Search

Background: Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (aRMS) with lymph node involvement (N1 classification) accounts for up to 10% of all cases of RMS. The prognosis is poor, and is comparable to that of distant metastatic disease. In the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 protocol, patients with a histologic diagnosis of aRMS/N1 received intensified chemotherapy with systematic locoregional treatment., Methods: Patients with aRMS/N1 were enrolled prospectively after primary surgery/biopsy and fusion status was assessed in tumor samples. All patients received 9 cycles of induction chemotherapy and 6 months of maintenance therapy. Local treatment included radiotherapy to the primary site and lymph nodes with or without secondary surgical resection., Results: A total of 103 patients were enrolled. The clinical characteristics of the patients were predominantly unfavorable: 90% had macroscopic residual disease after initial surgery/biopsy, 63% had locally invasive tumors, 77% had a tumor measuring >5 cm, and 81% had disease at unfavorable sites. Fusion genes involving forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) were detected in 56 of 84 patients. Events occurred in 52 patients: 43 developed disease recurrence, 7 had disease that was refractory to treatment, and 2 patients developed second neoplasms. On univariate analysis, unfavorable disease site, tumor invasiveness, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study group III, and fusion-positive status correlated with worse prognosis. The 5-year event-free survival rate of patients with fusion-positive tumors was 43% compared with 74% in patients with fusion-negative tumors (P = .01). On multivariate analysis, fusion positivity and tumor invasiveness proved to be unfavorable prognostic markers., Conclusions: Fusion status and tumor invasiveness appear to have a strong impact on prognosis in patients with aRMS/N1. Fusion status will be used to stratify these patients in the next EpSSG RMS study, and treatment will be intensified in patients with fusion-positive tumors. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the role of clinical factors together with FOXO1 fusion status in patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) to develop a predictive model for event‐free survival and provide a rationale for risk stratification in future trials. Methods: The authors used data from patients enrolled in the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study (EpSSG RMS 2005; EudraCT number 2005‐000217‐35). The following baseline variables were considered for the multivariable model: age at diagnosis, sex, histology, primary tumor site, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies group, tumor size, nodal status, and FOXO1 fusion status. Main effects and significant second‐order interactions of candidate predictors were included in a multiple Cox proportional hazards regression model. A nomogram was generated for predicting 5‐year event‐free survival (EFS) probabilities. Results: The EFS and overall survival rates at 5 years were 70.9% (95% confidence interval, 68.6%–73.1%) and 81.0% (95% confidence interval, 78.9%–82.8%), respectively. The multivariable model retained five prognostic factors, including age at diagnosis interacting with tumor size, tumor primary site, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies clinical group, and FOXO1 fusion status. Based on each patient's total score in the nomogram, patients were stratified into four groups. The 5‐year EFS rates were 94.1%, 78.4%, 65.2%, and 52.1% in the low‐risk, intermediate‐risk, high‐risk, and very‐high‐risk groups, respectively, and the corresponding 5‐year overall survival rates were 97.2%, 91.5%, 74.3%, and 60.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The results presented here provide the rationale to modify the EpSSG stratification, with the most significant change represented by the replacement of histology with fusion status. This classification was adopted in the new international trial launched by the EpSSG. Traditional clinical factors, together with FOXO1 fusion status, in nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma were investigated to develop a predictive model for event‐free survival and provide a rationale for risk stratification in future trials. The most important result was the replacement of histology with fusion status, and this model was used for patient stratification in the new European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group Frontline and Relapse Rhabdomyosarcoma trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04625907). