difference between the two groups. For this we state that the routine sonographical control of the surgical patient with intensive care being opposed to the sonography on demand shows no significant advantage. The demand for a routine sonography as a postoperative control can not be generally supported.

The article analyzes 378 lethal outcomes of acute surgical diseases of the abdominal organs. Main direct causes of death were established. A system of prophylactic measures has been developed and introduced into practical work which have improved the quality of urgent surgical aid.