Search

The low incidence of special types of breast cancer hinders adequate clinical research efforts. As such, collecting sufficient data to develop well‐established therapy strategies are difficult. The aim of our study was to obtain more data on these special types in order to better understand the different characteristics and optimize therapy strategies. A single‐institution retrospective cohort study from January 2007 until September 2015. One hundred and five patients remained after excluding the patients with invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma. The percentage of these so called special types in this population was 4%. Tubular carcinoma, cribriform carcinoma, carcinoma with medullary features, carcinoma with apocrine differentiation, secretory carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and invasive papillary carcinoma had a good or excellent prognosis, while invasive micropapillary carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, metaplastic carcinoma, and carcinoma with neuroendocrine features had a worse prognosis. Special types of breast cancer form a heterogeneous group. Submitting them all to the same treatment modality may lead to both over‐ and under‐treatment. We need to combine our data to optimize treatment strategies for the different special types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Resection of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) combined with systemic treatment is increasingly accepted but not offered as therapeutic option. New evidence of the additional value of surgery in these patients is scarce while prognoses without surgery remains poor. Patients and methods For this case matched analysis, all nationally registered patients with BCLM confined to the liver in the Netherlands (systemic group; N = 523) were selected and compared with patients who received systemic treatment and underwent hepatectomy (resection group; N = 139) at a hepatobiliary centre in France. Matching was based on age, decade when diagnosed, interval to metastases, maximum metastases size, single or multiple tumours, chemotherapy, hormonal or targeted therapy after diagnosis. Based on published guidelines, palliative systemic treatment strategies are similar in both European countries. Results Between 1983 and 2013, 3894 patients were screened for inclusion. Overall median follow-up was 80 months (95% CI 70–90 months). The median, 3- and 5-year overall survival of the whole population was 19 months, 29% and 19%, respectively. The resection and systemic group had median survival of 73 vs. 13 months (P < 0.001), respectively. Three and 5-year survival was 18% and 10% for the systemic group and 75% and 54% for the resection group, respectively. After matching, the resection group had a median overall survival of 82 months with a 3- and 5-year overall survival of 81% and 69%, respectively, compared with a median overall survival of 31 months in the systemic group with a 3- and 5-year overall survival of 32% and 24%, respectively (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15–0.52; P < 0.001). Conclusions For patients with BCLM, liver resection combined with systemic treatment results in improved overall survival compared to systemic treatment alone. Liver resection should be considered in selected cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is considered standard of care for patients with multiple brain metastases or unfit for radical treatment modalities. Recent studies raised discussion about the expected survival after WBRT. Therefore, we analysed survival after WBRT for brain metastases 'in daily practice' in a large nationwide multicentre retrospective cohort. Methods: Between 2000 and 2014, 6325 patients had WBRT (20 Gy in 4Gy fractions) for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 4363 patients) or breast cancer (BC; 1962 patients); patients were treated in 15 out of 21 Dutch radiotherapy centres. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method from the first day of WBRT until death as recorded in local hospital data registration or the Dutch Municipal Personal Records Database. Findings: The median survival was 2.7 months for NSCLC and 3.7 months for BC patients (p<.001). For NSCLC patients aged <50, 50-60, 60-70 and >70 years, survival was 4.0, 3.0, 2.8 and 2.1 months, respectively (p<.001). For BC patients, survival was 4.5, 3.8, 3.2 and 2.9 months, respectively (p=.047). In multivariable analyses, higher age was related to poorer survival with hazard ratios (HR) for patients aged 50-60, 60-70 and >70 years being 1.05, 1.19 and 1.34, respectively. Primary BC (HR: 0.83) and female sex (HR: 0.85) were related to better survival (p<.001). Interpretation: The survival of patients after WBRT for brain metastases from NSCLC treated in Dutch 'common radiotherapy practice' is poor, in breast cancer and younger patients it is disappointingly little better. These results are in line with the results presented in the QUARTZ trial and we advocate a much more restrictive use of WBRT. In patients with a more favourable prognosis the optimal treatment strategy remains to be determined. Prospective randomized trials and individualized prognostic models are needed to identify these patients and to tailor treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Reproductive and lifestyle factors influence both breast cancer risk and prognosis; this might be through breast cancer subtype. Subtypes defined by immunohistochemical hormone receptor markers and gene expression signatures are used to predict prognosis of breast cancer patients based on their tumour biology. We investigated the association between established breast cancer risk factors and the 70-gene prognostication signature in breast cancer patients. Patients and methods Standardised questionnaires were used to obtain information on established risk factors of breast cancer from the Dutch patients of the MINDACT trial. Clinical-pathological and genomic information were obtained from the trial database. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the associations between lifestyle risk factors and tumour prognostic subtypes, measured by the 70-gene MammaPrint ® signature (i.e. low-risk or high-risk tumours). Results Of the 1555 breast cancer patients included, 910 had low-risk and 645 had high-risk tumours. Current body mass index (BMI), age at menarche, age at first birth, age at menopause, hormonal contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy use were not associated with MammaPrint ® . In parous women, higher parity was associated with a lower risk (OR: 0.75, [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.59–0.95] P = 0.018) and longer breastfeeding duration with a higher risk (OR: 1.03, [95% CI: 1.01–1.05] P = 0.005) of developing high-risk tumours; risk estimates were similar within oestrogen receptor–positive disease. After stratifying by menopausal status, the associations remained present in post-menopausal women. Conclusion Using prognostic gene expression profiles, we have indications that specific reproductive factors may be associated with prognostic tumour subtypes beyond hormone receptor status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate trends in the risk of local recurrences after breast-conserving treatment (BCT) and to examine the impact of local recurrence (LR) on distant relapse-free survival in a large, population-based cohort of women aged ⩽40years with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: All women (n =1143) aged ⩽40years with early-stage (pT1-2/cT1-2, N0-2, M0) breast cancer who underwent BCT in the south of the Netherlands between 1988 and 2010 were included. BCT consisted of local excision of the tumour followed by irradiation of the breast. Results: After a median follow-up of 8.5 (0.1–24.6)years, 176 patients had developed an isolated LR. The 5-year LR-rate for the subgroups treated in the periods 1988–1998, 1999–2005 and 2006–2010 were 9.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1–12.5), 5.9% (95% CI 3.2–8.6) and 3.3% (95% CI 0.6–6.0), respectively (p =0.006). In a multivariate analysis, adjuvant systemic treatment was associated with a reduced risk of LR of almost 60% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; 95%CI 0.28–0.60; p <0.0001). Patients who experienced an early isolated LR (⩽5years after BCT) had a worse distant relapse-free survival compared to patients without an early LR (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.27–2.64; p =0.001). Late local recurrences did not negatively affect distant relapse-free survival (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.74–2.08; p =0.407). Conclusion: Local control after BCT improved significantly over time and appeared to be closely related to the increased use and effectiveness of systemic therapy. These recent results underline the safety of BCT for young women with early-stage breast cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]