6 results on '"Smith, Lora L."'
Search Results
2. Dispersal of Neonate Timber Rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) in the Southeastern Coastal Plain
- Author
-
Howze, Jennifer M., Stohlgren, Kevin M., Schlimm, Elizabeth M., and Smith, Lora L.
- Published
- 2012
3. Effect of nest location on gopher tortoise nest survival.
- Author
-
Dziadzio, Michelina C., Smith, Lora L., Chandler, Richard B., and Castleberry, StevEN B.
- Subjects
- *
GOPHER tortoise , *POPULATION dynamics , *ENDANGERED species , *SURVIVAL behavior (Animals) , *NESTS - Abstract
ABSTRACT Gopher tortoise ( Gopherus polyphemus) populations are declining range-wide primarily because of habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation, but low recruitment due to nest predation also may be contributing to this decline. The relationship of nest location and nest survival is unknown. Therefore, our objective was to determine whether nest location influenced depredation risk and potential recruitment success. Between 30 May 2013 and 3 September 2014, we constructed and monitored 105 artificial gopher tortoise nests (45 in 2013 and 60 in 2014) with 35 nests at each of 3 classifications of nest sites: within active burrow aprons (i.e., the mound of sand at the burrow entrance), inactive burrow aprons, and open sandy sites. Using the artificial nests, we investigated the influence of nest site classification, distance to road, and prescribed fire frequency (<1 year and 1 year since burn) on gopher tortoise nest survival. Additionally, we monitored 21 natural nests at burrow aprons to assess predation patterns as compared to artificial nests. Seventy-two (57%) of 126 nests were fully depredated during the study, and predation rates at artificial and natural nests were similar. We identified predators at 48 nests using trail cameras; the nine-banded armadillo ( Dasypus novemcinctus) was the primary nest predator (69%). Nests in open sandy areas away from burrows exhibited greater daily survival rates (DSR; 0.991 ± 0.005 SE) compared to nests in burrow aprons (active burrow aprons: 0.967 ± 0.018; inactive burrow aprons: 0.949 ± 0.027). Additionally, nests at locations burned the year of the study had a lower chance of survival (DSR: 0.959 ± 0.022) than nests at locations burned the previous year (DSR: 0.991 ± 0.005). Management practices that maintain open sandy areas (e.g., prescribed fire) away from burrows may increase tortoise nest survival. Fire return intervals of >1 year that are implemented frequently enough to maintain open sandy areas would be beneficial to nesting tortoises. © 2016 The Wildlife Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. COPPERHEADS ARE COMMON WHEN KINGSNAKES ARE NOT: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE ABUNDANCES OF A PREDATOR AND ONE OF THEIR PREY.
- Author
-
STEEN, DAVID A., MCCLURE, CHRISTOPHER J. W., SUTTON, WILLIAM B., RUDOLPH, D. CRAIG, PIERCE, JOSH B., LEE, JAMES R., SMITH, LORA L., GREGORY, BEAU B., BAXLEY, DANNA L., STEVENSON, DIRK J., and GUYER, CRAIG
- Subjects
LAMPROPELTIS ,PREDATION ,SNAKE ecology ,COPPERHEAD ,REPTILE populations ,POPULATION dynamics - Abstract
Common Kingsnakes (formerly known collectively as Lampropeltis getula) are experiencing localized declines throughout the southeastern United States. Because there have been limited studies to determine how snakes regulate prey populations, and because Kingsnake declines may result in ecosystem impacts, we evaluated the hypothesis that Kingsnakes regulate the abundance of one of their prey, the venomous Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix). We generated a database of captures of the two species across the southeastern United States and, while controlling for large-scale habitat preferences, identified a negative relationship between the relative abundance of Kingsnakes and the relative abundance of Copperheads. Our results are correlative but consistent with the hypothesis that Copperhead populations experience a release from predation pressure where Kingsnake abundances are low. We suggest that Kingsnake declines, which are occurring for unknown reasons, are having ecological effects in affected ecosystems. We further highlight the potential role that snakes play in influencing the population dynamics of their prey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Effects of predator exclusion on nest and hatchling survival in the gopher tortoise.
