Search

Aims: Unplanned readmissions early after a discharge from acute heart failure hospitalization are common and have become a reimbursement benchmark and marker of hospital quality. However, the competing risk of short-term post-discharge mortality is substantial.Methods and Results: Using data from the prospective, nationwide Registry IN-HF Outcome, we analysed the incidence and predictors of 30-day mortality or readmissions and associated days-alive-out-of-hospital (DAOH) in 1520 patients discharged alive after admission for acute heart failure. Within 30 days after discharge, 94 patients (6.2%) were readmitted (91% for cardiovascular causes; 60% recurrent heart failure) and 42 (2.8%) died, 10 of which occurred during readmission. Overall, 126 patients (8.3%) met the combined endpoint. By multivariable logistic regression, worsening chronic heart failure as clinical presentation [odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.77, P = 0.005), inotropes during admission (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.40-3.43, P = 0.0006), length of stay (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.002) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors at discharge (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.35-0.77, P = 0.001) independently predicted 30-day all-cause mortality and/or readmission (c-statistic = 0.695). Per cent 30-day DAOH was lower in patients with in-hospital inotrope use, no renin-angiotensin system inhibitors prescription at discharge, New York Heart Association III-IV class at discharge, and correlated inversely with length of stay and age.Conclusion: A clinical and biohumoral profile consistent with chronic advanced heart failure and end-organ damage identifies acute heart failure patients discharged home from cardiology units, who are at highest risk of early death and/or readmission. These findings have practical implications for tailoring specific follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In the recent Italian Network on Heart Failure (IN-HF) Outcome registry, including 1,855 patients with acute heart failure (AHF), we reviewed the use of inotropes and their prognostic implication on in-hospital and 12-month mortality. Methods IN-HF Outcome is a prospective, multicenter, observational, study involving 61 Italian cardiology centers. AHF patients have been enrolled over a 2-year period and followed-up for 1 year. Inotropes were used in 360 patients (19.4%). Results Patients who received inotropes had a more severe clinical and hemodynamic profile than those who did not and exhibited a significantly higher rate of in-hospital (21.4% vs 2.7%, p < 0.01) and 1-year (50.6% vs 17.7%, p < 0.01) mortality. At entry, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was ≤ 110 mm Hg in 58%, 111 to 130 mm Hg in 24.5%, and > 130 mm Hg in 17.5%. Multivariable analyses showed use of inotropes was the strongest predictor of all-cause death. These data were confirmed by propensity score analyses. According to SBP at entry, the 2 groups with SBP > 110 mm Hg who took inotropes, despite a more favorable clinical profile, exhibited a similar worse prognosis, particularly at 1 year: 56.3% (≤ 110 mm Hg), 43.7% (111–130 mm Hg), and 40.3% (>130 mm Hg) vs 17.7%. Conclusions Inotropes were used in nearly 20% of the patient admitted for AHF, and this treatment was associated with a short-term to medium-term poor prognosis. An inappropriate use of inotropes in patients with normal to high SBP, and presumably preserved cardiac output, may have significantly contributed to affect the all-group outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical observational studies on heart failure (HF) deal mostly with hospitalized patients, few with chronic outpatients, all with no or limited longitudinal observation.This is a multicenter, nationwide, prospective observational trial on a population of 5610 patients, 1855 hospitalized for acute HF (AHF) and 3755 outpatients with chronic HF (CHF), followed up for 1 year. The cumulative total mortality rate at 1 year was 24% in AHF (19.2% in 797 patients with de novo HF and 27.7% in 1058 with worsening HF) and 5.9% in CHF. Cardiovascular deaths accounted for 73.1% and 65.3% and HF deaths for 42.4% and 40.5% of total deaths in AHF and CHF patients, respectively. One-year hospitalization rates were 30.7% in AHF and 22.7% in CHF patients. Among the independent predictors of 1-year all-cause death, age, low systolic blood pressure, anemia, and renal dysfunction were identified in both acute and chronic patients. A few additional variables were significant only in AHF (signs of cerebral hypoperfusion, low serum sodium, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute