Search

Reproductive outcomes were evaluated in Nelore (Bos indicus) heifers submitted to one, two or no ovulation induction protocols based on progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) prior to a timed-artificial insemination (TAI) protocol. A total of 1,437 heifers (13.0 ± 0.8 mo old; 3.1 ± 0.1 of body condition score [BCS] and 279.9 ± 25.8 kg of body weight [BW]) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: 0IND (n = 486): no ovulation induction protocol; 1IND (n = 481): one ovulation induction protocol; or 2IND (n = 470): two ovulation induction protocols. On Day -47, heifers from 2IND received a disinfected intravaginal P4 device (2 g, previously used for 21 d), kept until Day -40, when 0.5 mg of E2 cypionate (EC) was given. On Day -19, heifers from 2IND and 1IND underwent the same protocol. On Day 0, all heifers were submitted to the same TAI protocol, starting with a P4 device (0.5 g), 0.5 mg of cloprostenol sodium (PGF), and 1.5 mg of E2 benzoate. On Day 7, P4 device was removed, 0.5 mg of PGF, 0.5 mg of EC, and 200 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) were administered. The TAI was performed 2 d later (Day 9). Blood samples were collected on Days -47 and 0, to determine the presence of CL (circulating P4 concentrations ≥ 1.0 ng/mL). Ultrasound was performed on Days 40, 75 and between Day 150 and parturition to assess pregnancy per AI (P/AI) and pregnancy loss (PL). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 ( a-c P ≤ 0.05; A,B 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10). The proportion of heifers with CL on Day -47 was similar among groups (3.4%). A greater proportion of heifers from 1IND had CL on Day 0, followed by 2IND, then 0IND (87.9 a ; 80.4 b ; 28.8 c %). There was an effect of treatment on expression of estrus (2IND: 66.6 a ; 1IND: 67.2 a ; 0IND: 57.4 b %), P/AI on Day 40 (2IND: 53.4 a ; 1IND: 43.9 b ; 0IND: 46.5 b %), P/AI on Day 75 (2IND: 49.8 a ; 1IND: 40.5 b ; 0IND: 44.4 ab %) and final P/AI (2IND: 45.5 a ; 1IND: 35.8 b ; 0IND: 40.5 ab %). No differences were observed in PL (40-75 = 6.3%; 75-final = 9.6%; Total = 15.3%). Particularly within lighter heifers, there was an effect of treatment on P/AI on Day 40 (0IND: 39.2 b ; 1IND: 43.3 ab ; 2IND: 53.9 a %) and on Day 75 (0IND: 36.6 B ; 1IND: 39.0 AB ; 2IND: 48.5 A %). At the first pregnancy diagnosis, more nonpregnant heifers from 2IND had CL on Day 40 than 0IND, but 1IND did not differ from the other groups (85.4 a ; 74.8 b ; 80.8 ab %). In conclusion, ovulation induction protocols performed prior to the TAI protocol increased the proportion of heifers with CL on Day 0. The use of two induction protocols resulted in greater fertility, particularly in lighter heifers, and increased cyclicity among nonpregnant heifers. These results indicate that this strategy may be an optimized method for inducing cyclicity and enhancing fertility of prepubertal Nelore heifers raised in pasture-based feeding systems., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The present study compared 2 strategies to initiate a progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol for lactating dairy cows: only GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) plus GnRH (EB+GnRH). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 487; 184 primiparous and 303 multiparous) from 2 commercial dairy herds were used for their second or greater services postpartum. Each week, cows that were nonpregnant at the pregnancy diagnosis 32 d after a previous AI were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups that differed only in the strategy to initiate (d 0) the TAI protocol. On d 0, every cow received a 2.0-g P4 implant; in the EB+GnRH group, cows were treated with 2.0 mg i.m. of EB and 16.8 µg i.m. of the GnRH analog buserelin acetate, whereas in the GnRH group, cows received only 16.8 µg i.m. of GnRH. On d 7 after the initial treatment, 0.530 mg i.m. of cloprostenol sodium (PGF) was administered in all cows, followed by a second dose on d 8, concomitant with 1.0 mg i.m. of estradiol cypionate and P4 implant withdrawal. The TAI was performed on d 10 (48 h after P4 device withdrawal) in both experimental groups. Only conventional Holstein semen was used throughout the study. The