Search

This article summarizes major and minor complications following transoral robotic surgery in the head and neck. Overall, transoral robotic surgery is extremely safe; however, surgeons must recognize inherent risks associated with major and severe bleeding, dysphagia, and minor complications, including injury to nerves, mucosal surfaces, teeth, and the eyes. This article briefly discusses prevention and management strategies for common complications., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Blood product utilization is monitored to prevent unnecessary transfusions. Head-and-neck pedicled flap reconstruction transfusion-related outcomes were assessed., Methods: One hundred and thirty-six pedicled flap patients were reviewed: 64 supraclavicular artery island flaps (SCAIF), 57 pectoralis major (PM) flaps, and 15 submental (SM) flaps. Outcome parameters included flap-related complications, medical complications, length of stay (LOS), and flap survival. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for relevant pre- and perioperative factors., Results: Of all head-and-neck pedicled flap patients included in our analyses (n = 136), 40 (29.4%) received blood transfusions. The average pretransfusion hematocrit (Hct) was 24.3% ± 0.5%, with 2.65 ± 0.33 units transfused and a posttransfusion Hct increase of 5.0% ± 0.6%. Transfusion rates differed with PM (47.4%), SCAIF (17.2%), and SM (13.3%) flaps (P < 0.005). Patients undergoing PM reconstruction trended toward higher transfusion requirements (PM 2.89 ± 0.47 units, SC 2.18 ± 0.28 units, and SM 2.00 ± 0.0 units), with transfusion occurring later in the postoperative course (4.9 ± 1.3 days vs. 2.4 ± 0.1 days for all other flaps; P = 0.08). Infection, dehiscence, fistula, or medical complications were not different. Transfusion thresholds of Hct < 21 versus Hct < 27 exhibited no difference in LOS, flap-survival, or medical/flap-related complications., Conclusion: Transfusion is not associated with surgical or medical morbidity following head and neck pedicled flap reconstruction. There were no differences in outcomes between transfusion triggers of Hct < 21 versus Hct < 27, suggesting that a more conservative transfusion trigger may not precipitate adverse patient complications. Our data recapitulate findings in free flap patients and warrant further investigation of transfusion practices in head and neck flap reconstruction., Level of Evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:E409-E415, 2018., (© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Patients with head and neck cancer who undergo reconstructive surgery are at risk for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but the risk profile for patients undergoing major flap reconstruction is highly variable. Herein, we report our findings from a retrospective analysis of head and neck cancer patients (n = 517) who underwent free (n = 384) or pedicled (n = 133) flap reconstructive operations at a major tertiary care center from 2011 to 2014. DVTs developed perioperatively in 9 (1.7%) patients. Compared with pedicled flap patients, free flap patients had a longer mean operative time (421.4 ± 4.4 vs 332.7 ± 10.7 min, P < .0001), but the DVT incidence did not differ significantly between free and pedicled flap patients (1.6% vs 2.2%, respectively, P = .28). These data suggest that perioperative DVT risk in head and neck oncology patients may be largely similar regardless of the reconstructive strategy pursued.

Importance: The optimal reconstruction of total glossectomy defects with or without total laryngectomy is controversial. Various pedicled and free tissue flaps have been advocated, but long-term data on functional outcomes are not available to date., Objectives: To compare various total glossectomy defect reconstructive techniques used by multiple institutions and to identify factors that may lead to improved long-term speech and swallowing function., Design, Setting, and Participants: A multi-institutional, retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients undergoing total glossectomy at 8 participating institutions between June 1, 2001, and June 30, 2011, who had a minimal survival of 2 years., Intervention: Total glossectomy with or without total laryngectomy., Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic and surgical factors were compiled and correlated with speech and swallowing outcomes., Results: At the time of the last follow-up, 45% (25 of 55) of patients did not have a gastrostomy tube, and 76% (42 of 55) retained the ability to verbally communicate. Overall, 75% (41 of 55) of patients were tolerating at least minimal nutritional oral intake. Feeding tube dependence was not associated with laryngeal preservation or the reconstructive techniques used, including flap suspension, flap innervation, or type of flap used. Laryngeal preservation was associated with favorable speech outcomes, such as the retained ability to verbally communicate in 97% of those not undergoing total laryngectomy (35 of 36 patients) vs 44% (7 of 16) in those undergoing total laryngectomy (P < .001), as well as those not undergoing total laryngectomy achieving some or all intelligible speech in 85% (29 of 34 patients) compared with 31% (4 of 13) undergoing total laryngectomy achieving the same intelligibility (P < .001)., Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with total glossectomy, feeding tube dependence was not associated with laryngeal preservation or the reconstructive technique, including flap innervation and type of flap used. Laryngeal preservation was associated with favorable speech outcomes such as the retained ability to verbally communicate and higher levels of speech intelligibility.

Objectives/hypothesis: Otolaryngology residents are often responsible for triaging after-hours patient calls. However, residents receive little training on this topic. Data are limited on the clinical content, reporting, and management of otolaryngology patient calls. This study aimed to characterize the patient concerns residents handle by phone and their subsequent management and reporting.Study Design: Retrospective review.Methods: Five hundred consecutive after-hours patient calls in a tertiary pediatric hospital were reviewed. Data collected included patient and caller demographics, clinical concerns, surgical history, recommendations, and subsequent emergency department (ED) visits.Results: On average, 3.7 calls occurred per shift, 2.8 on weekday and 5.9 on weekend shifts. Mean patient age was 6.6 years. Mothers (71%) called most frequently. The majority of calls were postoperative (64.2%). Of postoperative calls, most occurred within 3 days of surgery (52.3%). Most calls were for surgical site bleeding (19.9%). Residents recommended ED evaluation for 17.2% of calls, of which 20.9% returned to the primary institution ED. ED evaluation was recommended more frequently for postoperative patients (P = .040), particularly following adenotonsillectomy (51.2%) or surgical site bleeding (18.6%). With respect to documentation, 32.8% of medical record numbers were absent, 11.8% had name errors, and 2.2% of patients could not be identified.Conclusions: This is the first study to analyze the management and reporting of patient calls by otolaryngology residents. A wide array of clinical concerns are triaged by phone conversations. The study has implications for both resident and patient education.Level Of Evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:E163-E170, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]