Search

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly performed to expect lower complication rate compared to open esophagectomy. Studies of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) with circular staplers have reported better outcomes compared to MIE with cervical anastomosis, but frequent anastomotic complications have also been reported. MIILE with linear staplers is a promising alternative, but the long-term functional and oncological outcomes are uncertain. Methods: To evaluate the functional and oncological outcomes of MIILE with linear stapled anastomosis, a retrospective cohort study was performed in 104 patients who underwent MIILE with linear stapled anastomosis for esophageal malignant tumors. The primary endpoints were the overall complication and anastomotic leak rates. The secondary endpoints were late complications, overall and disease-free survival, and nutritional status at 6 and 12 months after MIILE. Results: Anastomotic leak occurred in 4 patients (3.8%). The short-term complication rate of grade IIIb or higher was 6.7%. During a median 57-month follow-up period, anastomotic stricture occurred in one patient, 7 required hiatal hernia repair, and 2 underwent conduit revision surgery. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 69.3% and 59.5%, respectively. Status of reflux esophagitis at the time of most recent evaluation was grade N/A/B/C/D in 52/10/10/13/8 among 93 patients who had follow-up endoscopy. The mean body weight loss at 6 and 12 months after MIILE was 11.3 and 11.8% with maintenance of the serum albumin level. Conclusions: MIILE with linear stapled anastomosis is a safe procedure with a low anastomotic complication rate and favorable long-term functional and survival outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Laparoscopic (Lap) surgery has not been established as a standard procedure for locally advanced colon cancers. Here, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of Lap multivisceral resection (MVR) for tumors that had invaded adjacent organs (T4b). Methods We performed retrospective analyses using a single institutional database. Eighty-four patients who underwent Lap or open MVR for surgical T4b primary colon cancers satisfied the inclusion criteria. Results Among the 84 patients, 48 underwent Lap MVR and 36 underwent open MVR. More patients in the open group were clinical T4b and were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in the open group had worse performance status ( P = 0.037) and tumors of greater diameter. Lap completion was achieved in 42 cases (87.5%); the conversion rate was highest in cases involving the urinary tract (40.0%). Lap reconstruction of the bladder or ureter was extremely challenging, and therefore, adjacent organ reconstruction influenced Lap completion. Regarding perioperative outcomes, Lap was superior to open surgery in terms of intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, and postoperative hospital stay. Conversion was required in six cases; five were strategic conversions, and conversion was not associated with severe morbidity. The microscopic positive surgical margin rate was not higher in the Lap group than in the open group. Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall and disease-free survival were comparable between the groups. Cox regression analyses revealed that the operative approach did not have a significant adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Conclusion The Lap approach could be considered for surgical T4b cancers, except for urinary tract invasion cases that require complicated reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]