Search

The most important and widely utilized system for providing prognostic information following surgical management for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is currently the tumor, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) staging system. An accurate and clinically useful staging system is an essential tool used to provide patients with counseling regarding prognosis, select treatment modalities, and determining eligibility for clinical trials. Data published over the last few years has led to significant controversies as to whether further revisions are needed and whether improvements can be made with the introduction of new, more accurate predictive prognostic factors. Staging systems have also evolved with an increase in the understanding of RCC tumor biology. Molecular tumor biomarkers are expected to revolutionize the staging of RCC by providing more effective prognostic ability over traditional clinical variables alone. This review will examine the components of the TNM staging system, current staging modalities including comprehensive integrated staging systems, and predictive nomograms, and introduce the concept of molecular staging for RCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Over the past 2 decades, a greater understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer has occurred. Surgical techniques have also evolved, and technological advances have made possible new methods of managing renal tumors. The most extensively used system to provide prognostic information for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is currently the tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) staging system. Emerging data over the last few years has questioned whether further revisions are needed and if improvements can be made with the introduction of new, more accurate and predictive prognostic factors. The recent discovery of molecular tumor biomarkers are expected to revolutionize the staging of RCC and potentially lead to the development of new therapies based on molecular targeting. This review will examine the current staging modalities and prognostic factors associated with RCC as well as the selection of patients most likely to benefit from clinical trials. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: We evaluated the prognosis, risk factors and relevance of the primary-free interval in a large cohort with metachronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We studied 120 patients with metachronous, bilateral renal cell carcinoma who were treated at 12 international academic centers. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors for contralateral metachronous renal cell carcinoma during followup. Disease specific survival was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Median age at diagnosis of the first and second renal cell carcinomas was 54 and 62 years, respectively. The most common histological subtype was bilateral clear cell renal cell carcinoma (89% of cases). Familial renal cell carcinoma was found in 14% of patients, von Hippel-Lindau disease was found in 4% and nonfamilial renal cell carcinoma was found in 81%. The 15-year disease specific survival rates for the first and second renal cell carcinomas were 66% and 44%, respectively. Logistic regression revealed von Hippel-Lindau disease, a family history of renal cell carcinoma, multifocal first renal cell carcinoma and young patient age as independent risk factors for contralateral renal cell carcinoma after surgery for unilateral renal cell carcinoma. A longer primary-free interval was associated with a better prognosis. When calculating disease specific survival from the diagnosis of the first renal cell carcinoma, the primary-free interval was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: Long-term survival rates of metachronous, bilateral renal cell carcinoma are moderate. von Hippel-Lindau disease, a family history of renal cell carcinoma, multifocal first renal cell carcinoma and young patient age are independent risk factors for contralateral renal cell carcinoma. These risk factors support close and extended abdominal surveillance following nephrectomy for unilateral renal cell carcinoma. Patients with a longer primary-free interval have a more favorable prognosis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains one of the most lethal urologic malignancies, with up to 40% of patients eventually dying of cancer progression. Despite advances in the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with RCC, approximately a third of patients who undergo surgery for clinically localized RCC will suffer a recurrence. Timely identification of recurrences following surgical extirpation is imperative in the treatment of these patients. RCC is known to metastasize through hematogenous routes of spread to distant organ sites and via lymphatic channels to regional lymph nodes. The path of tumor escape is associated with diverse clinical outcomes and a unique tumor biology. A consensus on surveillance regimens for patients following surgical resection of localized disease is lacking. The most extensively used system for providing prognostic information regarding survival and recurrence of disease has historically been the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system. As a result, most contemporary surveillance protocols have tailored follow-up regimens according to stage-based stratifications. Numerous studies have recently demonstrated that certain clinical and histopathological factors can improve the prediction of tumor recurrence. The incorporation of these prognostic factors into stage-based stratification models should be better than stage alone in attempting to provide a rational approach to identifying treatable recurrences while minimizing unnecessary exams and tests, as well as patient anxiety. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis, behavior and molecular biology of RCC have paved the way for developments that may enhance early diagnosis and prognostication, and improve survival for patients. Lastly, molecular markers should, in the future, revolutionize surveillance protocols for RCC by tailoring follow-up to specific molecular classifications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE To define the prognostic relevance of capsular involvement (invasion with no penetration) and collecting-system invasion in patients with stage I (pT1N0M0) and stage II (pT2N0M0) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), by evaluating the outcome of patients treated with nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 519 patients from a kidney cancer database treated with nephrectomy for stage I and II RCC between 1985 and 2005 were assessed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival time. The prognostic relevance of capsular involvement and collecting-system invasion were examined using univariate and multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS Capsular involvement and collecting-system invasion were evident in 112 (21.6%) and 39 (7.5%) patients, respectively. Capsular involvement was associated with higher Fuhrman grades and larger tumours. The incidence of collecting-system invasion was higher in patients with microvascular invasion. The median follow-up was 49 months. In univariate analysis, patients with capsular involvement and collecting-system invasion had a worse prognosis than patients without ( P = 0.007 and <0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, capsular involvement (hazard ratio 1.84, P = 0.036) and collecting-system invasion (3.78, P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of recurrence-free survival. Interestingly, there was no survival difference between patients with capsular involvement in stage I/II and patients with invasion of perinephric tissue (pT3aN0M0). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that capsular involvement and collecting-system invasion are poor prognostic findings in stage I and II RCC. They should both be considered when planning the follow-up. A revised pT3a stage including patients with capsular involvement could improve its prognostic validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been 35 years since the radical nephrectomy was standardized by the work of Robson et al. (J Urol 101:297–301, 1969). Despite being based on a retrospective review of only 88 cases operated upon over a span of 15 years, this publication was an important milestone in the attempt to create uniformity in the staging of Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the measurement of surgical outcomes for RCC. Although this manuscript forms the basis for our contemporary measurement of the long-term results of RCC surgery and set the standard to which the entire subsequent literature was compared, contemporary research subsequently has questioned many of Robson’s conclusions regarding RCC. In Robson’s era, the majority of patients presented with large, symptomatic tumors, pre-operative staging was imprecise, and many patients had locally advanced disease at the time of surgery: of the 88 patients in Robson’s series, 75% were managed through a thoracoabdominal incision. Since that time, advances in renal imaging and clinical staging have led to the increased detection of incidental, lower stage, organ-confined tumors more amendable to expanded surgical options. Surgical techniques have evolved and technological advances have made possible new methods of managing renal tumors in situ that have emphasized a transition from radical to less extirpative approaches. In addition, understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer has led to improved prognostication and the development of effective immunotherapies for advanced disease. The current concepts and long-term outcomes of the surgical management of RCC will be reviewed to help elucidate some of these changes, from the evolution of open to laparoscopic to percutaneous, from radical to partial to ablative approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reports on the open surgical management of renal cell carcinoma in the era of minimally invasive kidney surgery. Evidence showing that nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for patients with small tumors is equivalent to total radical nephroctomy in terms of long-term survival; Safety and efficacy of NSS; Clinical factors determining prognosis and survival in the management of the disease.

Reports on the adjuvant therapy of renal cell carcinoma in patient selection and therapeutic options. Renal cell carcinoma, survival and prognostic factors; Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma; Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma; Correlations with tumor oxygen measurements and prognostic in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.