- Author
-
Smith, Lora L., Steen, David A., Conner, L. Mike, and Rutledge, Jessica C.
- Subjects
- *
GOPHER tortoise , *TESTUDINIDAE , *PREDATION , *NEST building , *ANIMAL habitations , *EXCLOSURES , *REPRODUCTION - Abstract
Gopher tortoise ( Gopherus polyphemus) populations are declining throughout the Southeast, and high levels of predation on nests and juveniles have been suggested as a potential contributor to this decline. Therefore, we documented gopher tortoise nest success and hatchling survival relative to mammalian predator control. We used 4, large (approx. 40-ha) fenced, predator exclosures to exclude mid-sized mammalian predators: bobcat ( Lynx rufus), raccoon ( Procyon lotor), Virginia opossum ( Didelphis virginianus), fox ( Urocyon cinereoargenteus and Vulpes vulpes), coyote ( Canis latrans), nine-banded armadillo ( Dasypus novemcinctus), and skunk ( Mephitis mephitis); 4 unfenced plots served as controls. We monitored nests for survival through hatching and used radio-telemetry to examine hatchling survival. We radio-tracked 40 hatchlings for up to 329 days, but we were only able to track 8 individuals from a single nest at an unfenced plot because of high nest predation. Mean nest survival was greater at exclosures than at unfenced controls ( F1, 2 = 45.80, P = 0.0001). Hatchling survival differed ( χ2 = 5.839, P = 0.016) between unfenced plots (37.5%) and exclosures (74.4%), suggesting that mammals also were significant predators of hatchlings. The number of juvenile (<13 cm in diameter) and subadult tortoise burrows (13-21.9 cm) increased over a 6-year period in exclosures, providing further support for an effect of excluding mammalian predators on nest and juvenile tortoise survival. © 2012 The Wildlife Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Effects of Mesopredators on Nest Survival of Shrub-Nesting Songbirds.
- Author
-
Conner, L. Mike, Rutledge, Jessica C., and Smith, Lora L.
- Subjects
SONGBIRDS ,NEST building ,PREDATION ,FORAGING behavior ,SOLENOPSIS invicta ,ANIMAL species ,ANIMAL behavior - Abstract
Although nest predation is often the single largest source of mortality in avian populations, manipulative studies to determine predator impacts on nest survival are rare, particularly studies that examine impacts of mid-size mammalian predators (hereafter, mesopredators) on nest survival of shrub-nesting birds. We quantified nest survival and identified nest predators of shrub-nesting songbirds within 4 large (approx. 40-ha) exclosures and 4 control sites within a longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem. During 2003-2006, we located and monitored 535 shrub nests (222 with videography) for 4,804 nest-days to quantify daily nest survival and document predation events. We found no support for a treatment effect, suggesting mesopredators had little impact on daily nest survival (0.9303 in controls and 0.9260 in exclosures) of shrub-nesting songbirds. For the 5 most commonly monitored species, daily nest survival within species was constant. Our analysis suggested that shrub nests were most vulnerable during the nestling stage and presence of cameras on nests increased survival with the increase in survival being more pronounced during the incubation stage.We filmed 107 nest predation events, identifying predators at 88 nests. Of these 88 nests, snakes caused 33%, red imported fire ants (hereafter fire ants, Solenopsis invicta) 28%, raptors 17%, corvids 8%, mesopredators 6%, and small mammals 8% of nest predations. Cause-specific nest predation in controls and exclosures did not differ from expectation, providing evidence that compensatory predation did not occur. Nest predators differed from expectation with regard to nest stage; fire ants and raptors only depredated nests during the nestling stage. Presence of cameras had no effect on nest abandonment. Fire ants were the most prevalent nest predator, and nest predation by fire ants was only observed on nestlings, potentially reducing likelihood of renesting. Magnitude and timing of fire ant predation suggests that fire ants may be the most influential nest predator of shrub-nesting birds within the longleaf pine ecosystem. Our data suggest that controlling mesopredators will have no effect on nest success of shrub-nesting birds within longleaf pine forests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.