Search

Objective: To describe the changes in women's choices for prenatal testing after the introduction of nationwide health insurance coverage for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Switzerland., Methods: The present retrospective study reviewed data from all women with singleton pregnancies who presented at the prenatal unit of Basel University Hospital, Switzerland, for first-trimester screening between July 15, 2014, and December 31, 2015. Women were divided into three categories according to their risk for aneuploidy, and the uptake of NIPT in the period before and after the introduction of the nationwide coverage for NIPT was compared., Results: Overall, 887 women were included in the study: 573 screens were carried out before (group 1) and 314 after (group 2) the introduction of insurance coverage for NIPT. In group 1, 53 (9.2%) had NIPT as compared with 72 (22.9%) in group 2. Among women with intermediate risk for aneuploidies and basic insurance coverage, NIPT increased by 56% (12/88 [14%] vs 32/46 [70%]; P<0.001)., Conclusion: There was a notable increase in the uptake of NIPT; uptake was most significant among women with basic health insurance and intermediate risk for aneuploidy., (© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Purpose: The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by isolation of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood is a new diagnostic option in prenatal care. The aim of the study was to investigate the algorithm of prenatal testing before and after the introduction of NIPT in a tertiary referral center and to investigate the influence of NIPT on the frequency of invasive procedures., Methods: Retrospective data analysis was conducted of all singleton pregnancies that presented for first trimester screening 17 months before and after the introduction of NIPT (n = 2271). Women were categorized into three risk groups: low risk for trisomy 21 (<1:1000), intermediate risk (1:101-1:1000) and high risk (≥1:100). The choice of diagnostic testing after FTS was analyzed., Results: 1093 (group 1) presented before and 1178 (group 2) after the introduction of NIPT. The rate of high-risk patients was equal in both groups (14.4 vs. 15.4 %). No differences were found with regard to invasive testing (11.6 vs. 11.3 %). NIPT was chosen by 3.7 % (44/1178) in group 2. Of those with NIPT, 72.7 % had a risk estimate of <1:100, but 90.9 % were ≥35 years old. The rate of NIPT among high-risk patients with a normal ultrasound examination was 25 %., Conclusion: At present, NIPT is chosen mainly for reassurance by patients not considered to be at high risk. In the high-risk group, NIPT can be offered if the ultrasound examination is normal and the risk is high due to maternal age or serum screening alone. The rate of invasive testing was not reduced in this selected population.

The ability to gain genetic information from the fetus in the mother's blood during pregnancy has been a long desired goal of research in prenatal medicine. The detection of fetal DNA in maternal blood, coupled with the development of the powerful techniques of next-generation sequencing finally transferred this analysis into clinical practice. Following the commercial introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidies, there has been a very strong demand, which has fostered an extreme rapid development and improvement of technology. Publications in this field are so numerous so that it is challenging to keep up with the latest state of the art. Here, we describe the current basic concepts of cell-free DNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing, give an overview of the currently commercially available tests and the chromosomal aberrations that can be identified. We also present current and future concepts for the implementation of cell-free DNA testing into clinical care.

Introduction: The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) London developed a first trimester combined screening algorithm for preterm preeclampsia (pPE) that allows a significantly higher detection of pregnancies at risk compared to conventional screening by maternal risk factors only. The aim of this trial is to validate this screening model in the Swiss population in order to implement this screening into routine first trimester ultrasound and to prescribe low-dose aspirin 150 mg (LDA) in patients at risk for pPE. Therefore, a multicentre registry study collecting and screening pregnancy outcome data was initiated in 2020; these are the preliminary results. Methods: Between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, we included all singleton pregnancies with pPE screening at the hospitals of Basel, Lucerne, and Bern. Multiple of medians of uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), placental growth factor (PlGF), and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) as well as risks were analysed as calculated by each centre's software and recalculated on the FMF online calculator for comparative reasons. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Version 9.1. Results: During the study period, 1,027 patients with singleton pregnancies were included. 174 (16.9%) had a risk >1:100 at first trimester combined screening. Combining the background risk, MAP, UtA-PI, and PlGF only, the cut-off to obtain a screen positive rate (SPR) of 11% is ≥1:75. Outcomes were available for 968/1,027 (94.3%) of all patients; 951 resulted in live birth. Fifteen (1.58%) developed classical preeclampsia (PE), 23 (2.42%) developed PE according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) definition. Conclusion: First trimester combined screening for PE and prevention with LDA results in a low prevalence of PE. The screening algorithm performs according to expectations; however, the cut-off of >1:100 results in a SPR above the accepted range and a cut-off of ≥1:75 should be considered for screening. More data are needed to evaluate, if these results are representative for the general Swiss population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The current study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in a universal screening population and assesses the added value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: This retrospective analysis evaluated 5219 patients with singleton pregnancies who had a standardized ultrasound (US) examination in our unit and delivered at our institution between 2014 and 2019. Results: A total of 181 (3.5%) of 5219 (100%) patients had a suspicion or diagnosis of PAS with US. The accuracy of US in detecting placenta increta/percreta showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 99.9%, positive predictive value of 82.4%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The diagnosis of all forms of PAS showed a sensitivity of 25.8%, specificity of 99.8%, positive predictive value of 80.8%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. MRI was concordant with US in 11 of 14 (78.5%) cases of severe forms of PAS and in three of 15 (20.0%) cases with placenta accreta. Conclusion: A standardized US evaluation can be applied in a universal screening setting for the diagnosis of severe forms of PAS. MRI is a complementary examination in severe forms of PAS but seems of limited value to discriminate placenta accreta from placenta increta/percreta. Synopsis: Ultrasound shows a high accuracy in detecting severe forms of placenta accreta spectrum such as placenta increta/percreta in a universal screening population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]