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma is an aggressive tumour that can develop in almost any part of the body. Doxorubicin is an effective drug against rhabdomyosarcoma, but its role in combination with an established multidrug regimen remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the possible benefit of early dose intensification with doxorubicin in patients with non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma.Methods: We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial involving 108 hospitals from 14 countries. We included patients older than 6 months but younger than 21 years with a pathologically proven diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma. We assigned each patient to a specific subgroup according to the EpSSG stratification system. Those with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma incompletely resected and localised at unfavourable sites with or without nodal involvement, or those with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma without nodal involvement were considered at high risk of relapse. These high-risk patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either nine cycles of IVA (ifosfamide 3 g/m2 given as a 3-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, vincristine 1·5 mg/m2 weekly during the first 7 weeks then only on day 1 of each cycle [given as a single intravenous injection], and dactinomycin 1·5 mg/m2 on day 1 given as a single intravenous injection) or four cycles of IVA with doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 given as a 4-h intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 followed by five cycles of IVA. The interval between cycles was 3 weeks. Randomisation was done using a web-based system and was stratified (block sizes of four) by enrolling country and risk subgroup. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was 3-year event-free survival assessed by the investigator at each centre in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were considered in the safety analysis. In agreement with the independent data monitoring committee, the study was closed to patient entry on Dec 16, 2013, after futility analysis. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2005-000217-35, and is currently in follow-up.Findings: Between Oct 1, 2005, and Dec 16, 2013, 484 patients were randomly assigned to receive each chemotherapy regimen (242 in the IVA group and 242 in the IVA plus doxorubicin group). Median follow-up was 63·9 months (IQR 44·6-78·9). The 3-year event-free survival was 67·5% (95% CI 61·2-73·1) in the IVA plus doxorubicin group and 63·3% (56·8-69·0) in the IVA group (hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·65-1·16; p=0·33). Grade 3-4 leucopenia (232 [93%] of 249 patients in the IVA plus doxorubicin group vs 194 [85%] of 227 in the IVA group; p=0·0061), anaemia (195 [78%] vs 111 [49%]; p<0·0001), thrombocytopenia (168 [67%] vs 59 [26%]; p<0.0001), and gastrointestinal adverse events (78 [31%] vs 19 [8%]; p<0·0001) were significantly more common in the IVA plus doxorubicin group than in the IVA group. Grade 3-5 infections (198 [79%] vs 128 [56%]; p<0·0001) were also significantly more common in the IVA plus doxorubicin group than in the IVA group, in which one patient had grade 5 infection. Two treatment-related deaths were reported (one patient developed septic shock and one affected by Goldenhar syndrome developed intractable seizures) in the IVA plus doxorubicin group, both occurring after the first cycle of treatment, and none were reported in the IVA group.Interpretations: The addition of dose-intensified doxorubicin to standard IVA chemotherapy did not show a significant improvement in the outcome of patients with high-risk non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Therefore, the IVA chemotherapy regimen should remain the standard of care for patients with localised rhabdomyosarcoma in Europe.Funding: Fondazione Città della Speranza, Italy, and the Association Léon Berard Enfant Cancéreux, France. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Germ cell tumours (GCTs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours believed to arise from the totipotent primordial germ cell. While uncommon, they may present at any age from in-utero to young adulthood. Prognosis is generally good and considering them in the differential diagnosis of midline as well as gonadal masses may prevent diagnostic delay and/or escalation of potentially harmful treatment. In childhood, approximately 50% are gonadal and 50% extragonadal (20% intracranial/30% extracranial). Clinical presentation relates to mass effect at tumour site. Teratomas account for 50% of paediatric GCTs and, whilst considered benign, may recur if not completely excised. Malignant GCTs often secrete the tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotrophin, which may help in diagnosis and follow-up. Outcomes are generally good with >90% five-year overall survival. Management involves complete surgical resection for teratomas and non-metastatic gonadal tumours. In the UK, chemotherapy is reserved for stage 2–4 extracranial malignant GCTs. Intracranial tumours typically occur in the midline in the pineal and/or suprasellar regions. Intracranial germinomas are cured in >90% cases with radiotherapy or combined chemo-radiotherapy. About two-thirds of non-germinomatous intracranial tumours are cured with combined chemo-radiotherapy. Current issues relating to the diagnosis and management of teenagers and young adults with GCTs are highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early response to induction chemotherapy is used in current European guidelines to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy and subsequently to adapt treatment in pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). However, existing literature on the prognostic value of early radiologic response on survival is contradictory; here the prognostic value is analyzed with data from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 95 (MMT-95) study.Methods: This study examined 432 Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Grouping III (macroscopic residue) patients enrolled in the SIOP MMT-95 study with a response assessment after 3 courses of chemotherapy (a 2-dimensional assessment). Patients with progressive disease (PD) after 3 courses of chemotherapy were excluded (n = 7). Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS), calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, were compared for 3 groups (complete response [CR]/partial response [PR], objective response [OR], and no response [NR]). The prognostic impact of early response was assessed through the calculation of Cox proportional hazards.Results: After 3 courses of chemotherapy, 85.2% of the patients had CR/PR, 8.6% had OR, and 6.3% had NR. For all patients, the 5-year FFS and OS rates were 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56%-65%) and 74% (95% CI, 70%-78%), respectively. However, a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed no significant difference in FFS or OS between the response groups. The adjusted hazard ratios for an OR and NR were 1.09 (95% CI, 0.63-1.88) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.39-1.67), respectively, for FFS and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.47-1.76) and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.61-2.64), respectively, for OS.Conclusions: No evidence was found for the idea that early radiologic response to chemotherapy is prognostic for survival for patients with RMS. Treatment adaptation based on early response (except for patients with PD) should, therefore, no longer be incorporated into future studies. Cancer 2018;124:1016-24. © 2017 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Germ cell tumours (GCTs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours believed to arise from the totipotent primordial germ cell. While uncommon, they may present at any age from in-utero to young adulthood. Prognosis is generally good and considering them in the differential diagnosis of midline as well as gonadal masses may prevent diagnostic delay and/or escalation of potentially harmful treatment. In childhood, approximately 50% are gonadal and 50% extragonadal (20% intracranial/30% extracranial). Clinical presentation relates to mass effect at tumour site. Teratomas account for 50% of paediatric GCTs and while considered benign may recur if not completely excised. Malignant GCTs often secrete the tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotrophin, which may help in diagnosis and follow-up. Outcomes are generally good with more than 90% 5-year overall survival. Management involves complete surgical resection for teratomas and non-metastatic gonadal tumours. In the UK, chemotherapy is reserved for stage 2–4 extracranial malignant GCTs. Intracranial tumours typically occur in the midline in the pineal and/or suprasellar regions. Intracranial germinomas are cured in more than 90% cases with radiotherapy or combined chemo-radiotherapy. About two-thirds of non-germinomatous intracranial tumours are cured with combined chemo-radiotherapy. Current issues relating to the diagnosis and management of teenagers and young adults with GCTs are highlighted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background Infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) is a very rare disease occurring in young infants characterised by a high local aggressiveness but overall with a favourable survival. To try to reduce the total burden of therapy, the European pediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group has developed conservative therapeutic recommendations according to initial resectability. Material and methods Between 2005 and 2012, children with localised IFS were prospectively registered. Initial surgery was suggested only if possible without mutilation. Patients with initial complete (IRS-group I/R0) or microscopic incomplete (group II/R1) resection had no further therapy. Patients with initial inoperable tumour (group III/R2) received first-line vincristine-actinomycin-D chemotherapy (VA). Delayed conservative surgery was planned after tumour reduction. Aggressive local therapy (mutilating surgery or external radiotherapy) was discouraged. Results A total of 50 infants (median age 1.4 months), were included in the study. ETV6-NTRK3 transcript was present in 87.2% of patients where investigation was performed. According to initial surgery, 11 patients were classified as group I, 8 as group II and 31 as group III. VA chemotherapy was first delivered to 25 children with IRS-III/R2 and one with IRS-II/R1 disease. Response rate to VA was 68.0%. Mutilating surgery was only performed in three cases. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years (range 1.9–9.0), 3-year event-free survival and overall survival were respectively 84.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.5–91.7) and 94.0% (95% CI 82.5–98.0). Conclusions Conservative therapy is possible in IFS as only three children required mutilating surgery, and alkylating or anthracycline based chemotherapy was avoided in 71.0% of patients needing chemotherapy. VA regimen should be first line therapy in order to reduce long term effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]