Search

The clinical value of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in gastric cancer is controversial. We evaluated the clinicopathologic and prognostic value of CA 19-9 in gastric cancer. Methods. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Odds ratios (ORs), risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect measures. Results. Thirty-eight studies were included. Results showed that there were significant differences in the incidence of high CA 19-9 levels between stages III/IV and I/II groups (OR = 3.36; 95% CI = 2.34-4.84), the pT3/T4 and pT1/T2 groups (OR = 2.40; 95% CI = 1.60-3.59), the lymph node-positive and node-negative groups (OR = 2.91; 95% CI = 2.21-3.84), the metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative groups (OR = 2.76; 95% CI = 1.12-6.82), and vessel invasion-positive and invasion-negative groups (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.11-2.48). Moreover, CA 19-9 was significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.56-2.15), disease-free survival (HR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.16-2.95), and disease-specific survival (HR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.10-1.60) in gastric cancer. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis showed that CA 19-9 indicates clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whether the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system (AJCC-7) is a successful revision remains debatable. We aimed to compare the predictive capacity of the AJCC-7 for colorectal cancer with the 6th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system (AJCC-6). Methods: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset consisting of 158,483 records was used in this study. We evaluated the predictive capacity of the two editions of the staging system using Harrell's C index and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Results: There was a significant prognostic difference between patients at stage IIB and IIC (P < 0.001). Stage III patients with similar prognoses were adequately sub-grouped in the same stage according to AJCC-7. The Harrell's C index revealed a value of 0.7692 for AJCC-7, which was significantly better than 0.7663 for AJCC-6 (P < 0.001). BIC analysis provided consistent results (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that AJCC-7 is superior to the AJCC-6 staging system in predictive ca [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]