percentage of cows with corpus luteum (CL) on d 0 (73%) and overall ovulation rate after d 0 (54%) did not differ between groups. The CL regression between d 0 and the first PGF treatment was greater in the EB+GnRH group than the GnRH group (42% vs. 31%). Consequently, the proportion of cows with CL at PGF was greater when only GnRH was used on d 0 compared with EB+GnRH (86% vs. 82%), and the mean number of CL at PGF was greater (1.23 vs. 1.11). The expression of estrus near TAI was greater in GnRH group (84% vs. 77%), and cows showing estrus had greater (44% vs. 10%) pregnancy per AI (P/AI) on d 32 for both treatments. We found no effect of the presence of CL on d 0 or at PGF, nor of ovulation after d 0 or CL regression between d 0 and d 7 on fertility. However, fertility was critically impaired when cows did not have CL at both times, d 0 and at PGF treatment. We did not observe any interaction between treatment and other variables, and the P/AI was similar in cows receiving EB+GnRH or only GnRH on d 0 (37.8% vs. 36.6%). In summary, although there was no detectable difference in P/AI between treatments, this study demonstrated potential negative physiological outcomes caused by EB treatment on d 0 (greater incidence of luteolysis after d 0 and fewer cows with CL at PGF treatment). Overall, we found no benefit of adding EB at the initiation of a P4-based TAI protocol on fertility compared with using GnRH alone, despite differences in ovarian dynamics and expression of estrus., (The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

This study aimed to evaluate the progesterone (P4) release profile provided by four commercially available intravaginal P4 devices, as well as the effect of circulating P4 concentrations exclusively from these devices on the development of the dominant follicle (DF) in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows. Therefore, non-lactating multiparous Nelore cows were enrolled in an experimental design, over three replicates, starting on Day -9 with the insertion of a reused P4 device (2 g - original P4 load) for 7 d, followed by two treatments of cloprostenol sodium (PGF; 0.482 mg), 24 h apart, on Days -3 and -2. Just before device removal, on Day -2, a norgestomet ear implant was inserted and, 2 d later (Day 0), at the time of norgestomet withdrawal, cows were randomly assigned to receive one of the intravaginal devices: Primer (0.5 g); Prociclar (0.75 g); Sincrogest (1 g); or CIDR (1.9 g), and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) im. Blood samples were collected immediately before P4 device insertion, 12 h later and daily over 15 d (1 d after P4 device removal). Ultrasound examinations were performed on Days 0, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 14 to evaluate ovarian dynamics. Results are presented as mean ± SEM and differences were considered when P ≤ 0.05. Overall, the devices resulted in distinct circulating P4 concentrations over 10 d, varying according to their initial P4 load and P4 impregnated surface area. Primer provided the lowest circulating P4 concentrations over time, whereas, CIDR had the greatest concentration. Sincrogest and Prociclar were similar, producing intermediary circulating P4. There was no effect of treatment on the DF diameter on any specific day, nor on follicular growth rate from Day 7-10. However, the Primer device resulted in a greater mean DF diameter over time. Additionally, greater circulating P4 concentrations, mainly during the first 3 d of device insertion, were associated with smaller DF diameters regardless of the treatment. In conclusion, results from this study provided a better understanding of the P4 profile of intravaginal P4 devices, as well as, their effect on DF development in Bos indicus cows. These data contribute to optimize the use of P4 devices in the reproductive management of beef cattle., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim was to study reproductive outcomes of Nelore (Bos indicus) cows submitted to a 7-d estradiol (E2)/progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol, receiving various combinations of doses and hormones. Primiparous (n = 962) and multiparous (n = 1935) cows were submitted to synchronization (n = 2012) and resynchronization (n = 885 non-pregnant cows at pregnancy diagnosis 30 d after TAI) protocols, following a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of eight treatments. At the initiation of the TAI protocol (Day -9), all cows received a 1.0 g intravaginal P4 insert, 2.0 mg E2 benzoate and received (PGF1) or not (PGF0) 0.5 mg cloprostenol sodium (PGF). On Day -2, the P4 insert was removed, all cows received 0.5 mg PGF, 300 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and 0.5 (EC0.5) or 1.0 mg estradiol cypionate (EC1.0). On Day 0, cows were treated (G1) with 8.4 μg buserelin acetate (GnRH) or not (G0), concurrently with TAI. The eight treatments were generated: 1) PGF0-EC0.5-G0 (n = 364), 2) PGF0-EC0.5-G1 (n = 363), 3) PGF1-EC0.5-G0 (n = 363), 4) PGF1-EC0.5-G1 (n = 360), 5) PGF0-EC-1.0-G0 (n = 360), 6) PGF0-EC1.0-G1 (n = 363), 7) PGF1-EC1.0-G0 (n = 361), and 8) PGF1-EC1.0-G1 (n = 363). Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was greater at first AI compared with resynchronization (58.9 [n = 2012] vs. 54.9% [n = 885]). Presence of CL on Day -9 resulted in more cows expressing estrus (81.3 [n = 680] vs. 67.1% [n = 2033]) and greater P/AI (66.0 [n = 692] vs. 54.9% [n = 2106]). There was no difference in P/AI between cows that received or not PGF on Day -9 (58.7 [n = 1447] vs. 56.6% [n = 1450]). In contrast, PGF tended to increase P/AI of cows with CL on Day -9 (with PGF = 69.1 [n = 375] vs. without PGF = 62.5% [n = 317]). Cows that received 1.0 mg EC expressed more estrus than those treated with 0.5 mg (73.8 [n = 1414] vs. 67.9% [n = 1398]) and had greater P/AI (60.2 [n = 1447] vs. 55.1% [n = 1450]). P/AI was greater in cows treated with GnRH at TAI (59.8 [n = 1449] vs. 55.5% [n = 1448]), particularly in cows that did not show estrus (52.7 [n = 393] vs. 38.1% [n = 420]). Moreover, GnRH on Day 0 increased P/AI in cows with BCS < 3.0 (57.1 [n = 723] vs. 48.6% [n = 698]), in primiparous (50.1 [n = 465] vs. 41.9% [n = 497]) and in cows that received 0.5 mg EC (58.9 [n = 723] vs. 51.3% [n = 727]). In conclusion, 1.0 mg of EC on Day -2 and GnRH at TAI improved P/AI, but the combination of a higher dose of EC and GnRH treatment at AI did not enhance this effect. Furthermore, GnRH improved P/AI especially in Bos indicus cows with lower expression of estrus, such as primiparous, thinner cows, and cows treated with 0.5 mg of EC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Changes in circulating progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) during proestrus produce dynamic changes in endometrial function and pituitary release of gonadotropins. Independent and combined effects of P4 and E2 on endometrium and pituitary were evaluated. In a preliminary study, an exogenous hormone model of proestrus was created by removal of corpus luteum and follicles ≥5 mm followed by gradual removal of intravaginal P4 implants during 18 h and treatment with increasing doses of estradiol benzoate during 48 h to mimic proestrus using high E2 (n = 9) or low E2 (n = 9). Decreased P4, increased E2, and increased endometrial area (EA) simulated proestrus in high-E2 cows and this was used subsequently. The main experiment used a 2 × 2 factorial design with: high E2 and low P4 (n = 11); high E2 and high P4 (n = 11); low E2 and high P4 (n = 11); low E2 and low P4 (n = 10). At 48 h, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) release was determined. Variables were analyzed using PROCMIXED of Statistical Analysis System. The EA increased dramatically during 48 h only in high-E2 and low-P4 cows. For FSH, high-E2 cows had greater area under the curve (AUC) and FSH peak after GnRH than low E2, with mild negative effects of high P4. For LH, concentration at peak and AUC were 2-fold greater in high E2 compared to low-E2 groups, with low P4 also 2-fold greater than high-P4 groups. Thus, maximal changes in uterus and pituitary during proestrus depend on both low P4 and high E2, but different physiologic responses are regulated differently by E2 and P4. Changes in endometrium depend on low P4 and high E2, whereas GnRH-induced FSH secretion primarily depends on high E2, and GnRH-induced LH secretion is independently increased by high E2 or reduced by high P4., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)