Search

(1) Background: Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) can be associated with significant maternal and neonatal complications, and the aim of this retrospective study was to calculate the risks and probabilities of these complications in two tertiary maternity centers in Romania. (2) Methods: A total of 216 patients who attempted TOLAC were included in the study and were segregated into two groups, depending on TOLAC success. Medical records were assessed, and clinical data were used to determine the maternal and neonatal risks and complications, using multinomial logistic regression and postestimation predictions. (3) Results: Our data indicated that patients who had a failed TOLAC had significantly higher risks and probabilities of uterine rupture, either complete or incomplete; intensive care unit (ICU) admission; and emergency hysterectomy. The newborns of these mothers had significantly higher risks and probabilities of low Apgar score at birth, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and invasive ventilation. (4) Conclusions: Failed TOLAC could lead to significant maternal and neonatal complications, and women who attempt this procedure should be monitored in a tertiary center where a multidisciplinary team and an emergency operating room are available.

Background and Objectives: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex disorder that can negatively impact the obstetrical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive performance of four machine learning (ML)-based algorithms for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant patients diagnosed with PCOS. Materials and Methods: A total of 174 patients equally divided into 2 groups depending on the PCOS diagnosis were included in this prospective study. We used the Mantel–Haenszel test to evaluate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for the PCOS patients and reported the results as a crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A generalized linear model was used to identify the predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes in PCOS patients, quantifying their impact as risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs. Significant predictors were included in four machine learning-based algorithms and a sensitivity analysis was employed to quantify their performance. Results: Our crude estimates suggested that PCOS patients had a higher risk of developing gestational diabetes and had a higher chance of giving birth prematurely or through cesarean section in comparison to patients without PCOS. When adjusting for confounders, only the odds of delivery via cesarean section remained significantly higher for PCOS patients. Obesity was outlined as a significant predictor for gestational diabetes and fetal macrosomia, while a personal history of diabetes demonstrated a significant impact on the occurrence of all evaluated outcomes. Random forest (RF) performed the best when used to predict the occurrence of gestational diabetes (area under the curve, AUC value: 0.782), fetal macrosomia (AUC value: 0.897), and preterm birth (AUC value: 0.901) in PCOS patients. Conclusions: Complex ML algorithms could be used to predict adverse obstetrical outcomes in PCOS patients, but larger datasets should be analyzed for their validation.