Search

To analyse trends in the aetiology, treatment and outcomes of bloodstream infection (BSI) within the first year post-transplant over the last 10-year period, we prospectively recorded all episodes of BSI occurring in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients during the first year post-transplant from 2007 to 2016. Trends of factors were analysed by 2-year periods. Of 475 consecutive episodes of BSI, 218 occurred within a year of SOT in 178 SOT recipients. Gram-positive BSI decreased over time (40.5-2.2%). In contrast, there was a steady increase in Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) BSI (54.1-93.3%; P < 0.001), mainly due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2.4-20.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (7.1-26.5%). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) GNB (4.8-38.8%; P < 0.001) rose dramatically, especially due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production (7.1-34.7%). There was a sharp rise in the use of carbapenems, both as empirical (11.9-55.3%; P < 0.001) and as targeted antibiotic treatment (11.9-46.9%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, today, GNB are the leading causative agents of BSI in SOT recipients within the first year after SOT. In addition, MDR GNB have emerged mainly due to ESBL-producing strains. In spite of these changes, length of hospital stay, days of treatment and mortality have remained stable over time., (© 2017 Steunstichting ESOT.)

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are recognized longterm causes of death after liver transplantation (LT). The objective of this multicenter study was to analyze the prevalence and the evolution of CV risk factors and CV morbidity and mortality in 1819 LT recipients along 5 years after LT. The influence of baseline variables on survival, morbidity, and mortality was studied. There was a continuous and significant increase of the prevalence of all the CV risk factors (except smoking) after LT. CV diseases were the fourth cause of mortality in the 5 years after LT, causing 12% of deaths during the follow-up. Most CV events (39%) occurred in the first year after LT. Preexisting CV risk factors such as age, pre-LT CV events, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and hyperuricemia, and mycophenolate-free immunosuppressive therapy, increased post-LT CV morbidity and mortality. The development of new-onset CV risk factors after LT, such as dyslipidemia and obesity, independently affected late CV morbidity and mortality. Tacrolimus and steroids increased the risk of posttransplant diabetes, whereas cyclosporine increased the risk of arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. In conclusion, CV complications and CV mortality are frequent in LT recipients. Preexisting CV risk factors, immunosuppressive drugs, but also the early new onset of obesity and dyslipidemia after LT play an important role on late CV complications. A strict metabolic control in the immediate post-LT period is advisable for improving CV risk of LT recipients. Liver Transplantation 23 498-509 2017 AASLD., (© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Renal failure is a frequent complication in liver transplant recipients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A variety of risk factors for the development of renal failure in the pre- and post-transplantation periods have been described, as well as at the time of surgery. To reduce the negative impact of renal failure in this population, an active approach is required for the identification of those patients with risk factors, the implementation of preventive strategies, and the early detection of progressive deterioration of renal function. Based on published evidence and on clinical experience, this document presents a series of recommendations on monitoring RF in LT recipients, as well as on the prevention and management of acute and chronic renal failure after LT and referral of these patients to the nephrologist. In addition, this document also provides an update of the various immunosuppressive regimens tested in this population for the prevention and control of post-transplantation deterioration of renal function., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and AEEH y AEG. All rights reserved.)

The use of biological markers is developing in the field of liver transplant. Biomarkers are being studied in different contexts: 1) detection of tolerant patient; 2) recurrence of hepatitis C virus; 3) diagnosis and prognosis of liver cancers, and 4) diagnosis of infection. The immunological changes occurring in the transplant patient given their previous cirrhotic condition, the immunosuppression received, and possible intercurrent diagnoses (rejection, recurrence of hepatitis C virus…) highlight the importance of finding useful biomarkers in clinical practice to diagnose infection. After a review of the usefulness of biomarkers, we should perhaps add the serial determination of C-reactive protein in the immediate post-operative period, and later on procalcitonin, in the infection diagnosis algorithm. Although the determination of procalcitonin appears to be the most reliable biomarker in the differential diagnosis of sepsis and rejection, the studies carried out make it difficult to establish conclusions on its real clinical usefulness., (Copyright © 2010 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Steroid-resistant acute rejection (SR-AR) and ductopenic rejection (DR) after liver transplantation are infrequent, but difficult to manage. We performed a retrospective review of patients with SR-AR or DR treated with sirolimus-based therapy. Since 2002, we have treated five patients with SR-AR and eight patients with DR. All patients had associated renal insufficiency. Six patients showed no response, of whom five died and one was retransplanted. In six cases, rejection was resolved after changing, while one improved. Therefore, the total response rate was 54%. Ten of 13 patients (77%) suffered some type of adverse event. Ten of these (77%) suffered a hematologic event. Four patients (31%) had infection. Only two patients had to discontinue treatment. Univariate analysis showed that pre-conversion bilirubin was lower in responders (Bilirubin: R: 210 +/- 205 vs. NoR: 554 +/- 159 micromol/L; p = 0.07 and Creatinine clearance higher: R: 37 +/- 11 vs. NoR: 25 +/- 11 mL/min; p = 0.09). Sirolimus trough levels one month after switching were higher in responders (R: 11 +/- 1.8 vs. NoR: 7.5 +/- 3.3 ng/mL; p = 0.03). We conclude that a dual therapy regimen of tacrolimus and sirolimus can achieve a high response rate as a rescue therapy for SR-AR and DR, provided it is begun as soon as possible.

The incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) has decreased in recent years. Advances in immunosuppression and CMV prophylaxis have improved the management of CMV disease. Organ involvement is infrequent and gastrointestinal CMV disease is quite rare. Few cases of an antral mass due to CMV infection have been described; those reported to date have mostly been in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. We describe a case of a CMV-seronegative liver transplant patient who received a seropositive liver graft. Owing to gastrointestinal complaints, CMV prophylaxis was stopped one month after LT. The patient developed an antral mass due to CMV infection and an anastomotic biliary stricture. Antigenemia became negative with ganciclovir, but this treatment did not eliminate the mass. Ganciclovir resistance was ruled out as well as other causes of antral mass, especially malignancy. The patient finally required gastrectomy and hepaticojejunostomy. We conclude that CMV disease is less common today but should be included in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal mass after transplantation.