pulmonary edema), whereas others were observed only in CHF patients (lower body mass index, higher heart rate, New York Heart Association class, large QRS, and severe mitral regurgitation).In this contemporary data set, patients with CHF had a relatively low mortality rate compared with those with AHF. Rates of adverse outcomes in patients admitted for AHF remain very high either in-hospital or after discharge. Most deaths were cardiovascular in origin and ≈40% of deaths were directly related to HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The Home or Hospital in Heart failure (HHH) study was a European Community-funded, multinational, randomized controlled clinical trial, conducted in the UK, Poland, and Italy, to assess the feasibility of a new system of home telemonitoring (HT). The HT system was used to monitor clinical and physiological parameters, and its effectiveness (compared with usual care) in reducing cardiac events in heart failure (HF) patients was evaluated. Measurements were patient-managed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Aims: Nocturnal breathing disorders in the form of periodic breathing (PB) are very common in heart failure (HF) patients. There is an increasing interest in simple and affordable tools to screen patients and monitor these disorders at home on a long-term basis. We aimed to assess the pathophysiological and clinical relevance of a simplified method for monitoring of PB suitable to be self-managed by the patient at home. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Background: Periodic Breathing (PB, waxing and waning of tidal volume in which hyperventilation alternates with periods of apnoea or hypopnoea), is common during sleep and wakefulness in patients with Heart Failure (HF) and may increase mortality. Aim: To assess the effect of short-term, day-time PB on prognosis, in HF patients. Methods: We prospectively studied 380 consecutive HF referrals who had a 10 min, supine day-time respiratory recording. We related PB (adjusted for known predictors) to total cardiac mortality, during a median follow-up of 41 months. Results: Day-time PB occurred in 145/380 patients who had more severe HF and more compromised left ventricular function (p <0.005). Survival curves began to separate after 10 months and diverged steadily over the next 4 years with a cumulative risk of 41% (PB) vs 26% (No-PB), p =0.002. PB was independently predictive of increased cardiac mortality when entered into a clinical prognostic model (including NYHA Class, LVEF, LVEDD, Systolic Arterial Pressure, beta-blocker treatment, peak VO2 and blood urea) with a RR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.20–2.81. Conclusion: In advanced HF the presence of PB during a short day-time recording adds to known predictors of cardiac mortality. This may have practical implications for trials of HF therapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: To investigate the outcomes of hospitalized patients with both de-novo and worsening heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFpEF) (LVEF≥50%), compared to those with reduced LVEF (HFrEF). Methods and results: We studied 1669 patients (22.6% HFpEF) hospitalized for acute HF in the prospective multi-center nationwide Italian Network on Heart Failure (IN-HF) Outcome Registry. In all patients LVEF was assessed during hospitalization. De-novo HF presentations constituted 49.6% of HFpEF and 43.1% of HFrEF hospitalizations. All-cause mortality during hospitalization was lower in HFpEF than HFrEF (2.9% vs 6.5%, p=0.01), but this mortality difference was not significant at 1year (19.6% vs 24.4%, p=0.06), even after adjusting for clinical covariates. Similarly, there were no differences in 1-year mortality between HFpEF and HFrEF when compared by cause of death (cardiovascular vs non-cardiovascular) or mode of presentation (worsening HF vs de novo). Rehospitalization rates (all-cause, non-cardiovascular, cardiovascular, HF-related) at 90days and 1year were also similar. Mode of presentation influenced rehospitalizations in HFpEF, where those presenting with worsening HFpEF had higher all-cause (36.8% vs 21.6%, p=0.001), cardiovascular (28.1% vs 14.9%, p=0.002), and HF-related (21.1% vs 7.7%, p=0.0003) rehospitalization rates at 1year compared to those with de novo presentations. Conclusions: Outcomes at 1year following hospitalization for HFpEF are as poor as that of HFrEF. A prior history of HF decompensation or hospitalization identifies patients with HFpEF at particularly high risk of recurrent events. These findings may have implications for clinical practice, quality and process improvements and trial design. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]