Search

Cholecystocholedocholithiasis (CCL) occurs in up to 18% of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The two-stage treatment using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by LC is the treatment of choice for CCL. However, only 10 to 60% of patients have common bile duct (CBD) stones at the time of ERCP, thus exposing patients to unnecessary ERCPs, causing 3 to 15% of post-interventional pancreatitis. One-stage laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous (LERV) is an alternative for the treatment of CCL. Given the selective top-to-bottom CBD cannulation, LERV reduces the risk of pancreatitis and failed CBD cannulation. Additionally, LERV is performed exclusively in patients presenting CBD stones at intraoperative cholangiography, avoiding unnecessary ERCPs. Despite its advantages, considering the logistical burden of coordinating different specialties, LERV is performed in few centers. Here, we present the largest retrospective series of LERVs performed at our department, analyzing elective and emergency procedures.All consecutive patients undergoing LERV for CCL between January 2014 and December 2021 were included. LERV success rate, operative time, biliary outflow restoration rate, postoperative complications (POC), length of hospital stay (LOS), and recurrences were analyzed.181 patients were included (61 elective LERVs, 120 emergency LERVs). We reported a 100% LERV success rate, a 97.79% biliary outflow restoration rate, a 0% conversion rate, a mean intraoperative time of 120.17 ± 31.35 min, and LOS of 4.00 ± 2.82 days. POC included 7 Clavien-Dindo type 1, 11 type 2, and 3 type 3 cases. Seven patients presented with CBD stone recurrence: 2 within 30 days after discharge, 3 within 6 months after discharge, and 2 patients at 1 year. No statistically significant difference was found between elective and emergency patients.LERV is safe, representing a valid option even in emergency settings, thus enabling the management of CCL within a single procedure, consequently sparing additional anesthesia and decreasing post-ERCP complications.

It has been reported that patients who refuse blood transfusions, such as Jehovah's witnesses, can undergo major surgery. In a review of the literature, however, we critically examined the severity of anaemia in relation to operative mortality and morbidity rates. We report three cases of Jehovah's witnesses who underwent major surgery and presented complication during the postoperative period. Case 1: a 50-year-old man with oesophageal achalasia who underwent Heller's myotomy and Nissen's fundoplication. The postoperative period was complicated by massive haemorrhage and the patient was reoperated on postoperative day 1. After four years, he underwent total oesophagectomy because of severe chronic oesophagitis. On postoperative day 13 the patient suffered anteroseptal myocardial ischaemia, which was treated with medical therapy. Case 2: a 40-year-old man, admitted for ulcerative rectocolitis, who underwent total colectomy. On postoperative day 1 he presented massive haemorrhage and shock. He was reoperated and the postoperative period was complicated by myocardial ischaemia, renal failure and an enterocutaneous fistula. Case 3: a 65-year-old woman with ulcerative rectocolitis who underwent total colectomy and a temporary ileostomy. She suffered venous thrombosis of the lower limbs and pulmonary oedema. The patient died 14 months after surgery as a result of massive haemolysis by cryoagglutinins and cardiac arrest.